i have on my server SUSE Enterprise 11 SP1 installed. When i try to install an rpm it displays this error:
warning: fftw3-3.1.2-113.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
>943d8bb8
> 1:fftw3 ###########################################
[code]....
I get this error when trying to install
rpm -i glibc-.9-2.x86_64.rpm
warning: glibc-2.9-2.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4ebfc273
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.9-2 is needed by glibc-2.9-2.x86_64
glibc > 2.5 conflicts with glibc-common-2.5-49.el5_5.7.x86_64
Code:
Retrieving package faad2-2.7-1.pm.1.2.x86_64 (2/2), 37.0 KiB (82.0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: faad2-2.7-1.pm.1.2.x86_64.rpm [done (16.6 KiB/s)]
[code]....
I'm having some problems compiling mednafen on Suse 11.4. When I run configure, things work fine until I get the following series of errors:
[Code]...
configure: error: *** OpenGL header file not found! I've seen references in a few places that these type ("Present But Cannot Be Compiled") can usually be ignored, but in this case ./configure fails and I can't make. I am unsure why this is, as I've installed mednafen on Suse 11.4 before and it runs fine. I've tried installing various OpenGL-related packages that I can find (Mesa, freeglut, glib, etc) but nothing seems to solve the problem
I get the following each time using "terminal":
tourdog@PJK3:~$ gksu nautilus Initializing nautilus-gdu extension
** (nautilus:2347): WARNING **: No marshaller for signature of signal 'UploadFinished'
** (nautilus:2347): WARNING **: No marshaller for signature of signal 'DownloadFinished'
** (nautilus:2347): WARNING **: No marshaller for signature of signal 'ShareCreateError'
The "root - File Browser" comes up and it all seems to work but "what's up with the 3 warnings"?
I keep getting the updates icon popping up asking me to install software that is either already installed (Adobe Flash Player 10.1) or something that fails when I actually try to install is but I am sure it is also already installed (RPM Fusion Repository Config -free and nonfree). When I try to install the RPM Fusion packages it asked me for a Software Signature and then fails with the following message: failed to install signature: Traceback
[code]...
I have the flash player installed already and I am sure I already installed RPM Fusion. how can I resolve this and stop it from constantly asking me to install these packages?
I'm trying to compile Ardour 2.8.4 under openSUSE 11.2 with VST support. I think I've installed all the dependencies, but when I run scons I come up with this:
Code:
[usual ****]
...
[code]....
Today, shortly after booting my OpenSUSE 11.3 I got this popup. [URL]. I guess it was caused by the Updater Applet when checking the repos for new updates. But what does it mean? Why do I get this now and not when adding the repo. It seems to belong to the filesystems repo and I have indeed added that some time ago (in order to install davfs2). I'm not sure what it means to accept a signature.
Normally with public key infrastructure, you need to accept other's public keys or certificates containing their public keys. And before doing so you need to verify the fingerprint, otherwise the whole procedure is useless, because it might be a fake certificate / man in the middle talking to you. Once you have accepted (trusted) the public key (or a certificate containing it), the system will check signatures for you.
So the question "do you want accept this signature" sounds weird to me. In openSUSE repos I have come across fingerprints many times before. But whenever I have searched google in order to verify the fingerprint I have not received any useful hit. I would have expected that valid keys and their fingerprints are listed on some web site. It appears there are three instances of package signing keys ... but there has not been any answer.
Since there are no new ghostscript in repo for suse 10.2, I went to compile it from sources But, when making I got errors ups/gdevcups.c:4743: error: gx_device_cups has no member named header
[Code]...
Googling about this issue doesn't give me any luck version I'm trying to install is 8.64
When I installed the suse11.3, I running the "uname -r",the system shows "2.6.34-12-desktop",for some reasons,i need the kernel header for "2.6.34-12-desktop". I down the "kernel-source", "kernel-default" and "kernel-desktop" and I check the "/usr/src/" path, but only have these stuff "linux-2.6.34.7-0.7 linux-2.6.34.7-0.7-obj linux-obj", where can I get the kernel -header for "2.6.34-12-desktop".
View 9 Replies View RelatedI was trying to install openSSH on my computer and when I ran ./configure eventually came to this error:checking for openssl/opensslv.h... noconfigure: error: *** OpenSSL headers missing - please install first or check config.log ***
View 7 Replies View Relatedwhenever I tried to boot into V1 in the following, it hang.
# uname -a
Linux tadpole 2.6.32.12-0.7.1.1381.1.PTF-default #1 SMP 2010-05-20 11:14:20 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# cat /etc/*release*
[code]....
After using yast2 and install "xen" hypervisor, the bootloader show "V1" as label for Xen kernel, if I choose to boot into V1, it will just hang with very little message on screen:
ELILO boot: ...
V1
SLES11_SP1
Failsafe
[code]....
Gnome Forum have told me that changing the appearance of gdm I run: sudo -u gdm dbus-launch gnome-appearance-properties but I get this error: (Gnome-properties-Appearance: 18 047): Gtk-WARNING **: can not open display:
View 3 Replies View Relatedseems im getting this error when i update.I searched the forums for similar errors but i found no solution that worked for me. this is the error>>>>>
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: [URL]: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>
W: Failed to fetch [URL]
W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead
How do i get the correct key?
Every time I try to update Ubuntu via the Update manager, I get the following error messages.
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: [URL] stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY A2019EA84E7532C8
W: Failed to fetch [URL]
W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I already tried sudo apt-get update:
Code:
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: [URL] stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY A2019EA84E7532C8
W: Failed to fetch [URL]
W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
sudo apt-get upgrade
Code:
Err [URL] opera 11.00.1176
404 Not Found
Failed to fetch [URL] 404 Not Found
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing?
and sudo apt-get upgrade --fix-missing
Code:
Err [URL] opera 11.00.1176
404 Not Found
Failed to fetch [URL] 404 Not Found
I also tried changing my software sources server from United States to Main Server, but it didn't make any difference.
Details:Using wubi, just installed 2 weeks ago did an upgrade and got a grub command line "sh:grub>" dealI set the root of everything to my hard drive, and when I told it where the root.disk was located it says "error: fixup signature not match"
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhen i was updating my ubuntu 10.04 using update manager i got the error"W.A error occurred during the signature verification.the post is not updated and teh previous index files are used .GPG error: http://deb.playonlinux.com lucid release.
View 2 Replies View RelatedW: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: url karmic Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: url karmic-updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2
W: GPG error: url karmic-backports Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2
W: Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 9.10 _Karmic Koala_ - Release i386 (20091028.5)/dists/karmic/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs
W: Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 9.10 _Karmic Koala_ - Release i386 (20091028.5)/dists/karmic/restricted/binary-i386/Packages.gz Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs
W: Failed to fetch url...karmic/Release
W: Failed to fetch url/ubuntu/...pdates/Release
W: Failed to fetch url/ubuntu/...6/Packages.bz2 Sub-process /bin/bzip2 returned an error code (2)
code....
W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I am currently running Suse 11.3. I continue to get the following error when logging into the KDE login manager with my user account
"Warning: Cannot open ConsoleKit session: Unable to open session. The name
org.freedesktop.ConsoleKit was not provided by any .service files."
After acknowledging the error, it resets back to the login manager screen. If I login with root, I get the same message, but it continues on and logins into the session
I have a fairly old computer, (4 years) it is has an Intel Pentium 4 3,4 Ghz processor with 1,5Gb RAM, and had been running XP Home on a 80Gb HDD. About three weeks ago, I purchased a 500Gb HDD, and disconnected my old drive. I partitioned the new drive to 120 Gb and 380Gb. I put XP Pro on the 120Gb partition, and Ubuntu 9.10 on the balance.
On reboot, startup menu (grub?) gave me the option to boot from, among others, Ubuntu 9.10, and XP Pro. Both worked fine! I then reconnected the old drive, and if I wanted to boot up in XP Home, would tap "F8" on start-up, and select the old HDD to boot from. This was working fine and I was happy with the way it worked! This morning, when I re-booted, the Start-up menu now had XP Home added to the list.
If I select either Ubuntu 9.10 or XP Home, they both work fine, but if I select XP Pro, it give me the message "error: invalid signature" and when I press any key, brings me back to the menu.
I've had a problem doing updates to Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic for months. I'd like to upgrade, but figure I should solve the update issue first. The output of "apt-get update" is:
[Code]....
when i try to execute rpmorphan i receive this error, WARNING can not load translation file locale/en/rpmorphan_trans.pl
View 6 Replies View RelatedWhen kupdate applet started up, it popped up this window:
Code:
Do you want to accept this repository signature?
package_id :dummy;0.0.1;i386;data
repository_name: KDE_4_Stable
key_url: [URL]
key_userid:KDE OBS Project <KDE@build.opensuse.org>
key_id: 27C070176F88BB2F
key_fingerprint: ...elided...
key_timestamp: Fri Apr 16 06:26:59 2010
type: gpg
What is this? Why am I getting it? Is it safe to accept? I edited the key fingerprint.
This is my first post. I am unable to call some of the fftw3 library functions in a very simple fortran code. The code is as follows (the filename is trial.f):
Code:
program trial
implicit none
[code]...
Why am I getting this popup? Is this safe? What's the "dummy" part? This came up right when I started my computer up.
kde_popup on Flickr - Photo Sharing!
I have NVIDIA installed and I have the repo installed as well, but I have not made any changes to it. So why all of a sudden am I getting the following popup? Is it safe? Should I accept it?
Code:
Do you want to accept this repository signature?
package_id: dummy,0.0.1,i386,data
repository_name: NVIDIA_Repository_1
key_url: [URL]
key_userid:NVIDIA Corporation <linux-bugs@nvidia.com>
key_id: F5113243C66B6EAE
key_fingerprint: (I'm hiding this just in case it's a security risk)
key_timestamp: Thu Jun 15 12:13:18 2006
type: gpg
Also, why am I getting it now if it's from 2006?
Same problem with 11.4 x64 DVD version (gnome default). System ends with text before showing logon screen allso in failsafe
[code]...
After booting up openSUSE 11.1 i586 this morning, I got a message I had never seen before:
Repository Signature Required
Do you want to accept this repository signature?
package_id:dummy;0.0.1:i386;data
repository_name: repo-update
key_url: [URL]
key_useridpenSUSE Project Signing Key <opensuse@opensuse.org>
key_id:B88B2FD43DBDC284
key_fingerprint:22C07BA534178CD02EFE22AAB88B2FD43DBDC284
key_timestamp:Fri Nov 7 09:10:07 2008
type: gpg
Yes No
So I said Yes. But then it wanted root access, which I declined to provide and canceled the thing, whatever it is. Now, of course, my updater is displaying the yellow triangle with the ! in the center. This is the creepiest thing I have encountered since starting to use openSUSE several years ago. Did this result from some kind of screwup by the folks of openSUSE?
I am trying to install f10 on an old dell dimension 2400 with an old video chipset. Everything was working pretty smooth until I tried installing an .rpm file from a flashdrive. At first, it looked like it was installing the rhpxl file but gave a warning message that said
warning:rpmts_HdrFromFdno:Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, Key ID 4ebfc273
then says the public key will not be installed. Is there a file/command that I can download and run from a flash because I have no capable internet connection because for some reason linux doesn't see it in the install.
I'm interested in GNU/Tiger as recommended by a security guru I know. I did apt-cache search and located the package tiger:Code:tiger - Report system security vulnerabilitiesI also checked the ubuntu web-based package search and found tiger there too along with things like this signed message.Using apt-cache policy, I see this package is universe. I'd like to check the signature/cert/keys of this file before running apt-get install on it to see if it is acceptable given my current apt keys. Can someone explain how to do this?Also, what happens when I try to install a package using "apt-get install" and that package or one of its dependencies is:* unsigned* signed, but not by anyone whose key resides in my apt keyring?
View 3 Replies View Related
