Red Hat / Fedora :: Warning: Glibc-2.9-2.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA Signature: NOKEY, Key ID

Jun 9, 2011

I get this error when trying to install

rpm -i glibc-.9-2.x86_64.rpm
warning: glibc-2.9-2.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4ebfc273
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.9-2 is needed by glibc-2.9-2.x86_64
glibc > 2.5 conflicts with glibc-common-2.5-49.el5_5.7.x86_64

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

OpenSUSE Install :: Error:warning: Fftw3-3.1.2-113.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA Signature: NOKEY, Key ID?

Dec 2, 2010

i have on my server SUSE Enterprise 11 SP1 installed. When i try to install an rpm it displays this error:

warning: fftw3-3.1.2-113.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
>943d8bb8
> 1:fftw3 ###########################################

[code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

Red Hat / Fedora :: Error: Failed Dependencies - Glibc = 2.12.1-3 Is Needed By Glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64

Oct 26, 2010

I've been working to get gcc up and running on a new install of Fedora 13. glibc-devel had dependencies upon installation where it required glibc and glibc-common, both 2.12.1-3. No problem, found both at rpm dot pbone dot net. However, when I try to install the following circular dependency results... it doesn't matter the order of install.

Code:

[root AT localhost gcc_install]# rpm -ivh glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64 .rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.12.1-3 is needed by glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64

[code]....

View 5 Replies View Related

General :: Glibc-2.3.2-95.37.i386 Parallel To Glibc-x86_64

Jun 13, 2011

OS : Oracle Enter Prise Linux 6 (equivalent to RedHat)

I am in process to install oracle 10g on said OS.My process fails and after digging up , I came to know that some of the oracle libraries are compiled on 32-bit architecture and it require glibc-32 bit . also it require for gcc-32 bit.

Now i have downloaded all the required rpm for gcc-32bit . when I try to install glibc and its dependencies , it gives me error that newer version already exist.

How can I install , Gcc-32bit(libgc, libstd-i386 etc) in parallel or standalone?

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Glibc-common On X86_64?

Jun 17, 2009

I use FC 10 on my desktop. It is great!. But I have some troubles with installing new software via yum or rpm. Most of install/update/upgrade transactions fail. The yum prints string: Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.9-2 is needed by package glibc-2.9-2.x86_64 (installed) I tried to manually install or update the glibc-common via yum or rpm, but it fails. The # uname -a -i -p returns

Code:
Linux achfc10 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 18 11:58:53 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Could you have any ideas how to solve the issue?

View 8 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Glibc Conflict Between I686 And X86_64?

Dec 3, 2010

I have both glibc.i686 and glibc.x86_64 installed in Fedora 14 because I have programs that require both. Using a yum update gives me the following error: file /usr/share/doc/glibc-2.12.90/NEWS from install of glibc-2.12.90-19.i686 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.12.90-18.x86_64

What is the best way to work around this issue? Trying an "yum update glibc.x86_64" gives me the corresponding opposite error. Doing a "yum update glibc.i686 glibc.x86_64" gives a longer list of dependency conflicts with glibc-headers and glibc-common.

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Gksu Nautilus - WARNING: No Marshaller For Signature Of Signal 'UploadFinished'

Feb 10, 2010

I get the following each time using "terminal":

tourdog@PJK3:~$ gksu nautilus Initializing nautilus-gdu extension

** (nautilus:2347): WARNING **: No marshaller for signature of signal 'UploadFinished'
** (nautilus:2347): WARNING **: No marshaller for signature of signal 'DownloadFinished'
** (nautilus:2347): WARNING **: No marshaller for signature of signal 'ShareCreateError'

The "root - File Browser" comes up and it all seems to work but "what's up with the 3 warnings"?

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Installing RPMs (NOKEY) Key ID 4ebfc273

Apr 21, 2009

I am trying to install f10 on an old dell dimension 2400 with an old video chipset. Everything was working pretty smooth until I tried installing an .rpm file from a flashdrive. At first, it looked like it was installing the rhpxl file but gave a warning message that said

warning:rpmts_HdrFromFdno:Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, Key ID 4ebfc273

then says the public key will not be installed. Is there a file/command that I can download and run from a flash because I have no capable internet connection because for some reason linux doesn't see it in the install.

View 2 Replies View Related

Slackware :: Glibc And Glibc-i18n Packages Contain Redundant Files ?

Jun 24, 2011

I notice that these two packages contain the same files and uninstalling glibc-i18n doesn't uninstall the internationalization files, because they are also in the glibc package. Is this a mistake or is this normal or is there a reason for it ? I just made my own glibc package to fix this, but was wondering why this is the way it is...

View 7 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE Install :: Update Glibc-2.9 To Glibc-2.10 In 11.1 64 Bits

Apr 12, 2011

I have installed Zimbra 6.0.1 and updated to Zimbra 7.1.0, the problem is that it needs the glibc-2.10 to start one of its services. I tried everything but i'dont get to update the glibc.

View 1 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 :: How To Replace Glibc.i686 By Glibc.i386

Sep 16, 2011

I made an update of my Centos 5.5 yesterday. In doing so glibc has been updated to glibc.i686. Just now some of my FPGA tools crash. Unfortunately there isn't a downgrade for glibc.i686. How can I replace glibc.i686 by glibc.i386?A simple yum install glibc.i386 conflicts with the files from package glibc-2.5-65.i686

yum list glibc
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile

[code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Software :: Upgrade Redhat5 From Glibc 2.5 To Glibc 2.7

May 30, 2011

I am in very much need to resolve the issue of Upgrade redhat5 from glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7. The problem is when I run a binary compiled on our build setup (glibc 2.11) on Suse 11 (glibc 2.9) it works fine...

But the same binary do not work on redhat enterprise version 5 telling error as need glibc2.7 or sometimes segmentation fault for the same binary execution.

I tried upgrading the redhat glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7, but not successful.

View 3 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 :: Upgrade Glibc 2.5 To Glibc 2.7?

Jul 13, 2010

I am using CENTOS 5.3, I want to upgrade glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7.

how to do it.

I am not getting from where to start

View 4 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE :: NOKEY Error On Installing A Packman Package?

Feb 15, 2010

Code:
Retrieving package faad2-2.7-1.pm.1.2.x86_64 (2/2), 37.0 KiB (82.0 KiB unpacked)
Retrieving: faad2-2.7-1.pm.1.2.x86_64.rpm [done (16.6 KiB/s)]

[code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 :: Can't Install Kernel-headers Glibc And Glibc-headers?

May 11, 2010

Yesterday, I think I did something stupid: I removed kernel-headers, gcc, glibc-devel and glibc-headers. My box is a CentOS 5.4 webserver (it has loads of packages installed, but that was done through Virtualmin config, so it's quite coherent all in all). The thing is that now I need to reinstall at least the headers and glibc, but hey! this is what I get :

[Code]...

View 19 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Signature For Installing Packages Using Yum In F11?

Aug 2, 2009

I am using Fedora 11 and tried to install opera .I used the command yum install opera-9.64.gcc4-shared-qt3.x86_64.rpm (i downloaded rpm file and i was in the downloaded directory).Yum did check for dependencies and solved it to.At last it threw the error "Package opera-9.64.gcc4-shared-qt3.x86_64.rpm is not signed".

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Mount Img /NTFS /SIgnature Is Missing?

Jul 9, 2010

I've been learning again! Now I'm stuck. I have two external HDs. I ran dd if=/dev/sdg/ of=/media/1TB/max.img I now have a file called max.img on the other hard drive. I want to mount that image but it wont mount, its NTFS. I have run

mount /media/1TB/max.img ~/Desktop/Max -o loop

but I get told

mount: you must specify the filesystem type

So I then run

mount -t ntfs-3g /media/1TB/max.img ~/Desktop/Max -o loop

But again am told NTFS signature is missing. Failed to mount '/dev/loop0': Invalid argument The device '/dev/loop0' doesn't seem to have a valid NTFS. Maybe the wrong device is used? Or the whole disk instead of a partition (e.g. /dev/sda, not /dev/sda1)? Or the other way around?

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Get Socket.h Header File / Copy Pasting This Header File In 'incl' Directory Allow To Use It In The Program?

Apr 22, 2011

where can i get socket.h header file? will copy pasting this header file in 'incl' directory allow me to use it in the my program?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Signature Doesn't Work In Evolution Email?

Sep 28, 2010

I am using Evolution 2.28.3 with Fedora 12. If I go to preferences and try to add a signature or signature script the textbox goes from slightly blue to white but I can't enter any text or paste anything in it. I also noticed that it won't let be check the box for signature above previous message.

Is it broken or am I missing something?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Grub - Unknown Partition Table Signature

Jan 10, 2010

i have FC10, and have loss my grub because a windows 7 instalation (other partition). I am trying to re-install the grub version 0.97, so i used:

FC10 DVD install + repair a system

then:

Code:

chroot /mnt/sysimage
grub

but i got:

unknown partition table signature.

so i can not make any grub command:

Code:

grub> find /boot/grub/stage1
error 15: file not found

View 5 Replies View Related

Fedora :: F12: Glibc-2.11-2.i686 Dependency?

Dec 3, 2009

When I try to install (using yum) various things like wine in 64-bit F12, I get

Code:
Missing dependency: glibc-common = 2.11-2 is needed by package glibc-2.11-2.i686 (fedora)
What is currently installed is glibc-common-2.11-4.x86_64

View 3 Replies View Related

Red Hat / Fedora :: Updating Glibc And Glibc_common?

Aug 18, 2010

im running centos 4.4final and i have glibc, and glibc_common installed on version 2_3. Im trying to install the 2_9 rpm, but it says that it conflicts with 2_3, how can i upgrade the 2_3 to 2_9? i tryed using yum update glinc / glibc_common, and yum install, didnt work.

View 9 Replies View Related

Red Hat / Fedora :: Update GLIBC On RHEL WS 4?

Jun 20, 2011

Recently, I am trying to use a complied software on Linux OS. I need to use X-Windows to do some initialize. When I run this software, I am getting the error: '/lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found' I also checked the version of GLIBC on my computer, the highest one is GLIBC_2.3.4. So I have to update my glibc to 2.4 or higher. Some tips said it can be done using yum. I am a new user for linux. Could anyone guide me to do that? Here is the information of my computer: Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant Update ; Linux 2.6.9-89.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Sat Jun 13 07:02:28 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

View 5 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE :: 11.3 X86_64 Compile - Not Recognized Configure: Error: /bin/sh ./config.sub X86_64-unknown-linux- Failed

Aug 3, 2010

Attempting to compile an application that is not located in any of the repos yet for 11.3 64 bit. I have downloaded the appropriate src and untarred it. However, when I attempt to run the ./configure command here is the error I receive. checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-': machine `x86_64-unknown-linux' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux- failed

I have made sure that I have all kernel-headers packages installed and am unsure as how to proceed. I tried using the command "./configure --build=x86_64" and then receive an error stating that the "SYSTEM IS NOT SUPPORTED" and continued errors stating that gcc is not installed, eve though it is.

View 5 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Keep Getting Updates Icon Popping Up - Error 'failed To Install Signature: Traceback'

Aug 27, 2010

I keep getting the updates icon popping up asking me to install software that is either already installed (Adobe Flash Player 10.1) or something that fails when I actually try to install is but I am sure it is also already installed (RPM Fusion Repository Config -free and nonfree). When I try to install the RPM Fusion packages it asked me for a Software Signature and then fails with the following message: failed to install signature: Traceback

[code]...

I have the flash player installed already and I am sure I already installed RPM Fusion. how can I resolve this and stop it from constantly asking me to install these packages?

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Run C++ Program On Fedora And It Give Errors Of Its Header Files?

May 22, 2010

i have a c++ program and i tried to run it using gcc command and it gives header files error i got the header file now but dont know where to place those files?can any one got the idea??? we could not place header files in usr/include folder!

View 7 Replies View Related

Fedora Security :: New Glibc Update Make Selinux Prevent Qemu-kvm To Run

Aug 11, 2009

After install glibc-2.10.1-4 (x86_64) package, i couldn't run the qemu-kvm anymore.

SELinux is preventing qemu-kvm (svirt_t) "setrlimit" svirt_t.
SELinux prevented pt_chown from using the terminal 0.

View 6 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Bottom And Header Is Gone ?

Jun 17, 2010

I recently installed Fedora 13 on my computer, but when I logged in the header and bottom was gone. I do not know what to do. Is this a normal problem?

View 14 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Vmware And C Header Files ?

Dec 28, 2009

I've installed Fedora 12 (KDE version) on VMware workstation running under Windows 7.

I've been able to configure the VMware tools fine up until this point:

Code:

What is the location of the directory of C header files that match your running kernel? After some searching online I deduced I should install all of the latest updates and kernel-devel.

I then nuked the previous VMware tools install and started over with it again, but alas, no directory I try works (i.e. /usr/src/kernels/, /usr/src/kernels/2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686/ and so forth).

View 8 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Installing A Kernel Header?

Aug 4, 2010

I always wanted to get it installed on my old Dell Laptop and Fedora 13 is the first one that has actually worked.

Anyways, I am trying to install:

kernel-devel-2.6.33.3-85

Which I downloaded from:

[URL]

When I double click the file to install, it says:

could not do simulate: Backend will not install a src rpm file

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved