Ubuntu Installation :: Error: Fixup Signature Not Match?

Mar 29, 2010

Details:Using wubi, just installed 2 weeks ago did an upgrade and got a grub command line "sh:grub>" dealI set the root of everything to my hard drive, and when I told it where the root.disk was located it says "error: fixup signature not match"

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Ubuntu Installation :: Signature Verification Error During Upgrade Of 10.04 To 10.10?

Jan 19, 2011

when i was updating my ubuntu 10.04 using update manager i got the error"W.A error occurred during the signature verification.the post is not updated and teh previous index files are used .GPG error: http://deb.playonlinux.com lucid release.

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: SSH Putty "Server's Host Key Did Not Match The Signature Supplied"?

Apr 19, 2010

I have a SSH server "SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.1p1 Debian-6ubuntu2" running at IP 1.1.1.1When I try to access it from another machine on the internet which is at 2.2.2.2 every thing goes fine. However when I try to do the same thing from 3.3.3.3 it does not work and Putty throws me this error "Server's host key did not match the signature supplied". I went inside HKEY_Current_userSoftwareSimonTathamPuttySshHostKeys and tried to remove all the known host and still the issue is existing, I am literally scratching my head as to what is going wrong.I Googled about this error and I saw many were having problem similar to mine however none were able to give some conclusive results so far.

View 15 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Update Error Occurred During The Signature Verification?

Feb 7, 2010

W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: url karmic Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2

W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: url karmic-updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2

W: GPG error: url karmic-backports Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2
W: Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 9.10 _Karmic Koala_ - Release i386 (20091028.5)/dists/karmic/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs

W: Failed to fetch cdrom://Ubuntu 9.10 _Karmic Koala_ - Release i386 (20091028.5)/dists/karmic/restricted/binary-i386/Packages.gz Please use apt-cdrom to make this CD-ROM recognized by APT. apt-get update cannot be used to add new CD-ROMs

W: Failed to fetch url...karmic/Release

W: Failed to fetch url/ubuntu/...pdates/Release

W: Failed to fetch url/ubuntu/...6/Packages.bz2 Sub-process /bin/bzip2 returned an error code (2)
code....

W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Triple Boot: 9.10 / XP Home / XP Pro - Error: Invalid Signature

Jan 11, 2010

I have a fairly old computer, (4 years) it is has an Intel Pentium 4 3,4 Ghz processor with 1,5Gb RAM, and had been running XP Home on a 80Gb HDD. About three weeks ago, I purchased a 500Gb HDD, and disconnected my old drive. I partitioned the new drive to 120 Gb and 380Gb. I put XP Pro on the 120Gb partition, and Ubuntu 9.10 on the balance.

On reboot, startup menu (grub?) gave me the option to boot from, among others, Ubuntu 9.10, and XP Pro. Both worked fine! I then reconnected the old drive, and if I wanted to boot up in XP Home, would tap "F8" on start-up, and select the old HDD to boot from. This was working fine and I was happy with the way it worked! This morning, when I re-booted, the Start-up menu now had XP Home added to the list.

If I select either Ubuntu 9.10 or XP Home, they both work fine, but if I select XP Pro, it give me the message "error: invalid signature" and when I press any key, brings me back to the menu.

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Dropbox Update In Karmic 9.10 - Error Occurred During The Signature Verification

Mar 20, 2011

I've had a problem doing updates to Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic for months. I'd like to upgrade, but figure I should solve the update issue first. The output of "apt-get update" is:

[Code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: "No Setup Signature Found" Error And Lilo Won't Boot - Botched

Jun 18, 2010

I was using 2.6.28-14 kernel version, it update me to 2.6.28-15. Now I have upgraded kernels many times, not first timer, but this is a first to me. So I have this wierd system setup, don't ask. Where I use lilo instead of grub, just take it as it comes guys, I have to. At any rate, it upgraded all fine, and I restarted, play the blues I got a "No setup signature found" error and lilo won't boot. So I did some searching on web and everyone says to boot up CD and re-install lilo. Well with grub I've done this many times, no prob bob, but lilo won't work.

So I used my super auto grub CD to try to re-do things. Since grub config and grub was still installed on my Linux partition I tried it right. No go of course, grub says it can't find the partition nor can it mount it. So I tried the beta of lilo on the grub cd and it don't work either. Botched it up worse, first it wouldn't do anything on my second drive, just sat there black screen. Then I did it a second time, let's screw it up some more right. Now it doesn't even find a boot loader in the MBR ha ha.

So at any rate, how in the sam heck do I fix this thing? Short of downloading 10.04 and re-installing everything?? Don't want to do this, too much work when I can just upgrade and keep my stuff installed and setup. So I tried running jaunty from CD and re-loading lilo. So everything is working fine right, I mounted drive and apt-get install lilo and ran lilo. So lilo even telling it what config file to use and where won't find things and won't re-install. So just for grins, even though I thought it wouldn't work I mounted my second drive linux partition, the one with the boot info on it, you ready, to root "/". Then I couldn't unmount

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Setting Up An LDAP Server / Error Do Not Match LSB Default-Start Values (none)?

Oct 20, 2010

So I am creating a LDAP server for my school's Linux lab, so users on our school network can log into the Linux machines.

I found a guide here url...Authentication

But during the install, I get the following error.

update-rc.d: warning: libnss-ldap start runlevel arguments (2 3 4 5) do not match LSB Default-Start values (none)

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: A Error Occurred During The Signature Verification

Apr 17, 2010

seems im getting this error when i update.I searched the forums for similar errors but i found no solution that worked for me. this is the error>>>>>

W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: [URL]: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <ftpmaster@ubuntu.com>

W: Failed to fetch [URL]

W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead

How do i get the correct key?

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Cannot Update 10.04 - Error During Signature Verification

Feb 8, 2011

Every time I try to update Ubuntu via the Update manager, I get the following error messages.
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: [URL] stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY A2019EA84E7532C8
W: Failed to fetch [URL]
W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

I already tried sudo apt-get update:
Code:
W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used.GPG error: [URL] stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY A2019EA84E7532C8
W: Failed to fetch [URL]
W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
sudo apt-get upgrade

Code:
Err [URL] opera 11.00.1176
404 Not Found
Failed to fetch [URL] 404 Not Found
E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing?
and sudo apt-get upgrade --fix-missing

Code:
Err [URL] opera 11.00.1176
404 Not Found
Failed to fetch [URL] 404 Not Found
I also tried changing my software sources server from United States to Main Server, but it didn't make any difference.

View 4 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE Install :: Error:warning: Fftw3-3.1.2-113.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA Signature: NOKEY, Key ID?

Dec 2, 2010

i have on my server SUSE Enterprise 11 SP1 installed. When i try to install an rpm it displays this error:

warning: fftw3-3.1.2-113.1.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
>943d8bb8
> 1:fftw3 ###########################################

[code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Keep Getting Updates Icon Popping Up - Error 'failed To Install Signature: Traceback'

Aug 27, 2010

I keep getting the updates icon popping up asking me to install software that is either already installed (Adobe Flash Player 10.1) or something that fails when I actually try to install is but I am sure it is also already installed (RPM Fusion Repository Config -free and nonfree). When I try to install the RPM Fusion packages it asked me for a Software Signature and then fails with the following message: failed to install signature: Traceback

[code]...

I have the flash player installed already and I am sure I already installed RPM Fusion. how can I resolve this and stop it from constantly asking me to install these packages?

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: 9.10 - Cannot Boot Win 7 (Invalid Signature)

Apr 5, 2010

I'm trying to install Ubuntu 9.10 on my machine which already has Windows 7 (I want to be able to dual-boot). I had no problems installing Ubuntu but now I cannot boot Windows, I get this error after selecting Windows in the Grub boot menu:
Error: invalid signature
Press any key to continue

When I press a key I'm returned to the Grub menu. There I can boot Linux without problems. I have two 500 GB disks in a RAID 1 array. Windows 7 is installed there. Then I have a 1.5 TB disk where I installed Linux in a partition I created for it. I think the problem may be that I have RAID because this seems to show up as two disks and not one:
more /boot/grub/device.map
(hd0) /dev/sda
(hd1) /dev/sdb
(hd2) /dev/sdc
Three disks and not two.

If I do sudo update-grub I get this:
Generating grub.cfg ...
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-20-generic
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-20-generic
Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-14-generic
Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-2.6.31-14-generic
Found memtest86+ image: /boot/memtest86+.bin
Found Windows 7 (loader) on /dev/mapper/isw_ccdddiiiea_Mirror1
grub-probe: error: no mapping exists for `isw_ccdddiiiea_Mirror1'
done

View 9 Replies View Related

Programming :: Match Datetime By The Minute (not An Exact Match By The Second)

Oct 21, 2010

I have the following query:

Code:
$sql="SELECT table1.datetime, table1.user_id, table2.ip, FROM table1,table2 WHERE id='$id' AND (table1.id = table2.id AND table1.datetime = table2.datetime)";

In table2 the datetime fields are about 1 to 2 seconds off due to the source of the data, which I cannot change.

Is it possible via a query match table1.datetime & table2.datetime by HH:MM (ie. to the minute instead of to the second)?

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: GRUB2 Broken After Upgrade To 10.04 - No Signature?

Jul 8, 2010

I took the distribution upgrade from the update manager and can't boot now. Boot into a Live CD (ver. 9.10 - does that matter?), and go through the following steps.

ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ sudo fdisk -l
Warning: invalid flag 0x0000 of partition table 5 will be corrected by w(rite)
Disk /dev/sda: 750.2 GB, 750156374016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 91201 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x000ad56f

[Code]...

Anyone have an idea here? I have searched a lot and have only found a few references to this issue. Does the invalid flag message relate here? The partition is flagged as 'boot'.

View 9 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Signature For Installing Packages Using Yum In F11?

Aug 2, 2009

I am using Fedora 11 and tried to install opera .I used the command yum install opera-9.64.gcc4-shared-qt3.x86_64.rpm (i downloaded rpm file and i was in the downloaded directory).Yum did check for dependencies and solved it to.At last it threw the error "Package opera-9.64.gcc4-shared-qt3.x86_64.rpm is not signed".

View 1 Replies View Related

Software :: ACIDLAB: Error In Displaying Snort "signature" Name

Mar 29, 2010

I have installed snort and ACIDLAB on Apache+MySQL. When I view snort alerts on acidlab page, not "sig_name" but "sig_id" is displayed in the column "Signature" like below.

ID Signature Timestamp
-------- --------- -------------------
#0-(1-2) 1 <==?? 2010-03-29 19:30:52
#1-(1-1) 2 <==?? 2010-03-29 19:29:52

Is this an error in the MySQL Database? I dont have any idea about this error.

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Downloading A Game And Run Error "End-of-central-directory Signature Not Found"

Mar 31, 2011

I recently switched my secondary/kid's computer to run with linux. I am trying to download a game called wizards101 for them that they play frequently. I keep getting this message reading

Archive: /tmp/InstallWizard101-1.exe[/tmp/InstallWizard101-1.exe] End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on the last disk(s) of this archive. zipinfo: cannot find zipfile directory in one of /tmp/InstallWizard101-1.exe or /tmp/InstallWizard101-1.exe.zip, and cannot find /tmp/InstallWizard101-1.exe.ZIP,period.

I dont know what to do about getting it downloaded. I never had this problem downloading this game on windows.

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Installation :: Grub2 Doesn't Recognize The UUIds - Invalid Signature

Aug 11, 2010

I have /dev/sda with Squeeze and Win 7 on it, and /dev/sdb with Squeeze. I've managed to get Grub 2 to boot from /dev/sdb1, but only by disabling /dev/sda from being a boot option in the BIOS. When it is available to boot, and lower priority than /dev/sdb, grub does not recognize the UUIds of the disks. So, I've disabled it for now and can boot from /dev/sdb no problems. Trouble is I cannot get Win7 to boot. Grub prints:

error: no such device: f0903a3a903a081c
error: invalid signature

When I boot into Squeeze and run 'blkid' I can see that:

/dev/sda1: LABEL="System Reserved" UUID="F0903A3A903A081C" TYPE="ntfs"

The Grub entry for Win 7 is:

menuentry "Windows 7 (loader) (on /dev/sda1)" {
insmod ntfs
set root='(hd0,1)'
search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set f0903a3a903a081c
chainloader +1
}

I don't understand how Grub 2 cannot recognize the UUIds. Can Grub 2 to be made to work with volume labels or just plain old /dev/... descriptions? Maybe I should give grub-legacy a go.

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Expansion Drive Disconnecting - Error: Mount Exited With Exit Code 13: $MFTMirr Does Not Match $MFT (record 0)

Jun 1, 2010

I slipped on my expansion drive cable and it disconnected quickly, when I reconnected I got this error: Error mounting: mount exited with exit code 13: $MFTMirr does not match $MFT (record 0). Failed to mount '/dev/sdb1': Input/output error NTFS is either inconsistent, or there is a hardware fault, or it's a SoftRAID/FakeRAID hardware. In the first case run chkdsk /f on Windows then reboot into Windows twice. The usage of the /f parameter is very important! If the device is a SoftRAID/FakeRAID then first activate it and mount a different device under the /dev/mapper/ directory, (e.g. /dev/mapper/nvidia_eahaabcc1). Please see the 'dmraid' documentation for more details.

View 1 Replies View Related

Networking :: Error: Can't Load Actions File '/etc/privoxy/match-all.action': Invalid Line (9): { +standard.Cautious }

Apr 26, 2011

Every time I try to set to standard.(cautious|medium|advanced) I get Apr 26 17:20:59.960 7f7faff15700 Fatal error: can't load actions file '/etc/privoxy/match-all.action': invalid line (9): { +standard.Cautious } /

or something similar. No additional help is available in the docs. So i try to use http://p.p (i.e. config.privoxy.org), and click on [URL]... expecting to get the three mode buttons. It just returns to p.p.

I already set the three edit vars to allow remote editing etc.So I looked in the top 15 Google hits for "Privoxy standard.Cautious". Apparently, nobody else knows how to do this either even tried launching firefox in root. but I'm getting kind-of frustrated with the writers/maintainers of Privoxy 3.

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: RPMDB - Program Version 4.8 Does Not Match Environment 4.7

May 21, 2010

I have Ubuntu 9.10 running on Dell Dimension 8400, 1 gig ram, Pentium 4. No other OS installed. Last night I decided to upgrade from 9.10 to 10.0.4 through Upgrade Manager with the upgrade button. The upgrade ran over an hour and errored in the "Installing the upgrades" step with the following messages on the Terminal screen:

"rpmdb: Program version 4.8 doesn't match environment version 4.7.
error: db4 error (-30971) from dbenv->open: DB_VERSION_MISMATCH: Database environmnet version mismatch
error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - (-30971)
RPM failed to open database, cleaning it up..."

I went to bed without doing anything. This morning at 7:30am EST I checked the status of this and nothing changed to the screen it was still stuck on this error with progress bar at 4 minutes in Upgrade Manager. I can move my mouse and even open Firefox 3.6.3 to search for issues within Ubuntu environment so I am not frozen. I haven't tried anything else yet.

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Natty Upgrade, Now Firefox Fonts Don't Match Kde

Apr 29, 2011

So before natty, firefox 4 interface fonts matched the rest of my apps, but now they are huge! See the screen-shot to see what I mean. Anyone know how to get them to match again?

I think some of the browser fonts changed as well, but I know I can change them in the options menu.

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Installation :: RSA Server Certificate CommonName (CN) Does NOT Match

Feb 26, 2015

I install debian, I when I restart apache2, I got this error

[warn] RSA server certificate is a CA certificate (BasicConstraints: CA == TRUE !?)
[Thu Feb 26 11:53:45 2015] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `Ismo' does NOT match server name!?

How can I modify the commonName of the RSA server certificate?

View 1 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 :: Error "Metadata File Does Not Match Checksum"

Apr 6, 2010

After adding rpmforge on a fresh installation of CentOS 5.4 64bit, I received the error "Metadata file does not match checksum" so decided to try the fix yum -y remove yum-fastestmirror, As discussed at [URL]... Unfortunately, this also deinstalled yum. If I try to reinstall from my CentOS 5.4 DVD, I get:

# rpm -i --aid yum-3.2.22-20.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
yum-fastestmirror is needed by yum-3.2.22-20.el5.centos.noarch

But if I try to install the yum-fastestmirror I get

# rpm -i --aid yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
yum >= 3.0 is needed by yum-fastestmirror-1.1.16-13.el5.centos.noarch

Which is a bit circular.

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: F12 DVD Openssl Doesn't Match Python Requirement / Resolve This?

Mar 17, 2010

I upgraded from F11(x86_64) to F12 with no reported errors. (expected an update session to follow, but it didn't.)
Tried a manual "yum update" and it aborted with a notice that libssl.so.8 was not found (required by python-2.6.2). I didn't find anything useful at wiki.linux.duke.edu/YumFaq.

The DVD installs python-2.6.2-2 (8/21/09) and openssl-1.0.0-0.10.beta3 (10/16/09). /usr/lib/libssl.so.10 is a symbolic link to libssl.1.0.0. libssl.so.8 is not found, really.
I thought of replacing openssl with one from F11 but it was required by too many packages - couldn't remove.

I tried to find a later rpm of python, but couldn't locate any Fedora directories with individual packages.

I've searched the web and the forums. What am I missing?

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Preupgrade Outputs Unknown Programs - No Plugin Match

Nov 17, 2010

Have great F13. Step 1 in upgrade:to F14
[root@localhost ~]# preupgrade
Loaded plugins: blacklist, whiteout
No plugin match for: rpm-warm-cache
No plugin match for: remove-with-leaves
No plugin match for: auto-update-debuginfo
[root@localhost ~]#
What do I do about the no plugin matches???

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Error - "route: Netmask Does Not Match Route Address"

Jan 25, 2011

Having trouble getting my Netgear WNA1000 working thru wireless router. Have tried lots of suggestions from other threads to no avail. Someone suggested that th routing table isn't set correctly, so have been trying to use the follwing to make the proper entry in the routing table: sudo route add -net 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev wlan0

Result: error message stating with:
"route: netmask does not match route address"

followed by "Usage" instructions which tell me to do what I just did. Any ideas on how I can populate my routing table with correct entry for my wireless card? Not to complicate matters, but I temporarily turned off encryption on my router to eliminate that as a possibility until I get connected. So maybe it'still trying to connect via encrypted mode - do I need to turn off encryption on my (client) end?

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Install The Nvidia Quadro NVS 110 169.04 Drivers - Error "No Precompiled Kernel Interface Was Found To Match Your Kernel"

Nov 2, 2009

I am trying to install the Nvidia Quadro NVS 110 169.04 drivers but am having issues during install. Prior to attempting my install I did install the kernel-devel rpm so it can compile. after running the RPM I get. Quote: No precompiled kernel interface was found to match your kernel; would you like the installer to attempt to download a kernel interface for your kernel from the NVIDIA ftp site [URL]?

which of course does not work. next it says Quote: "No precompiled kernel interface was found to match your kernel; this means that the installer will need to compile a new kernel interface.. i hit okay and move on to. Quote: Error: Unable to find the kernel sources tree for the currently running kernel. Please make sure you have installed the kernel source files for your kernel and that they are properly configured; on Red Hat linux systems, for example be sure you have the 'kernel-source' or 'kernel-devel' RPM installed. if you know the correct kernel source files are installed, you may specify the kernel source path with the "--kernel-source-path' command line option

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Configure MFC-7420 Scanner Part - Get Warning : Overriding Because --force Enabled : Package Architecture (amd64) Does Not Match System (i386)?

Aug 13, 2011

I have installed Ubuntu 11.04, 64 bit and now I am trying to install/configure MFC-7420 scanner part (printer works fine)I tried to follow the steps listed at http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-590793.html, but I don't have etc / udev / rules.d/45-libsane.rules file to edit and can not continue with the remaining steps of the guide.

I also tried to follow the steps provided by the Brother Solution Center http:[url].... I have downloaded brscan2 64 bit and installed without error but when I tried to install the brscan-skey-0.2.1-3.amd64.deb using >sudo dpkg -i --force-all brscan-skey-0.2.1-3.amd64.deb I get the following error:

************************************************** **************************************************
sudo dpkg -i --force-all brscan-skey-0.2.1-3.amd64.deb
[sudo] password for aUser:
dpkg: warning: overriding problem because --force enabled:[code].....

Which dependencies am I missing? or What am I doing wrong?

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved