General :: What Is The Difference Between I686 And X86_64

Jan 26, 2011

I have an AMD Turion and do not know what to choose between these two versions to install Arch Linux.

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

General :: 64 Bit - Change From I686 (32-bit) To X86_64 Without A Complete Reinstall?

Feb 4, 2011

I just bought a new laptop and installed Fedora 14 on it. I now just noticed that I must have been very sloppy when selecting the download CD, because somehow I managed to install the 32-bit i686 version instead of the 64-bit x86_64.

Is there a way to change without wiping out the existing install and do a reinstall?

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Difference Between I386 And I686 Architecture Based Machine?

Jan 9, 2011

what exact difference between i386 and i686 architecture based machine. Both suppose to be using 32 bit OS ?

View 4 Replies View Related

General :: Difference Between I386 And X86_64 OS

Jul 25, 2011

whats the difference between i386 and x86_64 OS. and also difference between x86_64 Live CD and x86_64 DVD? W Whats extra in DVD ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Different Between X86 / I686 And X86_64

Aug 29, 2010

1) Differences between x86, i686, and x86_64

2) How to check if the processor is of 32 bit or 64 bit on Ubuntu

3) How to check if operating system(ubuntu) is of 32 bit or 64 bit

View 6 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Glibc Conflict Between I686 And X86_64?

Dec 3, 2010

I have both glibc.i686 and glibc.x86_64 installed in Fedora 14 because I have programs that require both. Using a yum update gives me the following error: file /usr/share/doc/glibc-2.12.90/NEWS from install of glibc-2.12.90-19.i686 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.12.90-18.x86_64

What is the best way to work around this issue? Trying an "yum update glibc.x86_64" gives me the corresponding opposite error. Doing a "yum update glibc.i686 glibc.x86_64" gives a longer list of dependency conflicts with glibc-headers and glibc-common.

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Fortran Program Gives Different Results Between F15 I686 And X86_64

Sep 2, 2011

I am having a problem with a simple program I wrote in Fortran (gfortran). This program basically reads a long list of numbers and makes some operations with them. Double precision is used in the variables and functions, and AFAIK everything is in order with the program. The thing is that I accidentally noticed that said program yields different results, and I am talking about integers being different, something noticeable. Apparently the offending chunk of code might be:

Code:

DOUBLE PRECISION FUNCTION tamano (x1,y1,z1)
DOUBLE PRECISION x1,y1,z1
tamano=dsqrt((x1)**2+(y1)**2+(z1)**2)

[code]....

One of the involved machines has F15 x86_64 and the other one F15 i686. My first guess is that this has something to do with how Fortran handles precision (which I supposed was the same for 32 and 64 bits). To compile the program I use:

Code:

gfortran --free-form -fno-whole-file program.f90

Is there another option I should pass the compiler to make sure the same precision is used in both cases? Or what can I do here?

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Build Packages For I686 And X86_64 Without Virtual Machines?

Jun 26, 2011

I have small question about building packages: is it possible to build packages for i686 and x86_64 (without virtual machines?)

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: I686 Xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-libs For F14 X86_64 Missing In Rpmfusion?

Nov 9, 2010

I'm installing x86_64 F14 on my Lenovo T61p, but I'm missing the i686 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-libs in rpmfusion. Am I the only one or Is there a reason?

Edit: wine 32bit and Google Earth for example need them....

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Error: Package Openldap-2.4.21-6.fc13.x86_64 (which Is Newer Than Openldap-2.4.21-4.fc13.i686

Jun 8, 2010

Code:
$ su -c 'yum install wine'
this forum won't let me put all the text in Transaction Check Error: package openldap-2.4.21-6.fc13.x86_64 (which is newer than openldap-2.4.21-4.fc13.i686) is already installed package nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64 (which is newer than nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-17.fc13.i686) is already installed

View 4 Replies View Related

Slackware :: 64 Bit Kernel Builds A BzImage In Both Arch/x86 And Arch/x86_64 - Difference Between The Two?

May 7, 2011

Can anyone explain why a 64 bit kernel builds a bzImage in both arch/x86 and arch/x86_64- is there a difference between the two?

View 2 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 :: Centos 5.5 X86_64 Or Centos 5.5 I386 - Difference Between The Two Versions?

Feb 9, 2011

I am in the process of building a new server on an Asus P5QPL-AM motherboard and an Intel E8600 processor.explain to me the difference between the two versions and what would you recommend.Also, is there any advantage of SATA over IDE hard drives?

View 1 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE :: 11.3 X86_64 Compile - Not Recognized Configure: Error: /bin/sh ./config.sub X86_64-unknown-linux- Failed

Aug 3, 2010

Attempting to compile an application that is not located in any of the repos yet for 11.3 64 bit. I have downloaded the appropriate src and untarred it. However, when I attempt to run the ./configure command here is the error I receive. checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-': machine `x86_64-unknown-linux' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux- failed

I have made sure that I have all kernel-headers packages installed and am unsure as how to proceed. I tried using the command "./configure --build=x86_64" and then receive an error stating that the "SYSTEM IS NOT SUPPORTED" and continued errors stating that gcc is not installed, eve though it is.

View 5 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Upgrade Of Java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13.i686 And Java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13.i686 Prevent The Loading Of Ameritrades Command?

Oct 21, 2010

Last nights upgrade of java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13.i686 and java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13.i686 prevent the loading of Ameritrades Command Center.Downgrading to version 1.6.0.0-37 fixes the problem. I'll post the bugzilla number as soon as I get the chance to file it.

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: ImageMagick Installation On I686-pc- Gnu?

Jun 6, 2010

while installing ImageMagick on my i686-pc-linux gnu, everything seems to go fine when i put ./configure --with-modules in action. however, after this, as soon as i execute "make"

it gives loads of error as shown below:

"make all-am
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/vijitkarma/ImageMagick-6.6.2-2'
CC magick/magick_libMagickCore_la-animate.lo
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/vijitkarma/ImageMagick-6.6.2-2'

[Code]...

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Install Gcc On Fedora 13 With I686 Architecture?

Jul 28, 2010

I have installed Fedora 13 lately, however its architecture is i686... i want to install the GNU C Compiler (both c and c++)..... now i searched for i686 architecture gcc but most of them are not compiled.. and are archives e.g., gcc-4.4.1.tar..... Also, some RPMs say about dependencies. Is there a simpler solution?

How to install Gcc, i dont have any compiler in Fedora even cc is not there!! I installed fedora from a live cd i got with the Digit Magazine!

View 2 Replies View Related

General :: What File Should I Download For I686 System

Sep 22, 2010

I am trying to upgrade my RHEL5 kernel.What file should i download for my i686 system.Googling gives a number of options...of which I feel ovzkernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5.028stab070.5.i686.rpm is the right one for me?Is it the latest stable kernel version...and how to install it?

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Run The Uname -m Command And The Output Is I686?

Mar 15, 2010

I run the uname -m command and the output is i686.What does it mean ???

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Public Key For Libmms-0.5-1.fc14.i686.rpm Is Not Installed?

May 1, 2010

I am trying to upgrade from Fedora 10 to Fedora 14 and my system returns this error:

Public key for libmms-0.5-1.fc14.i686.rpm is not installed

Obviously I need to install this but I have been unable to find it. Also I am not really sure whether I can go from Fedora 10 to Fedora 14.

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Cross Compile GNU Make For Alpha Architecture On I686 PC?

Dec 22, 2010

I'm trying to cross compile the GNU make for Alpha Architecture on my i686 PC and the GNU make i compiled would be placed in my virtual hard disk which is a Alpha based linux simulated system. My question is now , I'm able to cross compile the GNU make on my i686 real PC machine , but when i let the make program run in my virtual machine , it pops out the error ..

make: /lib/libc.so.6.1: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by make)

After that, I try another alternative , and I read through the file "INSTALL" on the GNU make directory that I downloaded from the internet . In this case , I downloaded make-3.81. On the sub section "Compiling For Multiple Architectures" It says that

"You can compile the package for more than one kind of computer at the same time, by placing the object files for each architecture in their own directory. To do this, you must use a version of `make' that supports the `VPATH' variable, such as GNU `make'. `cd' to the
directory where you want the object files and executables to go and run the `configure' script.`configure' automatically checks for the
source code in the directory that `configure' is in and in `..'. If you have to use a `make' that does not support the `VPATH'
variable, you have to compile the package for one architecture at a time in the source code directory. After you have installed the
package for one architecture, use `make distclean' before reconfiguring for another architecture." And I do not understand the line "by placing the object files for each architecture in their own directory" . What object files that I should put ?

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Cross Compiling A Driver On Fedora12-i686 For The Target Ppc860 Using ELDK Toolchain

Dec 31, 2010

I hve following doubts regarding cross-compiling

1. if cross toolchain build wth differnet library other than the one using presently on host, will it b matter.

2. if toolchain build for 32-bit nd if i'm running it on 64-bit will it b matter.

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Error: Package: Libva-freeworld-1.0.13-2.fc15.i686 (rpmfusion-free-rawhide)

Jun 27, 2011

This is what I get when I execute yum update

Code:

[root@rubolzz Genocide_Hoax]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Adding en_US to language list
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile

[code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora :: System Update Fails Error "librpmio.so.0 Is Needed By Package Abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates) Librpm.so.0 Is Needed By Package Abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates)"

Jan 10, 2010

when ever i try to install updates i get shown an error & the updates stop the error i get says "librpmio.so.0 is needed by package abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates) librpm.so.0 is needed by package abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates)"

View 12 Replies View Related

General :: Get The X86_64 That Will Run TOR?

Dec 23, 2010

I just installed Ubuntu but did not realize it did not support TOR. I like how easy this install went as I am not computer savvy AT ALL! Can anyone direct me to a download , site so I can get the x86_64or a Linux that will run TOR?

View 7 Replies View Related

General :: Using Firefox 4.01 On GNU/Linux X86_64 \ Autoupdate From 4 To 5?

Jun 22, 2011

I am using Firefox 4.01 on GNU/Linux x86_64. Is there any reason why there is no autoupdate? In fact, when I look at the "About Firefox" dialog, it just says "Updates available at [URL]

View 2 Replies View Related

General :: I386 Or X86_64 For New Dell Laptop?

May 4, 2011

I plan to install Fedora on my laptop. But I just confuse which one is right for me. My laptop is Dell Latitude E6420 (ODM CTO) Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2620M (2.7GHz, 4M cache) with Turbo Boost Technology With 6 GB Ram

View 5 Replies View Related

General :: X11 - NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-280.13.run Screwed Up Sound?

Aug 24, 2011

I just installed nVidia GT440 w/ NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-280.13.run driver on my Scientific Linux on two of my workstation and one of workstation sound disappeared. Both workstations are identical though in terms of hardware and OS (Scientific Linux).

I'm not really sure where to look, but here is dmesg from workstation where sound isn't working:[URL]..whenever I go to System -> Preference -> Sound -> Output on broken workstation I only see "HDA NVidia Digital Stereo (HDMI)" and my old/onboard sound card is missing.

I actually did roll out of same Video Card to more then just 2 workstation, I did that to a 5. Only 2 of them sound working as expected. 1 of them didn't even needed to install nVidia drivers but that workstation running slightly newer OS version 6.1 instead of rest 6.0, so I'm back to where I started it ... clueless ;(

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Install Pidgin-2.5.9-x86_64-1.txz / Learn Slackware?

Dec 24, 2010

I am very new to Slackware and Linux.
I was able to install and run Slackware 13.0. But I have no clue to install anything to Slackware.
Can some one kindly explain step by step how can I install pidgin-2.5.9-x86_64-1.txz ?. It will be a great help.
How can I learn Slackware?

View 4 Replies View Related

General :: Cross Compiling For X86 X86_64 / RHEL / Ubuntu / SLES?

Apr 15, 2010

I wonder if there is an easy way to accomplish the following: I made a tool and part of it needs to be compiled. It would be easy if I can automate compilation for multiple platforms (x86 / x86_64 / RHEL / SLES / Ubuntu). Is there a way to do this automated on a single host? Or should I set up an os for each distro? Also is there a way to generate RPM and deb files also on the same host without having to edit the meta files each time a version changes?

View 11 Replies View Related

General :: Why Does RHEL Server Contain Rpms For Both The I386 And X86_64 Platforms

Feb 25, 2010

For RHEL 5.4,
# uname -r
2.6.18-164.11.1.el5
# uname -m

[code].....

show some "duplicate" rpms, one for the i386 and one for the x86_64 platform?

For example,

aspell-0.60.3-7.1.i386
aspell-0.60.3-7.1.x86_64

There are numerous other "dups" like that. Is this normal?

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved