Fedora :: Glibc Conflict Between I686 And X86_64?
Dec 3, 2010
I have both glibc.i686 and glibc.x86_64 installed in Fedora 14 because I have programs that require both. Using a yum update gives me the following error: file /usr/share/doc/glibc-2.12.90/NEWS from install of glibc-2.12.90-19.i686 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.12.90-18.x86_64
What is the best way to work around this issue? Trying an "yum update glibc.x86_64" gives me the corresponding opposite error. Doing a "yum update glibc.i686 glibc.x86_64" gives a longer list of dependency conflicts with glibc-headers and glibc-common.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 26, 2010
I've been working to get gcc up and running on a new install of Fedora 13. glibc-devel had dependencies upon installation where it required glibc and glibc-common, both 2.12.1-3. No problem, found both at rpm dot pbone dot net. However, when I try to install the following circular dependency results... it doesn't matter the order of install.
Code:
[root AT localhost gcc_install]# rpm -ivh glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64 .rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.12.1-3 is needed by glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64
[code]....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2011
I made an update of my Centos 5.5 yesterday. In doing so glibc has been updated to glibc.i686. Just now some of my FPGA tools crash. Unfortunately there isn't a downgrade for glibc.i686. How can I replace glibc.i686 by glibc.i386?A simple yum install glibc.i386 conflicts with the files from package glibc-2.5-65.i686
yum list glibc
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 3, 2009
When I try to install (using yum) various things like wine in 64-bit F12, I get
Code:
Missing dependency: glibc-common = 2.11-2 is needed by package glibc-2.11-2.i686 (fedora)
What is currently installed is glibc-common-2.11-4.x86_64
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2011
OS : Oracle Enter Prise Linux 6 (equivalent to RedHat)
I am in process to install oracle 10g on said OS.My process fails and after digging up , I came to know that some of the oracle libraries are compiled on 32-bit architecture and it require glibc-32 bit . also it require for gcc-32 bit.
Now i have downloaded all the required rpm for gcc-32bit . when I try to install glibc and its dependencies , it gives me error that newer version already exist.
How can I install , Gcc-32bit(libgc, libstd-i386 etc) in parallel or standalone?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2009
I use FC 10 on my desktop. It is great!. But I have some troubles with installing new software via yum or rpm. Most of install/update/upgrade transactions fail. The yum prints string: Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.9-2 is needed by package glibc-2.9-2.x86_64 (installed) I tried to manually install or update the glibc-common via yum or rpm, but it fails. The # uname -a -i -p returns
Code:
Linux achfc10 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 18 11:58:53 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Could you have any ideas how to solve the issue?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 2, 2011
I am having a problem with a simple program I wrote in Fortran (gfortran). This program basically reads a long list of numbers and makes some operations with them. Double precision is used in the variables and functions, and AFAIK everything is in order with the program. The thing is that I accidentally noticed that said program yields different results, and I am talking about integers being different, something noticeable. Apparently the offending chunk of code might be:
Code:
DOUBLE PRECISION FUNCTION tamano (x1,y1,z1)
DOUBLE PRECISION x1,y1,z1
tamano=dsqrt((x1)**2+(y1)**2+(z1)**2)
[code]....
One of the involved machines has F15 x86_64 and the other one F15 i686. My first guess is that this has something to do with how Fortran handles precision (which I supposed was the same for 32 and 64 bits). To compile the program I use:
Code:
gfortran --free-form -fno-whole-file program.f90
Is there another option I should pass the compiler to make sure the same precision is used in both cases? Or what can I do here?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2011
I get this error when trying to install
rpm -i glibc-.9-2.x86_64.rpm
warning: glibc-2.9-2.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4ebfc273
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.9-2 is needed by glibc-2.9-2.x86_64
glibc > 2.5 conflicts with glibc-common-2.5-49.el5_5.7.x86_64
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2009
First thing after a clean F11 x86_64 install and "sudo yum install gsynaptics" says:
GConf2-2.26.2-1.fc11.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems
--> GConf2 conflicts with GConf2-dbus
From the verbose output:
gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-5.fc11.i586 requires: libgconf-2.so.4
--> Processing Dependency: libgconf-2.so.4 for package: gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-5.fc11.i586
[code]....
How do I resolve the conflict and get gsynaptics installed?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 25, 2010
I am trying to set up k3b. It complains about a missing mp3 decoder. Following this solution, I set up yum to use the livna repository and then found I actually needed the rpmfusion repo, so set that up as well. Now when I run "yum install k3b-extras-nonfree", I end up with a transaction error: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc12.x86_64
Any idea why the repo is trying to install faad2-libs x86_64 1:2.7-1.fc11 rpmfusion-free when all the other objects are correctly shown as fc12 and how do I get around this without breaking something which is already installed?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2011
I have small question about building packages: is it possible to build packages for i686 and x86_64 (without virtual machines?)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2010
I'm installing x86_64 F14 on my Lenovo T61p, but I'm missing the i686 xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173xx-libs in rpmfusion. Am I the only one or Is there a reason?
Edit: wine 32bit and Google Earth for example need them....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2009
It seems I have some problem with glibc i686 on my VIA CPU. How can I force to install glibc i386.rpm instead of i686 in the clean installation process?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2011
I have an AMD Turion and do not know what to choose between these two versions to install Arch Linux.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2010
1) Differences between x86, i686, and x86_64
2) How to check if the processor is of 32 bit or 64 bit on Ubuntu
3) How to check if operating system(ubuntu) is of 32 bit or 64 bit
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2010
I keep getting this error. packageKit Error dep-resolution-failed: patch:choqok-3320.noarch conflicts with libqoauth1.x86_64 When I go to the YAST software manager and search for libqoauth1.x86_64 it doesn't hit on anything. What gives here?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2011
I just bought a new laptop and installed Fedora 14 on it. I now just noticed that I must have been very sloppy when selecting the download CD, because somehow I managed to install the 32-bit i686 version instead of the 64-bit x86_64.
Is there a way to change without wiping out the existing install and do a reinstall?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2011
I'm trying to install a antivirus software, which my university provides. After nummerous attempts it works partially, meaning, i can scan my drives, directories and stuff but i can't use the buil-in on-access scanner.
After looking in the manual, i found out, that this seems to be a well known problem for red hat 64 bit distributions and derivatives. For me, using fedora 15 64bit, this means, i have to install the following packages:
glibc-2.11.1-1.i686
nss-softokn-freebl.i686 2.12.4-10.fc12
I was able to find the second one, but i can't find the first one.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2010
Code:
$ su -c 'yum install wine'
this forum won't let me put all the text in Transaction Check Error: package openldap-2.4.21-6.fc13.x86_64 (which is newer than openldap-2.4.21-4.fc13.i686) is already installed package nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64 (which is newer than nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-17.fc13.i686) is already installed
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2011
I notice that these two packages contain the same files and uninstalling glibc-i18n doesn't uninstall the internationalization files, because they are also in the glibc package. Is this a mistake or is this normal or is there a reason for it ? I just made my own glibc package to fix this, but was wondering why this is the way it is...
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2011
I have installed Zimbra 6.0.1 and updated to Zimbra 7.1.0, the problem is that it needs the glibc-2.10 to start one of its services. I tried everything but i'dont get to update the glibc.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2011
I am in very much need to resolve the issue of Upgrade redhat5 from glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7. The problem is when I run a binary compiled on our build setup (glibc 2.11) on Suse 11 (glibc 2.9) it works fine...
But the same binary do not work on redhat enterprise version 5 telling error as need glibc2.7 or sometimes segmentation fault for the same binary execution.
I tried upgrading the redhat glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7, but not successful.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 21, 2010
Last nights upgrade of java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13.i686 and java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13.i686 prevent the loading of Ameritrades Command Center.Downgrading to version 1.6.0.0-37 fixes the problem. I'll post the bugzilla number as soon as I get the chance to file it.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 13, 2010
I am using CENTOS 5.3, I want to upgrade glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7.
how to do it.
I am not getting from where to start
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 11, 2010
Yesterday, I think I did something stupid: I removed kernel-headers, gcc, glibc-devel and glibc-headers. My box is a CentOS 5.4 webserver (it has loads of packages installed, but that was done through Virtualmin config, so it's quite coherent all in all). The thing is that now I need to reinstall at least the headers and glibc, but hey! this is what I get :
[Code]...
View 19 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2010
when ever i try to install updates i get shown an error & the updates stop the error i get says "librpmio.so.0 is needed by package abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates) librpm.so.0 is needed by package abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates)"
View 12 Replies
View Related
Nov 19, 2009
today i tried to install clam antivirus for my fedora ... i used the following command: yum install clamav it shows the following error message: Error: clamav-data-empty conflicts with clamav-data how to rectify this..
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2010
im running centos 4.4final and i have glibc, and glibc_common installed on version 2_3. Im trying to install the 2_9 rpm, but it says that it conflicts with 2_3, how can i upgrade the 2_3 to 2_9? i tryed using yum update glinc / glibc_common, and yum install, didnt work.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2011
Recently, I am trying to use a complied software on Linux OS. I need to use X-Windows to do some initialize. When I run this software, I am getting the error: '/lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found' I also checked the version of GLIBC on my computer, the highest one is GLIBC_2.3.4. So I have to update my glibc to 2.4 or higher. Some tips said it can be done using yum. I am a new user for linux. Could anyone guide me to do that? Here is the information of my computer: Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 4 (Nahant Update ; Linux 2.6.9-89.0.3.ELsmp #1 SMP Sat Jun 13 07:02:28 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2010
Any body pls help me that how to download the smb (or) which websites are providing download the smb for fedora-13, i686.
View 2 Replies
View Related
