Fedora X86/64bit :: Build Multilib RPM Package In X86-64?

Dec 5, 2009

I am running Fedora 12 x86-64. I have a SRPM and want to build both x86-64 and i686 package. But the rpmbuild -ba can only build x86-64 package. --target=i686 is not working fine too, it try to find dependency in /usr/lib64. How can I build i686 package?

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Slackware :: Slackware64-13.0 Multilib Can Not Build Valid Initrd For Kernels 2.6.30

Feb 27, 2010

I've just installed a Slackware64-13.0 test machine with alienBOB's multilib packages. I'm running the stock kernel generic-2.6.29.6 with an initrd set up using mkinitrd.confEverything is fine except that I cannot build a right initrd for kernels 2.6.30, both the /testing one or a custom build: if I try, it will panic at boot with the "couldn't find a valid RAM disk image" error.On the same hardware, without multilib support, I was able to correctly build and boot 2.6.30 initrds.

View 11 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Vmplayer3.1.2 FC14x86_64 Build Failure?

Dec 13, 2010

Getting vmmon module build failure, gcc and kernel headers are installed,

[root@richard-g8jvm rules.d]# cat /tmp/vmware-root/setup-2838.log
Dec 13 12:54:09.521: app-140223614146336| Log for VMware Workstation pid=2838 version=7.1.2 build=build-301548 option=Release

[code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Error: "Missing Dependency: Libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1()(64bit) Is Needed By Package Iptstate-2.2.1-5.fc11.x86_64 (installed)"

Nov 10, 2009

Today I got update notification. I type in terminal yum update, and get this error: Quote: Error: Missing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1()(64bit) is needed by package iptstate-2.2.1-5.fc11.x86_64 (installed) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest

I removed iptstate.x86_64, again run yum update, and than, ibnetfilter_conntrack got installed. I tried to install iptstate.x86_64 again, but i get Quote:

[Code]...

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Build Mandrivas Theme Ia_ora From Source But It Fails

Feb 13, 2011

Im trying to build Mandrivas theme ia_ora from source but it fails.

Code:
sh install.sh
-- Found Qt-Version 4.7.1 (using /usr/bin/qmake-qt4)
-- Found X11: /usr/lib64/libX11.so
-- Found KDE 4.6 include dir: /usr/include/kde4
-- Found KDE 4.6 library dir: /usr/lib64/kde4/devel

[Code]...

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Can't Build Rpm Package?

Mar 9, 2010

I'm building an rpm from the following program source:[URL].. but I'm getting the following error after running rmpbuild: (here I only show the log after configure, see attachment for a full log):

configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creating Makefile
----the prefix for installation directories is:/usr
If this choice is not convenient, re-execute this configure
with the --prefix option, e.g.

[Code]...

I can figure that it cannot install under /usr/bin, rather it have to install in %{buildroot}, but I don't know how to deal with that. Please I need help with this!

View 9 Replies View Related

Slackware :: ORBit2 Slackbuild Fails When Building 32 Bit Package On Current Multilib

Apr 10, 2010

I am trying to build ORBit2 as a dependency for GConf and then google-chrome.

This is a multilib system and I want 32 bit chrome.

Both my 64 bit and compat32 packages are all current as of today per ftp://slackware.mirrors.tds.net/pub/slackware/.

I have edited the Slackbuild as follows:

Code:

The build fails each time with:

Code:

I am using the newest version of ORBit2 as the above indicates, but this is just to see if the newer package would build. The X.X.17 version failed with the same output.

I have run:

Code:

I've had no problems building this package with current in a pure 64 bit environment.

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Package To Install To Build Packages From Source

Mar 15, 2010

What package do I have to install to build packages from sources? I am trying to build the TrueCrypt package from source.

View 1 Replies View Related

Slackware :: Installed Multilib Support In 64bit Slackware 13.37 Installation?

Jun 28, 2011

I have installed multilib support in my 64bit slackware 13.37 installation than I proceed it to install google earth from slackbuilds... and did ln -sf /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /lib/ld-lsb.so.3Now when I try to run google earth I get:[ 760.092745] googleearth-bin[3647]:segfault at 984f7d31 ip 00000000984f7d31 sp 00000000ffbfe100 error 4

View 14 Replies View Related

SUSE :: Package A War File As An RPM Package - Always Giving Errors In %build Stage

Feb 14, 2011

Still I am asked to package a war file as an RPM package. That is an unusual RPM packaging(To me). If you guys could guide me I have a war file inside a folder, that folder is inside a tar file as a SOURCE for RPM package. The structure is like below.

[Code]...

I simply want that the war file from sources is transferred to the web app of my tomcat server through RPM. I try to package it as an RPM, but its always giving me errors in %build stage. When I try to remove %build from stage from the spec file, then it says command missing.

My system details are:
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64)
VERSION = 10
PATCHLEVEL = 1
LSB_VERSION="core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-noarch:core-2.0-x86_64:core-3.0-x86_64"

View 5 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Gcc Devel Package Missing?

Jul 27, 2009

I have been attempting to compile lmms on my 64 bit install of fedora 11, and have determined that I need the gcc-devel package. I cannot find it in any of the repositories. Where is it?

View 10 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Package Conflicts On Update (32bit / 64bit)

Aug 14, 2009

I've tried the "yum clean all" option to no avail. When I update either with the GUI or command line, I get this error:

[root@joshhardman ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package anacron.x86_64 0:2.3-78.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package binutils.x86_64 0:2.19.51.0.14-1.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package crontabs.noarch 0:1.10-30.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package genisoimage.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package icedax.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package shadow-utils.x86_64 2:4.1.4.1-5.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package wodim.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution .....

Can I not have the 64 bit and 32 bit packages installed at the same time?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Installing The Xen Runtime Environment Package Or The Xen Emulator For KVM?

Feb 28, 2009

I recently gave the boot to Windows and installed Fedora 10. Under Windows, I was using VirtualBox for all of my virtualized computing needs. I had set up a virtual network with two virtual machines - one running Windows Server 2K3 and the other running Windows 2000 Pro. I could run both VMs at the same time and still use the host OS. Now I am trying a similar setup under Fedora, I am using VirtualBox to run Server 2K3 and Windows XP. The problem I encounter is that when I run one VM, one of my CPU cores rockets to 100% usage and the other hovers around 40% - 60% usage. Is there a way to enhance performance so I can run both VMs at the same time? Third, what would be the effects of me installing the Xen runtime environment package or the Xen emulator for KVM?

System specs:

OS: Fedora 10 x86-64
CPU: Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Toledo)
RAM: 2GB PC3200
GPU: GeForce 7600 GT XXX

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Yum Update Fails Due To Missing Php-embedded Package?

Nov 20, 2009

my update today failed, because the packages raydium and maniadrive depend on libphp5-5.2.9.so, which is provided by php-embedded, which is (apparently) not in the fedora 64bit repository There does however seem to be an i586 version...

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: F13: Package Nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-19.fc12.x86_64

May 28, 2010

I have configured the Adobe repos and when I try to install Adobe Reader, yum gives me the following error:

Code:
Transaction Check Error: package nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-19.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-17.fc13.i686) is already installed I tried --skipbroken as a longshot to no avail. Obviously if I try to remove nss-softokn-freebl it tries to remove all of Fedora , looked in Koji but there is nothing in there either.

View 14 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Errors - Package Nss-softokn-3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64

Jun 19, 2010

This has been happening for over a week and is preventing me from installing updates, They all download OK then as they start to install I get this error message. Test Transaction Errors: package nss-softokn-3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64 (which is newer than nss-softokn-3.12.4-17.fc13.i686) is already installed Then the update fails and I am unable to continue.

I am a complete noob with this OS, I left for a week in the hope it would sort it's self out.

View 3 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Remove / Install Package Via Yum - Invalid Mode

Jun 2, 2011

Since the Fedoraplus site is down, I alternatively downloaded the FC14 version in hopes that it would work. Instead, I now receive the following error any time I try to remove or install a package via yum:
Code:
[Errno 22] invalid mode ('w') or filename: '//var/lib/yum/rpmdb-indexes/conflicts.tmp'
I'm pretty sure the issue here is a typo in a file (the extra "/" in the path to "conflicts.tmp").

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Install Libg++2.7.0 Package In FedoraCore 6 On A DELL Machine

Jun 1, 2009

I am trying to install libg++2.7.0 package in FedoraCore 6 on a DELL machine that has Intel Pentium D processor.I get an error saying "unrecognized host system name i686 unknown linuxoldld"

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Open Office Package "openoffice.org-core = 1:3.3.0-9.3" - Can't Find

Nov 20, 2010

i am looking for a rpm package to run openoffice because when i try to install it it come up with i need this openoffice.org-core = 1:3.3.0-9.3.fc14 but i cant find it anywhere on the net?

View 14 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: How To Build A .deb Package From Git

Jan 4, 2011

I work at a small company where we use to deploy things by just checking out the repo and copying stuff to production servers. This has to come to an end, enter .deb packages!

So I'm wondering what's the best procedure to do that. I already know how to create .deb packages, most of our stuff is Python and we're going to use python-support and cdbs. But how to maximally automate this?

We have a Git repo and ideally the whole thing should work like this:

* a tag is created in the Git repo (the version can be provided manually)

* some file like 'version.py' is created so that setup.py and the packaged software can refer to it and know the tag

* changelog is created from the Git commit logs

* the package is built (that's the part I've worked out - python-support and cdbs are involved here)

* optionally, the package is uploaded somewhere

There's a .deb package named 'git-buildpackage', is it suitable for this task? So far I can tell that it has one drawback - it looks for the 'debian/' directory in the root of the repository, which is not the case - our repo consists of several subdirectories, each contains a subproject that will be packaged independently.

View 2 Replies View Related

Server :: Kernerl3.0.0 Build As Rpm Package?

Aug 16, 2011

i make rpm package from linux kerlne 3.0.0 source. default spec file in "linux-3.0/scripts/package/mkspec" ,i add %post lines,this step use to install new kernel with rpm (ivh) tools and configure grub automatically

Quote:

echo "%post"
echo '/sbin/new-kernel-pkg --mkinitrd --depmod --install "$__KERNELRELEASE" || exit $?'
then ,make rpm-pkg, it makes rpms bellow:
Wrote: /root/rpmbuild/SRPMS/kernel-3.0.0-1.src.rpm
Wrote: /root/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/kernel-3.0.0-1.x86_64.rpm

[Code]...

View 3 Replies View Related

Programming :: Build A Package Using A Different Lib Than The One Installed?

Jul 11, 2011

Is is possible to compile (but not install) a library, and then compile a package using that library instead of the version that's installed?

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: E: Couldn't Find Package Build?

Jun 27, 2010

When I type this command ;sudo apt-get install build essentialI got this ;

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done

[code]...

View 2 Replies View Related

General :: Build Package For Evolution - Brutus?

Jul 22, 2010

i am new to linus and trying to connect evolution to exchange 2007 using evolution-brutus plug in. However not able to complete the compiling stage. where to download the following rpm. I am using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS- the Lucid Lynx

configure: WARNING: You should have the rpmdev-setuptree program if building evolution-brutus RPMs checking for rpmdev-wipetree... no configure: WARNING: You should have the rpmdev-wipetree program if building evolution-brutus RPMs checking for build. no configure: WARNING: You should have the build program if building evolution-brutus RPMs on SUSE checking for dpkg-buildpackage..

View 4 Replies View Related

Slackware :: Build Notes For LFS 6.6 With Package Users?

Oct 20, 2010

Edit: Ack! Duplicate post. See my thread, What a slacker learned from building Linux from Scratch..., the build notes are in this post.

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Launch Firefox 7.0a1 Nightly Build From A .bz2 Package?

Jul 5, 2011

I got Thunderbird 5.0a2 Beta because it had the file that runs it in there, but I can't find it anywhere in the Firefox Nightly Build one. There's also no config file in there either, and I don't want to replace my Aurora 6.0a2 Beta with the very unstable Alpha until I try it out. I would try it in the Virtual Machine but it'd take too long to set it all up.

[URL]

I downloaded the .bz2 file and Archiver extracted it for me. I remember in Slackware you just use installpkg on .bz2 files... Or was it .gz... I forget, anyway, how can I run Nightly-Build? Run-Mozilla.sh opens my Aurora browser.

View 6 Replies View Related

Software :: Package Gpart Fails To Build On Powerpc?

Apr 17, 2010

Question is: How do I compile a package for little endian on big endian proceessors? Gpart is known to build on arm-el, ia64, i386, and amd64. I'm using gcc 4.3 and have versions 3.4, 4.1, 4.2. Build environment is debian lenny, powerpc.

View 4 Replies View Related

Slackware :: Build GCompris A Childrens Educational Package?

Jul 5, 2011

I've been trying to build gCompris a childrens educational package. I got the compressed source & build from slackbuilds.org The only dependency mentioned in the readme was gnet so built and installed that ok .

With gCompris the build was progressing fine until a it hit a point at " text2html" .Looked in the 4th install disk of slackware 13.37 no sign of either.looked in slackbuild also no mention of either.

View 11 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Build-Essential Package Missing / Obsoleted

Jun 20, 2011

Today is my first day to use ubuntu for my C++ programming. However, when I was trying to install build-essential, it failed. This is the output shown:

vie@vie-laptop:~/TestC++$ sudo apt-get install build-essential
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package build-essential is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source
E: Package build-essential has no installation candidate
vie@vie-laptop:~/TestC++$ .....

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Use Compile File Build Package Without Messing Up Library

Apr 11, 2010

I want to build a package from source using src2pkg, but I don't know how to avoid library miss match. Suppose I have Firefox 3.5.2 on Slackware 13.0 64 and I want to upgrade it to 3.6.2. Last time when I venturesomely installed Firefox-3.6.2-current into my Slackware 13.0, I got library miss match. Thus, instead of upgrading the whole packages to current (which is impractical and cumbersome), I want to build 3.6.2 from source. How can I do this? Is there any guideline how to use src2pkg? Or should I rather use makepkg? Do I need to create a Makefile?

View 7 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved