today i tried to install clam antivirus for my fedora ... i used the following command: yum install clamav it shows the following error message: Error: clamav-data-empty conflicts with clamav-data how to rectify this..
View 3 Replies
I installed codecs for playing songs and movies.but when I tried to play few songs,it says the corresponding codecs need to be installed.after resolving dependencies,it says the following, Local conflict between packages Two packages provide the same file. This is due to mixing packages from different software sources
Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstdeinterlace.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-4.fc11.i586
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstflv.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.11-4.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.15-4.fc11.i586
[code]....
When I try to install Cinelerra I get this error:
Local file conflict between packages
Two packages provide the same file. This is usually due to mixing packages from different software sources.
Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/bin/mpeg3cat from install of cinelerra-2.1-20_git20091116.fc13.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libmpeg3-utils-1.8-3.fc12.x86_64
file /usr/bin/mpeg3dump from install of cinelerra-2.1-20_git20091116.fc13.x86_64 conflicts with
file from package libmpeg3-utils-1.8-3.fc12.x86_64
file /usr/bin/mpeg3toc from install of cinelerra-2.1-20_git20091116.fc13.x86_64 conflicts with
file from package libmpeg3-utils-1.8-3.fc12.x86_64
I have not been able to update in over a month. I get a message that says "Local file conflict between packages"
When I click on More Details, I get:
Test Transaction Errors: file /etc/fonts/conf.avail/25-unhint-nonlatin.conf from install of fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package fontconfig-2.6.99.behdad.20090508-1.fc11.i586
file /etc/fonts/conf.avail/30-metric-aliases.conf from install of fontconfig-2.7.1-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts
[code]....
I need to install some packages, but it fails because I previously installed gnome-shell testing, and now have the ricotz ppa packages conflicting with the default packages. See error below.
Code:
libgtk2.0-dev:
Depends: libgtk2.0-0 (=2.20.1-0ubuntu2) but 2.20.1-0ubuntu3~10.04~ricotz2 is to be installed
Depends: libpango1.0-dev but it is not going to be installed
Depends: libatk1.0-dev but it is not going to be installed
How do I remove these packages and re-install the default ones, without risking damage to my system?
UPDATE: I have now tried to remove this packages using ppa-purge and the new ubuntu tweaks, but for the life of me I cannot get rid of them.
I just upgraded Firefox from updated yet ancient version 3.0.17 to modern 3.6 using Firefox-stable repository March 15, 2010 update: Firefox 3.6 works perfectly on Hardy 8.04 using firefox-stable repository Quote: Originally Posted by OUTDATED INFORMATION SINCE THE BUG WAS FIXED I ran into two problems.
1. Firefox packages conflicted. I had to manually force-remove firefox-3.0 to install firefox-3.6.
2. Firefox 3.6 was not able to start. It was giving some kind of an error message. I worked around the problem by creating a new profile. but my old 3.0 profile with all my stored passwords, bookmarks, etc is unusable in 3.6
I have a Kubuntu 10.10 install on which I can't update my packages due to some fail conflict between pidgin and pidgin-facebookchat. I can't even remove the stuff via apt-get due to this conflict...
sudo apt-get remove pidgin
Code:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these:
[Code]...
httpd have been install by default and I don't start it as services. I have install apache2 but don't want to start as service, I can't add it into the chkconfig. When I try to remove httpd, fedora also want to remove these software.
gnome-user-share i586 2.26.0-2.fc11 installed 809 k
httpd-manual i586 2.2.11-8 installed 3.5 M
mod_perl i586 2.0.4-8 installed 6.3 M
[code]....
php and webalizer I don't care as I want to install the new version, but is their any problem removing the other one? Also I want to pount the apache2 documentroot to var/www/httpd but when I do this and try to see the website I got a 403 error (not autorize)
I have F10 x86_64 installed on my desktop. When I update the packages, everything works well, except curl-7.19.4-6.fc10.x86_64 which conflicts with the installed curl-7.18.2-6.fc8.i386 (Fedora 8!). The problem seems to be that my repo list does not have the info about the F10 i386 repository. This is the report from "yum repolist"
------------------------------------------------------
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
repo id repo name status
adobe-linux-i386 Adobe Systems Incorporated enabled: 17
fedora Fedora 10 - x86_64 enabled: 14,303
[code]...
I don't want to simply remove the f8.i386 package, because it'll take away a lot of other i386 packages that I'm sure I'll miss in the future (nspluginwrapper- .3.0-2.fc10.i386).
The other solution seems to be updating the curl-***.i386 package. However, I'm somewhat embarrased to confess that I don't know where to find the repository information...
i'm running on an i686 architecture with a 32-bit processor, and i'm using a fully updated firefox, more or less. i was able to install adobe flash 10 successfully, and i can load, manipulate, and access flash programs without incident. however, if i am running a flash program on one tab, and then in another tab i load another program (say an advertisement), the original program crashes.
why this is annoying:
i will listen to a song on videos, and open another tab to browse. a flash advertisement will crash the videos video. the video's viewing area turns white/gray and requires a refresh of the page - not a restart of the browser - to work properly. the only add-ons i installed are firebug and fireftp.
I have both glibc.i686 and glibc.x86_64 installed in Fedora 14 because I have programs that require both. Using a yum update gives me the following error: file /usr/share/doc/glibc-2.12.90/NEWS from install of glibc-2.12.90-19.i686 conflicts with file from package glibc-2.12.90-18.x86_64
What is the best way to work around this issue? Trying an "yum update glibc.x86_64" gives me the corresponding opposite error. Doing a "yum update glibc.i686 glibc.x86_64" gives a longer list of dependency conflicts with glibc-headers and glibc-common.
I'm about 2 weeks working on this server to install yum : Im almost getting there, the Dependencies are reduced to 2: rpm-python and yum-fastestmirror.But installing rpm-python its driving me crazy... it keeps saying:
Code:
[root@03044f2 ~]# rpm -Uhv popt-1.10.2.3-18.el5.i386.rpm
warning: popt-1.10.2.3-18.el5.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897
Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
file /usr/include/popt.h from install of popt-1.10.2.3-18.el5 conflicts with file from package popt-1.10.2-32
I found the package (popt-1.10.2-32) and it says it's already installed:
Code:
[root@03044f2 ~]# rpm -Uhv popt-1.10.2-32.i386.rpm
warning: popt-1.10.2-32.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 4f2a6fd2
Preparing... ########################################### [100%]
package popt-1.10.2-32 is already installed
I don't know what to do know.. I read somethings about forcing rpm --force but I'm afraid it will trigger another error... since this is a server I prefer not to play smart with it.
I have a Fedora system that I just changed the mother board on. The old NICs were eth0 and eth1. Now I have only one NIC that shows up as eth3. The problem is no matter what I do, eth0 and eth1 will not go away and their configs conflict with eth3. I removed Network Manager via yum. I deleted the ifcfg-eth0/1 files from /etc/ sysconfig/network-scripts and /etc/sysconfig/networking/default and profiles. In all of these locations the ifcfg-eth0/1 files keep reappearing after a reboot. I am at a loss at this point how to get rid of these non-existant NICs.
View 2 Replies View RelatedFirst thing after a clean F11 x86_64 install and "sudo yum install gsynaptics" says:
GConf2-2.26.2-1.fc11.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems
--> GConf2 conflicts with GConf2-dbus
From the verbose output:
gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-5.fc11.i586 requires: libgconf-2.so.4
--> Processing Dependency: libgconf-2.so.4 for package: gpointing-device-settings-1.3.1-5.fc11.i586
[code]....
How do I resolve the conflict and get gsynaptics installed?
I have been running F11 for some time now. I install updates regularly and to this time have had no issues. Now it comes up with error.
Code:
[root@red 2305 ~]
$ yum update
Loaded plugins: protectbase, refresh-packagekit
0 packages excluded due to repository protections
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check .....
--> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia conflicts with xorg-x11-drv-catalyst
Error: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia conflicts with xorg-x11-drv-catalyst
Error: xorg-x11-drv-catalyst conflicts with xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
package-cleanup --dupes
rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
[root@red 2306 ~]
I do not believe that I even have the 'xorg-x11-drv-catalyst' mentioned here installed:
Code:
[root@red 2315 ~]
$ yum list all | grep installed | grep catalyst
[root@red 2316 ~]
This returns nothing so why the error?
I have a Fedora 12 box, which works absolutely fine in a fastweb wlan. However, if I connect to another wlan where I need to link to a wireless access point cabled to the ISP modem/router, networkmanager shows the connection is ok, but...
1) I only can browse internet (es:www.google.it) for a few seconds after the connection is established, thanfirefox goes "Impossible to reach the server"
2) the same behaviour is confirmed by ping
Code:
[Adriano@localhost ~]$ ping www.google.it
PING www.l.google.com (209.85.135.106) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from mu-in-f106.1e100.net (209.85.135.106): icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=138 ms
64 bytes from mu-in-f106.1e100.net (209.85.135.106): icmp_seq=2 ttl=49 time=127 ms
[code]....
EDIT: There is a win box in the same net that is working fine.I see in the router config that ARP for the working machine is "complete", while for the Fedora one is "incomplete" Nothing changes configuring a static or dynamic IP address for the Fedora box I had a previous Fedora 11 installation on the same machine that now gives troubles, and it worked fine. But I can't tell if it's a software problem because my ISP seems to have telnet-ed the router, changing it's firmware (and maybe it's config). Shame on they.
I am trying to set up k3b. It complains about a missing mp3 decoder. Following this solution, I set up yum to use the livna repository and then found I actually needed the rpmfusion repo, so set that up as well. Now when I run "yum install k3b-extras-nonfree", I end up with a transaction error: Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib64/libfaad.so.2.0.0 from install of faad2-libs-1:2.7-1.fc11.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libfaad2-1:2.7-16.fc12.x86_64
Any idea why the repo is trying to install faad2-libs x86_64 1:2.7-1.fc11 rpmfusion-free when all the other objects are correctly shown as fc12 and how do I get around this without breaking something which is already installed?
I have a Fedora system that I just changed the mother board on. The old NICs were eth0 and eth1. Now I have only one NIC that shows up as eth3. The problem is no matter what I do, eth0 and eth1 will not go away and their configs conflict with eth3. I removed Network Manager via yum. I deleted the ifcfg-eth0/1 files from /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts and /etc/sysconfig/networking/default and profiles. In all of these locations the ifcfg-eth0/1 files keep reappearing after a reboot. I am at a loss at this point how to get rid of these non-existant NICs.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOn Fedora repo I found VirtualBox-ose packages there. What will be the difference in operation/function between their packages and the packages download on virtualbox.org website?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI recently upgraded from F13 to F14 using "preupgrade". This is the first time I've used preupgrade. So far, F14 is running OK. There are some leftovers from F13 and I'm wondering if this is correct.
Q1: There are 176 F13 packages remaining. [alfrugal@localhost Documents]$ rpm -qa | grep fc13 | wc -l 176 Is this OK? FWIW, after the upgrade, I ran "package-cleanup --orphans" as recommended by the "preupgrade" page on the Fedora Project wiki.
Q2: Also, my GRUB menu was correctly updated for F14, but it still contains the three entries it had for F13. Is it normal for the preupgrade process to require the user to clean up the obsolete entries from the GRUB menu?
im using fedora 14 and i have a slow internet connection. i want 2 install some packages from the fedora 14 dvd instead of downloading from internet using add/remove packages. i tried to edit /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo and /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo but it dint work.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen system is playing a media ( e.g. sth.mp3 ) by a media player like Totem, then I open a browser and forward to a page that should play sounds, but everything is pretty normal except the sounds ( I mean there's no sound ).
When firstly open a browser to surf the pages. If there's sound played in the browser, I can't play a audio media in a standalone player ( e.g. Totem ) before I close the browser. But If there isn't any sound played in browser, the outside player will work normally.
The 2 situations happens between no matter Chrome or Firefox and a outside player. I guess there maybe a conflict between gstreamer and adobe flash player. But I am not sure what happened in my system.
I download all packages of Fedora 12 64 bit and all rpmfusion packages , all of them free and nonfree. all of them is near 20GB, I download all of them by rsync.I download them in work,In home I use Fedora12 64 bit and do not have internet connection , I copy all packages with USB flash and copy them to my Fedora box , and I want install VLC and other codecs and Nvidia driver for some games.What I must do ?I said again I do not have internet connection in home but I have all packages , free and nofree and rpmfusion packages
View 14 Replies View RelatedMy soundcard (a Creative X-Fi Xtreme Music) is running with the unix-driver offered by Creative. But after a restart (without switching power off) I have to switch the sound device in xmms from ALSA to OSS. Also my tv card (an hybrid card from Hauppauge, WIN-TV HVR-1300) is only getting a signal after a restart, before there is no signal found. To get sound while watching tv I'm using one of the following lines, it seems to be random wich of them is working without error:
> sox -r 48000 -c 2 -t ossdsp /dev/dsp1 -t ossdsp /dev/dsp
> sox -r 48000 -c 2 -t ossdsp /dev/dsp -t ossdsp /dev/dsp1
So it looks like a problem in loading the modules in correct order, but I'm not sure. Perhaps there is also a problem with my nvidia graphic card (see list below for the kind of card), that I have installed with the unix-drivers from nvidia's webpage. To solve this problem I'm now searching since september, when I got my new computer, including:
-graphics: Lead896 D3 X GTX260 Extreme+
-CPU: Intel Core2Duo E8500, 3166 MHz, FSB 775
-mainboard: Asus P5Q-E, P45 F G SA
[code].....
Do you see any conflict when the Bus Id of the GDU is 06:04.0 (inboard Matrox) and the Bus Id of an audio card is 04:04.0 (Xonar DX) ?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI am running fedora12 in my machine and used virtualbox. I have 3 virtual machine running linux, xp and fedora as well. I have used linux as my gateway and configured NAT for my xp and fedora machine which is under the ip of 192.168.1.0 network.. Everything is fine but often i get error message in my xp machine that says 'there is an ip address conflict'.I just wonder there are only 2 machine on that network and how can there be a ip conflict(i have used a static ip for xp and fedora virtual machine).My ip address for linux is (192.168.5.x and 192.168.1.101). XP (192.168.1.1). Fedora (192.168.1.50).
View 5 Replies View RelatedIn application udp port listening with 3330 i am sending udp request from port 0.0.0.0:3330 to 0.0.0.0:3330 that is same port in the same machine....application works fine udp sending and receiving also fine.....for clarification ....is there any conflicts in the communication ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen booting, the grub menu appears and allows me to boot from the internal hard disk (sda) any OS there, such as WHEEZY (sda9). On the external disk (sdb) there is a dd'd copy (not an installation) of SQUEEZE (sdb1), which at one time was on sda but which has different partition assigments listed in its grub.cfg than the current ones shown below for sda.
Code:
Select allNAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 111.8G 0 disk
├─sda1 8:1 0 23G 0 part
├─sda3 8:3 0 1K 0 part
├─sda5 8:5 0 3.9G 0 part [SWAP]
├─sda6 8:6 0 11.7G 0 part
├─sda7 8:7 0 19.5G 0 part /home/norman/data
[code]....
Can I manually boot the SQUEEZE copy on sdb1 using grub commands (set, linux, initrd, boot) without disturbing the WHEEZY and other OSs on sda? Or will they be disrupted?Alternatively if for example JESSIE is installed in sdb3, for example, can it be booted similarly without affecting the installations on sda? I hesitate to try this by trial and error because of the work and time involved in rebuilding messed-up OSs to their desired configurations.
I installed 11.2 on VMware 6.03. My os is windows 7.When I try to go online a pop up showed up
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a bunch of .u1conflict files, and I removed the files having incomplete content and renamed some conflict files to remove the extension. However, the conflict files recur.
View 1 Replies View Related
