Fedora :: IRQ Conflicts - ECC Disabled In BIOS

Sep 3, 2010

When I moved from Fedora 13 from Fedora 11, I thought the annoying application crashes that I had been having were gone for good. Random crashes - firefox, Thunderbird, Abrt, metacity and what have you with SIGSEGV errors. I'm beginning to believe that these are not down to Fedora or even the RAM (Have run Memtest, several times). I'm not sure if what I am seeing are signs of IRQ conflicts of some sort. Can someone, please have a look and give me some guidance on what to do? Should I reinstall with acpi=off ? noapic? Also, don't have a clue why the system complains of ECC being disabled? The RAM is non-ECC. I have posted some sections of the logs here with links to the full logs instead of making this a massive post.

Code:
EDAC MC: Ver: 2.1.0 Aug 27 2010
EDAC amd64_edac: Ver: 3.3.0 Aug 27 2010
EDAC amd64: This node reports that Memory ECC is currently disabled, set F3x44[22] (0000:00:18.3).
EDAC amd64: ECC disabled in the BIOS or no ECC capability, module will not load.
Either enable ECC checking or force module loading by setting 'ecc_enable_override'.
(Note that use of the override may cause unknown side effects.)
amd64_edac: probe of 0000:00:18.2 failed with error -22
Complete system spec, BIOS details etc.

Full dmesg log on a fresh install. No issues experienced with system installation.

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Ubuntu Installation :: Disabled RAID In My BIOS

Sep 26, 2010

I've played with Ubuntu, and a linux evangelist at work has talked me into trying it again.I happened to be wiping my machine, so my plan was to have Windows 7 and Ubuntu on one hard drive (100GB for Ubuntu, the rest for Windows), and the second hard drive for downloads, TV, films, etc.First I installed Windows, then I torrented the x64 Ubuntu 10.04 live CD iso, and burned it to a DVD. I booted from it and installed on the second partition, but I then found when I booted back into windows that my second hard drive wasn't there any more.

It didnt take long to work out that Ubuntu had installed using the second hard drive as a mirror. This is very confusing to me, as I've disabled RAID in my BIOS. I booted from the Ubuntu CD again and looked for options about this but didn't find any. Eventually out of frustration I just unplugged the second hard drive, but now when I boot from the CD to install, no hard drives show up for me to install to.

View 4 Replies View Related

Hardware :: All USB Ports Disabled - Cannot Open In BIOS

May 4, 2010

I have Ubuntu 10.04 installed on an Asus x83v. About a month ago, my laptop began taking a very long time to boot up, assuming it booted at all. This happened out of the blue for no apparent reason. I found that boot up was faster when I unplugged all USB devices, though it was still a slow process. When I plugged devices back in, they did not work. My iPod was not recognized, nor was my USB mouse. This was extremely frustrating, but I figured it must be an issue with Ubuntu 9.10, and with 10.04 just around the corner, I figured I would upgrade and then see how things were. To make a long story short, it was all the same. With some research, I found that my USB ports were inexplicably disabled.

Here is the output of lsusb:
Code:
Bus 008 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 002 Device 004: ID 04f2:b071 Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd 2.0M UVC Webcam / CNF7129
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
This is with my USB mouse plugged in.

I went into BIOS and found that USB was enabled. However, on the rare occasion that my computer boots successfully with a USB device plugged in, I get a message like this from Ubuntu prior to reaching the login screen: "Unable to enumerate USB device, Port 002 disabled". I suspect I may need to reinstall my BIOS, however I am at a loss as to how to do so.

View 10 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE Wireless :: Card Keeps Disappearing Like Disabled In BIOS

Jul 24, 2010

I'm running SUSE 11.3 on a Dell Inspiron 1501 with a Broadcom BCM4311. I finally got the wireless working earlier with some help from caf4926 and now the card keeps disappearing almost like someone went into the BIOS and disabled it.

View 7 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Multimedia :: Why Are Devices Detected Even When Disabled In BIOS

Dec 5, 2010

I am having problems understanding how sound capable devices are being used on my Ubuntu10.10 64 bit system. I have an ASUS A8V motherboard with on-board multimedia functions provided through the VIA V8237 chip. BIOS gives me the option to disable this functionality and I have set BIOS this way. I want to use an M-Audio 24/96 card for all sound processing.

However, in applications like Audacity the VIA chip functions are all available and can be set as recording and playback devices. The same is true in ALSA.

Why does 'linux' (I have no idea which part of the OS) ignore the BIOS settings?

Furthermore alsamixer always selects the 'default' devices. Where and how are these set?

<System><Preferences><Sound> hardware tab list 2 'Internal Audio' devices but no M-Audio device. What are these devices? Only 1 of them appears to create any output with the 'Test Speakers' tab. This confuses me completely because the speakers are connected only to the M-Audio card.

None of the profiles for 'Settings for the selected device' match the capabilities of the M-Audio card (1 set of stereo inputs and 1 set of stereo outputs). So where are these profiles coming from? Which do I select for the M-Audio card?

What do the Input and Output tabs in <System><Preferences><Sound> mean? Are these different to the hardware tab? The 'Output' tab lists2 devices for sound output: 'Internal Audio Analog Stereo, Stereo' twice. What devices are these ?

View 6 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Conflicts With Jasper On Update

Nov 5, 2009

How to solve this conlifts, only pass in x86_64 and fedora 11?
--> jasper-libs conflicts with jasper
Error: jasper-libs conflicts with jasper

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Conflicts With File From Package Wireshark

May 12, 2010

I run into this error while trying to install wireshark. I am sure there is a quick fix. I can see the files are different I just don't know how to resolve the error.

Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_be.pyc from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_be.pyo from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_gen.pyc from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_gen.pyo from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Yum Update - Conflicts With File From Package

Apr 25, 2011

I am a Debian User, now I have decided to install Fedora 14 x86_64 on my Acer Aspire computer, mainly to develop C++/Java software. Due to this, I have installed a lot of development packages. Shortly after installation, I have encountered problems updating some packages.

Below 'yum update' output:
file /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/bin-package-db-0.0.0.0/libHSbin-package-db-0.0.0.0.a from install of ghc-ghc-devel-6.12.3-8.3.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package ghc-6.12.3-5.fc14.x86_64

file /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-binary-0.5.0.2/libHSghc-binary-0.5.0.2.a from install of ghc-ghc-devel-6.12.3-8.3.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package ghc-6.12.3-5.fc14.x86_64

file /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/designer/libqwebview.so from install of qt-webkit-1:4.7.2-8.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-x11-1:4.7.0-3.fc14.x86_64

file /usr/lib64/libusrp.so.0.0.0 from install of usrp-3.2.2-9.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gnuradio-3.2.2-7.fc14.x86_64

REPOs ENABLED:
Fedora 14 -x86_64,
Fedora 14 - x86_64 - Updates only.
Can't be a problem of multiple repos.

View 5 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Package Conflicts On Update (32bit / 64bit)

Aug 14, 2009

I've tried the "yum clean all" option to no avail. When I update either with the GUI or command line, I get this error:

[root@joshhardman ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package anacron.x86_64 0:2.3-78.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package binutils.x86_64 0:2.19.51.0.14-1.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package crontabs.noarch 0:1.10-30.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package genisoimage.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package icedax.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package shadow-utils.x86_64 2:4.1.4.1-5.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package wodim.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution .....

Can I not have the 64 bit and 32 bit packages installed at the same time?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: DHCP Conflicts With DHClient Package

Feb 24, 2010

I am trying to install dhcp server on F12 with yum, but at the time I issue yum install dhcp, I got the following message:

Transaction Summary:
Install 1 Package(s)
Upgrade 0 Package(s)

Total size: 821 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test

Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man5/dhcp-eval.5.gz from install of dhcp-12:4.1.1-5.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package dhclient-12:4.1.0p1-17.fc12.i686
file /usr/share/man/man5/dhcp-options.5.gz from install of dhcp-12:4.1.1-5.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package dhclient-12:4.1.0p1-17.fc12.i686

And I see that if I uninstall the dhclient package, I will lose my networkmanager, which I also need, is there a way to have a dhcp server as well as dhclient utility on fedora as it is possible on rhel?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Networking :: F13 VPN / Network Conflicts - Cannot Browse Internet

Sep 20, 2010

I'm using VPNC to connect to a remote cisco network, however I cannot browse the internet after the tunnel establishes. I know this is a DNS issue, as I can ping external address by IP (e.g. google). I can also communicate through the VPN tunnel without trouble.

/etc/resolv.conf gets updated by the VPNC with the remote networks DNS Servers, but I still cannot connect to the internet. I even manually tried to add my local nameserver to the /etc/resolv.conf file, without luck.

Also, just as a side note, I can only establish the tunnel via the command line "vpnc" command. I'm using Fedora 13 with KDE, but knetworkmanager / networkmanager will not establish the tunnel, however I haven't really dug very deep as to why. I've just setup some vpnc config files for loading the various connections manually, as needed.

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Update Fails - Conflicts With File From Package

Jun 14, 2011

Code:
$ su -c 'yum update'
Password:
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libva-freeworld.x86_64 0:1.0.12-1.fc15 will be updated
---> Package libva-freeworld.x86_64 0:1.0.13-1.fc15 will be an update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution .....

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Time Conflicts In Dual Boot Setup (F12 / WinXP)

Nov 24, 2009

The time in my Fedora 12 x64 installation is 5 hours behind what it should be. When I change it to the correct time, Windows XP x64 is now 5 hours ahead! (Dual boot setup). How I can sync the times on both os's. Both are set to GMT-5.

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Upgrading To FC12 Due To Conflicts And Dependency Errors

Feb 17, 2010

I've been trying to upgrade my installation for some time now and just can't quite get it right. I would upgrade from the DVD but the installer hangs when it says "Looking for installation images on CD device /dev/sr0". However, that's not really my question. I've resorted to the upgrade instructions as found at [URL]. If I don't use the '--skip-broken' option it complains about the following:

abrt-gui-0.0.11-1.fc12.x86_64 from fedora
abrt-libs-1.0.6-1.fc12.x86_64 from updates
samba-3.4.5-55.fc12.x86_64 from updates
samba-client-3.4.5-55.fc12.x86_64 from updates
samba-common-3.4.5-55.fc12.x86_64 from updates
samba-winbind-3.4.5-55.fc12.x86_64 from updates
samba-winbind-clients-3.4.5-55.fc12.x86_64 from updates

If I use the skip broken option, it then complains about:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/cryptsetup.mo from install of cryptsetup-luks-1.1.0-0.4.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package cryptsetup-luks-1.0.6-7.fc11.i586
file /usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/cryptsetup.mo from install of cryptsetup-luks-1.1.0-0.4.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package cryptsetup-luks-1.0.6-7.fc11.i586
file /usr/share/man/man8/cryptsetup.8.gz from install of cryptsetup-luks-1.1.0-0.4.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package cryptsetup-luks-1.0.6-7.fc11.i586

I can't seem to remedy this problem. There were other conflicts but I just removed those packages. When I attempt to remove 'cryptsetup-luks' it then tells me it's going to remove something like 200 others which did not sound like a good idea.

View 14 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Update Test Transaction Error - Conflicts With File

Mar 16, 2010

I think I had this problem before but I don't remember what was done to correct it. I just tried to do an update and got this error message.

Code:
Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstfbdevsink.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstoss4audio.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstsdl.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstshapewipe.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.21-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/bin/gst-camera from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/bin/gst-camera-perf from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-f...

View 12 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Yum Error KDE4 : "conflicts With File From Package"

Feb 14, 2009

It seems to me that I've got a dual package somewhere.

Quote:

Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/libakonadi-kabc.so.4 from install of kdepimlibs-4.2.0-1.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdepim-libs-6:4.1.4-1.fc10.i386
file /usr/share/config/plasmoids.knsrc from install of kdelibs-6:4.2.0-10.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10.i386
file /usr/share/kde4/servicetypes/plasma-animator.desktop from install of kdelibs-6:4.2.0-10.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10.i386

[Code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Won't Boot Past BIOS ?

Jul 28, 2009

I've had FC11 x86_64 running for awhile based on an upgrade from FC10. I powered down one night then when I tried to boot the next day the system just sat at the BIOS prompt "Verifying DMI pool data...". I opened the case to check all cables - all fine. I've run a memtest, also fine. I then suspected a bad HDD so I ran the Seagate tools from the Ultimate Boot CD (fast test) and both HDDs came up fine. BIOS can see both disks fine, too. I stuffed around with fixmbr and fixboot and got one step further, with it sitting at "invalid operating system" or something like that. I was able to use Linux rescue mode to mount the old filesystems fine.

Today I've completely blown away all my old partitions and started from scratch. After successfully completing an install with custom disk layout (identical to old layout) it still just sits at "Verifying DMI pool data..". Do I have a bad sector in my boot block? Possible BIOS issue? Is there some tool to re-write the boot block?

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora :: 11 Changes Bios Time Settings?

Aug 19, 2009

I'm successfully dual booting and running Windows XP and Fedora 11 (with EVERY recent update installed), everything works fine EXCEPT that I cannot get both System times to synchronize.. Evey time I run Fedora I find the system time is always an hour different to Windows. Evert time I correct the system time in Fedora it affects my BIOS time settings. If I then go into Windows I first have to go into the BIOS and correct the BIOS time setting by one hour before I get the correct time in Windows........ Nothing is wrong with my Windows side of things, I know this because if I don't log into Fedora then my system times stay correct, only when I correct the settings in Fedora (which are always an hour out) do I get my BIOS changed. Also in Fedora, although I live in the UK (London) Fedora ALWAYS DEFAULTS TO Guernsey, no matter how many times I correct this to LONDON, Fedora always defaults back to Guernsey.... Has anyone else experienced this as I'm sure it's a Bug in Fedora, surely it shouldn't alter my BIOS settings, should it ??

View 9 Replies View Related

Fedora :: BIOS Doesn't Support 4 GBs Of RAM?

Sep 24, 2009

Well, after installing the 64-bit RTM release of Windows 7, I finally became too fed up to stand it anymore. My BIOS does not recognize more than 3 GBs of RAM and therefore even my 64-bit Operating Systems (Windows 7 and Fedora 11) can't see or use the extra gig. Is there any way to get another BIOS or to add the support to my existing BIOS?

Oh, before I forget, I am using an Acer Aspire 5630 incase the model is required.

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: BIOS Not Recognize Live USB

Oct 31, 2009

I have created a live fedora11 usb using live usb creator, but when I restart the computer the bios does not recognize the live usb and system stop (not shut down) when I choose boot from usb drive option.
BIOS: inside H20

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: 12 - Get The BIOS To Have A USB Option?

Mar 31, 2010

I'm completely new to Fedora, though not to Linux (I'm switching from Ubuntu 9.10, now) and am having a few problems getting it installed. I followed the installation instructions, torrented the i386 DVD image, and put it on a 4gb USB drive using UNetbootin.

This is where my problems started. I restarted the computer, figured out which F key I needed to press to select the boot source, and then there wasn't a USB boot option. I've looked all over the place (using Google) and can't find out how to get the BIOS to have a USB option there-- I'm using a Toshiba Satellite A10, and that doesn't come with the USB boot option.

Now I'm trying to either figure out how to add the USB boot option or find another way to install. Burning a DVD (or CDs) doesn't work, as I don't have the resources to do so. I've seen somewhere that there's a way to install from a hard drive partition, but no instructions on how to do so (if someone could point me to a way to do that, it seems to be my best option right now-- if it even exists).

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Getting Alert BIOS Broken?

Feb 2, 2011

getting this bug report on starting fedora 13 in hp laptop

WARNING: at drivers/pci/dmar.c:647 check_zero_address+0x96/0x19b()
Hardware name: HP Pavilion dv6 Notebook PC
Your BIOS is broken; DMAR reported at address zero!
BIOS vendor: Hewlett-Packard; Ver: F.42; Product Version: Rev 1
Modules linked in:

[Code]...

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Hardware :: HDD Not Recognized By BIOS

Feb 17, 2011

I have a Dell workstation that I picked up for free. Most everything thing works, but it will not boot to the HDD (SATA). BIOS does not recognize the drive. I can, however, boot to a live Fedora 12 disk, and from the desktop I can see and write to the HDD. I would like to be able to boot from the disk and upgrade to 14 or whatever.

View 8 Replies View Related

Fedora Hardware :: HDD Not Present In BIOS?

May 3, 2011

I messed up my computer a little bit... I had F14, but I wanted to format the entireisk. I launched an installation cd with some older version of Fedora,dered it to remove everything (but I didn't accept changes, that's important!), but in the meantime I changed my mind and I wanted to wipe the disk the other way. There was no 'quit' button anywhere,just.. powered off the computer. Dumb, I know.Right now it doesn't work at all. At first, I thought I destroyed the partition array, but I looked into the bios and it says that no HDD drive is installed. And I have no idea what to do now. I tried to find a solution via Google, but all I found were problems related to newly bought hard drives. Nothing about a blonde powering off the computer during the installation process though .

View 4 Replies View Related

Red Hat / Fedora :: Change Bios Settings?

Nov 24, 2008

two weeks i was trying find out to change the bios settings in linux from command line...can we edit the bios settings after os loaded without reboot

View 7 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: F10 Widescreen Is Disabled?

Jan 23, 2009

I have some experience using linux systems, but my recent Fedora 10 (x86_64) install is my first attempt at installing and maintaining my own. I installed it to a clean second hard drive in my computer (Vista and XP partitions were previously installed on the first drive).The install was a bit of a fight, anaconda seemed to dislike my graphics card (ATI HD2900) and I finally got this issue resolved by running the install with 'linux xdriver=vesa'. Once the install completed I had to run a repair install to get a functioning grub, and even that I had to manually fix during the boot process because grub mixed up the two hard drives.

In Fedora I cannot choose any widescreen resolutions. I think this is either related to my hacky install process or ATI driver incompatibilities. I followed the URL... guide to try to update the drivers and have run a full system update. Neither has resolved my problems, and now I am fresh out of ideas.

Is there some other driver update process I should try, or should I just reformat the drive and try again with crossed fingers and a clean Fedora install?As an infuriating side note, I helped a friend install from the same DVD after my install fearing he might have the same issues, but the installer seemed to do everything automatically (his install was also on a second drive with Vista on the first, but his video card is a newer model ATI card than mine).

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Banner Sheet Cannot Be Disabled On F12

Dec 20, 2009

My F12 is connected to a Xerox DC432 printer on the network. The problem I'm facing is that banner sheet cannot be disable. The configuration setting on Administration->Printing showed that banner is off by default. "/etc/cups/printers.conf" file also have "JobSheets none none". I had the same problem with F11. Is there any step I'm missing? It doesn't seem to be problem of the printer itself because I could do this on a Windows OS.

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Networking :: Wi-Fi Suddenly Disabled In F11

Jan 22, 2010

My wireless gets randomly disabled in my Acer Timeline 3810 with F11. The time it can take is basically random, but most of the times it ends up happening. I get disconnected, and then in the network manager in gnome panel wireless network appears disables and in fact the option appears grayed out. The only thing I can do to get it back workinh is restart.

View 4 Replies View Related

Fedora :: KVM Support Disabled Running F15

Jun 4, 2011

I'm running Fedora 15/2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64. When I run <code>qemu</code> I'm getting "Could not initialize KVM, will disable KVM support" I know my CPU supports hardware virtualization, it has the vmx flag (grep vmx /proc/cpuinfo). I've checked that:
1. kvm and kvm_intel modules are loaded
2. /dev/kvm exists.
3. I'm in the kvm group, so I can access /dev/kvm..
Why KVM doesn't work?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Could Not Initialize KVM - Support Disabled

Jul 25, 2011

I installed kvm via the package manager but running "qemu" gives the output:
Code:
Could not initialize KVM, will disable KVM support
I'm in the group "kvm" and /dev/kvm exists but seems... empty
I'm not familiar with KVM, QEMU and virtualization technology...

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved