Fedora :: Yum Update - Conflicts With File From Package
Apr 25, 2011
I am a Debian User, now I have decided to install Fedora 14 x86_64 on my Acer Aspire computer, mainly to develop C++/Java software. Due to this, I have installed a lot of development packages. Shortly after installation, I have encountered problems updating some packages.
Below 'yum update' output:
file /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/bin-package-db-0.0.0.0/libHSbin-package-db-0.0.0.0.a from install of ghc-ghc-devel-6.12.3-8.3.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package ghc-6.12.3-5.fc14.x86_64
file /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-binary-0.5.0.2/libHSghc-binary-0.5.0.2.a from install of ghc-ghc-devel-6.12.3-8.3.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package ghc-6.12.3-5.fc14.x86_64
file /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/designer/libqwebview.so from install of qt-webkit-1:4.7.2-8.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-x11-1:4.7.0-3.fc14.x86_64
file /usr/lib64/libusrp.so.0.0.0 from install of usrp-3.2.2-9.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gnuradio-3.2.2-7.fc14.x86_64
REPOs ENABLED:
Fedora 14 -x86_64,
Fedora 14 - x86_64 - Updates only.
Can't be a problem of multiple repos.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 14, 2011
Code:
$ su -c 'yum update'
Password:
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libva-freeworld.x86_64 0:1.0.12-1.fc15 will be updated
---> Package libva-freeworld.x86_64 0:1.0.13-1.fc15 will be an update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution .....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2009
I've tried the "yum clean all" option to no avail. When I update either with the GUI or command line, I get this error:
[root@joshhardman ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package anacron.x86_64 0:2.3-78.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package binutils.x86_64 0:2.19.51.0.14-1.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package crontabs.noarch 0:1.10-30.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package genisoimage.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package icedax.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package shadow-utils.x86_64 2:4.1.4.1-5.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package wodim.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution .....
Can I not have the 64 bit and 32 bit packages installed at the same time?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2010
I run into this error while trying to install wireshark. I am sure there is a quick fix. I can see the files are different I just don't know how to resolve the error.
Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_be.pyc from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_be.pyo from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_gen.pyc from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_gen.pyo from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2010
I think I had this problem before but I don't remember what was done to correct it. I just tried to do an update and got this error message.
Code:
Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstfbdevsink.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstoss4audio.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstsdl.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstshapewipe.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.21-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/bin/gst-camera from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/bin/gst-camera-perf from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-f...
View 12 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2009
It seems to me that I've got a dual package somewhere.
Quote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/libakonadi-kabc.so.4 from install of kdepimlibs-4.2.0-1.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdepim-libs-6:4.1.4-1.fc10.i386
file /usr/share/config/plasmoids.knsrc from install of kdelibs-6:4.2.0-10.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10.i386
file /usr/share/kde4/servicetypes/plasma-animator.desktop from install of kdelibs-6:4.2.0-10.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10.i386
[Code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2011
I have inherited our Linux packaging and as the number of versions increase, the number of conflicts is starting to get a bit unmanageable. I believe the easiest way would have been to keep the package names the same and just change the release in the spec file but unfortunately I am past that as a lot of these packages are rolled out to our estate. (I am told there were reasons for not keeping the package name the same and incrementing the version/release)
Is it possible to wildcard conflicts so I don't need to keep adding as new versions are created. For example, instead of using all the conflicts below, have something along the lines of AAtest45* <= 1.4 & BBtest45* <= 1.4 Meaning that all I would need to do was change this to 1.5 at the next release (the packages below version matched the release in the spec file)
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2010
I am trying to install dhcp server on F12 with yum, but at the time I issue yum install dhcp, I got the following message:
Transaction Summary:
Install 1 Package(s)
Upgrade 0 Package(s)
Total size: 821 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man5/dhcp-eval.5.gz from install of dhcp-12:4.1.1-5.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package dhclient-12:4.1.0p1-17.fc12.i686
file /usr/share/man/man5/dhcp-options.5.gz from install of dhcp-12:4.1.1-5.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package dhclient-12:4.1.0p1-17.fc12.i686
And I see that if I uninstall the dhclient package, I will lose my networkmanager, which I also need, is there a way to have a dhcp server as well as dhclient utility on fedora as it is possible on rhel?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2009
How to solve this conlifts, only pass in x86_64 and fedora 11?
--> jasper-libs conflicts with jasper
Error: jasper-libs conflicts with jasper
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2010
I'm installing a NVIDIA driver and encountered some error message. Please see below the sequence (I've set runlevel to init 3);
linux:~/SuSe # rpm -ivh NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.suse81:i586.rpm Preparing... ############################ [100%])file /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nvidia-drv.o from install of NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191 conflicts with file from package XFree86-server-4.3.0.1-21
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2011
OpenSUSE 11.4, 64 bits, with
Index of /repositories/KDE:/Release:/46/openSUSE_11.4
and
Index of /repositories/KDE:/Extra/KDE_Release_46_openSUSE_11.4
repositories enabled. Since some days, if I go to YaST2 †’ Package †’ "Update packages if a new version is available" (I'm translating from Spanish) I get a warning that plasma-addons-4.6.5-9.3.x86_64 needs akonadi-runtime < 1.5.40, but that that requirement cannot be match because there are eliminated providers: akonadi-runtime-1.5.3-91.1.x86_64
and non instalable providers: akonadi-runtime-1.5.0-3.3.1.x86_64[openSUSE-11.4-11.4-0]
As "solution" it offers me to not install akonadi-runtime-1.6.0.93.1.x86_64 and libakonadiprotocolinternals1-1.6.0.93.1.x86_64 (which I selected) or to uninstall plasma-addons and kadressbook, which I do not think it is a good idea...
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2010
Running Ubuntu 10.04 64bit on a Gateway md7818u.When trying to install Pidgin today, I found that I could not do so in the software center due to to a "Software Dependencies Cannot Be Resolved" error. So I went to Synaptic and attempted there. One package after another kept saying "dependent on (insert package name here) but will not be installed" so I went to manually install these packages, with the same results, leading me to "libdirac-encoder0" which would install but conflicted with many of my installed programs it said that all had to be removed to install this package, which will allow me to install all of these other packages, which will allow me to install Pidgin.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2010
i want to install Skype, there is a dependency problem with libsound2. When i tried to install it, this eroor had appeared to me:
Code:
Erro: Conflicts qith the installed package 'libsound2-plugins'
when i tried to install that package (libsound2-plugins), this error appeared (the same dependency problem as with skype ==> so, i am in cycle
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2009
I tried to update from 5.2 to 5.3. But I got the error message:
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstqtdemux.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.9-1.el5_3.1 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.3-8.el5.rf file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstvideo4linux2.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.9-1.el5_3.1 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.3-8.el5.rf
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2011
I was trying to do a yum update and it hung on me so did a killall -9 yum. Now I go back to rerun the update.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2010
Code:could not add package update for poppler-data-0.4.0-1.fc12(noarch)updates: poppler-data-0.4.0-1.fc12.noarch.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2010
When I try to apply the latest updates on my 11.3 system, I get the following Warning. I think this is because I did the "switch system packages" to Packman after I installed it. What is the recommended solution?
Code:
#### YaST2 conflicts list - generated 2010-07-27 16:30:26 ####
patch:k3b-2785.noarch conflicts with k3b.x86_64 < 2.0.0-1.1.1 provided by k3b-2.0.0-1.pm.2.7.x86_64
[ ] do not install patch:k3b-2785.noarch
[code]....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2011
When I ran YaST | Software Management | Package | Update if newer Package Available this morning I get this message:
Code:
#### YaST2 conflicts list - generated 2011-01-22 09:40:42 ####
libxine1-codecs-1.1.19-2.pm.48.15.i586 requires libpostproc.so.51, but this requirement cannot be provided
uninstallable providers: libpostproc51-0.6.26387svn-1.pm.2.1.i586[ftp.uni-erlangen.de-suse]
[ ] break libxine1-codecs by ignoring some of its dependencies
[ ] Following actions will be done:
install libpostproc51-0.6.26387svn-1.pm.2.1.i586 despite the inferior architecture .....
[ ] do not install libxine1-codecs-1.1.19-2.pm.48.15.i586
#### YaST2 conflicts list END ###
What is it telling me? What should I do? What are the implications?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2010
after doing: $ sudo apt-get update i get lots of hits then: Hit [URL] pdates/multiverse Sources 99% [Waiting for headers]... and it just sits there. a reload in synaptic gives: downloading file 44 of 45 ... and it just sits there.
when i abort i get the following shown in error message: Failed to fetch http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/dists...tion-en_GB.bz2 Failed to fetch http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/dists/stable/Release Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2011
i cant update or install anything. i have started update manager and i got an error. then i tried to update through terminal and got this:
[code]...
way of fixing this?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2010
I issued "yum update" and the process ended with a transaction check error(see below).
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/backgrounds/images/default-5_4.jpg from install of oracle-logos-4.9.17-6.noarch conflicts with file from package desktop-backgrounds-basic-2.0-41.el5.centos.noarch
file /usr/share/backgrounds/images/default-dual-wide.jpg from install of oracle-logos-4.9.17-6.noarch conflicts with file from package desktop-backgrounds-basic-2.0-4
[code]...
I installed Oracle Database on this server few months ago. I see in /etc/yum.repos.d directory a public-yum-el5.repo file with entries pointing to Oracle which must have come from that installation. Now how do I proceed from here?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2010
I am enjoying the new install of Fedora 12, but am having trouble getting updates. First try more than >500 updates, but I get an error message.
"Could not add package update for abrt-plugin-runapp-1.0.8-2.fc12(i686)updates: abrt-plugin-runapp-1.0.8-2.fc12.i686" and won't continue.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2010
This happened completely randomly. One day, my synaptic and update manager is working fine and the next day, I open one of them and get a error window that doesn't say anything (no details on the error). So, i tried the terminal, sudo apt-get update, and this message shows:
Reading package lists... Error!
E: Problem parsing dependency Depends
E: Error occurred while processing lib�tartup-notificamion0-dev (NewVersion1)
E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_karmic_main_binary-i386_Packages
E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2010
Where can i put a request for a package update?
gnutls has been upgraded to 2.8.6, however, there is no rpm available for it,, only 2.8.5
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2010
I have recently taken delivery of a Dell Inspiron mini netbook with Ubuntu on, and I am new-fangled .install updates, I clicked the (orange down-arrow) button, and it compalined "E: /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.24-22-lpia_2.6.24-22.45netbook9_lpia.deb: files list file for package `libxcb-shape0' is missing final newline"
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2011
I get an error when trying to run update manager or Synaptic - same thing from Ubuntu Tweak as well. I also tried to update via terminal
[code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 2, 2009
When I update my system by KpackageKit I have the ability to read what was fixed by that package update by clicking on package's name. How to read this info in command line by yum?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2010
On my Fedora 11 x86_64 computer I have installed OOo 3.1.1 from www.openoffice.org because I need features that Fedora disabled in the repository version.And the latter also shows up in Software Update. Now, I went around and around with this and I know that installing the 1.3.1.1 package will break my OOo. I don't want Software Update even to list the 1.3.1.1 package because sooner or later I will slip up and install it on accident.
Side note: Why does Software Update think 1.3.1.1 is newer than 1.5.1? If it really is newer, someone at OOo needs to learn arithmetic.I think I can add an exclude line to /etc/yum.conf. But I can't figure out the syntax, and I don't know which package to exclude - the one I don't want updated or the alleged update package? Both? Or just the first part "openoffice.org-ure"?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2010
My question is: How to skip the installation of a package when using yum update from the command line? i.e., How would one update a system from command line and skip/not update kernel?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2010
Now, every time I do yum update my system will also offer me package for F12, F13, F14. But if I try to install it, it will not resolve because I my system is still F11. I don't remember exactly what the error message is, but I think it said that I should have system > 13 to install that packages. What should I do so next time I do yum update I just offered packages I needed only?
View 1 Replies
View Related
