Code:
$ su -c 'yum update'
Password:
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libva-freeworld.x86_64 0:1.0.12-1.fc15 will be updated
---> Package libva-freeworld.x86_64 0:1.0.13-1.fc15 will be an update
--> Finished Dependency Resolution .....
I am a Debian User, now I have decided to install Fedora 14 x86_64 on my Acer Aspire computer, mainly to develop C++/Java software. Due to this, I have installed a lot of development packages. Shortly after installation, I have encountered problems updating some packages.
Below 'yum update' output:
file /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/bin-package-db-0.0.0.0/libHSbin-package-db-0.0.0.0.a from install of ghc-ghc-devel-6.12.3-8.3.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package ghc-6.12.3-5.fc14.x86_64
file /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-binary-0.5.0.2/libHSghc-binary-0.5.0.2.a from install of ghc-ghc-devel-6.12.3-8.3.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package ghc-6.12.3-5.fc14.x86_64
file /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/designer/libqwebview.so from install of qt-webkit-1:4.7.2-8.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-x11-1:4.7.0-3.fc14.x86_64
file /usr/lib64/libusrp.so.0.0.0 from install of usrp-3.2.2-9.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gnuradio-3.2.2-7.fc14.x86_64
REPOs ENABLED:
Fedora 14 -x86_64,
Fedora 14 - x86_64 - Updates only.
Can't be a problem of multiple repos.
I've tried the "yum clean all" option to no avail. When I update either with the GUI or command line, I get this error:
[root@joshhardman ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package anacron.x86_64 0:2.3-78.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package binutils.x86_64 0:2.19.51.0.14-1.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package crontabs.noarch 0:1.10-30.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package genisoimage.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package icedax.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package shadow-utils.x86_64 2:4.1.4.1-5.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package wodim.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution .....
Can I not have the 64 bit and 32 bit packages installed at the same time?
I run into this error while trying to install wireshark. I am sure there is a quick fix. I can see the files are different I just don't know how to resolve the error.
Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_be.pyc from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_be.pyo from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_gen.pyc from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_gen.pyo from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
I think I had this problem before but I don't remember what was done to correct it. I just tried to do an update and got this error message.
Code:
Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstfbdevsink.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstoss4audio.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstsdl.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstshapewipe.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.21-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/bin/gst-camera from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.18-1.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.17-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/bin/gst-camera-perf from install of gstreamer-plugins-bad-f...
It seems to me that I've got a dual package somewhere.
Quote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/libakonadi-kabc.so.4 from install of kdepimlibs-4.2.0-1.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdepim-libs-6:4.1.4-1.fc10.i386
file /usr/share/config/plasmoids.knsrc from install of kdelibs-6:4.2.0-10.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10.i386
file /usr/share/kde4/servicetypes/plasma-animator.desktop from install of kdelibs-6:4.2.0-10.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package kdebase-workspace-4.1.4-1.fc10.i386
[Code]....
I installed Fedora 12 inside VirtualBox and trying to make Software Update. It fails with different messages which looks like:Could not add package update for ..Package name may differ. Internet connection is working. Is there another way to update the system?
View 2 Replies View Relatedmy update today failed, because the packages raydium and maniadrive depend on libphp5-5.2.9.so, which is provided by php-embedded, which is (apparently) not in the fedora 64bit repository There does however seem to be an i586 version...
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have inherited our Linux packaging and as the number of versions increase, the number of conflicts is starting to get a bit unmanageable. I believe the easiest way would have been to keep the package names the same and just change the release in the spec file but unfortunately I am past that as a lot of these packages are rolled out to our estate. (I am told there were reasons for not keeping the package name the same and incrementing the version/release)
Is it possible to wildcard conflicts so I don't need to keep adding as new versions are created. For example, instead of using all the conflicts below, have something along the lines of AAtest45* <= 1.4 & BBtest45* <= 1.4 Meaning that all I would need to do was change this to 1.5 at the next release (the packages below version matched the release in the spec file)
[Code]....
I am trying to install dhcp server on F12 with yum, but at the time I issue yum install dhcp, I got the following message:
Transaction Summary:
Install 1 Package(s)
Upgrade 0 Package(s)
Total size: 821 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man5/dhcp-eval.5.gz from install of dhcp-12:4.1.1-5.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package dhclient-12:4.1.0p1-17.fc12.i686
file /usr/share/man/man5/dhcp-options.5.gz from install of dhcp-12:4.1.1-5.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package dhclient-12:4.1.0p1-17.fc12.i686
And I see that if I uninstall the dhclient package, I will lose my networkmanager, which I also need, is there a way to have a dhcp server as well as dhclient utility on fedora as it is possible on rhel?
How to solve this conlifts, only pass in x86_64 and fedora 11?
--> jasper-libs conflicts with jasper
Error: jasper-libs conflicts with jasper
I'm installing a NVIDIA driver and encountered some error message. Please see below the sequence (I've set runlevel to init 3);
linux:~/SuSe # rpm -ivh NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191.suse81:i586.rpm Preparing... ############################ [100%])file /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nvidia-drv.o from install of NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-4191 conflicts with file from package XFree86-server-4.3.0.1-21
After Updating to version 8.0 today...
Package Updater GUI is Failing with the message:
No updates are available
No network connection was detected.
=================================
I did updates almost daily on wheezy
Todays updates [via the Pkg Updater GUI] were over 300 meg.
After the updates and reboot
System was showing version 8.0 in the GUI desktop and using 'cat /etc/debian_version'
Then...
From terminal I did ...
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
The dist-upgrade was over 40 minute and ~ 500meg
Things seemed to go well.
I updated sources.list with apt-spy.
[In order to trouble-shoot: I subsequently commented-out the apt-spy sources and found some generic sources on internet]
==========================================
# sources.list generated by apt-spy v3.2.2
#
# Generated using:
#
[Code].....
apt-get and Synaptic GUI both work.
I did/reviewed some settings in the Synaptic GUI I imported two v8 signing keys into Synaptic from [URL]
Package Updater GUI is Failing with the message: No updates are available No network connection was detected.
OpenSUSE 11.4, 64 bits, with
Index of /repositories/KDE:/Release:/46/openSUSE_11.4
and
Index of /repositories/KDE:/Extra/KDE_Release_46_openSUSE_11.4
repositories enabled. Since some days, if I go to YaST2 †’ Package †’ "Update packages if a new version is available" (I'm translating from Spanish) I get a warning that plasma-addons-4.6.5-9.3.x86_64 needs akonadi-runtime < 1.5.40, but that that requirement cannot be match because there are eliminated providers: akonadi-runtime-1.5.3-91.1.x86_64
and non instalable providers: akonadi-runtime-1.5.0-3.3.1.x86_64[openSUSE-11.4-11.4-0]
As "solution" it offers me to not install akonadi-runtime-1.6.0.93.1.x86_64 and libakonadiprotocolinternals1-1.6.0.93.1.x86_64 (which I selected) or to uninstall plasma-addons and kadressbook, which I do not think it is a good idea...
when ever i try to install updates i get shown an error & the updates stop the error i get says "librpmio.so.0 is needed by package abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates) librpm.so.0 is needed by package abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates)"
View 12 Replies View RelatedRunning Ubuntu 10.04 64bit on a Gateway md7818u.When trying to install Pidgin today, I found that I could not do so in the software center due to to a "Software Dependencies Cannot Be Resolved" error. So I went to Synaptic and attempted there. One package after another kept saying "dependent on (insert package name here) but will not be installed" so I went to manually install these packages, with the same results, leading me to "libdirac-encoder0" which would install but conflicted with many of my installed programs it said that all had to be removed to install this package, which will allow me to install all of these other packages, which will allow me to install Pidgin.
View 5 Replies View Relatedi want to install Skype, there is a dependency problem with libsound2. When i tried to install it, this eroor had appeared to me:
Code:
Erro: Conflicts qith the installed package 'libsound2-plugins'
when i tried to install that package (libsound2-plugins), this error appeared (the same dependency problem as with skype ==> so, i am in cycle
I have many servers running CentOS 5. I noticed yesterday many had a notificationthat updates were available. I clicked update and they all fail using the GUI. WhenI run yum update it shows packages to be upgraded and asks me to confirm. I enter yes but Yum fails on the first package. I wonder if this has something to do with therelease of 5.3?I get the same failure if I run a yum upgrade too.
Total download size: 465 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
[code]....
I tried to update from 5.2 to 5.3. But I got the error message:
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstqtdemux.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.9-1.el5_3.1 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.3-8.el5.rf file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstvideo4linux2.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.9-1.el5_3.1 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.3-8.el5.rf
I was trying to do a yum update and it hung on me so did a killall -9 yum. Now I go back to rerun the update.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCode:could not add package update for poppler-data-0.4.0-1.fc12(noarch)updates: poppler-data-0.4.0-1.fc12.noarch.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhen I try to apply the latest updates on my 11.3 system, I get the following Warning. I think this is because I did the "switch system packages" to Packman after I installed it. What is the recommended solution?
Code:
#### YaST2 conflicts list - generated 2010-07-27 16:30:26 ####
patch:k3b-2785.noarch conflicts with k3b.x86_64 < 2.0.0-1.1.1 provided by k3b-2.0.0-1.pm.2.7.x86_64
[ ] do not install patch:k3b-2785.noarch
[code]....
after a while of using Gnome with Fedora 12, I installed Openbox and started the configuration process. Everything is pretty much just the way I like it, but when I open the package manager and try to install something, it says "Authorization failed: you have failed to provide proper authentication. Please check any passwords or account settings" I'm sure it's because I forgot to add something to my autostart.sh, but I'm not sure exactly what...
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhen I ran YaST | Software Management | Package | Update if newer Package Available this morning I get this message:
Code:
#### YaST2 conflicts list - generated 2011-01-22 09:40:42 ####
libxine1-codecs-1.1.19-2.pm.48.15.i586 requires libpostproc.so.51, but this requirement cannot be provided
uninstallable providers: libpostproc51-0.6.26387svn-1.pm.2.1.i586[ftp.uni-erlangen.de-suse]
[ ] break libxine1-codecs by ignoring some of its dependencies
[ ] Following actions will be done:
install libpostproc51-0.6.26387svn-1.pm.2.1.i586 despite the inferior architecture .....
[ ] do not install libxine1-codecs-1.1.19-2.pm.48.15.i586
#### YaST2 conflicts list END ###
What is it telling me? What should I do? What are the implications?
I have a desktop running on Fedora 14. I installed LAMP by using scripts for package installation. That works fine. Also, I have a virtual environment (Virtual Machine Manager), in which I installed Fedora 14 as well. I tried to install LAMP by the same scripts and the same packages as on my desktop, but strangely - it does not work.
I figured out that in both cases two instances of httpd.conf are installed, one residing in /etc/httpd/conf/, the other one in /usr/local/apache2/conf. The first one seems to belong to the server that is by default installed together with Fedora 14. The second one is the result from the package installation.
For a reason unknown to me, the second one (/etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf) is always activated on my desktop, while the first one (/usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf) is activated by default in my virtual computer. I have been able to change the DocumentRoot with succes.
I know how to install LAMP with yum, I have a second virtual computer with LAMP installed by yum, and the whole question is not an urgent one, but... I am just curious... what could have caused the difference? And what would I have to do whenever I would like to use the package installation or vice versa?
I'm having troubles running systemtap scripts. It fails to run with message:
Code:
Checking "/lib/modules/2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686/build/.config" failed: No such file or directory Ensure kernel development headers & makefiles are installed.
Then I typed:
Code:
$rpm -q kernel kernel-devel kernel-debuginfo
kernel-2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686
kernel-devel-2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686
kernel-devel-2.6.33.6-147.fc13.i686
package kernel-debuginfo is not installed
So no kernel-debuginfo, a package which I cannot find in repo. So where to get it and why it's not included in default installation if SystemTap is. It's like having Apache without tcp/ip stack.
after doing: $ sudo apt-get update i get lots of hits then: Hit [URL] pdates/multiverse Sources 99% [Waiting for headers]... and it just sits there. a reload in synaptic gives: downloading file 44 of 45 ... and it just sits there.
when i abort i get the following shown in error message: Failed to fetch http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/dists...tion-en_GB.bz2 Failed to fetch http://dl.google.com/linux/deb/dists/stable/Release Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
Yum update fails with extra repositories in - I get
Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit
fedora/metalink | 29 kB 00:00
fedora
[Code].....
With the last set of patches and updates my Fedora 12 box will get to starting ATD and the screen blnks a few times and the boot process stops.I tried typing "I" for interactive boot so I could skip "atd" and try to recover the box without any luck.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi cant update or install anything. i have started update manager and i got an error. then i tried to update through terminal and got this:
[code]...
way of fixing this?