CentOS 5 :: Upgrade Glibc 2.5 To Glibc 2.7?
Jul 13, 2010I am using CENTOS 5.3, I want to upgrade glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7.
how to do it.
I am not getting from where to start
I am using CENTOS 5.3, I want to upgrade glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7.
how to do it.
I am not getting from where to start
I am in very much need to resolve the issue of Upgrade redhat5 from glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7. The problem is when I run a binary compiled on our build setup (glibc 2.11) on Suse 11 (glibc 2.9) it works fine...
But the same binary do not work on redhat enterprise version 5 telling error as need glibc2.7 or sometimes segmentation fault for the same binary execution.
I tried upgrading the redhat glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7, but not successful.
I made an update of my Centos 5.5 yesterday. In doing so glibc has been updated to glibc.i686. Just now some of my FPGA tools crash. Unfortunately there isn't a downgrade for glibc.i686. How can I replace glibc.i686 by glibc.i386?A simple yum install glibc.i386 conflicts with the files from package glibc-2.5-65.i686
yum list glibc
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
[code]....
I've been working to get gcc up and running on a new install of Fedora 13. glibc-devel had dependencies upon installation where it required glibc and glibc-common, both 2.12.1-3. No problem, found both at rpm dot pbone dot net. However, when I try to install the following circular dependency results... it doesn't matter the order of install.
Code:
[root AT localhost gcc_install]# rpm -ivh glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64 .rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.12.1-3 is needed by glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64
[code]....
I notice that these two packages contain the same files and uninstalling glibc-i18n doesn't uninstall the internationalization files, because they are also in the glibc package. Is this a mistake or is this normal or is there a reason for it ? I just made my own glibc package to fix this, but was wondering why this is the way it is...
View 7 Replies View RelatedYesterday, I think I did something stupid: I removed kernel-headers, gcc, glibc-devel and glibc-headers. My box is a CentOS 5.4 webserver (it has loads of packages installed, but that was done through Virtualmin config, so it's quite coherent all in all). The thing is that now I need to reinstall at least the headers and glibc, but hey! this is what I get :
[Code]...
I do yum update it says nothing to update. Coming from the Suse world at 11.2, glibc is already at 2.9, how do I update, there is a lot of dependencies on glibc.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have installed Zimbra 6.0.1 and updated to Zimbra 7.1.0, the problem is that it needs the glibc-2.10 to start one of its services. I tried everything but i'dont get to update the glibc.
View 1 Replies View RelatedOS : Oracle Enter Prise Linux 6 (equivalent to RedHat)
I am in process to install oracle 10g on said OS.My process fails and after digging up , I came to know that some of the oracle libraries are compiled on 32-bit architecture and it require glibc-32 bit . also it require for gcc-32 bit.
Now i have downloaded all the required rpm for gcc-32bit . when I try to install glibc and its dependencies , it gives me error that newer version already exist.
How can I install , Gcc-32bit(libgc, libstd-i386 etc) in parallel or standalone?
I need to downgrade glibc due to a broken kernel after a libc6 upgrade attempt. See:[URL]..Especially with the reduced capabilities I have right now (few if any programs are working), how might I go about downgrading glibc to 2.6?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've been looking further into Linux from Scratch, and I am particularly interested in the package management side of the system. I understand that this is not covered in the book, but if I were to attempt LFS, package management would be a major convenience. From what I have read, when upgrading packages like glibc, you have to recompile everything to reflect the change.
If that is true, how do package managers like pacman and apt get around this issue? Isn't lacking glibc for even the time it takes to replace the files catastrophic to the system?
I somehow landed into this situation (don't really remember how), but no package installation/removal seems to be possible for me. Neither apt-get -f install or autoremove seems to work.
When I do: sudo apt-get -f install I see the following:
- uname -a: Linux konnichiwa 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 20:53:41 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux (Jaunty 9.04, Ubuntu)
- Configuring libc6 screen with <yes>, <no> appears.
- Click on <yes>.
- It fails with this error:
Code:
konnichiwa% ruby apt-get install -f
ruby: No such file or directory -- apt-get (LoadError)
konnichiwa% ruby apt-get -f install
ruby: No such file or directory -- apt-get (LoadError)
konnichiwa% sudo apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libc6
Suggested packages:
glibc-doc
The following packages will be upgraded:
libc6
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1025 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/4776kB of archives.
After this operation, 217kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 146055 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu9 (using .../libc6_2.9-23_amd64.deb) ...
Checking for services that may need to be restarted...
Checking init scripts...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.9-23_amd64.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/locale', which is also in package belocs-locales-bin
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.9-23_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
how to find what glibc version I have? Our software vendor needs this info so they can send us the right run time.
View 3 Replies View Related/usr/dlc/bin/_progress: relocation error; symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time referrence
And the solution offered is:
But the problem still exists.
If I use 2.4.20 I get an error about shared "something" in library and I cannot use command line like using command as ll, ls, mkdir but if I change that to 2.6.18 I get the error above but I can now use these commands: ll, ls, mkdir, etc.
I'm using Progress 9.1D and the application was compiled using CENTOS 4.4. Now I just copied the Progress 9.1D as is to new server HP Proliant ML110 G5 with CENTOS 5.2 installed.
Copying Progress 9.1D to other computers (IDE and not SATA drivers) with CENTOS 4.4 installed has no problem. Everything runs.
Could this be due to GLIBC version. Progress application was compiled using GLIBC version 2.3.4 but my GLIBC now is version 2.5.
If this is the case, can I just copy GLIBC version 2.3.4 and put it in my ProliantML110G5 server? If not how do I do it? Downloading and installing etc.
I'm new to the yum installation route and am looking forward to getting some experience using it, however, I am working to build a Nagios server through yum and have run into difficulties meeting the dependencies. (I'd previously installed from source on a different server though I'd been warned is a bad thing so I am trying to make nice and go this route but have run into snags right off...) The dependency hurdle I'm trying to overcome is getting to GLIBC2_4 from my version of 2.3.
I've read through a number of posts where people have had issues getting glib updated or gcc installed correctly. This is pretty much a new installation of CentOS (VM cloned off an earlier install that was taken just after going through the GUI setup). As far as I have gotten is 'yum update' which updated the kernel and openssl.
I have just updated gcc to 4.4.3 on my centos 5.4 server. This all went fine but now i need to update glibc and libstdc++, Any ideas on how i go about doing this.
View 4 Replies View Relatedi have a error in my vpsError: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-49.el5_5.2 is needed by package nscd-2.5-49.el5_5.2.i386 (updates)
View 1 Replies View RelatedIt seems I have some problem with glibc i686 on my VIA CPU. How can I force to install glibc i386.rpm instead of i686 in the clean installation process?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm running my own repository for my CentOS servers and ran into problem which seems to be on the 32bit boxes only. When trying to patch, I get the following dependency error.
[Code]....
I am running CentOS 5.6 on my servers (auto-updating to the latest patches). A couple of days ago, a number of updates were applied:
glibc-common-2.5-58.el5_6.4.x86_64
glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.4.x86_64
nscd-2.5-58.el5_6.4.x86_64
glibc-headers-2.5-58.el5_6.4.x86_64
[Code]...
This update broke a software tool from Xilinx (FPGA compiler). I rolled back all of the above, to 2.5-58.el5_6.3, and the tool works OK. I get:
/home/cad/xilinx/ISE13.1/ISE_DS/ISE/bin/lin64/unwrapped/map: symbol lookup error: /home/cad/xilinx/ISE13.1/ISE_DS/ISE/lib/lin64/libXst2_Core.so: undefined symbol: _ZN5boost7archive6detail17basic_oserializerD2Evmake[2]: *** [map] Error 127
I updated several packages on one of my servers on Dec 21st and have been seeing excessive swapfile usage since then. The problem process seems to be httpd which in our environment runs a subversion server as well as serving a number of php pages over https. At present I am having to bounce apache approximately every 5 days as it has used all 8GB swap in that time.
[Code]..
Of the updates listed as installed, the only one that looks likely to affect apache is glibc. Looking at the stats from sar -r I can see swap usage increasing by approx 3% (of 8GB) every hour.
I have a server running Reh Hat Linux 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18. Can i upgrade kernel to version 2.6 and glibc to version 2.5?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am trying to install iptux from source because i need to change the default port else it won't work.while configuring i get this error :
configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.16.0) were not met:
No package 'glib-2.0' found
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
[code]....
Im using a VPS server and im running Debian 64bit.im trying to install latest glibc.How could i do this?if i understand it correctly this is a part of libc.I have an old version of glibc from libc6 but i cant seem to get the latest glibc and i need 2.4 or above.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI want to install glibc-utils on debain . but I can't find it by apt-get .my friend can install it on redhat. how to install glibc-utils on debian.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI use FC 10 on my desktop. It is great!. But I have some troubles with installing new software via yum or rpm. Most of install/update/upgrade transactions fail. The yum prints string: Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.9-2 is needed by package glibc-2.9-2.x86_64 (installed) I tried to manually install or update the glibc-common via yum or rpm, but it fails. The # uname -a -i -p returns
Code:
Linux achfc10 2.6.27.5-117.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 18 11:58:53 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Could you have any ideas how to solve the issue?
When I try to install (using yum) various things like wine in 64-bit F12, I get
Code:
Missing dependency: glibc-common = 2.11-2 is needed by package glibc-2.11-2.i686 (fedora)
What is currently installed is glibc-common-2.11-4.x86_64
About every other release of wine in the Emulators build service lately seems to require an updated version of glibc that isn't available in any of my repositories, preventing me from upgrading currently I get:
Code:
nothing provides libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.11) needed by wine-1.1.42-31.3.i586 but earlier releases have had similar dependency issues, and this one doesn't seem like a safe one to ignore.
Has anyone else had this problem or is it just me? I've been grabbing GLIBC from the opensuse 11.2 Updates repo.
Installed a new program that calls for GLIBC 2.8 and it immediately errors and quits(`GLIBC_2.8' not found ). Running Hardy Heron, YES, I know it is getting long in the tooth, but LTS? I should be able to install GLIBC 2.8? This boy can not find any reference to do so.
I'd upgrade, but running a laptop Dell Inspiron 6000 with ati X300 mobility (NEVER AGAIN WITH ATI! Give me Nvidia or give me death!) that has been put into legacy and is no longer supported by ati. So I am stuck on Hardy until I get a new laptop (Sometime in the year 2525 at the rate I can save money) The question(s) is/are:
1. Can GLIBC 2.8 (/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.8') be installed on Hardy Heron easily?
2.Can it GLIBC 2.8 be installed with non-standard repos?
3. Can GLIBC 2.x be custom compiled *easily* to Hardy or am I looking at a whole can of worms. ("Dood, solution: apt-get dist-upgrade" >remember ATI?<) Finally if I am looking under the wrong rock... Where may I find a forum to guide me through this- if one exists?
im running centos 4.4final and i have glibc, and glibc_common installed on version 2_3. Im trying to install the 2_9 rpm, but it says that it conflicts with 2_3, how can i upgrade the 2_3 to 2_9? i tryed using yum update glinc / glibc_common, and yum install, didnt work.
View 9 Replies View Related