Ubuntu :: Error: Http://packages.medibuntu.org Lucid Release: The Following Signatures Couldn't Be Verified Because The Public Key Is Not Available
Jun 15, 2010
When I go to the Update Manager to update my system I get the following error message: W: GPG error: http://packages.medibuntu.org lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2EBC26B60C5A2783
I am not sure what this exactly means and what I need to do to fix this.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 30, 2011
My software sources some how got screwed up. Now when I try to install from software manager or Synaptic, I get error messages. Here is the error messages at the bottom of "sudo apt-get update" :
W: GPG error: http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5
W: GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5
How do I fix this ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2010
When I try to do
[code]...
I've tried the method described here: [URL]... However, I'm still getting the same error.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2010
I'veopenoffice.org 3.0. I tried to upgrade it to oog3.1 via terminal by the command sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install openoffice.org 3.1 my terminal shows; the lines above these are not shown W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net intrepid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 632D16BB0C713DA6 W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Couldn't find package 3.1 I got the same results when I tried the commands with firefox 3.5.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2011
When I try to install things I am getting lots of errors.
[code]...
What can I do to fix my problems? I also included a screen shot of the repositories in Software Sources. I been messing with BeachBit as Root and been toying with Ubuntu Tweak and so I think I messed something up on accident. Here is my list that I have too.
[code]...
Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2011
All the places online said to do this script - sudo add-apt-repository ppa:hel-sheep/pastie && sudo apt-get updatesudo apt-get install pastieAnother had a sudo upgrade in the middle, but essentially just that script above. Whenever I do that, my terminal hangs at -Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv 8B9B7F6B51298512D6B5A8993B9ADE3DE4CA452gpg: requesting key DE4CA452 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.comEventually I crtl c and it looks like its installing, but then stops and says -W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 93B9ADE3DE4CA452
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2011
Why everytime I send apt-get update I got this error on the last lines? Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: [URL] Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 8F91B0E6C862B42C Here is my /etc/apt/sources.list
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2010
I use Ubuntu 9.04. Synaptic Software Manager > Repositories > Reload. I have a following error.
GPG error: [URL]... karmic Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 7804AF9D95075E6E. What can I do?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2010
I keep getting this error whenever I try to update or reload. Does anyone know how to get rid of this or fix it?
GPG error: http://repository.cairo-dock.org karmic Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2Failed to fetch http://repository.cairo-dock.org/ubu...6/Packages.bz2 Sub-process /bin/bzip2 returned an error code (2)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2010
after i installed some linux mint packages, i get the following error. W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 55708F1EE06803C5
its not related to the mint packages because i installed the keyring for that and since the error i have unchecked the linux mint repo. i have tried reinstalling the ubuntu-keyring package with no luck.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2010
What does this lot mean:?
Code:
Hit [URL]
Hit [URL]
Hit [URL]
Fetched 557kB in 2s (198kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: [URL] Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY EA8E8B2116BA136C
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
(after typing apt-get update)
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2010
I'm trying to update Karmic to Lucid. I try to update Karmic to the most recent update before I upgrade I get this error.
W: GPG error: [URL] karmic Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 6, 2010
I was doing an update today and got the following error:
W: GPG error: [URL] lucid Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 2EBC26B60C5A2783 Medibuntu Packaging Team <admin@lists.medibuntu.org>
I have tried updating the keys, and got this:
apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 2EBC26B60C5A2783
Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 2EBC26B60C5A2783
gpg: requesting key 0C5A2783 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
gpg: key 0C5A2783: "Medibuntu Packaging Team <admin@lists.medibuntu.org>" 6 new signatures
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: new signatures: 6
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2010
When I run sudo apt-get update I get the following message at the bottom:
[Code]....
I have tried numerous ways to add the keys i.e: gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys EF4186FE247510BE && gpg --export --armor EF4186FE247510BE | sudo apt-key add - However, I then get the following message:
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2016
What's the point of checking if my file was tampered (as it says in the debians page [URL] ....) if the signatures are downloaded over http? Didn't the recent incident with Linux Mint had cleared our mind about these things?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2010
I have Ubuntu 8.04 Desktop Edition running on my PC. I've had it for some time and it worked great, however recently when I tried to run Update Manager I started to get the following error message:
Quote: W: GPG error: http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2010
I am getting the following error message: W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://extras.ubuntu.com maverick Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY DB141E2302FDF932
W: Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/Release
W: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. Plus i tried to install google earth which did not work and i am now left with a message that in dpkg that googleearth is listed but has no files, how do i fix this.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2010
My problem is that I am unable to do a routine upgrade of packages. When I try to perform an upgrade, the following occurs:
Code:
$ sudo aptitude dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
[code]....
If I try to install another package, I get the following message:
Code:
E: I wasn't able to locate file for the tzdata-java package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package.
E: I wasn't able to locate file for the tzdata-java package. This might mean you need to manually fix this package.
E: Internal error: couldn't generate list of packages to download
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2010
I'm using Ubuntu 10.10 (i guess 64 bits), not the Maverick version but the new 10.10. My laptop is Acer Aspire 5715Z.
Now I was on this website and tried to add the repository to get the Medibuntu packages with the following code:
Code:
sudo wget --output-document=/etc/apt/sources.list.d/medibuntu.list http://www.medibuntu.org/sources.list.d/$(lsb_release -cs).list && sudo apt-get --quiet update && sudo apt-get --yes --quiet --allow-unauthenticated install medibuntu-keyring && sudo apt-get --quiet update
[Code].....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2010
Unfortunately, I am stuck running jaunty -- because my company still requires this as our standard OS for our software. I have a computer with a fresh install of 9.04 but of course none of the medibuntu packages. Why did they take down jaunty from the medibuntu repository! Where I can get these packages now? (w32codecs, etc.)
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2010
Since upgrading to squeeze, when installing certain packages, I am getting a potential malicious software warning stating that some packages I am installing cannot be verified / authorised (sorry I cannot recall the exact terminology).
When I update my package information, I'm getting the following error so I don't know if the two could be linked?
W: GPG error: [URL] Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907
My sources list is as follows:
#
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot i386 CD Binary-1 20100216-15$
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 21, 2010
I get the below errors when trying to connect to the below repos.It has almost always worked in the past. Is the site "packages.medibuntu.org" down again !?
Err http://packages.medibuntu.org karmic Release.gpg
Could not connect to packages.medibuntu.org:80 (88.191.82.11), connection timed out
Err http://packages.medibuntu.org karmic/free Translation-en_CA
[code]....
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2009
just installed Fed 11... running updates, adding rpmfusion - update prompts me - so running update Fed tried to updat rpmfusion config files for FREE and NON-FREE then i get the following error:
Code:
Public key for rpmfusion-nonfree-release-11-1.noarch.rpm is not installed
which halts me from updating my system... here are other errors:
Code:
[root@fedarylic ~]# rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY*
error: /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux: import failed.
error: /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora: import failed.
error: /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-11-primary: import failed.
[code].....
View 13 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2010
When you add medibuntu to 10.04, isn't there supposed to be a "medibuntu" sub-category on the left side? I installed the medibuntu repo expecting that I'd find google earth in there. But when I added it, I didn't see it listed there - even after rebooting.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2010
I'm following the instructions in the Medibuntu wiki. When I run the command in the terminal to add it to the repository, it runs for a couple of minutes then gives this error: Code:W: GPG error: URL...The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY BE1B248616AE4E77.What does that mean, and how can I fix it?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2011
I have problem upgrading my ubuntu 10.04 lucid to a newer release of Ubuntu. I have done updates regularly but nothing prompt regarding upgrading Ubuntu. as mentioned in Ubuntu website, updating must result in a notification of upgrading. I want to know if there is any way to do this manually?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2011
We could not access our web site page on firefox or chrome or ie:
Firefox give us these error:
We also try on linux with wget to access it:
Here is the result:
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2010
I'm getting some errors while trying to do an update:How can I know which are the apps that are causing this, and how should I remove/update these?This is my /etc/apt/sources.list
Code:
deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner
deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu lucid partner
deb http://linux.dropbox.com/ubuntu lucid main
deb-src http://linux.dropbox.com/ubuntu lucid main
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2010
A while ago I posted this thread, with no responses:[URL].. I deploy into an environment that for "security" reasons cannot be kept up to date with wherever the ubuntu archive is up to (with awareness that this is avoiding security updates...). It is a sealed system not connected to the internet. I'm working with the 8.04.1 LTS, and my customer is in an 'if it ain't broke don't change it' frame of mind w.r.t. moving to 8.04.4. My main problem comes in two variations: 1. Some packages my runtime system depends on are not distributed on the 8.04.1 DVD, but were available in the full ubuntu archive at the time of the point release (and still are, in an up-to-date form). My concern is that if I take the 8.04.4-ish version of a package it will not work correctly with an otherwise 8.04.1 system. In general I am expecting that it *might*, and the versioned dependencies it has on other packages will be loose enough. 2. Some packages my build system (which produces what I put onto the runtime system) depend on are also not on the DVD. So almost a repeat of 1 above, except that I am generally running afoul of strictly-versioned dependencies (the -dev version of a lib package depends on the matching lib package having exactly the same version). If the non-dev lib package is on the DVD, but is not the same version as the -dev package I have from an archive mirror taken just before the 8.04.1 release, I believe I'm screwed?
So my two questions are: a. Is there such a thing as a copy of the full ubuntu archive taken at the exact time the 8.04.1 LTS was released? I think that would solve most of my problems.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2010
I just had a look on the Virtualbox site and thus far there is no listing for a Lucid specific release.Can I use the Karmic release or is this going to cause problems? I don't want to use the Ubuntu OSE version because I need USB support.
View 8 Replies
View Related