Ubuntu :: The Following Signatures Couldn't Be Verified Because The Public Key Is Not Available: NO_PUBKEY 93B9ADE3DE4CA452?
May 29, 2011
All the places online said to do this script - sudo add-apt-repository ppa:hel-sheep/pastie && sudo apt-get updatesudo apt-get install pastieAnother had a sudo upgrade in the middle, but essentially just that script above. Whenever I do that, my terminal hangs at -Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv 8B9B7F6B51298512D6B5A8993B9ADE3DE4CA452gpg: requesting key DE4CA452 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.comEventually I crtl c and it looks like its installing, but then stops and says -W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 93B9ADE3DE4CA452
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 30, 2011
My software sources some how got screwed up. Now when I try to install from software manager or Synaptic, I get error messages. Here is the error messages at the bottom of "sudo apt-get update" :
W: GPG error: http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5
W: GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5
How do I fix this ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2011
When I try to install things I am getting lots of errors.
[code]...
What can I do to fix my problems? I also included a screen shot of the repositories in Software Sources. I been messing with BeachBit as Root and been toying with Ubuntu Tweak and so I think I messed something up on accident. Here is my list that I have too.
[code]...
Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2010
When I go to the Update Manager to update my system I get the following error message: W: GPG error: http://packages.medibuntu.org lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2EBC26B60C5A2783
I am not sure what this exactly means and what I need to do to fix this.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2010
I'veopenoffice.org 3.0. I tried to upgrade it to oog3.1 via terminal by the command sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install openoffice.org 3.1 my terminal shows; the lines above these are not shown W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net intrepid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 632D16BB0C713DA6 W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Couldn't find package 3.1 I got the same results when I tried the commands with firefox 3.5.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2010
When I try to do
[code]...
I've tried the method described here: [URL]... However, I'm still getting the same error.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2011
Why everytime I send apt-get update I got this error on the last lines? Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: [URL] Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 8F91B0E6C862B42C Here is my /etc/apt/sources.list
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2010
I use Ubuntu 9.04. Synaptic Software Manager > Repositories > Reload. I have a following error.
GPG error: [URL]... karmic Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 7804AF9D95075E6E. What can I do?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2010
I'm trying to update Karmic to Lucid. I try to update Karmic to the most recent update before I upgrade I get this error.
W: GPG error: [URL] karmic Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2010
What does this lot mean:?
Code:
Hit [URL]
Hit [URL]
Hit [URL]
Fetched 557kB in 2s (198kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: [URL] Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY EA8E8B2116BA136C
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
(after typing apt-get update)
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2010
During checking for updates by update manager i get following error: W: GPG error: [URL] karmic Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 5A9BF3BB4E5E17B5
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2010
When i tried to upgrade my system, I got this: W: GPG error: [URL] maverick Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 61E091672E206FF0
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2010
I am using Xubuntu 10.4 on a AAO 11.6 (160 GB) and it's been a month that I cannot update my system if I type in sudo apt-get update the system will download the packages but then display the message GPG error: [URL] karmic Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 74A941BA219EC810
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2010
I update my computer with ubuntu 10.04 I get this message(pic is attached). This is one error message I get:
[Code]....
I have used UbuntuTweak and Ailurus to add some repositories so I'm not sure if one of those are affecting this. What steps should I follow to fix this?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2011
I'm trying to write a p2p file sharing program using python's built-in libraries. Everything is going well. The only thing is that i'd like to be able to use openssl public and private keys so only a host with the public key could access/decrypt the filesharing. I've gotten these libraries (httplib, basehttpserver, ssl, os) to work using just a pem file containing both the public and private keys but no success with them seperately. Can someone point me in the right direction or offer an alternative? PS, the goal of the project is to create an anonymous, decentralized, secure file sharing program. I want to be able to upload this to sourceforge so everyone can use it, if that's any incentive
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 24, 2010
I run the following file with the >log.log redirector and it does not capture errors.
#!/bin/bash
echo ************************BEGIN LOG******************************
date +"%m/%d/%Y %H:%M:%S $HOSTNAME"
cp -f /scripts/original/clamscans.log /scripts
[code]....
The following errors show up when I run from the file from the term window, but are not written to log.log:
tar: /public/public/clamscans/*.txt: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
mv: cannot stat `/public/public/clamscans/*.txt': No such file or directory
I know with windows you can add the 2>&1 to capture error data. Is there such a thing for Linux?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2010
How can I forward all traffic from a public IP to another public IP. Let's say I have a first debian box named box1 with eth0 = 1.1.1.1 and eth0:1 = 1.1.1.2 and I want to forward all traffic from 1.1.1.2 to "box2" located somewhere else over the internet and having for eth0 2.2.2.2 Both 1.1.1.0/24 and 3.3.3.0/24 are public IP ranges.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2010
create a VM here with virsh. I've managed to create the XML file and got it to work properly, however running it is the problem. These are the errors I get error: Failed to start domain Cent-OS, internal error process exited while connecting to monitor: open /dev/kvm: No such file or directory ,Could not initialize KVM, will disable KVM support qemu: could not open disk image /media/55D123D9E79ABF54/VM/Cent-OS-5.5.img: Permission denied
I've tried setting SElinux to permissive mode.
Fedora 14 X64
hypervisor qemu
XML:
[code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 31, 2009
I have a GnuPG key that's been signed by several people. I want to add another name (and e-mail) to it.I used seahorse to do it, but it doesn't look like the old signatures migrated to the new name.Is this standard behavior? Is there a way that I can migrate the signatures, or do I have to request that the signers themselves do it?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2011
I have a GnuPG key that's been signed by several people. I want to add another name (and e-mail) to it. I used seahorse to do it, but it doesn't look like the old signatures migrated to the new name. Is this standard behavior? Is there a way that I can migrate the signatures, or do I have to request that the signers themselves do it?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2011
ls -al ../public-back
drwxrwxr-x 4 apache apache 4096 Apr 19 03:32 templates
ls -al ../public-back/templates
drwxrwxr-x 2 apache apache 4096 Apr 19 03:33 content
[code]....
How do I move the contents of /public-back/templates recursively with permissions into /public/templates ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2010
I recently enabled autologin on my linux distro, now during login network manager needs to have a password entered before it will load. How do I set it so that I don't have to enter the password every time?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2010
Is there a way to make Clam update the signatures automatically? I cannot see an option in Clam TK.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 6, 2010
I was doing an update today and got the following error:
W: GPG error: [URL] lucid Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 2EBC26B60C5A2783 Medibuntu Packaging Team <admin@lists.medibuntu.org>
I have tried updating the keys, and got this:
apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 2EBC26B60C5A2783
Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 2EBC26B60C5A2783
gpg: requesting key 0C5A2783 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
gpg: key 0C5A2783: "Medibuntu Packaging Team <admin@lists.medibuntu.org>" 6 new signatures
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: new signatures: 6
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2011
else had a problem with wheezy on cd1 install? I get to the install screen and can not go any farther as it will not pick up the keyboard or mouse. I have tried it on several PCs and also verified the disc. Just curious why there was not a 3/21 build? I have squeeze on my main drive and was wanting to install testing on my second drive with LXDE. It fun having stable running great on one drive and then playing around with testing on another. If you mess up so what format start over.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2010
Since upgrading to squeeze, when installing certain packages, I am getting a potential malicious software warning stating that some packages I am installing cannot be verified / authorised (sorry I cannot recall the exact terminology).
When I update my package information, I'm getting the following error so I don't know if the two could be linked?
W: GPG error: [URL] Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907
My sources list is as follows:
#
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux testing _Squeeze_ - Official Snapshot i386 CD Binary-1 20100216-15$
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2009
I have successfully hosted eGroupware on my server and I am happy to having EGW its really very handy to use for my organisation.
But I have a problem when ever I want login into EGW, on top of the login window I am still getting 'Your session could not be verified' the error. I am really not understand why this is coming even my EGW is working perfectly as per my understanding. But I am sure may be I have done a mistake either time of installation or configuration.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 2010
Is there a way to check RPM signatures during a kickstart install? Seems as if the signatures are not checked during an installation.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2010
I made a live USB memory stick / pendrive with Ubuntu netbook remix 10.04 using my desktop computer. I want to install / update my netbook that has no network function yet. I booted the desktop with the pendrive & ran update manager. I want to update the kernel so I will have the driver that will operate my netbook ethernet.Acer AOD260 has Ethernet Controller: AR8151 v1.1 Fast Ethernet, Atheros Communications & Network Controller: Broadcom 4727 (rev 01)and will not work from the current release of 10.04 (too new) but there are supposed to be drivers in the newer kernels.
Running Update Manager I get a box labeled "Debconf on ubuntu" & says "Configuring grub-pc". There is an entry box that says "linux command line:" & is empty. When I press the help button I get the message "The following Linux command line was extracted from /etc/default/grub of the 'kopt' parameter in GRUB Legacy's menu.lst. Please verify that is correct, and modify it if necessary.The installer is hanging, Preconfiguring packages ..., probably waiting for a response, but I have no idea what to do.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2011
I've successfully set-up Drupal on my machine on a local network and have no problem accessing it with the virtual host names defined in /etc/hosts, but I don't have bind or any other DNS set-up.I've installed Postfix and can sent email with the mail command to unix account, and I can also read them with the mail command( from the command line).Now, my problem is with not being able to use the local Unix email accounts in drupal. Particularly, I would like to have one of the unix account receive email for the development site.I might like to also have various user on the drupal installation, and then test sending notifications to them.here is my /etc/postfix/main.cf# See /usr/share/postfix/main.cf.dist for a commented, more complete version
View 2 Replies
View Related
