Ubuntu :: 10.04 LTS - No Option For LVM And RAID In Partition Scheme
Oct 21, 2010
I have installed Ubuntu 10.04 LTS on machine but wanted to choose RAID and LVM during partition scheme. Unfortunately I couldn't find such option during partitioning. Is it true that for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS it is unable to use RAID and LVM ?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 12, 2011
I am not really sure if the title makes any sense or if it even possible. Basically I am currently triple booting with Mac osx on the first partition windows 7 on the second and ubuntu linux on the 3rd with a swap partition. So basically on my 2TB harddrive
Mac (200gb)
Windows (200gb)
Linux (200gb)
Swap (8gb)
NTFS(1592gb)
The last partition is formatted as ntfs using Gparted, windows cannot detect it. The windows disk partitioner shows the swap and ntfs partitions as unformatted. I can unformat the space and use the windows partition to add format it as ntfs but it would format the linux swap partition as well. I am worried that it could potentially screw up everything on my harddrive. My question is. What do I need to do to get the ntfs parition recognized by windows (should I use the windows partitioner)?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2010
Just wondering if Ubuntu will install alongside OSX on a GUID partiton scheme.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2011
I setup a dual boot system, with approximately 200gig planned for ubuntu 10.10. Based on the article here:[URL]..And this quote:
Quote:
# sda1 Recovery Partition, unchanged
# sda2 Windows partition, shrunk preferably from inside Windows, hopefully about 30Gb
# sda3 Primary Partition, 10Gb, file-system = ext3, in the Partitioning Section of the installer change the "Mount Point" = /
[Code]...
I assumed at that point that the "sda3" "/" would be for booting purposes. I would have to guess that I was wrong, because it is filling up very quickly. As you may be able to tell by the screen shot, "sda5", "/home" was what was assumed to be the file structure to store all of the programs and such.
I have only been running this setup for a week, and would expect to not be seeing my "boot" partition growing so quickly. Do I need to resize it? here do the standard programs that I get from the ubuntu software center install at (partition wise)? I suppose I dont mind wiping that section dry and starting over, but I would give a resize a try if possible.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2010
I am a total noob for Linux / Ubuntu. I have been using windows all my life and I decided to get rid of Bill finally. I want to install Ubuntu by Manually partitioning my HD. I have a 500GB HDD. optimal partition scheme. I repeat i am a total Noob. please let me know details for each partition like
1. Primary or Logical
2. type
3. mount point
4. size
I am having no other OS in the pc. just planning to have ubuntu. no dual boot needed.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2011
I'm installing Centos 5.5 on a HP ProLiant DL180 Server with ~8 TB of hard disk (4 disks that have been pre-RAIDED), from an installation DVD.
Normally when I get to the partitions screen, I would select "remove all partitions etc".
But this gives me an error message "Your boot partition is on a disk using the GPT partition scheme but this machine cannot boot using GPT. This can happen if there is not enough space on your drives for the installation."
Pressed OK, tried the other three partition options but they led to the same outcome.
Tried Advanced storage configuration: Showed that there was one hard drive (c0d0) with ~ 8 TB of space.
I figured I should create a root sector, set one up with 100 MB of space, ext3, set the mount point as /.
Created a software raid of the remaining space.
Trying to go "next" gave me a similar error about GPT partition scheme. Trying various other configurations all gave similar errors about the GPT scheme.
What do I need to do? Some earlier hard format of the disk or something?
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2011
i was experiencing slow start ups since i installed ubuntu 11.04. it took about 20-30sec for the apple logo to come up (or rEFIt). today apple released EFI firmware updates which doesn't seem to install. reason is that the partition scheme is not compatible. EFI Firmware updates only install from GUID partition schemes.
DiskUtility tells me i have MBR. So it seems like Ubuntu changed the Partition Scheme.
Can any body confirm that? how can i make sure ubuntu installs into existing GUID? i will re-partition later today and give you an update if the EFI firmware update installs and boot time is faster.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2010
A snapshot of my existing partion configuration can be viewed at: [URL] I intend for the space including /dev/sda1,dev/sda2 and /dev/sda3 to be used by slack 13.0. The OS at /dev/sda6 and /dev/sda7 will be "retired" once I get slack up, running and configuration for my work. In the past I have preformatted partitions, that is, from the existing OS, I have formatted partitions for use by the next OS, using gparted. In the case of ubuntu, that has worked well. And frankly, I'm pretty rusty with fdisk....
1)Is there any advantage - or disadvantage - in my doing this for my pending slackware installation? Will slack recognize the "clean" partition and opt to skip formatting?
2)I presume that slack will recognize the existing swap partition. Am I correct?
3)My scheme would be to provide separate partions for /, /home/ and /usr or /usr/local.
4)Any recommendations on filesystems?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2010
I thought this might interest someone out there:[URL].. I used SD cards with MBR formatted as ext2 for backup. After I read these articles, I reformatted my cards with GUID Partition Table and ext4 format. Now I make my backup in half the time!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2011
I meet a problem about "Your boot partition is on a disk using the GPT partitioning Scheme but this machines cannot boot using GPT." in installation. Does GRUB-0.97 on CentOS 5.4 support GPT?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2011
Could any RAID gurus kindly assist me on the following RAID-5 issue?I have an mdadm-created RAID5 array consisting of 4 discs. One of the discs was dropping out, so I decided to replace it. Somehow, this went terribly wrong and I succeeded in marking two of the drives as faulty, and the re-adding them as spare.
Now the array is (logically) no longer able to start:
mdadm: Not enough devices to start the array.Degraded and can't create RAID ,auto stop RAID [md1]
I was able to examine the disks though:
Code:
root@127.0.0.1:/etc# mdadm --examine /dev/sdb2
/dev/sdb2:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.90.00
code....
Code:
mdadm --create --assume-clean --level=5 --raid-devices=4 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2 /dev/sdd2
As I don't want to ruin the maybe small chance I have left to rescue my data, I would like to hear the input of this wise community.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2010
I have two hard drives inside an Ubuntu 9.10 machine, each with a data partition on. What I want to do is as I save files to one data partition partition (or delete them) I want the files copying/deleted automatically on the the other data partition. I do not want to start using RAID or end-of-day incremental backups.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2010
How do I recreate an LVM raid 1 partition, without destroying data on the discs? I have a 650GB data partition which is a raid 1 array with ext3. Two days ago, the system (Ubuntu 9.04) started to refuse to write to it, claiming no space left on device - even if there is ca. 102GB free left, if the disk is 85% full (according to df)! Interestingly, removing a couple of GB did not help, after reboot the disk was again full..
I did the "tune2fs -m 0" trick and then forced file check on next reboot by "sudo touch /forcefsck" .. and the result is that the raid partition is gone. I have the two physical drives /dev/sd*, unmounted, but the /dev/md1 is no longer there. What can I do to re-create it, without losing the data? I realized that I ran tune2fs on the physical partitions /dev/sd* - was I supposed to run it on /dev/md1?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2010
To be honest, I am trying to install Linux Mint, but since this is based on Ubuntu, and I am comfortable with Ubuntu on my VM I decided to label it Ubuntu.
I have a 235 HDD and it is partitioned like this:
C: 150 GB (Windows) NTFS
D: 70 GB (Data) NTFS
G: 15 GB (for my not yet installed Linux) NTFS
I also followed this tutorial and now I have some sort of LiveCD inside my USB: [URL]. So, now I have a pen drive with an Ubuntu LiveCD and a 15GB ready for my Ubuntu!
This is what I do:
1 - connect pen to computer
2 - turn on computer
3 - pen start running and I load Linux like a LiveCD (yey!)
4 - Linux loads and I wait
5 - I click "Install linux"
6 - I configure the language, time zone and keyboard with no problems
7 - Disk partitioning ... it offers me 2 choices:
7.1 - Erase entire disk and install Ubuntu
7.2 - Manually partitioning: but drive C:, D: and G: do not appear!!!
I want to install my Linux on driver G:, but I don't find a "Install Linux in this specific partition" option!
View 9 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2010
Is it possible to use the 'discard' option when mounting an ntfs-partition? Because I'm buying an ssd and I intend to dual-boot windows xp (which doesn't support TRIM) and Ubuntu 10.10 (which does).
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2010
The ext4 file system creation in partition #1 of Serial ATA RAID isw_fjidifbhi_Volume0 (mirror) failed. Not sure what's wrong? How do I solve this? This happens after I enter my login details and click next. Then it fails on the install screen with this error.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2010
Been attempting to install ubuntu on my Intel fake raid on a new PC.The installer sees the raid, but errors out:Quote:The ext4 file system creation in partition #1 of Serial ATA RAID isw_ehbgbddej_Volume0 (mirror) failed.This seem to be the EXACT issue described in this bug report:I read all the way down this bug report, and at the bottom it says:Quote:Launchpad Janitor on 2010-06-25Changed in parted (Ubuntu Lucid):status: Fix Committed → Fix ReleasedA few weeks ago, a fix was "committed" and "released". I had been working with an earlier 10.04 ISO, so I downloaded 10.04 from the web site today. Still the same problem.Maybe I'm just reading the bug report wrong? If it says the fix is committed and released, I would naively assume that it is fixed. Do I need to patch to apply the fix or something? Doesn't seem likely.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2011
I am unable to hibernate my computer while using Ubuntu and I figured out the reason--Ubuntu is not using my swap partition. I would follow the existing tutorials on setting up a swap partition after installing Ubuntu, but since the volume uses hardware RAID 0, the swap partition is not assigned a /dev/ entry (like /dev/sdxx) and I am not sure how I can mount it.
Here is what I have:
Code:
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2011
I am trying to grow my array to make full use of my drives. I have a raid 6 using mdadm on my home server. The array used to consist of 6 1.5TB drives when it was created. Since then I've been replacing the 1.5TB drives with new 2TB drives. And now I have replaced the last 2 drives.
When I added the first 3 disks I did not use the whole disk for the raid partition but rather made it the same size as the 1.5 partitions. As it turns out this may have been a bad idea. (But it gave me another 3 partitions of 500GB that I turned into 1 disk using mhddfs.)
Now I'm trying to grow the array. I've been testing in a virtual enviroment on how to do it but I cannot find another method than this :
1) fail 1 disk.
2) re-partition the disk with the size of the whole disk.
3) re-add the drive as a spare.
4) start the now degraded array to let it resync.
5) wait quite a while. (aprox 5 hours)
6) start again from step 1 for the other disks.
7) use mdadm with grow command to enlarge the array
use resize2fs to fill array to max size
Now although since this is a raid 6, I keep some redundancy but I still worry about degrading the array so manny times and rebuilding the whole thing. I mean I read the thing out 3 or 4 times over doing this.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 1, 2011
Quote:
EFI GUID Partition support works on both 32bit and 64bit platforms. You must include GPT support in kernel in order to use GPT. If you don't include GPT support in Linux kernel, after rebooting the server, the file system will no longer be mountable or the GPT table will get corrupted. By default Redhat Enterprise Linux / CentOS comes with GPT kernel support. However, *******if you are using Debian or Ubuntu Linux,******** you need to recompile the kernel. Set CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION to y to compile this feature.
Is this true? Ubuntu has no GPT support native to the server install? Never compiled a kernel. Is that of itself going to be a mind bender? How much doo doo am I going to get into if I haven't done it a few times? Trust me when I tell you its no thrill formatting and reformatting a 8tb raid drive or the individual disks if it screws up. Been on that ride way too long already. Need things to go smoothly. This is not a play toy server, but will be used in a business.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2010
I have finally decided to restore grub on my netbook after installing windows 7, and I can boot into UNR just fine but the Jolicloud option is now gone. How do I add it back to the GRUB menu.lst?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2011
I am finally, and happily ditching Windows IIS, SQL Server, and ASP in favor of LAMP. Not only will I save a bunch of money on operating systems but I've found php and MySQL development to be much faster than their Microsoft counterparts.Currently I have two W2008 and two Ubuntu servers running and doing virtually parallel tasks. I want to can the W2008 machines but I am not 100% sure of my Ubuntu mirrors.Everything seems to be working fine. I've copied tons of data back and forth as a primitive test but sometimes things work fine for all the wrong reasons. Here's where I get confused.
Question 1:Do I need to partition the RAID device (MD0) and then format it?From my experience this is necessary to get the device to mount.
Question 2:In this case was it also necessary to format the individual drive partitions?
Question 3:If I do a daily cat /proc/mdstat is this all I need to do to check the drive status.
Question 4:Is there any other check I can do to assure that the mirrors are created, mounted, and operating correctly?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 1, 2011
I have two disks in a RAID.
Code:
SATA device C465.76 GBATA WDC WD5000AVDS-6
SATA device D465.76 GBATA WDC WD5000AAKS-0
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2011
I have been working in my spare time over the last few days, Had problems with the whole grub2 not installing on RAID 1. Then I found out that I had to have a separate non raid Ext4 partition on one drive with "/Boot" as mount point and install went though fine.
My question is, will the developers FIX this. I mean if I only have 2 x 2tb drives in teh pc as RAID 1, and the one fails with the boot partition the whole machine goes down. Kinda defeats the whole RAID feature huh.
I USED to run a windows network with RAID 5 servers, and windows never had a problem installing everything on the RAID. Or even setting up RAID 1 in the bios on the PC and installing XP or NT4 on the RAID 1. There was never a need for a separate non raid boot partition.
Do we need a separate RAID friendly/enabled Grub? I guess for now I will get a 250gb drive and install the Server OS to it, and setup RAID1 manually after the server OS boots. Then will make a ghost type image of the server in case that drive fails so I can quickly install a new drive and restore the image and get it back up and running again.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 26, 2009
I am trying to partition my server before installing CentOS and cPanel.I have hardware RAID 1/10 On RAID 1 I would have
/
/boot
On RAID 10 I would have
/tmp
/usr
/var
/var/log
2 GB swap
/home
Is it correct partionining setup?What should I have on RAID 10 ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2010
I have just installed a new version of fedora 12 64bit and have setup the following drive configuration -
Code:
But for some reason I am getting dm-1 and dm-3.
How can I change the array so it contains the normal /dev/sda and /dev/sdb disks and partitions?
Why is the system telling me my drives are dm devices? I have no bios raid features on the motherboard.
How do I use md-1 and md-3 partitions?
How do I go back to the traditional /dev/sda and /dev/sdb devices?
By the way the system tells me that /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1 do not exist.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2010
I have just installed a new version of fedora 12 64bit and have setup the following drive configuration -
Code: [root@fedora ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md2 : active raid1 sdc1[0] sdd1[1]
312568576 blocks [2/2] [UU]
[Code]....
but for some reason I am getting dm-1 and dm-3.
How can I change the array so it contains the normal /dev/sda and /dev/sdb disks and partitions?
Why is the system telling me my drives are dm devices? I have no bios raid features on the motherboard.
How do I use md-1 and md-3 partitions?
How do I go back to the traditional /dev/sda and /dev/sdb devices?
By the way the system tells me that /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1 do not exist.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2011
I'd like to set up RAID for my data partition.
My data are in /dev/sda5 (ext3).
There's an empty partition /dev/sdb5 (ext3).
I want /dev/sdb5 to be a mirror image of /dev/sda5, the command to invoke should be :
mdadm --create /dev/md0 --level=mirror --raid-devices=2 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdb5
My question is : how to ensure that the synchronization is done by copying data to the empty space and not the converse ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2010
I have 8.04 running mdadm raid 1. I selected the wrong drive in gparted and managed to hose my partition tables.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2010
After a disastrous upgrade to 10.04 I am at my wits end trying to recover my /home partition from my unbootable system. The /home partition is part of a RAID5 array across 4 disks and I've been trying to use some disk imaging tools from Ultimate Boot CD to recover it with, but none of the utilities seem to recognize or will let me work with my multi-disk device.
Currently I've been booting up with a Live CD in attempts to mount the encrypted partition then copy all the files to an external device I bought, but the mounting process has presented me with some problems. The partition in encrypted with ecryptfs and I have both the disk's passphrase as well as an FNEK signature to work with. Attempting the following:
Code:
Another small issue is the cipher I used. I don't remember which kind of encryption the disk is encrypted with (80% sure it's aes though). I assume figuring out which cipher I used will be more like a guessing game through the ecryptfs mount prompt, but I'm wondering if this would affect the error message I get.
View 9 Replies
View Related