I installed successfully fedora 15. The problem is that after a couple of session, the system doesn't load gnome3 desktop. I boot, insert my credential at login and the system load the splash screen (the blue screen with birds) but doesn't load the desktop
View 4 RepliesWhen I boot up or shut down F13 I see the blue splash screen with the fedora logo. How do I shut this off?It seems to be hiding thosepretty boot-up and shut-down messages that reassure me my computer hasn't frozen up.
View 7 Replies View RelatedWhy, after a successful (I thought) dual boot installation w/ a side-by-side lynx and meerkat install and XP does my system refuse to boot? It just gets to the Dell screen, giving boot options (none of which are making any difference) and keeps looping it. Last night, after re-installing the grub (lost after the XP install) everything was working fine. I powered down and this morning tried to restart and...this. I really don't want to have to reinstall everything and reconfigure and reinstall apps--what can I do? And more importantly, WTF did this happen to begin with?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi block my screen (glmatriz screensaver), and go sleep or lunch, and when i get back, i have to logon again, and all my applications have been killed. the weirdest thing is that this does not happen everytime, but i cannot find a pattern to the times that happens.i pretty sure that the machine is not rebooting, cause my uptime still intact.some data: ubuntu lucid (upgraded from jaunty) x86, system all up to date. hardware is a desktop dell vostro 220n (intel chipset, 2gb memory and a pentium e5400.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm using Debian 7.8 Wheezy amd64, Gnome classic session. Laptop ASUS F551MAV, Intel HD Graphics (Integrated GPU), xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.19.0-6, firmware-linux-free 3.2
Sometimes, after inactivity, the screen turns black, not allowing me to see login screen. If I press CTRL+ALT+F1 (or F2,F3,Fn) nothing happens. The computer is still responsive, as I can reboot it through key shortcuts.
I have search in almost all logs in /var/log, without any information about the cause of the error. The time I was away from computer was between +- 18:10-18:22
Here is the log of daemon.log at the time of rebooting: [URL] ....
I can see one line that seems to be an error with (but it is displayed as warning):
Code: Select allFeb 18 18:21:47 debian gnome-session[3714]: Gdk-WARNING: gnome-session: Fatal IO error 11 (Recurso no disponible temporalmente) on X server :0.#012
Recurso no disponible temporalmente is in english something like: Resource not available temporaly.
Log of syslog at the moment of screen blocked
Code: Select allFeb 18 18:17:01 debian /USR/SBIN/CRON[4235]: (root) CMD ( cd / && run-parts --report /etc/cron.hourly)
Feb 18 18:21:36 debian acpid: client 3226[0:0] has disconnected
Feb 18 18:21:44 debian shutdown[4411]: shutting down for system reboot
[Code] ....
It is not the first time that this is happens. It already happened a few times, that when I'm away, the screen is simply blocked.
im running ubuntu lucid here, and on both firefox and chrome.....after i watch somthing in a full screen...i have to restart the browser to be able to type somthing with keyboard!
its wierd, i dont know if its veetle problem or ubuntu problem!anyone is facing this issue?
i'm trying to intall an old etch debian release using the netinstall netinstall debian-40r9-i386-netinst.iso. But i've got an issue while configuring the miror. Here where i'm blocked (it seems my archive miror is not right but why ?): in the previous screen, i entered the right path (i think): and as you can see in my screen cap of the broswer, the website of the archive is right, so where am i go wrong ?:
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow can I solve the problem?
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe firewall in Fedora 12 seems to block UPnP by default, but opening port 1900 for UDP, as I have seen suggestedes not resolve the problem.have the following three scenarios:Firewall Enabled: Transmission cannot open a port by UPnPFirewall Enabled (1900 UDP allowed): Transmission cannot open a port by UPnPFirewall Disabled: Transmission opens a port via UPnP fineAny ideas? Yes, the port that I'm trying to open is also allowed. Router is a Linksys BEFSR41 v4.3, should you care
View 6 Replies View RelatedFedora 13 64. NetworkManager tries to unlink /etc/hosts and is blocked:
Code:
SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/NetworkManager from unlink access on the file /etc/hosts.
Additional Information:
[code]....
I am using pidgin messenger. Its not connecting properly as our Internet is blocked by a firewall. Can we do something so that it works properly
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've got a Fedora postfix server that I just upgraded from 9 to 10 using preupgrade. Starting yesterday, some messages were rejected by servers because the IP address had a poor "reputation". The odd thing is, the IP address they're registering isn't the IP address the server is sending from.
When I look at the full headers of our outgoing e-mail, the e-mail is listed as coming from ***.***.***.11, which is the correct address. But these services are somehow tying the e-mails back to ***.***.***.12, which is used for a different purpose entirely. Since this *.12 address doesn't match the MX record, I'm assuming that's why the mails are being blocked, but I'm not sure how the mails are being identified as coming from that address in the first place. It's odd that this just started when I upgraded.
My ubuntu got blocked.! From W7.! How can i get it back.! iam 100% sure that i did not erase or replace the ubuntu partition.!
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to install fedora 12 on my computer. I have burned the live cd ISO and it works just fine until right before it shows the login screen. I suspect that it may have to do with my ati radeon 9800 graphics card. give me some boot options or some such thing so that I could install fedora on my computer. Also some other specs
ASUS A7N8X Mother Board
AMD Athalon XP
1GB ram
Is there anyway i can ssh/rdp/telnet into my server from the outside bypassing comcast ALL blocked ports
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm having a trouble with sendmail on Centos. When I check the maillog, every emails is sent, but when i check my mail browser, it didn't receive the mail. This problem happens with an email address only. (the red email was not received ) This is the maillog
[Code]....
So I set up an Ubuntu 10.04 server with apache2 installed, but for some reason I can't get to it from my browser. the iptables have all changed directories in 10.04 so I can't find the iptables. Apparmor wasn't the problem. The network hard ware is not the problem.There is something inside of 10.04 that is blocking port 80. I can ping it all day using the ip address but when I ping it useing http://ipaddress it can't find the host
View 4 Replies View RelatedI can't seem to remotely SSH or VNC into my machine. If I'm on the LAN and try accessing via LAN IP, it works fine. If i go in through a remote address (my dyndns) or even my home IP, I can't connect (yes, all of the ports are forwarded, I've triple checked this multiple times). Interestingly enough, port 80 works just fine. It would seem as though some sort of firewall is blocking me. I've done this plenty of times before with various machines, and this has me quite perplexed.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI dont know how, but somehow all the ports on my comp appear to be blocked except for 24, for ssh and 5900 unknown. I can connect to the network, but as far as I can tell, I'm powerless to do anything. No webpages load, I'm typing this on my phone.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI tried to install the packages for atmel at76 in order to get my usb wifi dongle work, the Kpackagemanager told me that "some modifcation are necessary to acomplish the task" on followings packages:
linux-generic
linux image-generic
linux firmware.
When selecting okay the following error message appear :
"The following packages block the update: linux-generic linux-image-generic linux-firmware"
I am trying to use Bittornado with iptables via Firestarter. Previously, I had no problems, but now I have started using Firestarter, traffic is blocked. AIUI, after selecting the .torrent file, the client (me) connects to the tracker. In Firestarter, I see that my IP is trying to connect to various ports, all of which are blocked.I assumed the problem was that because Firestarter has a restrictive outbound traffic policy, that I needed to add Bittornado to it. So in Bittornado, I selected the acceptable ports as 10000-10010 (randomized), and then in Firestarter for the outbound policy I allowed those same ports.The inbound traffic policy has no rules. All traffic is permitted and I have a direct connection to the Internet (no NAT). I do not understand why, if I have selected the permissible outbound ports in Firestarter, and also selected those same ports in Bittornado, why connections between my IP and the tracker are blocked?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to connect to the www.freeopenvpn.com vpn service from my ubuntu 10.04 netbook edition. Installed the parts based on the instruction of the website, then the connection successful (lock icon on the connection area) but.....
the traffic does not go through, ping rejects with some "buffer error", network monitor does not show any data flow on the lan card. after the connection. Was trying it from commandline, and from gui as well. Same result. Can't even navigate to the service start page.
I do not have firewall, using the linksys built in firewall in my router. The same (dual boot) machine and router let the same vpn work under win XP, so the hardware is fine.
I suspect that it is a routing problem. (using dhcp from the modem-router)
Found that the vpn module installed the virtual tun0 interface and set up the routing table automatically.
Code:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
173.192.86.142 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
[Code]....
So I have two ssh servers I connect to regularly that do not use the standard port 22, so I use the "-p" flag to connect to them. This works flawlessly EVERYWHERE except on my girlfriend's work network. When I am on that network (same laptop), I can ssh into servers which use port 22, but not the other servers on this alternate port.Is there any way OTHER than ssh'ing into a machine I can access and then ssh'ing again from there to my destination (which, by the way, does work)? I want to make a direct connection for speed and security reasons.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am still trying to run my Write It Now4 under Wine. The first time I couldn't figure out how to do it and then I changed the permissions to give myself Execute permission.This allowed me to install it under wine.When I went to open it, I was given the message again that it was blocked by Ubuntu. How do I unblock it. I have the rights to use this program but the people upstairs seem to know better. this is why I am trying to leave Windows. I don't like my computer telling me that I cannot do something I know I am allowed to do because someone somewhere decided it was not good for me.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've setup the Uncomplicated Firewall (UFW) on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and blocked an IP address. UFW status shows that the firewall is active and the IP in question is denied. The issue is that I'm seeing the blocked IP address in my Apache logs.
View 1 Replies View Relatedim using the latest version of thunderbird, & can receive messages ok but cant send.
it just says "sending....." & nothing else. yesterday I left it for over an hour - nothing happens.
I've been advised it may be with my firewall (I do not remember setting one up on this PC - my other Pc broke the last few days ago)..
Q1. How do i know if i have a firewall installed on Ubuntu.
q2. How do i tell it to allow Thunderbird to send ?
Q3. any other reason why Thunderbird may be blocked from sending. (the server settings on thunderbird are OK )
I get today a server with CentOS.. and someone told me to block access to port 22 for all IP's except my.. so I did
Code:
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s my_ip --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
and after
[code]...
In my Ubuntu 9.04 installation, just a few days ago, I lost my usage of the internet. I still had internet access. Firstly though, there was a problem with the router, so I tried a friend's router (both Netgear DG834) and the friend's one worked. But in Ubuntu, I could not access any web pages or email. Skype works.
I tried using my netbook and that could access web pages okay. So then I booted my main PC into the old installation that I kept there of Ubuntu 8.04, which I am using now. And in this the internet works just fine, I can access websites and download and send email.
But in Ubuntu 9.04, it seems like something is blocking my access. I do not recall installing anything new, although something may have been updated recently. I can see the DNS servers from Ubuntu 9.04 and it gets an IP address from the router. What is the likely cause of the Internet being blocked for websites and email (but not Skype)?
If I use my current iptables firewall settings my php includes from my own site get blocked by the firewall. If I use accept all tcp and udp it still does not work. If I use a default policy of accept all, then the php includes work which is not safe. I am running a drupal 6 site on a centos 5.3 vps with apache 2.2.0 and php 5.2.6 w/ safe mode on. He is my current iptable configuration.
Quote:
Chain VZ_FORWARD (1 references)
target prot opt source destination
Chain VZ_INPUT (1 references)
target prot opt source destination
[code]....
We have a spam in our network and we installed antivirus in all our systems and cleaned the virus from all pc's after that i had removed my ip from the database of blocked ip's but still my ip is blocked for sending spam i don't know from which pc the spam is going on the internet.
so i have a question that my proxy server is redhat linux and as a newbie i don't know the command's to find out which pc is creating large bandwidth to the internet. If you tell the command how to see which pc is sending spam then i will discard that pc. Also i want a strong firewall to stop spam activities.