I opened nautilus from gnome-terminal, then (With the options in context menu of right click) I realized a checkout, and when I click on the option "commit" nothing happens. But on terminal I receive the error shown in this screenshot...
I m new to setup the CVS in linux , i have tried lots but every time whenever i try to commit the change in module or file this error has been generated : cvs [commit aborted]: 'root' is not allowed to commit files.
I think what i need to do is update the certifcate for the apache2, but I'm not sure how to do this, where to put it, and then which of the thousand apache config lines needs to be changed
I'm suffering from an issue of RabbitVCS. I need to follow a big SVN respority, which has about ~20k files (or more), and when I click on the folder, nautilus just freezes for a while because of RabbitVCS. I'm using ubuntu 10.10 x64, using the very last RabbitVCS froum launchpad, and I've 4gb of ram so memory should not be an issue I guess. Is there an good alternative SVN browser except KdeSVN and RapidSVN?
I have installed SVN and running it fine. Update and commit and all are running without issues and running it under DAV from apache on Ubuntu server.
Now I need to run post-commit hook to auto update a testing staging server to test the changes. Without post-commit hook, everything works fine. The post-commit hook if run individually as a script manually runs fine without issues and it updates the said working copy. But if it is run by SVN, it somehow does not run and gives error to the client from where commit was done. This is the error I get for the post-commit script:
I have been searching EVERYWHERE for a solution to my problem, I have been sent to the red-bean "answer" so many times I think I know it word by word.Here is my problem, I run a WHM/cPanel server and want to make a repository (/home/<user>/svn) update a working copy (/home/<user>/public_html/dev) to work on a dev. subdomain on each site we have.I have the the SVN part working but can not get anything about the post commit to work. I even simplified it to the point that all the /hooks/post-commit file contained was.
I have started once month ago using git locally in my computer to keep different version of my files. For that I am using
Code: git add file to add a new file to my git system and Code: git commint to commit changes.
Let's say that I am implementing a file called git.R and I have commited so far 4 times.
understand what is the best way
a) To check the differences between the changes I did to the file git.R b) Restore as current git.R the third commit out of four I did c) Restore the second commited git.R as git2.R
I'm attempting to use svn (client-side) on an Ubuntu 9.10 virtual machine and, although I am able to check out without issue, I seem unable to commit changes to the repository and get the error:
svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to MKACTIVITY request for '/svn/rockoon_repos/!svn/act/8ed27527-fbfc-4dd5-b2aa-5a4d4b3e4e14'
I'm pretty sure this has something to do with the fact that the svn server uses ssl authentication (the server is running subversion+apache on a windows server box in case that matters).
The strange thing is that I am able to commit to the same repository on another computer using Tortise SVN (ie on Windows) without issue, so it seems that the issue must be client side (most resolutions I found for this issue online seemed to be server side fixes). I've also checked to make sure that I'm using "https" in the checkout URL.
When i try to partition the disk i get this error, on the live and the install dvd. I have googled but have not found solution?"cannot commit to disk after 5 attempts"
Running 8.0.4LTS. I can't get rid of the Adept Notifier applet because Adept Updater cannot download language-pack-en 1:8.04+20100117. It always comes up with a Requested of "no change". If I do a Request Upgrade it changes to "BREAK (upgrade)", but when I hit Apply Updates, I get the following error: Could not commit changes - Adept Notifier There was an error committing changes. Possibly there was a problem downloading some packages or the commit would break packages. I can live without a new language-pack-en, but I would like to clear it from my Adept Notifier, so I can see when I really do need updates.
I must have not read through the tutorial first.. I made changes to a project managed with git. A local copy of the repository exists on my machine (as is supposed to be with git). No branch was created for my additions. I've been committing changes to my local repository and doing pulls/merges with the remote repository. I do not have permissions to push changes to the remote repository forcing me to create a patch to email to someone who does.
Code: $ git status # On branch devel # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/devel' by 6 commits. <snip>
No tracked files are now modified. I cannot figure out how to create a patch that reflects changes between the remote repository and the commits of my repository. All tutorials I've read online state that you make a patch before committing to local. Is there a way to do this with git? Or must I download a separate copy and manually perform a diff?
When I commit changes on a SVN repository, I always run into the following problem in the terminal in Ubuntu: Error reading /home/ssylee/.nano_history: Permission denied.
When I try to upgrade ubuntu 9.10 to 10.04 I get the error message
Error during commit 'E:Couldn't configure pre-depend openoffice.org-core for openoffice.org-filter-binfilter, probably a dependency cycle.' Restoring original system state
After it finishes downloading the files. I completely removed all openoffice related files on my computer and i still get the message.
After downloading the packages I get the following error message: "Could not install the upgrades Error during commit 'E:Couldn't configure pre-depend X11-common for x11-xkb-utils, probably a dependency cycle.' Restoring original system state".
A question of ODBC correctness - maybe someone knows.
Code: // statement handle is sth, connection handle is dbch SQLExecDirect(sth, ...); // ... bind var, fetch results ... SQLFreeHandle(SQL_HANDLE_STMT, sth); // free statement handle SQLEndTran(SQLHANDLE_DBC, dbch, SQL_COMMIT); (error checking removed for clarity).
To my mind this seems wrong - surely the statement handle should be free'd only after the commit is done? Or maybe not. I theorize about the ODBC library like this: a whole set of statements can be created, run, executed in one transaction (which is held at the connection level), and only after all that is a commit/rollback done. So maybe it's OK. Even so it still feels weird. What is written above works, but there are rare and very difficult to replicate problems with this code, and I wonder if a premature free might be the cause...?
regarding installing the rabbitvcs on Fedora 15 64 bit. I managed to install it on Fedora 14 using the following link: http://wiki.rabbitvcs.org/wiki/install/fedora but I did not get success on Fedora 15. Nautilas does not show the options in its context menu.
install the RabbitVCS on openSuse 11.4. I followed the link at RabbitVCS site: http://wiki.rabbitvcs.org/wiki/install/opensuse but I did not get any success. There are also steps for openSuse 11.2 and 11.4 combined but there is no repository accessible using the given links. The main problem is RabbitVCS requires Python 2.6 but in openSuse there is Python 2.7 and that is the reason why I am not been to install it.
I have just installed Ubuntu (/dev/sda7) and Debian (/dev/sda4), but since I have updated all informations on Ubuntu, then Debian did not appear anymore on the grub list. There is an wiki I have found, but I an not really sure about what to do.
Here are the boot informations: Boot Info Script 0.55 dated February 15th, 2010
Boot Info Summary:
=> Grub 2 is installed in the MBR of /dev/sda and looks at sector 488861020 of the same hard drive for core.img, core.img is at this location on /dev/sda and looks on partition #3 for (,gpt3)/grub.
[Code]...
ps: on this file, it says that the /boot is installed on the MBR and /dev/sda3. I will remove the boot from MBR as I am now using /dev/sda3 instead. Sorry for my english
I know of 3 at least so far Sidux and GRML and DRBL are there any others that are based on stabel or sid? or what? frugal as in like puppy, tinycore, dsl, etc nomadic like, usb, hd, etc?
I have a Windows domain with a proxy. I have an account that can use the proxy and the URL that points to the proxy.pac file. this might seem a stupid question but can anyone tell me how do I enter the username and password for my test Windows account so that Debian can authenticate it?
I had (and still do) a working dual-boot XP/Karmic (GRUB version 1.97 beta4). I shrank the Ubuntu partition and set up partitions and installed Debian 5.04. When I got to the point of installing GRUB, I told Debian to install grub to MBR. On rebooting, Ubuntu was not an option on the NEW (looked different) grub menu.Maybe it was GRUB2? Could boot to either XP or Debian though.
Thought easiest thing was to reinstall Ubuntu since it seems to "see" other OS's more reliably. So I did, and installed GRUB again during its install to MBR. Then, all three were in the GRUB menu (version 1.97 beta4 again), but when tried booting to Debian, got an error (forget the wording), but think it was because the partitions got renumbered when installing Ubuntu.
SO, reinstalled Debian, reformatting the partitions but not deleting them first so the numbering stayed the same. When got to the part for installing GRUB, I told it to skip (I got some kind of error that said "Install failed. This is a fatal error. You will have to boot with an external device..."), hoping now the current GRUB would work.
Now, all three were on the GRUB menu, but when I tried to boot Debian, I got "no such device" and a list of numbers/letters after it. And "press any key to continue", which takes you back to the GRUB menu (version 1.97 beta4, by the way).
O.K., did sudo update-grub in ubuntu and rebooted. Now, Debian 5.04 shows as last entry in GRUB, and choosing it starts a boot, which hangs at "Begin: Waiting for root file system....".
Waiting long enough at the "Waiting for root file system..." hang results in a series of notifications:
WARNING bootdevice may be renamed. Try root=dev/hda3 Gave up waiting for root device. Common problems: -Boot args (cat /proc/cmdline) -Check rootdelay= (did the system wait long enough?) -Check root= (did the sytem wait for the right device?) -Missing modules (cat /proc/modules; ls /dev) ALERT! /dev/sda3 does not exist. Dropping to a shell!
In Gparted, the partition with Debian root is hdc3, although on the GRUB menu it's listed as /dev/sda3. However, in Gparted the Windows partition is hdc1 and on GRUB it's /dev/sda1, and it boots fine.....
Is my Debian install just borked? Did telling it to skip installing a bootloader (I got some kind of error that said "Install failed. This is a fatal error. You will have to boot with an external device..." ruin it?
If skipping the bootloader install did ruin it, how do you install Debian without borking your current GRUB? That's what happened the first time.
I have used Debian Linux for two years, most recently the seventh or so iteration of Version 5. I use the Gnome desktop and the Synaptic Package Manager, not the Update Manager, for updates because it's easier to build a log with the former.In my most recent update, Synaptic stripped out all the xserver-xorg files�47 in all. I thought it peculiar but did not know enough to interfere. When I rebooted, the system told me I must install xserver or correct GDM configuration and restart.
Have I been hacked? Am I being tested by the Linux Illuminati? Or does it have something to do with the warning message I received at the end of the update-upgrade, attached? And how do I go about reinstalling xserver? With Aptitude? I have tried running apt-get -f install, to no effect.
I got two harddisks, sda and sdb. Is it possible to install Debian root into software raid partitions sda2 and sdb1 leaving all other partitions 'normal' (not-raid)? do partitions sda2 and sdb1 need to be exact same size and position?
I have rtl8187se linux driver, during installation in debian linux it tells that "the kernel is not a generic". How can i install this driver in default debian kernel (without generic)?