I have a problem when install Cenos5.5-i386-dvd.iso on VMware6.5. My host os is Windows2003 sp1 and I installed Centos via VMware on host windows2003. After powering on VM, it loaded the ISO file but showed me an error like that " Could not fine kernel image : linux " then boot process failed.
View 1 Replies
after download CentOS-5.5-i386-LiveCD-Release2 i did not found install option ? how can i install it ??? on my laptop ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIt seems I have some problem with glibc i686 on my VIA CPU. How can I force to install glibc i386.rpm instead of i686 in the clean installation process?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having issues installing nagios-plugins using yum. Been using Suse don't have much experience with CentOS (CentOS release 5.2 (Final), ) Linux hoster 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux It says
"Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Net::SNMP) is needed by package nagios-plugins"
Whereas net-snmp-perl.i386 is already installed.
yum deplist nagios-plugins
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
[Code]....
I am in the process of building a new server on an Asus P5QPL-AM motherboard and an Intel E8600 processor.explain to me the difference between the two versions and what would you recommend.Also, is there any advantage of SATA over IDE hard drives?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been using SLES 10 SP1 so far with about 6TB Raid system without problems.I have upgraded the OS to CentOS 5.3 i386 and I have noticed the kernel can not recognize raid system larger than 2TB.Is there any parameters that I have to set ? or the i386 distribution simply does not support larger raid, so I have to use x86_64 version, instead?
View 1 Replies View RelatedFor some reason, no matter what setting I adjust in Administration or Prefrences in the system menu for sound, no sound seems to come from my speakers. I created a log file and I got this as the error:------- System Config Soundcard Log -------- Sun Sep 12 12:59:56 EDT 2010 aplay: main:583: audio open error: Device or resource busy
View 7 Replies View RelatedI was following a simple tutorial on how to program and compile a hello world program using assembly when I got this error;Quote:ld: i386 architecture of input file `hello.o' is incompatible with i386:x86-64 output.The tutorial told me to make two files;Quote:hello.asmsection .data;section declaration
msg db "Hello, world!",0xa;our dear string
len equ $ - msg ;length of our dear string
section .text;section declaration
[code]....
I am trying to download CentOS 5.4 from the following link[URL].. CentOS-5.4-i386-bin-DVD.iso 02-Oct-2009 12:35 3.7G I have downloaded it twice with chrome and the size I received twice is 1.99 GB (2,147,417,640 bytes)
Is this correct or I am doing something wrong. I am reluctant to try another mirror because I guess they all will point to the same file.
I have a dedicated server. Centos 5.4 i386
But is I do the command "yum" is said: "package yum is not installed"
How can I install yum back on te server? Yum has removed by a guide that says: ""yum -y remove yum-fastestmirror"
Edit: yum
-bash: /usr/bin/yum: no such file or directory
I've been trying to find log4cpp and log4cpp-devel packages in the *i386* repositories on the Centos 5.4 mirrors but they appear to be missing. They do exist in the x86_64 repositories on the same mirrors.e.g.[URL]
View 2 Replies View RelatedAfter yum installed me fuse-ntfs-3g-2009.11.14-1.el5.rf.i386 I noticed that on one NTFS partition directories created by a normal user were writable only by root, although the user's umask was correct (0022; actually the files had root as group owner).I have a second partition mounted with exactly the same options in /etc/fstab where this problem did not occur.
/dev/hdb1 /win/d ntfs-3g uid=500,gid=500,umask=0007,nls=utf8 0 0
/dev/hda7 /win/f ntfs-3g uid=500,gid=500,umask=0007,nls=utf8 0 0
I ran a "yum downgrade fuse-ntfs-3g" and the problem was gone.Would be good to get a new version of the driver into the repos.
I keep getting a notice that "Updates Available" for the package syslinux-3.86-3.i386 updates syslinux-3.11-4.i386. But when I try to do that I am met with a dependency for perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5-1.3-1.2.1 which is followed by the error: Public key for syslinux-3.86-3.i386.rpm is not installed
View 3 Replies View RelatedI would like to install xmlrpc-c . I do: wget -P /tmp [URL] and when i execute: rpmbuild --rebuild /tmp/xmlrpc-c-1.06.18-1.el5.kb.src.rpm i got this error:
[Code]...
I have been given a "gift" of a Netfinity 5100 that currently has that other M$ operating system on it. I want to configure it as closely as possible to my web server located in Chicago that uses CentOS 5.5. and use it as a "test server".
This is daunting for me as I've only been involved with Linux for less than 6 months. I have Ubuntu 10.10 on my desktop PC.
The person who gave it to me indicated that I should plug it in and let the 2 arrays charge for 24 hours. I'm doing that. I also have had an electrician install a clean new 20 amp circuit for it. And I have downloaded and created a CentOS 5.5 i386 Live CD.
OK ... we've now exhausted my realm of knowledge. Can anyone give me a broad scope of what needs to be done? I will try to plug in the specifics of each step as I progress.
A assume I plug in a keyboard and screen to it. Do I use an ethernet connection between the server and my router to provide broadband ... what steps are necessary to configure that? Do I need to download and install Apache and MySQL .. if so, where?
I have a PXE/kickstart installation system running ok. I would like to build a custom installation x86_64 .iso with the i386 .rpms removed. Currently I install from the standard x86_64 iso, then go and remove the i386 rpm's with all the attendant problems and impact on docs etc. Has anybody tried this? Is it as simple as just deleting *i386.rpm and then building another .iso from the resultant installation tree?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a centos server x86_64 arch installed - i am getting some issues where i want to update rpms but because there is a equivliant i386 package installed i get dependency errors.Is it safe to run this command to remove all i386 packages - will my system still boot after this yum remove *.i?86
View 1 Replies View RelatedSo I'm playing around w/ some Cisco equipment and needed a quick tftp server. Go to command line and type yum install tftp-server. I get No Package available! I can clearly see it here on the i386 repo. Any ideas?? In the meantime, I'm just going to upgrade this lil 600m laptop to CentOS 6 to quickly solve the problem but I thought it was curious.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI want to get the source codes of the RPM package alsa-driver-1.0.20-78.el5.i386.rpm, but I don't know where I can find it,
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen I installed CentOS on a 64 bit machine, I selected the 64 bit option. However, for some reason it installed many i386 packages - these were exact duplicates of installed x86_64 packages.Is this typical? How do I prevent this on future installs? If I left them installed, could this have caused a problem in the future? Due to my fastidious nature, I used yum extender to uncheck every duplicate i386 package and uninstalled them. This took some time. I am still not proficient with yum directly so I am wondering if there is a command to uninstall all i386 packages quickly.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs cento open source ? if yes, where i can download source code of CentOS x.y Single ServerCD i386 ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedAnyone know what version of spam assassin is newer 3.3.1-3 or 3.3.1-52 I would assume 52 is newer but I don't know if once it reaches 99 it going to 2 Example 3.3.1-99 ---- 3.3.1-2 -----3.3.1-21 and so on. I could be completely off but can anyone just clarify if 3.3.1-3 is newer or older than 3.3.1.52
(On a side note does anyone know the difference between spamassassin-3.3.1-3.el5.rfx.i386.rpm and spamassassin-3.3.1-3.el5.rf.i386.rpm?? What does the X mean?) I looked at the release date of .52 and it seems to be in march 2010 whereas .1-3 seems to be in november. oes that seem correct? Does anyone have a direct download to spamassassin-3.3.1-3el5.rf.i386.rpm???
This is a standard install, just like I've done dozens of times before.
Plain vanilla, just installed.
When I boot, I get to the splash screen and it doesn't go into the default selection.
Could this be a Hardware thingy? The reason I ask is because I've had this issue happening with 5.2 on the same machine. I just formatted it completely and installed a fresh 5.3 i386 on it and I get the same behavior.
[root@server ~]# cat /boot/grub/grub.conf
# grub.conf generated by anaconda
#
# Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file
# NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that
[Code]....
I need the nspluginwraper.i386 how can i install it
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Intel machine and what do i do? I install the AMD64 and not the i386. DO i need to uninstall the AMD and instal the i386 for my 64 bit machine?
View 10 Replies View Relateddownloaded the install dvd mounted it and ran it but I am getting an error line 55 of the kickstart file: section does not end with %%end install exited abnormally.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI cannot install lm_sensors-2.5.5-3.i386.rpm nor lm_sensors-2.5.5-6.i386.rpm on RH 7.1.
The files complained by "failed dependencies" are present on my computer.
Why it fail to install?
Please help to fix the problem. code...
Installing f10 on an x86_64 platform from CD or netinst. I can't seem to find a way to have it install i386 compatible (32-bit) software at the same time. Is there a repo that has to be enabled? In f8 i think it was just a box to click somewhere.
View 13 Replies View RelatedI would like to try out fc10 on an old, k6-2 pc. Last night I tried to download the dvd, but firefox 'completed' the download with only 1.2/~3xg, and of course it didn't work.
I am trying a test net installation in VirtualBox, so far so good.
However, I would rather have a more complete installation on hand and I'm looking at the full install cd's --there are 6 of them.
[url]
Are all 6 required for a minimal install, or could I get by with one (or two, etc)? For example, with debian installation cds you can use just the first one -- the rest are just a complete set of packages for everything +kitchen sink.
I have VISTA home installed in my HP DV5 laptop and I have installed MS Virtual PC. When I try to install Fedora 11 i386 get stop at "SMP alternatives: switching to UP code" and won't proceed.But I installed Fedora 11 i386 in my desktop using same steps it work fine.
View 2 Replies View Related
