How can I drop or forward a incoming connection from a part of a host like *.alicedsl.de
For example:
The user is connection from *.alicedsl.de on port 12345
So how can I drop this connection or forward to google.com on port 80
Lets say i have two machines on public ips. If i get incoming traffic on machine #1 on port 55242 i would just like to forward it to machine #2 on port 35000.I would just like to use machine #1 same way as a dns server works. It just redirects the traffic and tells the client where to go.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to use iptables in order to forward all the incoming packets for port 5555 to port 5556 on the same server (192.168.2.101).
I wrote the following commands:
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i any -p tcp --dport 5555 -j DNAT --to 192.168.2.101:5556
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m state --state NEW -d 192.168.2.101 --dport 5556 -j ACCEPT
I have setup my linux fedora server and i want to restrict access to my server.Basically i control using iptables.I'm not sure how to write an iptables rules to control drop all connection to port 8080 and allow only certain ip can access the instance on port 8080 example ip=10.254.14.16,192.168.1.10.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have 2 servers..
let say server A and server B
On server A open ssh is configured and is running on port 2298. So from my machine I can login there using ssh on port 2298
But when I login to server B and from there I try to connect to server A I cannot.
ssh: connect to host <ipaddress here> port 2298: Connection refused
I am trying to do a NAT forward in iptables but get the following error:Quote:[root@server88-xxx-xxx-198 openvpn]# iptables -t nat -I POSTROUTING -i tun0 -o eiptables v1.3.5: Can't use -i with POSTROUTINGAny ideas on what to do?I have an OpenVON server running and I need the client to use the ports on the OpenVPN server
View 8 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to drop all packets from the internet that use a fake ip address so they appear to come locally.
Do I need both lines or only the first ?
--append INPUT ! --in-interface lo --source 127.0.0.0/8 --jump DROP
--append INPUT ! --in-interface lo --destination 127.0.0.0/8 --jump DROP
Do I have to create a rule for:
Code:
$IPT -A fwalert -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,ACK SYN,ACK -m conntrack --ctstate NEW $RLIMIT -j LOG $LOGLIMIT --log-tcp-options --log-level 4 --log-prefix
to drop rather than log if my table has a default policy of drop with :
Code:
$IPT -t fwalert -P DROP
When deleting a rule, when is better to use DROP instead of REJECT and vice versa? Also, please provide some basic info. for the use of MASQUERADE??
View 3 Replies View RelatedCan we enable IP tables to forward multicast or broadcast messages?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a server on CentOS 5.And I would like to set up an automatic forward so that every incoming message of a specified user gets forwarded to a specified email (my gmail account).In your opinion, what is the simplest solution ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHaving trouble visualising how IP-Based Virtual Host (with SSL) would work. Here is my vhosts.conf file:
Code:
#Define Name Virtal Host
NameVirtualHost 10.10.0.54:80
#Used to replace the main server host. The log file will reside in /var/log/httpd/error_log
[Code]....
How will it work? I will need to forward port 443 to the 10.10.0.55 interface right? Without doing that, there is no way this is going to work... is there? And that means that I can't run more than 1 ip-based SSL virtual host on one machine because I can't forward 443 to two different interfaces.
Also, do I use internal ip address or external ip address in the <VirtualHost > tag? I only have one static public ip.
I recently installed a new Ubuntu PC that runs iptables and PSAD. I had the same script on another Ubuntu PC, but when I copied the script onto the new PC, I got this error. I don't remember where I found the tutorial for this, all I know is that this is the script (Edited for my usage):
Code:
#!/bin/bash
# Script to check important ports on remote webserver
# Copyright (c) 2009 blogama.org
# This script is licensed under GNU GPL version 2.0 or above
[code]....
Safe.txt contains:
Code:
127.0.0.1
192.168.1.8
192.168.1.1
98.200.58.73
192.168.0.1
And the error message generated is:
Code:
root@NETWORK-SERVER:/var/ddosprotect# ./ipblock.sh
' not found.4.4: host/network `127.0.0.1
Try `iptables -h' or 'iptables --help' for more information.
' not found.4.4: host/network `192.168.1.8
[code]....
I work with RHEL, and have instaled DHCP server on it. Sometimes it is happen this bad behaviour:
May 19 10:52:34 alpha dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:1f:3c:91:9b:ba (LENOVO-C3236B87) via 10.192.31.0
May 19 10:52:35 alpha dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 10.192.31.230 to 00:1f:3c:91:9b:ba (LENOVO-C3236B87) via 10.192.31.0
[Code].....
a good IPTABLES protocol to reject all incoming ssh trafiic except for a single IP or IP range?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI need to configure iptables to block incoming traffic (except specific ports), but allows all outgoing traffic.
I am able to block incoming traffic, but doing so also prevents outgoing traffic (tested by telnet [URL] 80)
The following was used:
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport ssh -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT 1 -i lo -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -j DROP
Also, even allowing NOT SYN requests still prevents outgoing traffic.
iptables -I INPUT 1 -p tcp ! --syn -j ACCEPT
Another point:
# modinfo ipt_state
modinfo: could not open /lib/modules/2.6.18-028stab070.14/modules.dep
How to install ipt_state module on ubuntu?
I've got a box with 2 interfaces, with IP1 = 192.168.100.1 and IP2 = 10.1.1.1 respectively on them. I've got an iptables rule that looks like:
Code:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/8 -p udp -j SNAT --to-source 10.1.1.1 --random
If I get 2 consecutive packets from the same address and port from 192.168.100.0/24, they get SNAT-ed and come out of the same port on 10.1.1.1. If then I get another packet from the same address and port 10 minutes later, then it gets SNAT-ed, but comes out of a different port on 10.1.1.1. How can I set the time delay I would like iptables to remember its incoming address/port to outgoing port mappings?
Can I, with only the use of IPTABLES, limit the incoming bandwith for a protocol? We have for example servers that have a FTP and HTTP server running and whenever HTTP has a lot of connections open, the other uploads/downloads get a timeout. I know I can limit the number of connections but prefer to limit on protocol level. Is this possible using IPTABLES and if so, can someone indicate how to proceed or provide a link? If it's not possible can someone point me to the right tool for the job?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI followed one of these tutos [URL]. My OS is Debian Lennny, iptables v1.4.2.
My iptables -L
iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED, ESTABLISHED
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:xxxx
ACCEPT icmp -- proxy.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT icmp -- proxy.p19.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT icmp -- proxy.rbx.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT icmp -- proxy.rbx2.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT icmp -- ping.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT tcp -- cache.provider.net anywhere tcp dpt:ssh
DROP all -- anywhere anywhere
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere
ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:domain
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:domain
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere multiport dports www,https
ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere icmp echo-request
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:ssh
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:xxxx
As soon as I add "iptables -A OUTPUT -j DROP" server lock me out and I have to reboot to be able log back. The ssh port is open in both INPUT and OUTPUT what's wrong?
I have tried to google it around and couldn't find any good solution for it. What I want is to hook up to the kernel network hooks and for example investigate all of the packets (maybe keep some in the buffer and drop in the kernel so I could send them out lets say 10 minutes later) but from a C / C++ program perspective / level. I know it can be done via iptables but isn't there a way to do it from a program ?? I have found a library called ipq but apparently doesn't work with kernel 2.6.x anymore.
View 10 Replies View RelatedSo here is my issue in a nutshell. I need to take FTP requests that hit Server_A and forward them to Server_B. Server_B is not natted...Server_B is another public server in a completely different location in the world. One thing to note is that I only have one NIC hence why you will see both in and out being eth0. This is what I have in my iptables on SERVER_A:iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth0 --sport 21 -o eth0 -d SERVER_B --dport 21 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPTiptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth0 --sport 20 -o eth0 -d SERVER_B --dport 20 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPTI've also tried both of the above without the --sport option. When I FTP to SERVER_A (where the above iptables rule are) it connects to SERVER_A instead of forwarding them to SERVER_B.
View 1 Replies View Relatedmy company is a small company!and it only have one public ip,but my company have a lot of websites to access!now i use Reverse Proxy Server -- apahce to solve temporary!it is not convenience for me !So i think out whether iptables can not be used to forward according to the domain!!it is the test as follows:
public ip :10.0.0.1
privite ip1 :192.168.1.1
matching website domain:www1.test.com
privite ip2:192.168.1.2
matching website domain:www2.test.com
and if someone access [URL] the iptables will know they want to access 192.168.1.1 and it will forward to the server 192.168.1.1!!
I`m running a rather simple iptables script, but no matter what port i try to forward it wont open. Here are the basics:
Code:
ipt="/usr/sbin/iptables"
$ipt -F
[code]...
I've got a box with 2 interfaces, with IP1 = 192.168.100.1 and IP2 = 10.1.1.1 respectively on them. I've got an iptables rule that looks like:
Code:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/8 -p udp -j SNAT --to-source 10.1.1.1 --random
If I get 2 consecutive packets from the same address and port from 192.168.100.0/24, they get SNAT-ed and come out of the same port on 10.1.1.1. If then I get another packet from the same address and port 10 minutes later, then it gets SNAT-ed, but comes out of a different port on 10.1.1.1. My question is: how can I set the time delay I would like iptables to remember its incoming address/port to outgoing port mappings?
i need is to have http and https allowed, together with mail server (incoming and outgoing) and ftp, ftps and ssh. all other ports have to be closed.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need to forward a port to use dtella. I'm using Fedora 10, using iptables for my firewall.
I'm currently trying to forward it from terminal with this command:
Code:
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth0 -d [ip address] --dport 11823 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.2:80
this is what I get from iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
[Code].....
I just upgraded my fedora 13 to fedora 14. I changed the cpu and the motherboard so i had to install from scratch...but I saved my iptables.
The problem is that
I do all the suff
service iptables save
And apparently it works...
But everytime I reboot I have to re run the script to forward Internet...Everything else works just fine...I mean I can ssh, vnc, etc but wont forward intel :S dont know why?
I have three machines on three networks192.x.x.x10.x.x.x172.x.x.xThe routers are set to forward communication between 192. network and 10. network, and between the 10. network and the 172. network.However, there's not routing between 192. and 172.I want to fix that by using a machine on the 10. network to forward communication between the other two networks.The machine has one etherent connection eth0 whose address is 10.1.1.11I set up an aliased ip address eth0:0 to be 10.1.1.12 using Quote:ifconfig eth0:0 10.1.1.12Then I tried to set forwarding rules the 10. machine such that 10.1.1.12 address will provide access to the machine 172.1.1.55 as followsQuote:# iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 10.1.1.12 -j DNAT --to-destination 172.1.1.55The default policies for all chains is ACCEPT.I then try to access 10.1.1.12 from 192.1.1.20 expecting it to actually access 172.1.1.55 ; it does not work
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need to set OUTPUT to DROP, and add the outgoing traffic one by one, but I couldn't do it. My current config is as follows:
Code:
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
-A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
:RH-Firewall-1-OUTPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-OUTPUT
#previously ESTABLISHED,RELATED comm is ok
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
#80 is ok from all
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
If I change OUTPUT to DROP in :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0], I don't get any response from a server running in that box. I am using RHEL 5.5. Now, asking Red Hat is not an option: I have the license but I don't have support license.
iptables and multiple public-facing IP addresses. With the current setup I have a public-facing firewall with iptables which will then forward traffic to a LAN IP. I will hopefully be allotted 1 private IP per public IP, which I hope will make this much more simple. For example, I have server A with the LAN IP of 10.0.0.1 which I would like to have traffic forwarded from 5.0.0.1, the public IP. I also have server B with LAN IP of 10.0.0.2 which I would like to have forwarded from 5.0.0.2, the second public IP. From what I have read and understood, this should be a simple task, however I would just like to double check to make sure that it is in fact possible, and if so, how would it be recommended that I go about doing so. Essentially, I need to forward each public IP to a corresponding LAN IP with all ports.
View 3 Replies View Related