Do I have to create a rule for:
Code:
$IPT -A fwalert -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,ACK SYN,ACK -m conntrack --ctstate NEW $RLIMIT -j LOG $LOGLIMIT --log-tcp-options --log-level 4 --log-prefix
to drop rather than log if my table has a default policy of drop with :
Code:
$IPT -t fwalert -P DROP
how can i drop igmp port 0 packets with iptables rule? my log file is full of this router advertisement.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm not an iptables expert. Anybody know how to create a rule/chain that will log info similar to what tcpdump -s0 would do?
View 3 Replies View RelatedQuestion (and Google results aren't making this clear): Ubuntu has both iptables & ip6tables installed. 1. If I set a rule in iptables, does that rule also apply to ipv6, or just ipv4?
2. If "no" to above, then it would be prudent to *also* set ip6tables rules as well if I want to maintain an active firewall, correct?
3. Does ip6tables rules have the same syntax and behavior (more or less) to iptables rules - i.e. can I just copy my iptables rules & change "iptables" to "ip6tables"?
4. Any gotchas or issues that I should be aware of?
I have configured a sendmail MTA for incoming mails in a network and by using IPtables i have redirected the traffic internally to other port where one more SMTP by a application is running.Iptables rule:iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPTiptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 25 -j REDIRECT --to-port 25000My sendmail config is as below.
Sendmail.mc
define(`SMART_HOST', `relay:host.subdomain.mydomain.com')dnl
dnl # define(`RELAY_MAILER',`esmtp')dnl
[code]...
I'm trying to drop all packets from the internet that use a fake ip address so they appear to come locally.
Do I need both lines or only the first ?
--append INPUT ! --in-interface lo --source 127.0.0.0/8 --jump DROP
--append INPUT ! --in-interface lo --destination 127.0.0.0/8 --jump DROP
When deleting a rule, when is better to use DROP instead of REJECT and vice versa? Also, please provide some basic info. for the use of MASQUERADE??
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow can I drop or forward a incoming connection from a part of a host like *.alicedsl.de
For example:
The user is connection from *.alicedsl.de on port 12345
So how can I drop this connection or forward to google.com on port 80
i'm new in linux world i would like to know how can i add the rtp protocol to my iptables rule for Netfilter firewall,but without installing the asterisk server
View 1 Replies View RelatedUnsure about IP tables lingo, so excuse me for not looking this up:I have a server, running IP tables, that I do not want to allow any type of outgoing traffic to 192.168.1.21
View 3 Replies View RelatedI guess this is the right place to put questions about iptables, so forgive me if it is not.I have a MySQL database which I need to allow connections to: 1 - the internal network; 2 - the web server (Apache) connections;3 - A user who is out of this network in a range of dynamic IP.Let's suppose the range IP for this user is 179.4.247.0-179.4.247.254 and the server; where is MySQl and Apache is 60.22.30.232. This user will use the windows client MySQL tool to make connections into this database.
So I think these rule below allow connections to the internal network and apache:
iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -m state state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -m state state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
[code]....
I'm looking for a way to add a rule that would whitelist my ip address when I login with SSH. I can grab the IP out of the SSH_CONNECTION variable, however I'm not sure how I could add it into iptables with my non-root privileged user. I've got root access, but I want the process to be automatic. I considered sudo, however I don't want normal users to be able to modify anything about iptables, though perhaps there is a trick about it that I don't know which would only allow it in the /etc/profile or the like
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy firewall , wich is an Ubuntu server 10.10 , have 3 interfaces:
eth0(192.168.0.254):linked to the DMZ
eth1(192.168.1.254):linked to the LAN
eth3(212.217.0.1):linked to the Internet
-The DMZ have one web server with a static address (192.168.0.1).
-My LAN address range is (192.168.1.2-192.168.1.100) managed by a DHCP server in the same firwall machine.
There are some of the rules that I need to set up :
-Allow HTTP between the LAN and the internet
-Allow HTTP between the web server in the DMZ, and the internet.
Is there a way to tell the firewall , to redirect all incoming HTTP requests only to the web server in the DMZ ?
Loaded up Centos 5.5 final. Configured iptables to block regions of the world based on networks. An example would be:
-A INPUT -s 139.82.0.0/16 -j DROP
My /etc/sysconfig/iptables file contains about 10k entries like this. If I use this, the machine lags hardcore network wise.
I am using squid on my fedora box as a proxy server.By default the iptables (Firewall) service is on.To allow web pages to my client machines i stop the iptable service.
#service iptables stop
By doing it client computers start browsing.kindly how can I add a rule so that without stoping firewall client compter work fine.my perver IP address is 10.1.80.10
This isn't exactly of critical importance, but is there any way to block two entirely different addresses in the one rule, rather than writing individual rules for each of them? For example, if the addresses were 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8, and I only wanted to block these two.
Or alternatively, if I wanted to block two subnets, say 1.1.1.0/24 and 8.8.8.0/24? Can this be done in one rule?
my iptables Policy is Drop..my server ports is open just for httpd,ssh .Is there any rule which can allow all connection from a specific program for ex. i want to scan an ip Address ports.as you know nmap connect to every known port to see if that is open or not so, if i want to allow nmap to connect, i need to include all ports for that, or i can allow connection from localhost to outside in all ports .my server is very secure . i dont want other programs (probably a backdoor) use those ports to connect outside i want to know is there any ability in iptables which can rule connections by name of program like "Allow any Connection from /usr/bin/nmap to everywhere " ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am new to iptables. The setup tool on a VPS doesn't work. So, I am learning to insert rules. I have inserted so many and some of them show as duplicates now.
1- I want to know how to remove the duplicates. Is there a file that these rules are store in so I can go in and easily edit it?
2- Is there any other utility that handles firewall in Linux that I am unaware of? or is the iptables the ultimate door guard? This is a plain install of CentOS.
3- Since I believe I opened port 5090 but I think it still might be blocked, could SELINUX be the problem? How can I get my way around setting it to permissive or disable if I don't have access to "setup" command?
4- What is the order of iptables reading? does rule #1 supersede all other rules? or does the last rule supersede all rules prior to it?
5- Do the rules below make a fairly safe system? (except for the duplicates which should be remove) I understand that a safe system is dependent also on the applications that are allowed in this category and I am not talking about those. I am talking about dropping all other inquiries and in general is this how iptables are setup? This is what I currently have:
[root@tel ~]# service iptables status
Table: filter
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
num target prot opt source destination
[Code]...
I followed one of these tutos [URL]. My OS is Debian Lennny, iptables v1.4.2.
My iptables -L
iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED, ESTABLISHED
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:xxxx
ACCEPT icmp -- proxy.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT icmp -- proxy.p19.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT icmp -- proxy.rbx.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT icmp -- proxy.rbx2.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT icmp -- ping.provider.net anywhere
ACCEPT tcp -- cache.provider.net anywhere tcp dpt:ssh
DROP all -- anywhere anywhere
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere
ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:domain
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:domain
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere multiport dports www,https
ACCEPT icmp -- anywhere anywhere icmp echo-request
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:ssh
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:xxxx
As soon as I add "iptables -A OUTPUT -j DROP" server lock me out and I have to reboot to be able log back. The ssh port is open in both INPUT and OUTPUT what's wrong?
I have tried to google it around and couldn't find any good solution for it. What I want is to hook up to the kernel network hooks and for example investigate all of the packets (maybe keep some in the buffer and drop in the kernel so I could send them out lets say 10 minutes later) but from a C / C++ program perspective / level. I know it can be done via iptables but isn't there a way to do it from a program ?? I have found a library called ipq but apparently doesn't work with kernel 2.6.x anymore.
View 10 Replies View RelatedTrying to setup my box as a router on Ubuntu 10.04. When trying to setup a NAT rule in iptables 1.4.4 like so:
Code:
sudo iptables --table NAT --append POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
I keep getting:
Code:
Can't initialize iptables table 'NAT': Table does not exist (do you need to insmod?)
Looking at lsmod, it doesn't look like I have anything NAT related loaded ( I just have iptable_filter, ip_tables, and x_table ). Doing a locate nat, I find a module that looks like it should work. I'm running 10.04.1 LTS - Kernel is 2.6.32-25-generic #45-Ubuntu SMP and it is pretty much stock - haven't done anything fancy... this module looks promising:
Code:
/lib/modules/2.6.32-25-generic/kernel/net/ipv4/netfilter/iptable_nat.ko
but loading it and I get:
Code:
-1 Unknown symbol in module
The iptables has every rule set correctly, the users in the subnet works great, but I have the following issue.every user connect to a mysql running on the internet through the port 3306, the forward and masquerade do the job. Now I have a user in the outside, and he wants to connect to a mysql in a certain machine (Not the gateway), prerouting rules solve my problems, but all the packages from the inside users goes now to that certain machine. I would like something like if the package passed trough masquerade don't pass trough the prerouting rule, and if it come from the outside (Not a package that come from a petition from the inside) pass trough the prerouting rule.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI need to set OUTPUT to DROP, and add the outgoing traffic one by one, but I couldn't do it. My current config is as follows:
Code:
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
-A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
:RH-Firewall-1-OUTPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-OUTPUT
#previously ESTABLISHED,RELATED comm is ok
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
#80 is ok from all
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
If I change OUTPUT to DROP in :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0], I don't get any response from a server running in that box. I am using RHEL 5.5. Now, asking Red Hat is not an option: I have the license but I don't have support license.
I have set the iptables INPUT policy to DROP. As I have expected tcpdump wasn't showing any packages... for a while. Suddenly it begun to show UDP syslog packages being sent by a remote host. It is conform with the configuration of syslog, but since the INPUT policy was set to DROP, with no exceptions, it is not conform with configuration of iptables. Why after setting INPUT policy to DROP, with no exceptions most of the packets recieved before are being dropped and some not, as tcpdump shows?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have setup my linux fedora server and i want to restrict access to my server.Basically i control using iptables.I'm not sure how to write an iptables rules to control drop all connection to port 8080 and allow only certain ip can access the instance on port 8080 example ip=10.254.14.16,192.168.1.10.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've read the instruction about setting up the iptables rules to filter all port except HTTP, SSH, FTP. I require first remove all default iptables rules and set default rules to all chains as DROP:
# Set default-deny policies for all three default chains
$IPTABLES -P INPUT DROP
$IPTABLES -P FORWARD DROP
$IPTABLES -P OUTPUT DROP
Then allow only some ports:
#Accept inbound packets that are part of previously-OK'ed sessions
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -j ACCEPT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED
# Accept inbound packets which initiate SSH sessions
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -p tcp -j ACCEPT --dport 22 -m state --state NEW
# Accept inbound packets which initiate FTP sessions
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -p tcp -j ACCEPT --dport 21 -m state --state NEW
# Accept inbound packets which initiate HTTP sessions
$IPTABLES -A INPUT -p tcp -j ACCEPT --dport 80 -m state --state NEW
# Log anything not accepted above $IPTABLES -A INPUT -j LOG --log-prefix "Dropped by default:"
But I hired a VPS from other country so the only mean I can manage it is via SSH. If I setup the default rule to DROP first, I afraid that I can no longer connect via SSH to tell iptables allow SSH
So my question is:
- Does the IP tables take effect immediately after I input a rule?
- Is there any mean to run this as a batch job (create a script and run all these rules one time).
- My VPS has a web control panel which have a terminal via web. Is this a native terminal or just a connection via port 80 or 22?
I need help creating an iptable rule. The iptables are installed on my router. My router also connects to a "hide my a**" vpn account
at 79.142.65.5:443 The goal is to somehow force the traffic to go through the vpn, because what sometimes happens is, the vpn connection drops (for what ever reason) and my real ip becomes exposed. Basically, I want to block "myself" from accessing the Internet when not connected to the vpn because of privacy concerns.
Below is my iptables. It has the 3 default chains and it also has many custom user chains. I need to know what kind of a rule to add, What interface to apply it to (lo,tun0,br-lan,eth1) and the correct chain to insert into.For example, you could tell me something like:
Quote:
FORWARD chain, change rule 1 to
iptables -R FORWARD 1 -j zone_wan_MSSFIX -p tcp --destination-port 443 -i eth1
Obviously, That was just a guess, I need someone that knows iptables to help me.
Code:
Chain INPUT (Policy: ACCEPT)
Rule # Traffic Target Prot In Out Source Destination Options
Rule 1 72.95 KB DROP all * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state INVALID
Rule 2 1.11 GB ACCEPT all * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
[code].....
I have 3 network interfaces on my Linux Router :
Interface - Gateway - Type
Code:
br0 - 192.168.0.1 - Internet
eth2 - 192.168.1.1 - LAN
tun0 - 10.0.0.2 - VPN (via br0)
What I'd like to do is to route all TCP packets coming from eth2 to tun0 where a VPN client is running on 10.0.0.2. If I delete all default routes and if I add a new route to tun0 like :
Code:
route del default
route add default gw 10.0.0.2
Everything is fine, and everyone on eth2 can reach the Internet using the VPN access. Now the problem is that my VPN client does not allow any other protocols other than TCP. And I also want to allow VPN access only to eth2, no other LAN nor the router itself. use iptables to filter any TCP packets and mark them, so they can be sent to tun0, while any other packets can reach the Internet via br0 (192.168.0.1). I found on the Internet that we can mark packets before they get routed. Using the following commands :
Code:
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -j MARK --set-mark 85 -i eth2 -p tcp --dport 80
ip route add table 300 default via 10.0.0.2 dev tun0
ip rule add fwmark 0x55 table 300
First of all, --dport 80 never work... :/ I wanted to filter TCP 80 packets coming from eth2, but none of them seems to be HTTP packets... oO (very strange...). Nevermind, I decided to forget about the --dport option. I use the "iptables -L -v -t mangle" command to see how many packets are marked, and it is working fine, all TCP packets coming from eth2 are marked. Now the problem is that none of them are routed to tun0 they are all respecting the "route -n" rules... and not the "table 300" rule I have created.
I'm trying to configure auditd to monitor "strange" events with apache2 weberver on Wheezy (though same problem occurs on Jessie), tried both with "vanilla" 3.2 and backports 3.16 kernel I am actually using.
Here's auditd rules I have problem with:
Code: Select all-a exit,never -F arch=b64 -S stat -F path=/var/www/server-status -k web
-a exit,always -F arch=b64 -S stat -F uid=www-data -F success=0 -k web
So to recap, I want to log stat syscall failures for www-data user, but excluding some "known" issues, such as that "/var/www/server-status" (after a2enmod status, /server-status path can be accessed for statistics, though apache2 still tries to find physical file for that path and fails).
But the problem is.. excluding does not work.
Here's "auditctl -l" output:
Code: Select all# auditctl -l
LIST_RULES: exit,never arch=3221225534 (0xc000003e) watch=/var/www/server-status key=web syscall=stat
LIST_RULES: exit,always arch=3221225534 (0xc000003e) uid=33 (0x21) success=0 key=web syscall=stat
But when I execute:
Code: Select all# wget -O - http://localhost/server-status
audit.log appears:
Code: Select alltype=SYSCALL msg=audit(1461591557.077:365): arch=c000003e syscall=4 success=no exit=-2 a0=7f1bedab9358 a1=7ffef316ac20 a2=7ffef316ac20 a3=7f1bedab91f8 items=1 ppid=2398 pid=2451 auid=4294967295 uid=33 gid=33 euid=33 suid=33 fsuid=33 egid=33 sgid=33 fsgid=33 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="apache2" exe="/usr/lib/apache2/mpm-prefork/apache2" key="web"
type=CWD msg=audit(1461591557.077:365): cwd="/"
type=PATH msg=audit(1461591557.077:365): item=0 name="/var/www/server-status" nametype=UNKNOWN
type=UNKNOWN[1327] msg=audit(1461591557.077:365): proctitle=2F7573722F7362696E2F61706163686532002D6B007374617274
So, syscall=4 (stat) is still captured. Looks like "path" is known for auditd, but not excluded.
I've tried various rule combinations, for example simpler, more generic one:
Code: Select all-a exit,never -F path=/var/www/server-status
But it's the same.
Sadly man audit.rules and man auditctl does not have "exit,never" examples, only some (sometimes also similarly unsuccessfull) google results.
Could it be that Debian kernel does not support some audit features?
I have a netbook (MSI Wind U100 rebrand) that has one of those card readers built into the handrest. The thing is I've never used it once, and it keeps popping up in powertop as waking the cpu when it should just shut up and be quiet.Aside from breaking open the case and tearing it out, the immediate solution is to browse to /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1/1-6/ and pipe 1 to the file remove. That disables it until system reboot or resume, at which point I have to do it all over again.
Code:
$ echo 1 | sudo tee /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1/1-6/remove
Now I'd like to create an udev rule to make it not get initialized at all. A quick Google search found me this article on creating udev rules, and after toying about with the udevadm tool I managed to produce the attributes/properties of the device.
Code:
zorael@lethe:/sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1/1-6$ udevadm info -a -p $(pwd)
Udevadm info starts with the device specified by the devpath and then walks up the chain of parent devices. It prints for every device found, all possible attributes in the udev rules key format. A rule to match, can be composed by the attributes of the device and the attributes from one single parent device.
looking at device '/bus/usb/devices/usb1/1-6':
KERNEL=="1-6"
SUBSYSTEM=="usb"
DRIVER=="usb"
ATTR{configuration}=="CARD READER
[code].....