I have a GnuPG key that's been signed by several people. I want to add another name (and e-mail) to it. I used seahorse to do it, but it doesn't look like the old signatures migrated to the new name. Is this standard behavior? Is there a way that I can migrate the signatures, or do I have to request that the signers themselves do it?
View 1 RepliesI have a GnuPG key that's been signed by several people. I want to add another name (and e-mail) to it.I used seahorse to do it, but it doesn't look like the old signatures migrated to the new name.Is this standard behavior? Is there a way that I can migrate the signatures, or do I have to request that the signers themselves do it?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there a way to check RPM signatures during a kickstart install? Seems as if the signatures are not checked during an installation.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI recently installed Ubuntu and noticed when I load 'Recovery Mode' from Grub, I am not asked for a password. Since you can change the login password from there, is there a way to add a password to this?
I would like to be prompted for a password before the recovery mode starts.
I'm trying to edit a "xl2tpd.conf" file but it always says I have no write permission tried to add my account to admin group but it says something about not able to lock on password try later.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to automatically load some iptables rules by adding the below script in the /etc/network/if-up.d directory:
Code:
#!/bin/sh
IPTABLES=/sbin/iptables[code]...............
I'd like to add a user to my server that will only have access to a mount point over sshfs. Is there any way I can provide them this access without actually giving them permission to open a terminal on my server? I tried /bin/false and /sbin/nologin already, but /bin/false didn't allow the mount point to be made and /sbin/nologin prevented a login completely (also stopped the mount point from working).
View 6 Replies View RelatedI just set up denyhosts and it worked properly the first time adding lots of ips to the hosts.deny.I then set it to run every 12 hours noon and midnight.I wanted to see if ran properly and I got all this.Does it look like its working?
Code:
May 15 12:00:01 hyrule CRON[14286]: (root) CMD (python /usr/share/denyhosts/denyhosts_ctl.py -c /usr/share/denyhosts/denyhosts.cfg )
[code]...
I'm trying to update Karmic to Lucid. I try to update Karmic to the most recent update before I upgrade I get this error.
W: GPG error: [URL] karmic Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 5A9A06AEF9CB8DB0
Is there a way to make Clam update the signatures automatically? I cannot see an option in Clam TK.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI was doing an update today and got the following error:
W: GPG error: [URL] lucid Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 2EBC26B60C5A2783 Medibuntu Packaging Team <admin@lists.medibuntu.org>
I have tried updating the keys, and got this:
apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 2EBC26B60C5A2783
Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 2EBC26B60C5A2783
gpg: requesting key 0C5A2783 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
gpg: key 0C5A2783: "Medibuntu Packaging Team <admin@lists.medibuntu.org>" 6 new signatures
gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: new signatures: 6
My software sources some how got screwed up. Now when I try to install from software manager or Synaptic, I get error messages. Here is the error messages at the bottom of "sudo apt-get update" :
W: GPG error: http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5
W: GPG error: http://archive.canonical.com lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5
How do I fix this ?
I use Ubuntu 9.04. Synaptic Software Manager > Repositories > Reload. I have a following error.
GPG error: [URL]... karmic Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 7804AF9D95075E6E. What can I do?
When I try to install things I am getting lots of errors.
[code]...
What can I do to fix my problems? I also included a screen shot of the repositories in Software Sources. I been messing with BeachBit as Root and been toying with Ubuntu Tweak and so I think I messed something up on accident. Here is my list that I have too.
[code]...
Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
All the places online said to do this script - sudo add-apt-repository ppa:hel-sheep/pastie && sudo apt-get updatesudo apt-get install pastieAnother had a sudo upgrade in the middle, but essentially just that script above. Whenever I do that, my terminal hangs at -Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /etc/apt/secring.gpg --trustdb-name /etc/apt/trustdb.gpg --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv 8B9B7F6B51298512D6B5A8993B9ADE3DE4CA452gpg: requesting key DE4CA452 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.comEventually I crtl c and it looks like its installing, but then stops and says -W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net maverick Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 93B9ADE3DE4CA452
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhat does this lot mean:?
Code:
Hit [URL]
Hit [URL]
Hit [URL]
Fetched 557kB in 2s (198kB/s)
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: [URL] Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY EA8E8B2116BA136C
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
(after typing apt-get update)
Do you know how to write programs that use electronic signatures in JAVA (although I am not pretentious about the language in any way).
When I say e-signatures I mean those USB smart cards(security tokens) that are capable of doing encryption by themselves and store securely the private key. I am particularly interested in how authentication works with a digital signature, how to sign data, and most importantly how to check that a digital certificate is valid. What do I need to store in the Database for authentication for example -- is it the serial or the Hash?
What's the point of checking if my file was tampered (as it says in the debians page [URL] ....) if the signatures are downloaded over http? Didn't the recent incident with Linux Mint had cleared our mind about these things?
View 0 Replies View RelatedI keep getting this error whenever I try to update or reload. Does anyone know how to get rid of this or fix it?
GPG error: http://repository.cairo-dock.org karmic Release: The following signatures were invalid: NODATA 1 NODATA 2Failed to fetch http://repository.cairo-dock.org/ubu...6/Packages.bz2 Sub-process /bin/bzip2 returned an error code (2)
When I go to the Update Manager to update my system I get the following error message: W: GPG error: http://packages.medibuntu.org lucid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 2EBC26B60C5A2783
I am not sure what this exactly means and what I need to do to fix this.
I'veopenoffice.org 3.0. I tried to upgrade it to oog3.1 via terminal by the command sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install openoffice.org 3.1 my terminal shows; the lines above these are not shown W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net intrepid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 632D16BB0C713DA6 W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Couldn't find package 3.1 I got the same results when I tried the commands with firefox 3.5.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen I try to do
[code]...
I've tried the method described here: [URL]... However, I'm still getting the same error.
Why everytime I send apt-get update I got this error on the last lines? Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: [URL] Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 8F91B0E6C862B42C Here is my /etc/apt/sources.list
[Code]....
ubuntu 9.10 login panel is worse with respect to ubuntu 8 since now all the users with names are shown without a way to hide them!Why don't keep the old way at least as an option?
View 5 Replies View RelatedTo avoid having to input a password for the keyring each time I connect to the net via wireless, I enabled the 'Available to all users' option in Network Manager. Now, my question is this. Are the 'users' it refers to just those created on this machine? Would a drive-by be able to use my network without entering the password?
View 3 Replies View Related1. I understand you can protect your files or directories in your website by setting file/directory permissions. The meaning of r w x is clear to me, but I'm not sure how to proceed... Starting with the index.html file, if I wanted to make it so that anyone in the world can read it but can't modify it, do I set its permissions to rwxr-xr-x? If I set it to rwxr--r--, would that mean the file couldn't be served? I mean, what does the x setting do on a .html file, how can a .html file be executable?
2. If file permissions work on the lines of owner-group-others, in the context of a website, who is 'group'? As far as I can tell, there's only the owner, which is me, and others, which is the world accessing the site. Am I correct in thinking that by default, say when creating a website on a shared hosting server, there is no group unless I specifically set one up?
3. My ISP allows the DynDNS.org service, meaning that I could serve a website from my home. It's too early to go that route just yet, but for future reference, I would like to ask about the server software called Hiawatha. It is said to be secure, but having read some evaluations of it, it doesn't seem to offer anything that couldn't be accomplished with Apache or Cherokee, it's just that its security settings are simpler and easier to configure. Am I right about this? Or does Hiawatha truly offer something that the other major server packages don't?
i updated both browsers i have and lost my secure log-in pages (no padlocks showing ) concerning different Web mail accounts.Just before i did these updates i checked an unrelated thing on-line regarding my sound card of which i kept a copy of and got this message below :
!!ALSA/HDA dmesg
!!------------------
[ 12.762633] cfg80211: Calling CRDA for country: AM
[code]....
Conky can be used to display a variety of information on the users desktop. I wanted to use Conky instead to display the current status of security as reported by:
SANS Internet Storm Center
IBM Internet Security Systems
Symantec Threatcon
McAfee Threat Center
I therefore created 4 small scripts which download the current status from these sites, and set the colour of those status's depending on the current value.The conky configuration allows for a semi-transparent background - though this is optional.Attached is an example image showing the 4 different colours.Also attached is an archive with the 4.sh files, .conkyrc and draw_bg.lua (from here http:[url].....
I just installed Ubuntu on a desktop. Can anyone give me some guidance on installing basic security software? In particular, I'm looking for a firewall, antivirus, and anti-spyware/malware utilities.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI already posted a topic similar to this concerning the Desktop OS version, but this deals with the Netbook because unlike the Desktop, the Netbook is less cooperative. Allow me to elaborate: Today (or rather yesterday since it's not after midnight where I am), I changed my password because I was hopelessly confounded about how to get my Wireless Network card up and running after it had been installed and I was allowing my dad to use it. This issue has since been resolved, however...
When I chose my password during the original installation, there was no mention of it being "too simple." This is where the Desktop OS and the Netbook OS differ. The desktop will let me change it in the terminal without any errors. The Netbook will not. When I've attempted to revert it back to the original, it will not let me do so in the User Profile or in the Terminal. The Passwords and Encryption Keys application also does not appear to help.
So now even after I've changed it to a different "complicated" password I am still prompted to insert two different passwords since I changed my user password but I am unable to change the password I input during the installation. A bit screwy methinks. This is extremely important. I'd like to know how to change the original installation password.
If I can't change the main password on my laptop then this is a serious potential security breach just waiting to happen (especially since it's on a laptop and I will be hauling it around with me) and I will most likely install a different OS if this isn't resolved --- It would be very unfortunate since I spent the whole day fixing it and I really enjoy the interface. Luckily I can live with this on my Desktop since I'm not going to be hauling it around with me everywhere when the school year starts.