This is on Ubuntu 10.04 Server Edition. The ethernet cord was disconnected one day. I plugged it back in to find I can ssh to and from that machine, but I cannot update or browse the web (elinks) on it. I tried "ifconfig eth0 up" which did nothing. Why is it that only local connections work?
View 1 RepliesI have a ubuntu desktop 9.10 that is used as a file server and occasionally as a desktop. My problem is after about 15 min of idle the server can not be accessed by other computers. I attempted to disable power management but Im not sure if i did that correctly. Where should i look for problems?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI've been having a lot of trouble with getting wireless networking devices to work. I guess I have a lot of company, since mfrs don't seem to be very interested in supporting Linux.It seems that one common symptom is that, when I try to "Ping" using the Terminal, I get "network is unreachable".Does this mean anything specific, or is it a general output whenever the network is not carrying on two way communications? Does it mean that the wireless interface is down? Does it mean that the wireless hardware is not transmitting? Not receiving?
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy ubuntu installation was running fine with the Belkin F7D1101 v1 after using this install method:[URL]..But, after allowing ubuntu to autoupdate many programs (don't remember which ones), the device stopped working. I checked all of the commands in the link above. They are all still functioning. dmesg throws no errors, but it terminates with
<code>ADDRCONF (NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready</code> Are there any network files which may have been overridden from autoupdate? iwconfig wlan0 shows "Access Point: Not-Associated" What output can I show you to help me find the problem?
I dont even know where to start looking on Google.Just in case this matters, for completeness.I've an inactive eth0 (wired ethernet link) with static IP.Other possibly relevant details:I'm using an old 802.11b card. Cant imagine this is relevant, because the internet is working fine as far as pinging anything outside the local network goes.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a network printer directly connected via ethernet cable to an Ubuntu netbook, but pinging the printer fails, giving "Host Unreachable". The network light on the ethernet socket is lit green, and there is nothing else cable-connected to the network - just a simple cable connection between the netbook ethernet socket and the Network printer (a HP Laserjet 4200n). Ping works fine if I plug the cable into a different machine (a Win XP box) and ping from there, so it's not a cable or IP address problem.
This sounds simple enough and should work, but I'm stumped. Clues, anyone?
I'm experiencing massive latency/unreachable problems on my Linux machine. It's true for all network connections, here's an example of me trying to ping my router:
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=15115 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=14107 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=13107 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=12107 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=11108 ms
[Code]...
I've tried now with both the maverick default kernel and 2.6.37-rc5 kernel (both 64 bit), same result. If I take the card up and down (ifup, ifdown) performance is restored for a little while, then it's back. I've tried changing cable, network card and router port but no luck.
I've got router with: eth2 - local network (192.168.1.1), ppp0 - uplink (x.y.z.a)
my firewall:
Code:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.5 on Mon Jan 11 12:22:25 2010
*raw
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [1038480:666298388]
[code]....
somehow iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -d x.y.z.a -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.1 helps, but imho there should be some other solution. kernel is 2.6.31.6, architecture is x86_64.
P.S. i've also tried iptables -A POSTROUTING ! -d x.y.z.a -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE that didn't help either.
I have two linux servers, I tried to ping from one linux box to another and vice versa but error message is "connect: Network is unreachable" Where as If I tried from windows machine I am getting the reply from both the servers.
C:Documents and Settings>ping bnkprod
Pinging bnkprod.softtech.com [172.20.40.141] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 172.20.40.141:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 4ms
I am plagued by the following error when attempting port forwarded connections to my minecraft server. Port forwarding is good and test ok on router based firewall. No iptables entries. Natty N, all updates current.
[INFO] Disconnecting CascadianNW [/184.100.247.218:57787]: Failed to verify username! [internal error java.net.NoRouteToHostException: Network is unreachable]
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: Network is unreachable
Some discussion indicate jvm network connection issues related to ipv6, but they are old posts.
I want to add this route but I am getting this error message. What is the reason of this problem? I cant add this route? how can i add?
Code: [root@linux/]# route add -net 10.1.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 gw 10.2.0.1 eth0 SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
I have an HP BL460c G5 with 5.3 installed fresh
it can ping its own IP address just fine
its a bit slow but constant pinging the switch its connected to
and i get alot of Destination host unreachables(a few do get through) when pinging the gateway
port on the switch is hardcoded to GB/full. and the server itself reads that its connecting at GB/full.
I have 5 1955 blades in an enclosure for an custom application cluster.All were running Centos 4.4 no problem.We wanted to start upgrading them cleanly to 5.5 so two of them got fresh installs of 5.5.The installs went well enough, no glaring errors.However they can only ping each other! The network settings are fine, no firewall or selinux. I'd run the info script but I can neither download it to them nor paste it in via kvm.Standard static entries, virtually identical to their 4.4 brethren. They ping each other so network drivers are fine, no built in switch configuration changes. It has to be some kind of network configuration issue that i'm just not seeing.
Edit* When i try and ping anything else, including the other blades, I get Destination Host Unreachable.
i have a problem with my internet connection in ubuntu 8.04 server edition. if i ping to: [URL]... i get: Destination Host Unreachable but when i ping to my gateway or other pc's in my network no problems occur.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with the Fedora 12 Network Manager - OpenVPN configuration. If I use the same configuration and manually start openvpn (as client) I get connected to the OpenVPN server and I can ping the network that I am accessing. With Network Manager - I get connected but when I try to ping is giving me "Destination host unreachable". The routing table looks similar except that when connecting with network manager is giving me on more route in table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 wlan0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 2 0 0 wlan0
192.168.171.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 tap0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 wlan0
Where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the IP of the OpenVPN server. When connecting "manually" I this routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 2 0 0 wlan0
192.168.171.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 tap0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 wlan0
What I do wrong in Network Manager? If I try to delete the route with xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is disconnecting the vpn connection.
I've got a problem with 'seeing' other machines on my Network. I have two laptops both with F10 on them however I can't ping either of them. They can connect fine to the internet and ping the router, they are both on the same subnet with Firewalls disabled on both machines. When I try to ping it says: "Destination Host Unreachable". I've tried firing up Wireshark to see if that will give me any clue but even that doesn't show any packets whatsoever from the other machine across the Network. It's like they are completely invisible to each other.
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy issue is with linux routing tables using iproute2, coupled with the iptables MARK target. When I create a rule to lookup a table with iproute2, and the routing table routes an address as type unreachable (or blackhole, or prohibit), if a higher priority rule does a lookup to another table that routes the address as type unicast but that higher priority rule also matches on a fwmark, the packet to that address is never generated locally to even go through iptables packet filtering/mangling in order to mark it, because the lower priority rule that doesn't match on a fwmark says it's unreachable. For example, I have 2 rules installed with ip:
Code:
10: from all fwmark 0x1000 lookup routeit
20: from all lookup unreach
ip route list table routeit
[code]....
Now, in the packet filter, I have an iptables rule to mark packets to destination 10.0.0.5 with 0x1000 in the mangle table and OUTPUT chain. When I generate a packet locally to 10.0.0.5, all programs get ENETUNREACH (tested with strace). However, if I take out the route entry that 10.0.0.0/8 is unreachable, it all works fine and the routes in the routeit table get applied to marked packets (I know because my default gateway would not be 1.2.3.4, but wireshark shows packets being sent to the MAC address of 1.2.3.4).
The best I can surmise is that when generating a packet locally, the kernel tests the routing tables in priority order but without any mark to see if it is unreachable/blackhole/prohibit, and doesn't even bother generating the packet and traversing iptables rules to see if it would eventually be marked and thus routed somewhere. Then I assume after that step, it traverses iptables rules, then traverses the routing tables again to find a route. So is there any way around this behavior besides adding fake routes to the routing table (e.g. routing 10.0.0.5 to dev lo in the unreach table in this example)?
I have recently installed 10.04 on an old box I have sitting around and wanted to include it in my home network. After struggling with Network Manager I went in and set up the files manually.
/etc/hosts reads:
127.0.0.1 localhost
10.0.0.01 one.network one
10.0.0.02 two.network two
[code]....
then the IPv6 stuff
/etc/network/interfaces reads:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
[code]...
Now I can access the internet from this machine, but when I attempt to ssh to another machine in the network I get the message "Port 22 network is unreachable" Checking with google I found that there should be some ssh config files. I have one ssh_config but no sshd_config. I don't know if this is relevant. Also "network" is not the name of my network. Changed for anonymity.
I recently installed Fedora 10 and I'm trying to install a driver for my HP Deskjet F4200 Series All in One printer. I downloaded the proper hplip file and when i go to install it in the terminal it gets to the very end where it is trying to install the missing required dependencies. When it checks for the network connection it comes back saying "error: The network appears to be unreachable. Installation cannot complete without access to error: distribution repositories. Please check the network and try again."I am connected to the internet through hardwire cable (also tried it through wifi) and have no trouble accessing internet through mozilla or downloading packages elsewhere. Any ideas on why my terminal won't recognize my internet connection??
View 3 Replies View RelatedI installed Fedora 10 and are using KDE. I struggled to get my network up and running - error for ping was "network is unreachable". I eventually got it right by modifying my ifcfg-eth0 file manually.
Now I'm trying to install with yum, but yum fails to connect, probably because of the proxy. I've set the proxy in <System Settings><Network Settings><Proxy> but it doesn't allow me to also add the authorization - greyed out. I've chosen the manual configuration of proxy.
1. How can I enable or allow the adding of authorization in the proxy dialogs or
2. Where is the proxy file which I can modify from command line (and how)?
I am building a v2.6 kernel floppy disk distro to run on a 1992 computer. FWIW The specs on the computer are
* 66 MHZ processor
* 12 MB ram
* 400 MB HD
* EGA monochrome video card
It runs Linux quite nice actually. I want to get it online with a null modem cable and use the other Linux box as a gateway to the internet. I have networking, TCP and slip support in the kernel. I do now know if I have all the needed network configuration files. I am able to ping 127.0.0.1. If I try to ping the other computer, I get a "network is unreachable" error. Tell me any commands to run on either box and I will attempt to do so. Remember the old computer is running a stripped down toolset since its only two floppies worth.
I have 2 live IP based Linux systems .
[Code]...
Both systems connected in same LAN based network . Both WAN live ips are connected through different modems. Problem is that , no system is able to ping or connect with other system with Live ip , though they are able to connect through LAN ip and both systes are accessable and also able to browse internet (google etc..) Ping error :-- Destination Host Unreachable.
I am trying to set up a virtualized ubuntu server in a local lan.In short : The server does not always answer to ping/ssh/whatever, but sometimes does, it seems completely random and dependant on the clients, it drives me crazy, what can I do to track down the problem ?In long : I will give the exact environment further down, but first the symptoms :A very strange network behaviour : the server does not always answer to ping/ssh/whatever from another computer in the LAN. It *seem*s completely random if it does or not, however I have identified some facts :- it is able to ping any computer in the LAN, or even outside (using IP or hostname) so it's connection seems ok.
- it is able to ping itself using "ping localhost"- the hyperviser is always able to ping it, however the *first* ping always fails (ie 3/4 first round then it works fine).now for the strange/random facts :- from my linux client, I can usually ping the server for about 10 minutes after I restart networking (in the ubuntu server), then it does not answer to ping/ssh/whatever anymore (though it happened that it suddenly came back for a while)- from my colleague windows client, we can ping the ubuntu server (same as the hyperviser, 3/4 first round), even when the linux client can't anymore- from my virtualized windows client, it is equal to my linux client (does not work fine)- from another linux client, same (does not work fine)- from 2 another windows machines, it does NOT work either !Now for the environment :- Hyper-V is the hyperviser on a DELL computer (not my fault, didn't have the choice)- Ubuntu server 10.04 standard install, with the synthetic network drivers activated in the kernel and defined in Hyper-V.
- A static IP- All computers in a LAN with mostly windows servers (such as DNS, AD and exchange servers)- there is another virtualized server (windows) on the same hyper-v global virtual network, with its own IP, and this one pings perfectly fine from any client.- the hyper-V also answers to ping
I have Ubuntu machine with cifs share mounted at boot via /etc/fstab
fstab entry looks like this:
/kain/buksica /media/buksica smbfs owner,_netdev,gid=xxxx,uid=xxxxx 0 0
When my coleague shuts down his windblows machine my Ubuntu box freezes.. I cannot even open my home folder.
Is there any way kernel can detect that this share is down and silently umount it or in some other way keep stable.
I have a CentOS5 box here (actually running the latest release of EasyIDS). Everything was working fine for about half an hour, and now I can't access the box through a web browser on it's IP address. I can't ping the box either. If I log on to the server, I can ping other boxes on the network and external resources, but nothing seems to be able to see it. I checked to make sure HTTPD is running, and it is. The firewall is not running (or at least that's what it says when I do service --status-all).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a home server running Ubuntu Server 10.10, it is running Samba for file sharing with a mix of Windows and Linux boxes in my house. My main problem is that the server is only accessible by IP or by using hostname.local, but it is not possible to connect to it by just typing the hostname. Further more, it is not being automatically discovered and listed by Windows or Linux clients.
What's really odd is that I also have an Ubuntu Desktop 10.10 install on a separate computer, and that computer is accessible using just the hostname and is automatically being discovered and listed by other computers.
What is missing on the server? What is responsible for resolving just hostname, avahi seems to only deal with hostname.local and that is working fine. I also compared the samba config of the desktop and server Ubuntu installs but wasn't able to find any setting that would be influencing this. Is there some package I'm missing on the server?
I use DNS on my server as a chasing DNS so its not fully configured. I seem to be having trouble with IPV6 addresses. I'm guessing this is linked to the 6to4 tunnel I have set up to my windows box, but I'm not really sure.
Code:
May 21 18:00:16 hyrule named[1148]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET/AAAA/IN': 2001:dc3::35#53
May 21 18:00:16 hyrule named[1148]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET/AAAA/IN': 2001:500:1::803f:235#53
May 21 18:00:17 hyrule named[1148]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'zg.akamaitech.net/AAAA/IN': 2001:503:a83e::2:30#53 .....
I have a strange problem with my debian lenny server. I am running ispconfig 3, squirrelmail, webmin, clamav, etc on my lenny server. I have a few domain names binded to my ip adress. Until yesterday, everything worked fine. Today, i couldn't seem to reach my mailbox, and my website appeared to be offline. But when someone checks it from outside, it works fine! Only i cant reach it. This problem only occurs with one of the six domainnames i have. The rest is reachable for me.
I checked the logs, the ipadresses, everything seems fine. I have no clue what it could be... anyone suggestions?
Figured out the problem, party... it's a problem with my XP. If i boot in Windows 7 the site is reachable. Doesn't make sense tho.
I have a big pb after installing F11 : my partition containing all my photos is now unmountable. Before installing F11, it was in ext3 filesystem
During installing F11 on sda1 (first hard drive), I noticed some strange error messages like "volume doesn't exist" or something like that.
now, when I try to mount my partition of my third hard drive, i get this :
Code:
[root@vincent vincent]# mount /dev/sdc1 /home/vincent/sdc1
mount: type inconnu de systme de fichiers 'lvm2pv'
which means "mount: filesystem type unknown 'lvm2pv' "
[Code]......
I have one server with 4 network interfaces:
eth0: 192.168.0.0/24 - local lan A
eth1: 200.1.2.3 - internet link - default route
eth2: 192.168.10.0/24 - local lan B eth3: 192.168.20.0/24 - local lan C
Lan A - Default routing to eth0
Lan B - Default routing to eth2
Lan c - Default routing to another server but the workstations has static routing to this server too.
Everything is working fine on Opensuse 11.1 until I upgrade this sever to Opensuse 11.2 ( Reinstall, not update at all ). After upgrade to 11.2 the routing across local lan interfaces simply not work, if you try to ping lan-to-lan you got the message: Network unreachable, even with the IP Forward enable, but the default route is working fine trough the SNAT.
I've come back to Opensuse 11.1 and everything become normal, does anyone have an problem like this? Maybe a bug? PS: I do not try to disable the AppArmor, next weekend I will try Opensuse 11.2 without the AppArmor and post here anyway.