I dont even know where to start looking on Google.Just in case this matters, for completeness.I've an inactive eth0 (wired ethernet link) with static IP.Other possibly relevant details:I'm using an old 802.11b card. Cant imagine this is relevant, because the internet is working fine as far as pinging anything outside the local network goes.
View 2 RepliesWe are having two DNS servers working as master and slave in our DMZ network subnet.DMZ network consist other servers also, but only the DNS servers intermittently becomes unreachable (no ping response) from different subnets whereas the internal communication (within subnet) happens at that time.From the DNS server we are unable to ping gateway ip also when the issue arises.We tried changing the port where DNS servers connected in DMZ switch and even reformatted the OS and reconfigured DNS but nothing seems to be working.We even tried changing the IP address of the server but after few days the New IP Address also gets affected
We google around a lot tying to fix the issue but no solution has yet come up.We are not even sure whether it is server issue or a network issue.
i have a problem with my internet connection in ubuntu 8.04 server edition. if i ping to: [URL]... i get: Destination Host Unreachable but when i ping to my gateway or other pc's in my network no problems occur.
View 9 Replies View RelatedMy internet gateway is 192.168.1.1 with a 255.255.255.0 subnet mask. I have a router connected to it running ddwrt with an ip 192.168.2.1/24 creating a second subnet behind it. I have a tenant moving in that will be wirelessly connecting to the ddwrt router, so to the 192.168.2.0/24 subnet. What I am looking for is a rule that will pass internet traffic to and from this client, but restrict him access from the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet otherwise. The ddwrt router is connected to the 192.168.1.1 gateway through its wan port, btw. For example, the client would get an ip address of 192.168.2.100 wirelessly from the ddwrt router. I want him to be able to surf the internet through the 192.168.1.1 gateway, but not to have any other access to the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet (ideally not have access to ANYTHING besides the internet).
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have TWO L3 + router switch (say switch1 and switch2). I created VLAN100 with VLAN ID 100 in both the switches. I created router 192.168.1.1/24 in Switch1. I created router 192.168.2.1/24 in Switch2. Switch1 is connected with 1.x/24 PCs. PCs are configured with 1.1 gateway. Switch2 is connected with 2.x/24 PCs. PCs are configured with 2.1 gateway. Both Switch1 and switch2 are connected by a trunk to carry VLAN100 data.
1)I have few PCs of 1.x connected to say Switch1 Is it possible for PC with IP 192.168.1.100(x) to ping PC with IP 192.168.2.100(y)?What are the configuration required in both switches to make them communicate ? All the device in both the subnets should ping/communicate with each other.
2)Move PC (192.168.1.100) to switch2. Move PC (192.168.2.100)to switch1.What will happen when PC(1.100) ping (2.100) and vice versa?What will happen when PC(say 1.80 in switch1) pings PC (say 1.100 in switch2) and vice versa? What will happen when PC(say 1.80 in switch1) pings PC (say 2.100 in switch1) and vice versa?
I installed Redhat Enterprise linux server5. it has two LAN card and two subnet connected to these two LAN card. i can browse network from these two network easily. But i created VLAN on one network card.Now i cant browse network from these VLAN subnet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a remote machine on which my server application runs. The remote server is linux based. What and all steps I would required do to IDENTIFY and SOLVE if The server is not reachable
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm using debian lenny.When I boot with kernel 2.6.36, ping always respond with Network is Unreachable. But when I boot with kernel 2.6.26 it works. I can't even ping the dafault router of 2.6.26 kernel when I am at 2.6.36. Also, system/administration/network does not show any connections while it shows something at the other kernel.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI installed centos 5.3 x86 at vrtualbox on windows 7 x64 as host. The ping answers "network is unreachable", ifconfig has an ip "192,168,51,100". At control panel, I seleted intel PRO/1000MT Desktop Host only. Is this centos's problem?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a remote machine on which my server application runs. The remote server is linux based. What and all steps I would required do to IDENTIFY and SOLVE for following two problems
1. The server is not reachable
Was trying to understand the behavior of TCP when the server becomes unreachable . For this I am using vsftpd and the default linux ftp client to check the behavior.I was trying the following things. Was Trying to download a file from an FTP server using the FTP client as anonymous user. While the file is getting downloaded, I removed the network cable from the FTP server to understand the behavior of TCP when the server becomes unreachable.
As per the functionality of TCP/IP , when the server becomes unreachable for whatever reason , the client tries retransmitting the data till it can send the data or it timeouts. But in my above experiment using FTP , I can see that the FTP client is not trying to retransmit data at all . This I came to know using by sniffing FTP traffic at the client side. Is this expected or default FTP client available in Linux does not obey TCP/IP functionality properly ?
Until yesterday everthing was working perfectly. Today I started my Debian Lenny and internet doesn't work. I can't ping my router successfully:
Code:
takada:/home/sam# ping 192.168.1.1
PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 192.168.1.97 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
[code].....
i don't understand what I am doing wrong. I started a CentOS Vm through Vmware server 1.05 When I run the machine I preform Dhclient and my machine gets an IP internet works fine.
When I change my IP to static everything stops working I cant ping anything anymore I cant ping my server I cant ping my gateway I cant ping google My config is done through Webmin but I know it can also be done through /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 My hosts file has this
127.0.0.1 localhost srvspam
my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file has this
BOOTPROTO=none
NAME=""
MACADDR=""
HWADDR=00:0C:29:59:91:DE
[Code]...
This is on Ubuntu 10.04 Server Edition. The ethernet cord was disconnected one day. I plugged it back in to find I can ssh to and from that machine, but I cannot update or browse the web (elinks) on it. I tried "ifconfig eth0 up" which did nothing. Why is it that only local connections work?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a ubuntu desktop 9.10 that is used as a file server and occasionally as a desktop. My problem is after about 15 min of idle the server can not be accessed by other computers. I attempted to disable power management but Im not sure if i did that correctly. Where should i look for problems?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI've been having a lot of trouble with getting wireless networking devices to work. I guess I have a lot of company, since mfrs don't seem to be very interested in supporting Linux.It seems that one common symptom is that, when I try to "Ping" using the Terminal, I get "network is unreachable".Does this mean anything specific, or is it a general output whenever the network is not carrying on two way communications? Does it mean that the wireless interface is down? Does it mean that the wireless hardware is not transmitting? Not receiving?
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy ubuntu installation was running fine with the Belkin F7D1101 v1 after using this install method:[URL]..But, after allowing ubuntu to autoupdate many programs (don't remember which ones), the device stopped working. I checked all of the commands in the link above. They are all still functioning. dmesg throws no errors, but it terminates with
<code>ADDRCONF (NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready</code> Are there any network files which may have been overridden from autoupdate? iwconfig wlan0 shows "Access Point: Not-Associated" What output can I show you to help me find the problem?
I have a network printer directly connected via ethernet cable to an Ubuntu netbook, but pinging the printer fails, giving "Host Unreachable". The network light on the ethernet socket is lit green, and there is nothing else cable-connected to the network - just a simple cable connection between the netbook ethernet socket and the Network printer (a HP Laserjet 4200n). Ping works fine if I plug the cable into a different machine (a Win XP box) and ping from there, so it's not a cable or IP address problem.
This sounds simple enough and should work, but I'm stumped. Clues, anyone?
I'm experiencing massive latency/unreachable problems on my Linux machine. It's true for all network connections, here's an example of me trying to ping my router:
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=15115 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=14107 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=13107 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=12107 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=11108 ms
[Code]...
I've tried now with both the maverick default kernel and 2.6.37-rc5 kernel (both 64 bit), same result. If I take the card up and down (ifup, ifdown) performance is restored for a little while, then it's back. I've tried changing cable, network card and router port but no luck.
I've got router with: eth2 - local network (192.168.1.1), ppp0 - uplink (x.y.z.a)
my firewall:
Code:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.5 on Mon Jan 11 12:22:25 2010
*raw
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [1038480:666298388]
[code]....
somehow iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -d x.y.z.a -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.1 helps, but imho there should be some other solution. kernel is 2.6.31.6, architecture is x86_64.
P.S. i've also tried iptables -A POSTROUTING ! -d x.y.z.a -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE that didn't help either.
I have two linux servers, I tried to ping from one linux box to another and vice versa but error message is "connect: Network is unreachable" Where as If I tried from windows machine I am getting the reply from both the servers.
C:Documents and Settings>ping bnkprod
Pinging bnkprod.softtech.com [172.20.40.141] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 172.20.40.141:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 4ms
I am plagued by the following error when attempting port forwarded connections to my minecraft server. Port forwarding is good and test ok on router based firewall. No iptables entries. Natty N, all updates current.
[INFO] Disconnecting CascadianNW [/184.100.247.218:57787]: Failed to verify username! [internal error java.net.NoRouteToHostException: Network is unreachable]
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: Network is unreachable
Some discussion indicate jvm network connection issues related to ipv6, but they are old posts.
I want to add this route but I am getting this error message. What is the reason of this problem? I cant add this route? how can i add?
Code: [root@linux/]# route add -net 10.1.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 gw 10.2.0.1 eth0 SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
I have an HP BL460c G5 with 5.3 installed fresh
it can ping its own IP address just fine
its a bit slow but constant pinging the switch its connected to
and i get alot of Destination host unreachables(a few do get through) when pinging the gateway
port on the switch is hardcoded to GB/full. and the server itself reads that its connecting at GB/full.
I have 5 1955 blades in an enclosure for an custom application cluster.All were running Centos 4.4 no problem.We wanted to start upgrading them cleanly to 5.5 so two of them got fresh installs of 5.5.The installs went well enough, no glaring errors.However they can only ping each other! The network settings are fine, no firewall or selinux. I'd run the info script but I can neither download it to them nor paste it in via kvm.Standard static entries, virtually identical to their 4.4 brethren. They ping each other so network drivers are fine, no built in switch configuration changes. It has to be some kind of network configuration issue that i'm just not seeing.
Edit* When i try and ping anything else, including the other blades, I get Destination Host Unreachable.
I have 2 x PCs and a NAS. Both PCs have 2x NICS. PC connectivity to Internet is via an ADSL router. Current config: Thus far (by choice) I've used static IPs in the 192.168.168.x range for my internal network, connecting all PCs and NAS via a jumbo frame enabled gigabit switch. This has facilitated moving data between the PCs and the NAS at high-speed. As both PCs also required Internet access from time to time, both are also connected to the ADSL router using the 2nd NIC and using subnet 192.168.1.x. I'm sure some of you are shaking your heads by now, but it works well and has been entirely hassle free.
However, I've an app running on the NAS that I'm keen to get Internet connected also. As my existing network devices are not using DHCP I figured the simplest method would be to change my ADSL router configuration such that it is in the same 192.168.168.x subnet, change its DHCP server settings to serve IPs in the same subnet (but in a restricted range I know won't cause any conflicts with the static IPs) and problem solved. On changing the ADSL router confiruration with all machines already booted up and configured as described above, everything worked. All devices could see one another, and access the Internet. On later rebooting the system this no longer works
- Internet access is fine but PCs don't see one another or the NAS. If I disconnect the ADSL Router from the PCs then all devices see one another again.
- Does having 2x NICS on a single device each assigned unique IPs in the same subnet create an issue and can it be overcome? I'd like to overcome it because making one of my PCs the gateway forces me to have it on anytime another device needs access.
- If I'm forced to use Internet connection sharing with one PC on the network connected to the router, how do I best configure this?
- One of the things I need to retain is gigabit connectivity between the PCs and PCs and the NAS (currently achieved by 192.168.168.x subnet being linked via gigabit switch).
I am trying to make Apache web server, it's work but cannot be browsed outside my subnet.I am on huge LAN network, not sure how it works, know it have TL-SL2428WEB Smart Switches and probably some kind of DHCP, every user have maximum 64KB, just plug UTP cable, and I have static address on that subnet like: "my.sub.net.ip" witch I know from Java NetworkInteface class or when I try to update IP on my www.dyndns.com Dynamic DNS account with ez-ipupdate, but my subnet is connected to Web with another IP like "my.isp.provider.ip" witch I get from whatismyipaddress.com and I check that is my Cable ISP provider web IP. It is possible that there is more subnet layers between these two IP.Problem occurs when I try to access to my web site from another computer. When I set dyndns host name to be my.sub.net.ip or use localhost everything works fine from my computer, I can access my web site, Apache work, I can use ssh. To illustrate you it work like this: Go to DNS server, find my host name, get my "my.sub.net.ip" and say "This is actually my localhost IP, no need to go on Web, lets loopback". But when I try from another computer even from my college's computer on same subnet it don't succeed. When host name is set on "my.isp.provider.ip" of course nothing works.
We, users of LAN, don't have access to our LAN nor we have admin. For example sometimes we stuck without net and we cannot even press reset button on switches or something like that, we have to wait for day to they, owner of LAN, order some professional to do that. It seems they are just user of Cable TV and IP, and they bay and install LAN without any kind of admin. Also, I use Fedora 13, with httpd, ssh and others packages that comes with Fedora 13 DVD. I know to write bash scripts, use yum, very good in C++ and Java, great programmer, but newbie in networking, , a very little Perl, html, web servers, I heard for DHCP, DNS, NAT, IP forwarding. How you see it is problem in my lack of knowledge about networking. I hope that I succeed to describe by problem with enough details. Please, try to help me. I be very graceful for any kind of help. Don't afraid to bomb my head with any kind of information hard to understand.
I've rent a server from a Germany data center,They use a single IP as their gateway that is not in range of my servers IP,Strangly server is working well and when I use 'route -n' command the gateway which is in other subnet appears properly./etc/sysconfig/network contains no gateway IP and I don't know how they set the default gateway while after reboot the gateway is the same, also the IP is static and there's now DHCP.I need to know how they did it so I can do the same on my VPSes.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with the Fedora 12 Network Manager - OpenVPN configuration. If I use the same configuration and manually start openvpn (as client) I get connected to the OpenVPN server and I can ping the network that I am accessing. With Network Manager - I get connected but when I try to ping is giving me "Destination host unreachable". The routing table looks similar except that when connecting with network manager is giving me on more route in table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 wlan0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 2 0 0 wlan0
192.168.171.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 tap0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 wlan0
Where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the IP of the OpenVPN server. When connecting "manually" I this routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 2 0 0 wlan0
192.168.171.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 tap0
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 wlan0
What I do wrong in Network Manager? If I try to delete the route with xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is disconnecting the vpn connection.
I have a 6to4 tunnel running on Ethernet (subnet 2002:ad4c:16cc:1) without problem. It runs radvd and announces a default route back to the Internet like this: "default via fe80::6a7f:74ff:fe0a:fbec dev br0"
On this same Ethernet I have a Linux plugbox (fe80::225:31ff:fe01:cc) which is a gateway to a network of IPv6 enabled sensors. I've assigned this second subnet 2002:ad4c:16cc:2. How do I get the plugbox to announce "2002:ad4c:16cc:2 via fe80::225:31ff:fe01:cc" so that the hosts on the Ethernet (2002:ad4c:16cc:1) will automatically pick up the route? The route works if I add it to the boxes manually. I've tried getting radvd on the plugbox to do this but I've had no success.