Ubuntu :: 10.4 - Conflicts In Software Sources?

May 26, 2010

I am having conflicts in my software sources some maybe out of date but I am not sure how to tell which ones are. Is there a program that solves these problems. I have Ubuntu 10.4

View 4 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Ubuntu Installation :: Can't Update Http://ppa.launchpad.net Natty/main/Sources Sources

May 16, 2011

I've got the following problem: I just noticed that there were just very few notifications about updating the system (usually there are damn many of them in a week) So I opened the update manager and clicked on "refresh list". The following result popped up: p,li{white-space:pre-wrap;}E: Error http://ppa.launchpad.net natty/main/Sources Sources 404 Not Found First I thought, it would be just some kind of server problem, but it didn't stop. The next thing was to research the thread and I even found something. However, the solution suggested didn't work at all. (Things, which might have caused this: I installed the default software center |I'm using Kubuntu, but in this case that fact doesn't matter| and used it. To sum up:

- not able to update the system referring to the launchpad main sources for 11.04
- following error: E: Error http://ppa.launchpad.net natty/main/Sources Sources 404 Not Found It would be great if this was a common issue and I've been simply too stupid to find a proper solution. So you could just post the link.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Change The Sources That Aren't In Sources.list?

Apr 21, 2010

I am running Jolicloud on my netbook (which I believe is an Ubuntu derivative) and I am tried to enter the getdeb.net sources in so I can install apps from the website through APT but

1) When I entered the sources into sources.list and then the key into Terminal and then went to the site and tried to install an app it didn't work.

2) I deleted the line of code in the sources.list file and when I opened terminal and entered "sudo apt-get update" it showed the list of sources, but on the list were Getdeb.net sources.

My question is how do I delete sources that aren't in /etc/apt/sources.list ?

View 6 Replies View Related

General :: Disabling Cd Sources In Apt/sources.list?

Aug 28, 2009

I am installing a hp officejet pro 8500 all in one printer to knoppix 6.0.1. install hangs saying i need to disable cd sources in etc/apt/source.list. How do i do this?

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu One :: U1 Conflicts And Slow Uploading

Feb 11, 2010

I keep getting u1conflicts in my Moneydance backup. For example, I am usually doing something in Moneydance daily. However, when I went to open it up yesterday, it didn't save anything from the previous 3 days. The last 3 days worth were u1.conflict. Moreover, this is the only computer that we do the Moneydance transactions on. My other question is about the speed it is taking to upload all my pictures. Granted, I do have A lot of pictures (3000+), but it is taking forever to upload them. When U1 is running, it takes all of the bandwidth. My husband already posted something about limiting the bandwidth problems. What I am wondering though is if there is a way to get all my pictures backed up faster? I have been trying to back them up for about a week now. In 6 hours, it only backed up 115 files of over 3000, and that is using up all of our bandwidth.

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Gourmet Conflicts With Miro?

Jul 17, 2010

I'm using Lucid. I installed gourmet, a gnome recipe program using Ubuntu Software Center. Everything appeared to go smoothly. Then I tried to use miro and discovered it was gone. So I reinstalled, then discovered gourmet was gone. OK, there's the problem, so I went to Synaptic to confirm. Tried to reinstall gourmet and was told it would remove miro. So, any fix for this? I'd like to use both programs.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Package Conflicts / Trying To Install Pidgin

May 25, 2010

Running Ubuntu 10.04 64bit on a Gateway md7818u.When trying to install Pidgin today, I found that I could not do so in the software center due to to a "Software Dependencies Cannot Be Resolved" error. So I went to Synaptic and attempted there. One package after another kept saying "dependent on (insert package name here) but will not be installed" so I went to manually install these packages, with the same results, leading me to "libdirac-encoder0" which would install but conflicted with many of my installed programs it said that all had to be removed to install this package, which will allow me to install all of these other packages, which will allow me to install Pidgin.

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Extra Effects Conflicts With OpenGL

Sep 28, 2010

Whenever I try to run any of my OpenGL programs with Settings -> Appearance -> Visual Effects: Extra, the program window flickers and disappears. However, if I turn my effects to Normal, my OpenGL programs run smoothly. Any way to have both on at the same time?

Code:
$ fglrxinfo display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5800 Series
OpenGL version string: 1.4 (4.0.10237 Compatibility Profile Context)

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Security :: Apparmour Conflicts With Cups-pdf?

Dec 28, 2010

With just the default settings, cups-pdf is not working. Kernel complains:

Code:
Dec 28 11:56:13 <hostname> kernel: [22362.501505] type=1400 audit(1293537373.392:2429): apparmor="DENIED" operation="mknod" parent=16861 profile="/usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf" name="<home_dir>/PDF

[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Security :: Changed From Firestarter To Gufw - Conflicts

Mar 11, 2011

Just want to stealth ports on my laptop. Had problems with firestarter when I installed in on 10.10. Set Firestater back to defaults and then dumped it with:

Code:
sudo apt-get purge firestarter
Set up Gufw to defaults and now am not sure what I am seeing with iptables.
iptables -L shows .....

Do these settings look correct for default settings for Gufw? or do I still have some problems with the old firestarter settings not being removed. All I want is all ports stealthed. I know that ping is enabled but I believe that is a default setting in ufw. Could I restore iptables to default with:

Code:
sudo iptables -F
and then enable Gufw and set default?

View 5 Replies View Related

Debian :: Why Aptitude Can't Resolve Conflicts That Apt-get Can

Sep 23, 2015

I'm using Debian Testing (I know it doesn't happen in Stable)

Words isn't required here. I'll show examples:

# aptitude dist-upgrade
Code: Select allThe following NEW packages will be installed:
  appstream{a} coinor-libcoinutils3v5{ab} coinor-libosi1v5{ab} cpp-5{a}
  g++-5{a} gcc-5{a} gcj-5-jre{a} gcj-5-jre-headless{a} gcj-5-jre-lib{a}
  geoip-database-extra{a} gnuplot5-data{a} gnuplot5-qt{a} icoutils{a}
  kded5{a} kinit{a} kio{a} libapt-inst1.7{a} libapt-pkg4.16{a} libasan2{a}

[Code] ....

Why apt-get can while aptitude can't?

I've searched on web, and all I can tell is that aptitude is "safer" than apt-get because it taking account the packages on hold.

But I don't have any package on hold! (I've tested dpkg --get-selections | grep hold)

View 11 Replies View Related

Fedora :: IRQ Conflicts - ECC Disabled In BIOS

Sep 3, 2010

When I moved from Fedora 13 from Fedora 11, I thought the annoying application crashes that I had been having were gone for good. Random crashes - firefox, Thunderbird, Abrt, metacity and what have you with SIGSEGV errors. I'm beginning to believe that these are not down to Fedora or even the RAM (Have run Memtest, several times). I'm not sure if what I am seeing are signs of IRQ conflicts of some sort. Can someone, please have a look and give me some guidance on what to do? Should I reinstall with acpi=off ? noapic? Also, don't have a clue why the system complains of ECC being disabled? The RAM is non-ECC. I have posted some sections of the logs here with links to the full logs instead of making this a massive post.

Code:
EDAC MC: Ver: 2.1.0 Aug 27 2010
EDAC amd64_edac: Ver: 3.3.0 Aug 27 2010
EDAC amd64: This node reports that Memory ECC is currently disabled, set F3x44[22] (0000:00:18.3).
EDAC amd64: ECC disabled in the BIOS or no ECC capability, module will not load.
Either enable ECC checking or force module loading by setting 'ecc_enable_override'.
(Note that use of the override may cause unknown side effects.)
amd64_edac: probe of 0000:00:18.2 failed with error -22
Complete system spec, BIOS details etc.

Full dmesg log on a fresh install. No issues experienced with system installation.

View 2 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE :: Conflicts On Transaction Via YaST32

May 30, 2011

I recently locked Thunderbird 3.1.8 and Firefox 4.0 using zypper addlock, but now every time I go into Online Update I get "There are some conflicts on the transaction that must be solved manually." with these "options" which I have to tell it "Do not install..." (2x) seen at SUSE Paste.Is Online update trying to update my locked apps or a DEP of the locked app or something else? I can't touch those 2 apps, but how can I "fix" this behavior?

zypper locks output:
Code:
# | Name | Type | Repository
--+--------------------+---------+-----------
1 | thunderbird | package | (any)
2 | firefox | package | (any)
3 | thunderbirud | package | (any)
4 | mozillathunderbird | package | (any)
5 | mozillafirefox | package | (any)

View 9 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE :: Package Conflicts Updating KDE SC 4.6.5

Jul 16, 2011

OpenSUSE 11.4, 64 bits, with
Index of /repositories/KDE:/Release:/46/openSUSE_11.4
and
Index of /repositories/KDE:/Extra/KDE_Release_46_openSUSE_11.4
repositories enabled. Since some days, if I go to YaST2 †’ Package †’ "Update packages if a new version is available" (I'm translating from Spanish) I get a warning that plasma-addons-4.6.5-9.3.x86_64 needs akonadi-runtime < 1.5.40, but that that requirement cannot be match because there are eliminated providers: akonadi-runtime-1.5.3-91.1.x86_64
and non instalable providers: akonadi-runtime-1.5.0-3.3.1.x86_64[openSUSE-11.4-11.4-0]
As "solution" it offers me to not install akonadi-runtime-1.6.0.93.1.x86_64 and libakonadiprotocolinternals1-1.6.0.93.1.x86_64 (which I selected) or to uninstall plasma-addons and kadressbook, which I do not think it is a good idea...

View 7 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 :: Update To 5.3 Have Some Packet Conflicts?

Apr 1, 2009

I tried to update from 5.2 to 5.3. But I got the error message:

Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test

Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstqtdemux.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.9-1.el5_3.1 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.3-8.el5.rf file /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstvideo4linux2.so from install of gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.9-1.el5_3.1 conflicts with file from package gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.3-8.el5.rf

View 4 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 :: Yum Update Failed Now Having Conflicts

Sep 19, 2011

I was trying to do a yum update and it hung on me so did a killall -9 yum. Now I go back to rerun the update.

View 4 Replies View Related

Debian :: OpenJDK And Icedtea - Plugin Conflicts

Aug 29, 2011

I have the following packages of openjdk and icedtea installed.
i openjdk-6-jre - OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspot JIT
i openjdk-6-jre-headless - OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspot JIT (headless) 
i openjdk-6-jre-lib - OpenJDK Java runtime (architecture independent libraries)
i icedtea-6-jre-cacao - Alternative JVM for OpenJDK, using Cacao
i A icedtea-6-jre-jamvm - Alternative JVM for OpenJDK, using JamVM

Now I am not a developer or anything just a user. My use-case are two :-
a. Running java programs on the desktop
b. Running java in the web-browser.

I *think* both of them get installed by default. Openjdk via the default-jre virtual package while icedtea due to some of the openjdk headless packages.
~$ aptitude why openjdk-6-jre
i default-jre Depends openjdk-6-jre (>= 6b23~pre8-2~)
~$ aptitude why icedtea-6-jre-jamvm
i openjdk-6-jre-headless Recommends icedtea-6-jre-jamvm (= 6b23~pre8-2)
~$ aptitude why openjdk-6-jre-headless
i openjdk-6-jre-lib Depends openjdk-6-jre-headless (>= 6b17)
$ aptitude why openjdk-6-jre-lib
i openjdk-6-jre-headless Depends openjdk-6-jre-lib (>= 6b23~pre8-2)

Notice the circular dependency at the end. From what I read the headless packages are basically for those systems where a server is running which does not have have a monitor, in which case I wonder why its installed in my system? My actual issue is of having the java for iceweasel. I did search for having java plugins and did not find anything except for icedtea-plugin to run java on my browser.

Trying to install it through gave conflicts :-
$ sudo aptitude install icedtea-plugin
[sudo] password for shirish:

The following NEW packages will be installed:
icedtea-netx{a} icedtea-plugin xulrunner-1.9.1{ab}
0 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded.
Need to get 8,642 kB/9,103 kB of archives. After unpacking 26.5 MB will be used.

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
openjdk-6-jre-headless: Conflicts: icedtea-netx (< 1.1.1-2~) but 1.1-1 is to be installed.
xulrunner-1.9.1: Depends: libmozjs2d (= 1.9.1.16-6) but 1.9.1.16-9 is installed.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:

Keep the following packages at their current version:
1) icedtea-netx [Not Installed]
2) icedtea-plugin [Not Installed] 
3) xulrunner-1.9.1 [Not Installed]

Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] q
Abandoning all efforts to resolve these dependencies.
Abort.

I did see the other solutions but most of them recommend downgrading both the openjdk and icedtea packages to the ones in testing rather than in unstable.

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora X86/64bit :: Conflicts With Jasper On Update

Nov 5, 2009

How to solve this conlifts, only pass in x86_64 and fedora 11?
--> jasper-libs conflicts with jasper
Error: jasper-libs conflicts with jasper

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Conflicts With File From Package Wireshark

May 12, 2010

I run into this error while trying to install wireshark. I am sure there is a quick fix. I can see the files are different I just don't know how to resolve the error.

Test Transaction Errors: file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_be.pyc from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_be.pyo from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_gen.pyc from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686
file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/wireshark_gen.pyo from install of wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wireshark-1.2.6-2.fc12.i686

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Yum Update - Conflicts With File From Package

Apr 25, 2011

I am a Debian User, now I have decided to install Fedora 14 x86_64 on my Acer Aspire computer, mainly to develop C++/Java software. Due to this, I have installed a lot of development packages. Shortly after installation, I have encountered problems updating some packages.

Below 'yum update' output:
file /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/bin-package-db-0.0.0.0/libHSbin-package-db-0.0.0.0.a from install of ghc-ghc-devel-6.12.3-8.3.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package ghc-6.12.3-5.fc14.x86_64

file /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/ghc-binary-0.5.0.2/libHSghc-binary-0.5.0.2.a from install of ghc-ghc-devel-6.12.3-8.3.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package ghc-6.12.3-5.fc14.x86_64

file /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/designer/libqwebview.so from install of qt-webkit-1:4.7.2-8.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package qt-x11-1:4.7.0-3.fc14.x86_64

file /usr/lib64/libusrp.so.0.0.0 from install of usrp-3.2.2-9.fc14.x86_64 conflicts with file from package gnuradio-3.2.2-7.fc14.x86_64

REPOs ENABLED:
Fedora 14 -x86_64,
Fedora 14 - x86_64 - Updates only.
Can't be a problem of multiple repos.

View 5 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE :: 11.2 - Security Patch For Libfreebl3 Conflicts

Oct 27, 2010

I have SuSE 11.2. There is a security patch for Mozilla NSS Library. However, I get told by YaST that the libfreebl3-3241.noarch conflicts with mozilla-nspr.i586. (There's also a patch for glibc but apparently, it is not "willing" to install this without installing the other patch first). Anyway, I did the following: zypper lp and then rpm -qi libfreebl3 and then zypper lr -d.

Here are the results:
Code:
zypper lp
Repository 'Updates for openSUSE 11.2-0' is out-of-date. You can run 'zypper refresh' as root to update it.
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages.....

Code:
zypper refresh
Repository '11.2' is up to date.
Repository 'Education' is up to date.
Repository 'Printing' is up to date.
Retrieving repository 'games' metadata [done]
Building repository 'games' cache [done]
Retrieving repository 'Updates for openSUSE 11.2-0' metadata [done]
Building repository 'Updates for openSUSE 11.2-0' cache [done]
Repository 'mozilla/openSUSE_11.2' is up to date.
Repository 'openSUSE-11.2-Non-Oss' is up to date.
Repository 'openSUSE-11.2-Oss' is up to date.

All repositories have been refreshed. I don't know what to do. In order to update FireFox, (on Aug 1, 2010) I had to do as posted in this thread: (instructions by caf4926) Updating firefox. So, I followed these directions: ImageBam - Fast, Free Image Hosting and Photo Sharing. Now what do I do?

View 3 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE Multimedia :: 11.1 - Mythfrontend Conflicts With PulseAudio

May 12, 2009

Woke up this morning and updated my main myth machine, and now mythfrontend won't start. I get this message:

Code:
2009-05-12 07:57:50.003 Closing DB connection named 'DBManager0'
2009-05-12 07:57:50.006 Primary screen 0.
2009-05-12 07:57:50.008 Connected to database 'mythconverg' at host: ***.***.*.***
2009-05-12 07:57:50.010 Using screen 0, 1680x1050 at 0,0
2009-05-12 07:57:50.069 AudioPulseUtil, Error: Failure to suspend: Invalid argument
2009-05-12 07:57:50.070 AudioPulseUtil, Error: Failure to suspend: Invalid argument
2009-05-12 07:57:50.070 ERROR: ***Pulse Audio is running!!!!***
2009-05-12 07:57:50.070 ERROR: But MythTV was not able to suspend it. EXITING!

So, I googled about, and found this thread on a mythtv dev mailing list:
No Start with Pulse Audio (Changeset 20310) | MythTV | Dev
Apparently, the new mythtv .21-fixes is incorporating the .22 pulseaudio check. Myth checks for pulse and exits if it can't kill it. I had sound issues with 11.1 before, and tried to remove pulseaudio but created bigger headaches for myself by doing so. Interestingly, if you log into a mythtv session from the xdm, mythfrontend will run. So, pulse isn't loaded at the session level. But, I'd like some other workaround that allows me my normal desktop at the same time!!

View 8 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE Network :: 11.4 / Nfs Server Conflicts With Vboxdrv?

Mar 17, 2011

I can't start NFS server anymore. I get the following message:

"insserv: FATAL: service syslog is missed in the runlevels 4 to use service vboxdrv"
"insserv: exiting now!"

Is it vbox conflicting with nfs server?

View 1 Replies View Related

Server :: Installing 32 Bit RPMs On 64 Bit - Conflicts With 64 Bit Packages

Aug 18, 2011

I'm using a 64 bit Linux server (OEL 6.1):

I was trying to install Oracle Database on this server that I realized the installer requires some 32 bit libraries. For instance it was looking for libXp.so.6 which existed under /usr/lib64, but not /usr/lib. Even when I changed the installation script to look into lib64 for the library, it failed with an error from Java that it needs 32 bit and instead has found 64 bit.

I downloaded a bunch of 32 bit RPM packages and when I tried to install them, I got the error that a newer version of those packages is installed, which is not the case. Cause all previously installed packages are 64 bit. I was wondering why it thinks that 64 bit packages are newer version of 32 bit packages. And is there a way to solve this?

View 1 Replies View Related

Software :: Filename Conflicts Avoided In A Environment?

Aug 2, 2011

This might be a question for developers and distribution-specific package maintainers respectively. Since google wasn't my friend today, I'll humbly ask here:

1. I've never ever encountered a "file already exists in filesystem" error when installing a new package (for the Arch Linux dist) - unless a previous version of the package was somehow forgotten by my package manager (pacman). Have I just been lucky, or do package maintainers keep a list of each and every path occupied by files of previous packages? Neither?

2. What needs to be considered by the developer of a piece of software when it comes to something as trivial as names of files produced by the source? Names of binaries, for example, don't seem to be entirely random, but descriptive of what the binary/library does in runtime. If I wanted to name my new amazing piece of software (which is not GNU echo) 'echo', what would primarily make me decide otherwise? Is there any "centralization" with regards to what names cannot (should not) be used in a given situation?

View 7 Replies View Related

Software :: Kdebase-runtime Conflicts With Kcontrol?

Dec 29, 2010

kdebase-runtime conflicts with kcontrol?

View 5 Replies View Related

Software :: Preventing Dependency Conflicts - CentOS 6

Aug 3, 2011

I've recently installed cacti on one of my servers and grimaced a bit when I had to install additional third-party yum repositories for CentOS 6. My question is, how does one go about preventing potential conflicts with certain dependencies overwriting key/critical dependencies relied upon from packages that might share them, i.e. apache? I understand yum priorities and have read the discussions regarding pros/cons from the threads involving one of the YUM maintainers. Since I need my servers to act as production-class equipment and, hence, be as reliable as they can, I'm always hesitant to allow yum to automate package upgrades when third-party repos are involved. How best to handle this?

View 3 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 :: Upgrading From 5.5 To 5.6 - Conflicts With File Error

May 13, 2010

I issued "yum update" and the process ended with a transaction check error(see below).
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test

Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/backgrounds/images/default-5_4.jpg from install of oracle-logos-4.9.17-6.noarch conflicts with file from package desktop-backgrounds-basic-2.0-41.el5.centos.noarch
file /usr/share/backgrounds/images/default-dual-wide.jpg from install of oracle-logos-4.9.17-6.noarch conflicts with file from package desktop-backgrounds-basic-2.0-4
[code]...

I installed Oracle Database on this server few months ago. I see in /etc/yum.repos.d directory a public-yum-el5.repo file with entries pointing to Oracle which must have come from that installation. Now how do I proceed from here?

View 2 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Package Conflicts On Update (32bit / 64bit)

Aug 14, 2009

I've tried the "yum clean all" option to no avail. When I update either with the GUI or command line, I get this error:

[root@joshhardman ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package anacron.x86_64 0:2.3-78.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package binutils.x86_64 0:2.19.51.0.14-1.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package crontabs.noarch 0:1.10-30.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package genisoimage.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package icedax.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package shadow-utils.x86_64 2:4.1.4.1-5.fc11 set to be updated
---> Package wodim.x86_64 0:1.1.9-6.fc11 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution .....

Can I not have the 64 bit and 32 bit packages installed at the same time?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: DHCP Conflicts With DHClient Package

Feb 24, 2010

I am trying to install dhcp server on F12 with yum, but at the time I issue yum install dhcp, I got the following message:

Transaction Summary:
Install 1 Package(s)
Upgrade 0 Package(s)

Total size: 821 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test

Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/man/man5/dhcp-eval.5.gz from install of dhcp-12:4.1.1-5.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package dhclient-12:4.1.0p1-17.fc12.i686
file /usr/share/man/man5/dhcp-options.5.gz from install of dhcp-12:4.1.1-5.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package dhclient-12:4.1.0p1-17.fc12.i686

And I see that if I uninstall the dhclient package, I will lose my networkmanager, which I also need, is there a way to have a dhcp server as well as dhclient utility on fedora as it is possible on rhel?

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved