Server :: Iptables PREROUTING \ User Via Internet Access LinuxA Tcp Port 1935?

Oct 20, 2010

LinuxA & LinuxB
linuxA:eth0(10.1.1.1) connected linuxB:eth0 (10.1.1.2)
linuxA:eth1(202.1.20.45) connected internet

[code]....

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Networking :: IPTables Port Forwarding Using Prerouting Not Working?

Feb 18, 2010

I was trying to setup port forwarding on my setup. My network consists of:

Code:

[Server: xxx.xxx.xxx.15]
|
|
[ switch ]

[code]....

I ran the following 2 commands:

# iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.15:80
# iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT

Yet I am unable to connect. Are these the correct commands? I am using IP Masquedering on the same box using the following commands:

Code:

$IPTABLES -P INPUT ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -F INPUT
$IPTABLES -P OUTPUT ACCEPT

[code]....

I don't think there is a hidden firewall in the switch but if these commands are correct, then I may need to contact my ISP and see if they are blocking the commands. I just wanted to make sure I was not doing some stupid mistake before I try to contact my ISP.

EDIT: Also, is it possible to forward Port 80 requests to different servers depending on the hostname used to connect, so say [URL] redirects to server xxx.xxx.xxx.15 while hhh.com redirects to xxx.xxx.xxx.16?

View 3 Replies View Related

Security :: Iptables - Limit Access To Port 8443 On Server To 2 Specific IP Addresses

Dec 23, 2010

I'm trying to limit access to port 8443 on our server to 2 specific IP addresses. For some reason, access is still being allowed even though I drop all packets that aren't from the named IP addresses. The default policy is ACCEPT on the INPUT chain and this is how we want to keep it for various reasons I wont get into here. Here's the output from iptables -vnL

[Code]...

Note the actual IP we are using is masked here with 123.123.123.123. Until I can get everything working properly, we're only allowing access from 1 IP instead of 2. We can add the other one once it all works right. I haven't worked with iptables very much. So I'm quite confused about why packets matching the DROP criteria are still being allowed.

View 10 Replies View Related

Networking :: IPtables - Allow PPTP Server To Access Internet

Jan 24, 2010

I'm running an own PPTP Server, but I can't get it to access the internet. All my PCs at home run in the 192.168.0.0/24 net, the PPTP Server has local IP192.168.0.5 and remote IP 192.168.0.80-99. The router to the internet is at 192.168.0.1, and the IP of eth0 on the machine where the pptpd runs is 192.168.0.4. I want to be able to connect to the internet trough that VPN and access my local LAN servers (which works fine so far). I can ping internet and local IPs successfully, but can not access them with a browser, or connect to them in any other way. I have 'accepted' all in/output and forwards.

I am running a Squid proxy on the same machine, and if I do:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -j REDIRECT -i ppp0 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -p tcp --dport 80 --to-port 3128
I can access the internet through Squid, but of course Jabber/ICQ etc. Won't work then because it just refers port 80. But I want the PPTP Clients to connect to the internet directly, if I don't use that rule it's not possible to load any pages. But pinging works all the time. DNS is also working fine, but I can't even access webpages via IP directly. How can I allow the PPTP IPs 192.168.0.80-99 to get direct access to the Internet with Iptables?

View 3 Replies View Related

Server :: Iptables Rules To Allow User's Access M$ Exchange 2010

Feb 17, 2010

We have setup a Exchange server at remote location and while testing I am facing following issue:

1. While configuring Outlook, it's not able to reach the exchange server which hosted at third party and is reachable from everywhere except my Local Network.
My Local network is as following:

Local Lan On Private subnet - Gate+Firewall(Iptables) with two interfaces(private and pubic)with natting-Internet Connectivity.

Where as Exchange server is setup at a Data Center and accessible from internet.

I need to know that what all rules are required for user's to configure outlook with Exchange 2010.

Rest of the things are working fine (Internet connectivity, Exchange OWA access).

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Flash Video On Port 1935 Is Timing Out?

May 20, 2010

I'm having problems flash video on port 1935 is timing out, other flash video works fine though. I'm running 10.04 and have tried flash from the repos (flashplugin-nonfree) and also downloaded the .deb package form the adobe web site, neither work.

I have been using this to try and problem solve but it just says i'm timing out [URL]...

View 2 Replies View Related

Networking :: Prerouting - Port Forwarding ?

Jul 24, 2010

Have router running Fedora 11 with eth0 - Internet (with static IP) and eth1 - LAN using IP 192.168.0.8.

I want to contact over RDP my Windows 7 machine, so I added to iptables:

But this won't work.

View 9 Replies View Related

Fedora Networking :: Iptables Redirects And Prerouting Settings Lost After Reboot

Oct 31, 2009

Im new to fedora 11 and iptables, and i need to set the following set of instruction so VirtuaBox can accept request from lan, to the mailServer in the guest os, but after restart fedora i have to input it all again.How can it become permanent entry in iptables.

View 2 Replies View Related

Security :: Iptables Requirement \ Package Passed Through Masquerade Don't Pass Through The Prerouting Rule?

Nov 26, 2010

The iptables has every rule set correctly, the users in the subnet works great, but I have the following issue.every user connect to a mysql running on the internet through the port 3306, the forward and masquerade do the job. Now I have a user in the outside, and he wants to connect to a mysql in a certain machine (Not the gateway), prerouting rules solve my problems, but all the packages from the inside users goes now to that certain machine. I would like something like if the package passed trough masquerade don't pass trough the prerouting rule, and if it come from the outside (Not a package that come from a petition from the inside) pass trough the prerouting rule.

View 6 Replies View Related

Server :: If Forward A Port In Iptables, Does The Port Have To Be Open On The Firewall

Aug 5, 2009

If I forward port 80 to port 3128 for squid with an iptable rule, does port 3128 have to be open on the firewall or is this all routed behind the firewall?

View 4 Replies View Related

Server :: User Access Control To Internet

Sep 29, 2010

Am using Suse 10.2 for internet and e-mail server. currently all my users have access to the internet if they know how to setup their web browsers. how do i deny some users internet access so that a user can only access his/her e-mail but not internet.

View 1 Replies View Related

Software :: Squid 3.0 Access List / Remove Redirect Statement From Iptables All Internet Access Is Blocked?

Jun 11, 2010

I have an old FC2 box running Squid version 2.5. It has been running since 2003 so I am in the process of replacing it. I have a new machine with FC11, iptables, and Squid 3.0 installed.

On the old machine I use iptables to intercept Port 80 traffic and send it to Squid. By default I block all internet access and allow only sites that are in an Allowed_Sites.txt file. Within Squid I also have statements to allow certain users to bypass Squid based on their IP address.

I have set up the same thing on the new box. I have iptables intercepting the Port 80 traffic and sending it to Squid. That is working because if I remove the redirect statement from iptables all internet access is blocked.

The problem I am having is that Squid is not blocking any websites. It acts like the ACL is set to http_access allow all. I have worked on this for several hours and am stumped.

These are my Squid rules:
acl allowed_sites url_regex "/etc/squid/Allowed_Sites.txt"
acl manager proto cache_object
acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/32
acl to_localhost dst 127.0.0.0/8 0.0.0.0/32
acl SSL_ports port 443
acl CONNECT method CONNECT
http_access allow manager localhost
http_access deny manager
http_access allow Bypass_Users
http_access deny !Safe_ports
http_access deny CONNECT !SSL_ports
acl our_networks src 192.168.1.0/24
http_access allow allowed_sites
http_access allow our_networks
http_access deny all
icp_access deny all
htcp_access deny all
http_port 192.168.1.254:3128 transparent
hierarchy_stoplist cgi-bin ?
access_log /var/log/squid/access.log squid
refresh_pattern ^ftp: 1440 20% 10080
refresh_pattern ^gopher: 1440 0% 1440
refresh_pattern -i (/cgi-bin/|?) 0 0% 0
refresh_pattern . 0 20% 4320
visible_hostname FC11.proxybox
icp_port 3130
coredump_dir /var/spool/squid

View 2 Replies View Related

Security :: IPTABLES Port 8080 \ Still Cannot Access Through Ssh Nor Putty And It Doesn't Show Up When Netstat Either?

Jun 6, 2011

I'm trying to open port 8080 on my application server. I've included it in my iptables; however I still cannot access through ssh nor putty and it doesn't show up when I netstat either.Here is my iptables-config:

-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i eth0 -s xxx.xx.x.0/24 -j ACCEPT

[code].....

View 7 Replies View Related

Server :: Iptables Port Forwarding Not Working?

Mar 26, 2010

I have the following setup and Im trying to forward all incoming connection on port 1194 on eth2 which is the external network to ip 192.168.10.100, but seems its not working.

Current config:

# Generated by iptables-save v1.3.8 on Sun Nov 16 00:00:54 2008
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [26751696:2175544875]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [339911:19096812]

[code]....

plus im adding the prerouting:

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -p tcp --dport 1194 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.10.100

This configuration doesnt work. I also I have tried:

iptables -D PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -d XX.XX.XX.XX --dport 1194 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j DNAT --to 192.168.10.100:1194

and the same its not working. Connecting thru telnet to the domain: telnet mydomain.org 1194 doesnt work, but within the server, running telnet 192.168.10.100 1194 it works.

View 8 Replies View Related

Server :: IPTABLES Port Redirecting To SQUID

Jul 12, 2011

i've got a software that uses a specific tcp port e.g 11111. i want to redirect all the traffic from 11111 to squid port 3128. i'm using the following commands to redirecting:

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 11111 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.1:3128
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 11111 -j ACCEPT

my ubuntu server has two interfaces. eth0 is for local network (dhcp assigns ips) and eth1 is for internet. my ubuntu server acts as a gateway and as an authentication server for users.

at squid also i have the following configuration regarding my port:

acl myport port 11111 http_access allow CONNECT myport. my squid installation is not transparent as users need to authenticate in order to access the web.

my application is a windows application and of course is not working. i examined the packets with wireshark and i noticed that when the program tries to access the internet, squid replies with err_invalid_request (the packet contains that data). the program is trying to send some plain text via port 11111 and as far as i can image, somehow squid declines the data. i cant get rid off squid as i want to pass the traffic from squid. what is the problem?

View 1 Replies View Related

Server :: Iptables Firewall To Allow Ssh On Port 3210

Mar 9, 2010

I have setup sshd_config for port 3210! I have difficult setup the iptables firewall to allow ssh on port 3210! i always enter this:

iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 3210 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 3210 -j ACCEPT

but after i restart ssh, the system do not allow port 3210... why? do i forget something?

View 4 Replies View Related

General :: PPPOE Server Access Internet Clients Fail To Access Internet

Aug 26, 2010

I have a linux box (fedora) with two ethernet cards eth1 and eth2. On eth1 I successfully configured a PPPOE internet connection. Such that from the server I can browse the internet. On eth2 I wired it to a wireless router essentially to provide the wireless cloud. On eth2 I also configured dhcp, such that the Linux box is both PPPOE and DHCP server.However my clients on the LAN cannot access the Internet.

On passing the routing command I get
Destination Gateway Iface
196.44.x.y 0.0.0.0 ppp0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 eth2 (my subnet)
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ppp0.

The router (functioning as a wireless access point mainly) has a fixed IP address of 192.168.1.2 and eth2 has IP address 192.168.1.1. The dhcp file running on Linux has been set with option router (Gateway) 192.168.1.1. I cannot figure out how to correctly set the routing table such that my clients on wireless can access the internet cloud. I googled and googled but no solid solution. Any suggestions?

View 3 Replies View Related

Security :: IPtables And FTP When Server Listening On Non-Standard Port?

Nov 9, 2009

I'm using iptables with modules ip_contrack_ftp to be able to use passive ftp. It works well as long as port 21 is being used as listening port. Is there any way to make it work when I configure my ftp server (vsftpd) to listen on an alternative port, lets say 21001 or something? The helper module only seems to be working properly with the standard port, so I was wondering whether there was a way to "tell it" that another port is being used? I mean, of course I make a rule in fw to allow traffic to the alternative port.

But once it's time to start passive connection, then the iptable module cannot handle it properly. I could solve the problem by making a range of passive ports in the ftp-server configuration and allow the incoming traffic to them, but then using helper modules doesn't make any sense. I just want to allow the traffic to the listening port and then want the ip_contrack_ftp module to take care of the rest. This is what I do today - but only port 21 seems to be working. Is there a way to do this with a non-standard ftp port?

View 5 Replies View Related

Security :: IPTABLES - Restrict Internet Access Based On Time Of Day And MAC Address

Feb 6, 2010

I am trying to configure my Linux router to restrict Internet access for one computer on my LAN. It needs to be restrictive based on the time of day and the days of the week. I am using the MAC address of the computer to single out the one computer that needs to be blocked. However, this is my first attempt at making any rules with iptables, and I am not sure if I am doing this right. If some one can take a look at this I would greatly appreciate it. This is what I have done so far.

Here is my thinking. Create a new target. Check the MAC address, if it is NOT the offending computer return to the default chain. If it is the offending computer check that we are between the allowed hours and dates and ACCEPT. If we are not within the time/date range then drop the packet.

Code:

Here I am trying to route all packets regardless of the computer on the LAN into the blocked_access chain for checking.

Code:

Is it a good idea to route all traffic through the blocked_access chain? I do run other servers that are accessible from the Internet, so I am not sure how this setup will affect that. I also use shorewall on the router to setup iptables for me. How would I integrate this with shorewall?

I am using squid to block access when he is using the web browser. However, he is still able to play games(World of Warcraft) and the like.

I am using Debian sid, iptable(1.4.6), shorewall(4.4.6), kernel 2.6.32-trunk-686.

View 7 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 Server :: Port Configuration - Being Blocked - Iptables And Connection

Jul 4, 2009

I have a fresh installation of CentOS 5 I'm using for a server, and I'm having issues with port configuration. I have iptables running, and it started with no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file. I added a few basic rules (port 53, port 10000 for webmin), saved the file, and restarted the service. I tried connecting to webmin, scanned ports, and traffic was blocked. I set iptables to allow all traffic and restarted the service, and it still showed basically every port as being blocked. It seems port 80 and port 22 work for some reason, even when I tell iptables to block all ports.

I'm not sure what's going on here. Iptables is reading the /etc/sysconfig/iptables file, and if I use lynx localhost:someport it responds as it should according to the file. However, if I try connecting by IP, it's like there's some other firewall or something running that does whatever it's configured to do.....

View 2 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 Networking :: Can't Access Any Port From The Internet

Nov 28, 2010

1. I've just installed Centos 5.5 on a dell machine with 2 network interfaces, and have disabled SELinux.

The output for the command sestatus is: SELinux status: disabled

2. Am I right to think that iptables is not a concern since SELinux is disabled? In any case, the output for the command "iptables -L" is:

Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:domain
ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:domain

[Code]....

View 6 Replies View Related

Server :: IPtables - SSH Running On Port 2298 (Host Connection Refused)

Aug 1, 2011

I have 2 servers..
let say server A and server B
On server A open ssh is configured and is running on port 2298. So from my machine I can login there using ssh on port 2298
But when I login to server B and from there I try to connect to server A I cannot.
ssh: connect to host <ipaddress here> port 2298: Connection refused

View 2 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 Networking :: Iptables Not Opening Port To Connect Via Vnc To A Server Running 5.5?

Apr 27, 2011

I'm trying to open up some ports to connect via vnc to a server running Centos 5.5. I've edited /etc/sysconfig/iptables everything *looks* fine, but I still can't seem to get access to the port I've opened (I added some newlines for clarity between commands):

[Code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Networking :: Can't Access Internet On 4 Port Ethernet Router

Mar 1, 2010

I changed to a 4 port ethernet router (D-Link DSL-2542B Adsl2+)with intention to share Internet access with my brother (he's on Vista).Initially it all went well,but 3 days ago there were connection problems occured on the part of the ISP. Without realized the problem,I had reset the router.This morning I've been informed by the ISP that the connection has been re-established.So,I accessed the Internet via the 4 port router but failed to do so (server not found).Suspecting that the problem was from the 4 port router,I reverted to my old Adsl router (DSL-520B single port) and without any problem I managed to access the Internet back.I really need help to configure back the 4 port ethernet router to its initial state.

View 9 Replies View Related

Security :: Iptables: Verify Traffic On Port To Check If It Is Legitimate For That Port?

Apr 18, 2011

Is there any way to verify if packets being trafficked over a certain port are valid for the service you want to use this port for?

One obvious example that probably clarifies my question:
When I open port 443 (outgoing or incoming) for https/ssl traffic, I don't want this port to be used for say openvpn traffic.
Thus: when someone wants to surf to a website with https, it should be ok but if someone wants to connect to his home openvpn server over that same port, it should be blocked.

View 5 Replies View Related

Networking :: Use Iptables In Order To Forward All The Incoming Packets For Port 5555 To Port 5556?

Apr 4, 2011

I'm trying to use iptables in order to forward all the incoming packets for port 5555 to port 5556 on the same server (192.168.2.101).

I wrote the following commands:

iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i any -p tcp --dport 5555 -j DNAT --to 192.168.2.101:5556
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m state --state NEW -d 192.168.2.101 --dport 5556 -j ACCEPT

View 3 Replies View Related

Networking :: Iptables Can't Port Forward (PAT Port Address Translation)?

Feb 20, 2010

I'm using a Debian servers, as router/firwall.. I've two ethernet interfaces into the server, one for wan and one for lan. The i use SNAT so my LAN clients can access the internet throgh the debian router. That is working... Now i want to be able to access servers on the LAN site from the WAN site, and i wanna use port address translation (PAT). I have a FTP server running on a lan server, so i'm trying to portward port 21.

iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth1 -d (WANIP) --dport 21 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.2:21

When people try to access my FTP from the WAN site, they are redirected to the local FTP server, and they are promted for crendentials, but when the credentials are typed, and the local ftp server should answer the wan request, the connections dies.

The wan clients are being promted for credentials, so they are redirected to the local lan server, but after that the connections dies, so i think there is some kind of nat problem, when the local lan server is trying to respond to the wan request..

Here i my iptables script:

#flush table
iptables -F
#input regler

[code]....

View 6 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Provide Internet Access To Multiple Computers Using Only A Hub And 1 Ethernet Port

Mar 18, 2010

Ever need to provide access to multiple PC's and did not have a router only a hub. Maybe this isn't original thinking, but then again maybe you didn't think of doing it this way (which i am sure there are many ways to do it) So I have 2 Ubuntu Servers, 1 Windows Box and a Hub - All 3 with internet access off of single ip and single Ethernet port.

While searching for a backup method today I came across Clonezilla. I was wondering if this was the right thing for me and since I needed to backup my roommates PC for a reformat and install of Windows I decided I would give it a try, but only if it would work. I didn't want the hassle of going into the main part of the house and finding out what cord was what as there is a cable modem connected into a switch (4 static IP's with internet) and one port of the switch hooked to a router) Anyways, didn't work he was on the router I was on the switch)

But this got me thinking. When I setup my server to do this, during one of the setup scripts it said it was setting up Internet access for client machines and that it was assigning them IP addresses threw a DHCP server that it had installed.

So, I dug up the hub connected the internet cable to hub up link and Server 1 on port 1 Server 2 on port 2 and Windows on port 3 The main server gets the internet provided IP address and routes it to the hub via a virtual interface. Server 2 is configured for DHCP and the windows box, It was set to get info automatically but it didn't fill the DNS info so I had to manually do that (just a heads up) I decided to use OpenDNS Servers (208.67.222.222 & 208.67.220.220) but im sure putting in the gateway IP address would have worked too.

So, by now if you need this I am sure you are excited and want to get to it. Like i said there are probably other ways of doing it, ways that don't involve you installing clonezilla and DRBL, maybe even just DRBL is needed, maybe one of them installed whats needed as a dependency- all I know is it works, if you know - elaborate so people know, but hey- this way not only do you have internet access on all PC's you can deploy custom images to them as well.

View 1 Replies View Related

Networking :: Iptables - Port Forwarding To Blocked Port?

Mar 25, 2010

I have a mail server on which I would like to block port 25 on my eth0 for everyone except our external spam filter. the problem is that I want our users to be able to connect via port 10025 which is forwarded to port 25, which then is blocked...

View 2 Replies View Related

General :: Allow Access To Server From Only 1 IP Address Using Iptables?

Aug 3, 2011

I have a server located remotely that I'd like to protect by allowing access to only my IP address (on any port). Currently anyone can access the server using ssh, http, and any other services that my server is running. (The reason I need to protect it for now is that it's a test/development server and really only needs to be accessed by me.)

The downside of doing this is every time my desktop IP address changes (from where I access the remote server), I would need to update the iptables configuration. (This could be a hassle, but based on my limited knowledge it seems to be the best way to allow access from only myself.)

Could anyone share how to allow access to my server using iptables from only my IP address and on any port?

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved