I'm trying to open up some ports to connect via vnc to a server running Centos 5.5. I've edited /etc/sysconfig/iptables everything *looks* fine, but I still can't seem to get access to the port I've opened (I added some newlines for clarity between commands):
[Code]....
I'm trying to open port 119. I already have a few ports open. I've used webmin to open both incoming and outgoing ports. iptables --list --numeric gives me:
Code:
...
ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:10000
[code]....
My first time installing centos server and adding it to xp home network. I am new to setting up my own network in general. I have a home windows wired ethernet xp network (simple linxs router) with 2 xp boxes and one centos5 box all connected to the same router. I just set up the centos box running tomcat on port 8080. I need to do two very basic things at this point, but am not sure what I need to do:
What do I need to do so I can:
1. Connect in firefox on one of my xp boxes and call the tomcat server running on my centos box?
2. Be able to ftp to centos box from either of my xp boxes?
I have 2 servers..
let say server A and server B
On server A open ssh is configured and is running on port 2298. So from my machine I can login there using ssh on port 2298
But when I login to server B and from there I try to connect to server A I cannot.
ssh: connect to host <ipaddress here> port 2298: Connection refused
I have 2 server behind the netgear router on my network . win2k3 and CentOS development server, I have port forarded 80 to win2k3 server which i can access over the internet and is accessable. However I can SSH CentOS machine and portforwarded 8080 and 82 for web access, I can't access via any of the port, browsers says UNABLE TO CONNECT.. there is no firewall in CentOS machine.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a fresh installation of CentOS 5 I'm using for a server, and I'm having issues with port configuration. I have iptables running, and it started with no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file. I added a few basic rules (port 53, port 10000 for webmin), saved the file, and restarted the service. I tried connecting to webmin, scanned ports, and traffic was blocked. I set iptables to allow all traffic and restarted the service, and it still showed basically every port as being blocked. It seems port 80 and port 22 work for some reason, even when I tell iptables to block all ports.
I'm not sure what's going on here. Iptables is reading the /etc/sysconfig/iptables file, and if I use lynx localhost:someport it responds as it should according to the file. However, if I try connecting by IP, it's like there's some other firewall or something running that does whatever it's configured to do.....
I am new to iptables. The setup tool on a VPS doesn't work. So, I am learning to insert rules. I have inserted so many and some of them show as duplicates now.
1- I want to know how to remove the duplicates. Is there a file that these rules are store in so I can go in and easily edit it?
2- Is there any other utility that handles firewall in Linux that I am unaware of? or is the iptables the ultimate door guard? This is a plain install of CentOS.
3- Since I believe I opened port 5090 but I think it still might be blocked, could SELINUX be the problem? How can I get my way around setting it to permissive or disable if I don't have access to "setup" command?
4- What is the order of iptables reading? does rule #1 supersede all other rules? or does the last rule supersede all rules prior to it?
5- Do the rules below make a fairly safe system? (except for the duplicates which should be remove) I understand that a safe system is dependent also on the applications that are allowed in this category and I am not talking about those. I am talking about dropping all other inquiries and in general is this how iptables are setup? This is what I currently have:
[root@tel ~]# service iptables status
Table: filter
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
num target prot opt source destination
[Code]...
I have been trying for days now to get this to work. didn't want to bother people with my questions, i have installed Fail2Ban 0.8.4 on CentOS 5.4.
I get the email notifications from Fail2Ban stating that it just blocked another IP, however, when i look at the iptables through webmin, nothing is actually in there, also the log/secure file dose not show that the ip has been blocked.
Even when I try to log-in with the wrong password, after a few tries i get the email telling me that my ip is blocked, however, I can still SSH using my 'blocked' IP.
Pl can anyone guide me to connect centos 5.5 using ethernet port to ADSL Broadband modem which is configured in PPPoe mode?
View 19 Replies View RelatedIf I forward port 80 to port 3128 for squid with an iptable rule, does port 3128 have to be open on the firewall or is this all routed behind the firewall?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to use iptables in order to forward all the incoming packets for port 5555 to port 5556 on the same server (192.168.2.101).
I wrote the following commands:
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i any -p tcp --dport 5555 -j DNAT --to 192.168.2.101:5556
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m state --state NEW -d 192.168.2.101 --dport 5556 -j ACCEPT
I'm using a Debian servers, as router/firwall.. I've two ethernet interfaces into the server, one for wan and one for lan. The i use SNAT so my LAN clients can access the internet throgh the debian router. That is working... Now i want to be able to access servers on the LAN site from the WAN site, and i wanna use port address translation (PAT). I have a FTP server running on a lan server, so i'm trying to portward port 21.
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth1 -d (WANIP) --dport 21 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.2:21
When people try to access my FTP from the WAN site, they are redirected to the local FTP server, and they are promted for crendentials, but when the credentials are typed, and the local ftp server should answer the wan request, the connections dies.
The wan clients are being promted for credentials, so they are redirected to the local lan server, but after that the connections dies, so i think there is some kind of nat problem, when the local lan server is trying to respond to the wan request..
Here i my iptables script:
#flush table
iptables -F
#input regler
[code]....
I have a mail server on which I would like to block port 25 on my eth0 for everyone except our external spam filter. the problem is that I want our users to be able to connect via port 10025 which is forwarded to port 25, which then is blocked...
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have a proxy server up and running but one server using port 8181 cannot be accessed.how i can open that port!...i tried adding it in the safe ports but it still isn't working...
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to connect with my server via telnet, but when i sent the command (telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Port) doesn't works and shows then follow error: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused, It happens with any port. Is strange but my telnet services works (telnet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx), In addition, i tried with firewall enabled and disabled and the problem still happens. My centOS run on virtualbox.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWow, don't know why I seem to have so much trouble with this ftp stuff. I have so start all over a few times, reinstalling Lucid Lynx destop all over, and adding the needed files to make it a server. I am just trying to do something simple for now- just having a localhost server environment to develop my joomla website, and later on host it from my server 'out there' (I already have a domain name and dynDNS service with nameservers etc. but don't want to do that yet, as I have in the past with my router forwarding port 80, and actually got hacked! so I don't want to do that again until I learn more about security) My problem right now is that I can't even get the localhost ftp to 'connect to the server'. i know the host name (localhost) and username/password that I set when I set up Lucid Lynx, and I'm sure that is what I use for the ftp usernamepassword, host etc. And I put port 21 for the port. I see from 'Shields Up' that my port 21 is closed. So I followed advice on a thread and entered a few commands in the terminal to ad iptables etc. But still, port 21 is closed and I can't install components with the Joomla installer in admin's backend. And I can't use fireftp to even change permissions in my local folders. What do i do next, open port 21 somehow? I saw a terminal command about opening port 21 that was simple but I forget it.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi am not able to port 8080 on my CentOS VPS server.I have followed all the instuctions as mentioned on iptables wiki page.Also I am able to telnet my ip address and port number, But can not access from browser.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am trying to run a minecraft server from my slackware machine, but i am having an issue.The port for minecraft (25565) is open on my router, but it is reported as closed by all the open port check tools. I noticed that the same was happening for my VNC server. the port reports itself as closed until i actually open the vnc server software. for examplei check the vnc port (5900) when the vnc software is not running, and it is reported as closed. nmap localhost gives the following:
Code:
Not shown: 993 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
[code]....
I am using centos 5.3 , and also using webserver in local network
Here is all configuration
1, server
eth0 , 222.80.1.90 this is live ip
eth1 10.0.0.1
2, webserver
eth0 10.0.0.2
I want set iptables on server 1 , to acces webserver from other city ,
How to configure iptables
I am unable to open my webmail on my small business computers (all ubuntu 10.04 LTS using a Billion router) but am able to access it from my home computers (also ubuntu 10.04 LTS but with a different router).
The most likely problem is obviously that the firewall in the router is blocking access. I know how to open ports in the router's firewall, but how do I determine which port or ports need to be opened?
I have asked my email provider, and that have replied that the port can vary and I need to get my technical support people to do it. Obviously they struggle to understand the concept of 'small business"!
iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -p udp --dport -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --dport -j ACCEPT
and the rules are placed in iptables, i can see them when I do iptables -L. But when I do netstat -an | grep 161 I can see that port 161 (SNMP) is not listening. Why?
I have the following setup and Im trying to forward all incoming connection on port 1194 on eth2 which is the external network to ip 192.168.10.100, but seems its not working.
Current config:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.3.8 on Sun Nov 16 00:00:54 2008
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [26751696:2175544875]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [339911:19096812]
[code]....
plus im adding the prerouting:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -p tcp --dport 1194 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.10.100
This configuration doesnt work. I also I have tried:
iptables -D PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -d XX.XX.XX.XX --dport 1194 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j DNAT --to 192.168.10.100:1194
and the same its not working. Connecting thru telnet to the domain: telnet mydomain.org 1194 doesnt work, but within the server, running telnet 192.168.10.100 1194 it works.
i've got a software that uses a specific tcp port e.g 11111. i want to redirect all the traffic from 11111 to squid port 3128. i'm using the following commands to redirecting:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 11111 -j DNAT --to 192.168.0.1:3128
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m tcp -i eth0 --dport 11111 -j ACCEPT
my ubuntu server has two interfaces. eth0 is for local network (dhcp assigns ips) and eth1 is for internet. my ubuntu server acts as a gateway and as an authentication server for users.
at squid also i have the following configuration regarding my port:
acl myport port 11111 http_access allow CONNECT myport. my squid installation is not transparent as users need to authenticate in order to access the web.
my application is a windows application and of course is not working. i examined the packets with wireshark and i noticed that when the program tries to access the internet, squid replies with err_invalid_request (the packet contains that data). the program is trying to send some plain text via port 11111 and as far as i can image, somehow squid declines the data. i cant get rid off squid as i want to pass the traffic from squid. what is the problem?
I have setup sshd_config for port 3210! I have difficult setup the iptables firewall to allow ssh on port 3210! i always enter this:
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 3210 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 3210 -j ACCEPT
but after i restart ssh, the system do not allow port 3210... why? do i forget something?
Im having a frustrating issue with my two machine cluster I setup using Conga. Everything was working great except now when lucci starts mysql the port (3306) is never opened to outside machines. I can do a "ps -ef | grep mysql" and see it running as well as login to mysql on the node it is running on - but an nmap of the machine does not show the 3306 port and I cannot login to mysql remotely and yes I turned off all iptables(iptables,ip6tables) and SElinux is disabled.What am I missing here? If I start mysql on my own (and it is using the same my.cnf as lucci is) it does show the port open and works perfect,t for some reason when lucci starts it, no dice
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am running a voip server on port 5060. I want to hide this to all the robots scanning the net permanently - I know this is not enough security - it is just to prevent them from wasting by bandwidth testing all usernames until fail2ban stops them !
I'd like to have port 5060 accepting requests only from 'trusted' hosts, while others (client with dynamic ip) use port 5065 - thus, port 5060 will only appear open for some trusted partners and the bots will skip to something else.
I have setup the iptables rules succesfully to accept only trusted hosts.
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -s 93.x.y.z -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 5060 -j ACCEPT
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -p udp -m state --state NEW -m udp --dport 5060 -j DROP
I've added a PREROUTING NAT rule that change the port from 5065 to 5060 for others - but then, this gets caught in the INPUT rule as port 5060 -A PREROUTING -p udp -m udp --dport 5065 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.1:5060
This works so well that the packets coming on port 5065 are translated to port 5060 and get caught in the DROP rule...
I have a CentOS box which is Internet Facing. It has 3 LAN's connected to it which are for virtual machines.
I want to port forward port 445 to a machine on one of the LAN interfaces. I have tried various ways to get it done, but still cannot access that port from the interface. I definately know device hosting port 445 is live, as I can ping it from the CentOS box and use lynx to access it! (It's a web server)
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 445 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.2:445
I've been Googling about port forwarding iptables and even though there's result and I've applied it in my script, I can't make iptables forwading request to another machine so I decided to ask help.
eth0 is my Internet Interface (1.2.3.4 is the public ip)
eth1 is my Lan Interface
eth2 is my DMZ Interface
[code]....
There is this server where in I want to use port redirection using iptables. For port redirection I have used nat table with PREROUTING chain and REDIRECT option. Like:
Code:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport pop3 -j REDIRECT --to-port 8110
It just does not work. I have tried to redirect other ports as well but nothing works.
[code]....
I have a server running debian squeeze and kvm to virtualize a Windoze box. It's setup to use NAT. This is because of limits on the network by the admin and unfortunately, there isn't a way to get around this.
View 1 Replies View Related