Im running a web server on port80, but i want traffic coming from ip 212.333.111.222 on port 80 to be fowarded to port 9020 on the same server that my web server is rinning at that is my sshd port
View 1 RepliesIs there any way to verify if packets being trafficked over a certain port are valid for the service you want to use this port for?
One obvious example that probably clarifies my question:
When I open port 443 (outgoing or incoming) for https/ssl traffic, I don't want this port to be used for say openvpn traffic.
Thus: when someone wants to surf to a website with https, it should be ok but if someone wants to connect to his home openvpn server over that same port, it should be blocked.
I want to set my ip as static and port forward it through a specific port can anyone help me with this im using ubuntu 10 with 64 bit OS
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a mail server on which I would like to block port 25 on my eth0 for everyone except our external spam filter. the problem is that I want our users to be able to connect via port 10025 which is forwarded to port 25, which then is blocked...
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a CentOS box which is Internet Facing. It has 3 LAN's connected to it which are for virtual machines.
I want to port forward port 445 to a machine on one of the LAN interfaces. I have tried various ways to get it done, but still cannot access that port from the interface. I definately know device hosting port 445 is live, as I can ping it from the CentOS box and use lynx to access it! (It's a web server)
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 445 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.2:445
I've been Googling about port forwarding iptables and even though there's result and I've applied it in my script, I can't make iptables forwading request to another machine so I decided to ask help.
eth0 is my Internet Interface (1.2.3.4 is the public ip)
eth1 is my Lan Interface
eth2 is my DMZ Interface
[code]....
I have a server running debian squeeze and kvm to virtualize a Windoze box. It's setup to use NAT. This is because of limits on the network by the admin and unfortunately, there isn't a way to get around this.
View 1 Replies View Relatedhow to set an external static IP address to forward to an internal static IP address. Here is an example:
Linux box (slackware) IP address =
eth0: 10.xxx.xxx.xxx (internal)
eth1: xxx.xxx.xxx.170
eth1.0: xxx.xxx.xxx.171
eth1.1: xxx.xxx.xxx.172
DVR system that I need to forward to: IP address =
xxx.xxx.xxx.251
xxx.xxx.xxx.252
This was all setup by someone else whom I have never spoken with. The IP tables seems to be set up but I cannot provide a screen shot at this time. What I need to do is this. When a user connects to the external static IP address of xxx.xxx.xxx.171 with their DVR software, IP tables will forward to the DVR system at xxx.xxx.xxx.251. The ports desired are 554,555,556, and 557. I know some about Linux but not about IPtables.
I've used iptables since it replace ipchains, and I've never had a problem like this.The problem is, as you can see by the title, that port forwarding simply does not work.
network topology:
Slackware Linux Server:
eth0 - LAN (192.168.0.0/25)
eth1 - DSL Static IP
eth2 - cable Static IP
eth1 is our standard office connection; it handles all of our default traffic (web browsing for the staff, email, etc). eth2 is our VPN connection, as well as use for all incoming connections (www, etc). Behind the linux box I have a series of Windows Server 2008 R2 boxes that are used to run our office software, website, etc - I don't care how nice they make their products these days, I simply don't trust any MS box open to the net.
Therefore, this leaves me with having to port forward port 80 from eth2 to the internal IP address of the web server.
My ruleset is as follows:
$WWW - ip address of the web server
iptables -A FORWARD -d $WWW -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to $WWW
Running ip route shows that I have routing entries for all 3 networks, and I can ping, ssh, etc to any of the addresses without issue. OpenVPN connects across eth2 as well, and all 15 of my VPN tunnels work fine. However - and here's the kicker - if I delete the default route and replace it with the route for eth2, port forwarding works fine.
If we accept that my networks are as follows:
192.168.0.0/25 - eth0 net, gw .1
1.1.1.0/29 - eth1 net, gw .1, eth1 ip .2
2.2.2.0/30 - eth2 net, gw .1, eth2 ip .2
then ip route reveals the following:
2.2.2.0 via 2.2.2.1 dev eth2
2.2.2.0 dev eth2 scope link src 2.2.2.2
1.1.1.0 dev eth1 scope link src 1.1.1.2
[code]....
I have a linux server I'm intending to use as a firewall. The server has the following adapters
eth0 - Public IP (VLAN2)
eth0:1 - Public IP2 (VLAN2)
eth1 - 10.241.4.4 (VLAN4)
the Default gateway is my ISPs gateway. Additionally, I have the following route set: route add -net 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 gw 10.241.4.1
I have a server that exists on VLAN 208 at IP 10.241.209.67/21., its GW is 10.241.208.1 (first IP in /21 range)
as it is on the 10.0.0.0/8 network, traffic from the firewall is successfully routed from that server through my router to the FW and out to the Internet. The FW can ping, ssh, etc... the server and vice versa.
I want an iptables rule that will allow me to forward port 4401 on eth0:1 to 10.241.209.67:4401.
Is this possible since the IP is not on the same subnet as eth1, even though it is accessible?
I'm a bit better than a neophyte linux user. I have not made port forwards with it in the past without scripts to assist so I'm looking for not just "it is possible", but also the syntax of how to add it.
I have the following setup and Im trying to forward all incoming connection on port 1194 on eth2 which is the external network to ip 192.168.10.100, but seems its not working.
Current config:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.3.8 on Sun Nov 16 00:00:54 2008
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [26751696:2175544875]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [339911:19096812]
[code]....
plus im adding the prerouting:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -p tcp --dport 1194 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.10.100
This configuration doesnt work. I also I have tried:
iptables -D PREROUTING -t nat -p tcp -d XX.XX.XX.XX --dport 1194 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j DNAT --to 192.168.10.100:1194
and the same its not working. Connecting thru telnet to the domain: telnet mydomain.org 1194 doesnt work, but within the server, running telnet 192.168.10.100 1194 it works.
I am using ubuntu 8.40 as a router wit 2 nic.eth0 is for local and eth1 is for external network.i have a internal webserver in my lan and want to forward some ports to the net and i executed te following commands.
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth1 -d 192.168.0.239 --dport 8080 -j DNAT --to 192.168.10.99:8080
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -i eth1 -d 192.168.10.99 --dport 8080 -j ACCEPT
But i cant connect to the port 8080 from the external network.
iam using arno iptables can give me command to ip forwarding cause my web server behind my router. my ip web server 192.168.0.11 and my ip router on eth 1 192.168.0.1 and eth0 i use to dial up my modem and i use pppoe for that.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've got two virtual machines running, the first VM (VM1) has two network interfaces, one bridged with my real lan, one a private subnet. The second VM (VM2) has one nic, only on the private subnet.
I have VM1 acting as a router for VM2, giving access to my real lan for internet access. The problem I'm having is I cannot get VM1 to forward ports 80 (http) or 222 (ssh) to VM2 from my real lan.
Here is the script I've cobbled together from various (foreshadowing!) locations:
Code:
I've been beating myself over the head with iptables and CANNOT get port forwarding to work. Here's my situation: Static LAN IP on eth0 Static internet IP on eth1 ip_forward is turned on by uncommenting in sysctl.conf Here's the output of iptables-save:
Code:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Tue Mar 8 10:34:12 2011
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [2443:347058]
[Code]...
Edit: by the way, the intended purpose of this machine is to server as a gateway and firewall. MASQUERADE is working, for whatever that is worth. And the host behind the firewall that is serving up http is definitely working too. All that is not working is getting hosts on the internet talking to hosts behind the firewall.
I was trying to setup port forwarding on my setup. My network consists of:
Code:
[Server: xxx.xxx.xxx.15]
|
|
[ switch ]
[code]....
I ran the following 2 commands:
# iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination xxx.xxx.xxx.15:80
# iptables -A INPUT -i eth1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
Yet I am unable to connect. Are these the correct commands? I am using IP Masquedering on the same box using the following commands:
Code:
$IPTABLES -P INPUT ACCEPT
$IPTABLES -F INPUT
$IPTABLES -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
[code]....
I don't think there is a hidden firewall in the switch but if these commands are correct, then I may need to contact my ISP and see if they are blocking the commands. I just wanted to make sure I was not doing some stupid mistake before I try to contact my ISP.
EDIT: Also, is it possible to forward Port 80 requests to different servers depending on the hostname used to connect, so say [URL] redirects to server xxx.xxx.xxx.15 while hhh.com redirects to xxx.xxx.xxx.16?
I'm new to linux, but enjoy using it very much, especially without a GUI, console is fun! I need to set up port forwarding. We have 3 servers, 1x running Ubuntu server 8.04 (used as transparent proxy), 1x server 2003, 1x windows xp.
The linux box has the following ips:
eth0 (internal) 192.168.1.5
eth1 (external) 192.168.0.7
Windows server 2003:
192.168.1.6
Windows XP:
192.168.1.9
Router:
192.168.0.1
The router automatically forwards specific ports to 196.168.0.7 (Linux eth0). From there I want to forward port 8585 to 192.168.1.6 and 3000 to 192.168.1.9. Is there a way that I can do this using iptables?
The commands that I think I'm gonna use look like this:
iptables -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.0/24 -p tcp --dport 8585 -d 192.168.1.6 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.0/24 -p tcp --dport 3000 -d 192.168.1.9 -j ACCEPT
Would this be a correct way of doing it? My biggest problem is that I can't test it without going live, and if I go live and something doesn't work, the entire building will be left without internet, people will hate me. Also, The proxy captures all data on port 80 and forwards it to 3128 so that the proxy can monitor the usage, and a few systems runs fine with it, others however can ping websites, and internet explorer says "website found, waiting for reply" but the webpages cannot be displayed.
I have a computer with two interfaces eth0(LAN) and eth1(WAN).I have followed some guides on the internet and came up with this iptables configuration:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.4 on Wed Apr 20 09:43:12 2011
*nat
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
[code].....
I need to set OUTPUT to DROP, and add the outgoing traffic one by one, but I couldn't do it. My current config is as follows:
Code:
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
-A FORWARD -j RH-Firewall-1-INPUT
:RH-Firewall-1-OUTPUT - [0:0]
-A INPUT -j RH-Firewall-1-OUTPUT
#previously ESTABLISHED,RELATED comm is ok
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
#80 is ok from all
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
If I change OUTPUT to DROP in :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0], I don't get any response from a server running in that box. I am using RHEL 5.5. Now, asking Red Hat is not an option: I have the license but I don't have support license.
My firewall , wich is an Ubuntu server 10.10 , have 3 interfaces:
eth0(192.168.0.254):linked to the DMZ
eth1(192.168.1.254):linked to the LAN
eth3(212.217.0.1):linked to the Internet
-The DMZ have one web server with a static address (192.168.0.1).
-My LAN address range is (192.168.1.2-192.168.1.100) managed by a DHCP server in the same firwall machine.
There are some of the rules that I need to set up :
-Allow HTTP between the LAN and the internet
-Allow HTTP between the web server in the DMZ, and the internet.
Is there a way to tell the firewall , to redirect all incoming HTTP requests only to the web server in the DMZ ?
I'm trying to limit access to port 8443 on our server to 2 specific IP addresses. For some reason, access is still being allowed even though I drop all packets that aren't from the named IP addresses. The default policy is ACCEPT on the INPUT chain and this is how we want to keep it for various reasons I wont get into here. Here's the output from iptables -vnL
[Code]...
Note the actual IP we are using is masked here with 123.123.123.123. Until I can get everything working properly, we're only allowing access from 1 IP instead of 2. We can add the other one once it all works right. I haven't worked with iptables very much. So I'm quite confused about why packets matching the DROP criteria are still being allowed.
I have just set up shorewall on my router running Arch Linux. The external network is on eth0 and the internal network on eth1.I have set it up for masquerading and that works fine and I can open ports to the firewall. But I'm having trouble with port forwarding to my internal machines.The problem I have is that when port 22350 is forwarded to 192.168.1.3 on my local network, checking the port with nmap from a remote computer gives me:
Code:
PORT STATE SERVICE
22350/tcp closed unknown
[code]....
here is what i need to do: [url]..... resolves to 209.5.5.5 which is my public IP on the external side of my router. Router is setup to forward (port forwarding) all port 80 based traffic to internal ip 192.168.1.10 which I want that server to lookup the request, and for web1 forward to 192.168.1.101, for web2 to .102 etc....how can i acheive this? What do i need to use?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI've got a box with 2 interfaces, with IP1 = 192.168.100.1 and IP2 = 10.1.1.1 respectively on them. I've got an iptables rule that looks like:
Code:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/8 -p udp -j SNAT --to-source 10.1.1.1 --random
If I get 2 consecutive packets from the same address and port from 192.168.100.0/24, they get SNAT-ed and come out of the same port on 10.1.1.1. If then I get another packet from the same address and port 10 minutes later, then it gets SNAT-ed, but comes out of a different port on 10.1.1.1. How can I set the time delay I would like iptables to remember its incoming address/port to outgoing port mappings?
I tried to make "ssh tunneling", but failed and got this message.
Quote:
Administrator@windstory-PC /
$ ssh -R 7869:localhost:7869 windowsstudy@192.168.0.4
windowsstudy@192.168.0.4's password:
Warning: remote port forwarding failed for listen port 7869 Last login: Wed Jul 21 01:56:04 2010 from 192.168.0.2 -bash-3.2$
1. system environment
192.168.0.2 - windows 7 + copssh
192.168.0.4 - centos 5.4 x86 + openssh
2. Guide for setting "ssh tunneling"
[URL]
3. Added this to sshd.conf
Quote:
AllowTcpForwarding yes
4. "netstat -na|grep 7869" at 192.168.0.4
Quote:
[root:maestro:~]# netstat -na|grep 7869
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:7869 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:7869 127.0.0.1:53539 ESTABLISHED
[code]....
5. result of "ssh -vvv -R 7869:localhost:7869 windowsstudy@192.168.0.4"
Quote:
debug3: authmethod_lookup password
debug3: remaining preferred: ,password
debug3: authmethod_is_enabled password
[code]....
6. I added 7869 for telnet service as follow;
Quote:
mytelnet 7869/tcp # My Telnet server
I've got a box with 2 interfaces, with IP1 = 192.168.100.1 and IP2 = 10.1.1.1 respectively on them. I've got an iptables rule that looks like:
Code:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/8 -p udp -j SNAT --to-source 10.1.1.1 --random
If I get 2 consecutive packets from the same address and port from 192.168.100.0/24, they get SNAT-ed and come out of the same port on 10.1.1.1. If then I get another packet from the same address and port 10 minutes later, then it gets SNAT-ed, but comes out of a different port on 10.1.1.1. My question is: how can I set the time delay I would like iptables to remember its incoming address/port to outgoing port mappings?
i used the angry ip scan software and found alot of the public ip addresses on our network are accessable from outside when they are not suppose to, For eg printers/ pcs etc. to make a start on locking down the network i was wondering if anybody knew th iptables command to add a rule which blocked all incoming traffic to specific ip adresses on the network and to a range of ip addresses.
View 7 Replies View RelatedSo unfortunately I live in a place that will not let me have a static IP, so I have been setting up access to my home computer via reverse SSH tunnels that run on an micro amazon ec2 instance. I have gotten SSH to work fine, but I cannot figure out port forwards.Here is a small infographic I made to help illustrate (i felt the question was clearer with a diagram of what I was trying to do. Here are the commands listed in the graphic:I the following on my home computer: ssh -R 1337:localhost:22 -i .ssh/tokyoMinekey.pem ec2-user@ec2serveraddressand I run this on the ec2 server: ssh -L6600:localhost:6600 -Nf localhost -p 1337
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm looking to use Linux (Ubuntu 9.10) as a network bridge between two subnets. I can configure iptables to permit all traffic on eth0 (subnet 1) to pass to eth1 (subnet 2) but before transmitting that traffic I want to perform further analysis. Is it possible within iptables or via a third-party product such a pyroman, to write a "hook" that then directs that traffic to another application installed on the same host?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure iptables for only HTTP and HTTPS traffic. I start by blocking all traffic, which works, via:
Code:
iptables -F
iptables -P INPUT DROP
iptables -P FORWARD DROP
iptables -P OUTPUT DROP
I then try to allow HTTP and HTTPS on eth0 with these commands, which does not work:
Code:
iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 80 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
Code:
iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 443 -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth0 -p tcp --sport 443 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT After these commands I should be able to access the internet. Does anyone know why this is not working?