here is what i need to do: [url]..... resolves to 209.5.5.5 which is my public IP on the external side of my router. Router is setup to forward (port forwarding) all port 80 based traffic to internal ip 192.168.1.10 which I want that server to lookup the request, and for web1 forward to 192.168.1.101, for web2 to .102 etc....how can i acheive this? What do i need to use?
View 6 Replies
Im running a web server on port80, but i want traffic coming from ip 212.333.111.222 on port 80 to be fowarded to port 9020 on the same server that my web server is rinning at that is my sshd port
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy PC is part of a LAN so while configuring eth0, we specify the Gateway to access all other resources in the network. The PC successfully access Internet through a proxy server configured in Mozilla(manual proxy config) but the update option or the Synaptic Pkg mngr are not able to access internet anyway. I have tried the option "Apply System Wide" in "Network Proxy" but no progress so far.
I also tried to forward all request coming for udp/tcp on port 80 to the proxyserver on a specific port, but with no success. Also I can't ping any website from terminal, reiterating the fact that I can access internet in firefox through the proxy on a specific port.
I have just recently switched my setup to have my server be in the middle of traffic and act as my new router while making my other routers just switches. However, after doing this I can no longer access my UPnP devices. They used to show up in my router but I am assuming either there is an issue with my iptables rules or that some how having my server run the dhcp and dns routing is messing with UPnP.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAt the moment I have a proxy and all the users have to configure it in the browser to access internet. I want to make the users able to browse even without configuring the proxy in the browser. but eventually it should be received in the proxy rather than giving an error to the user. I heard with transparent proxy I can redirect all the traffic from a particular network, to a particular host( ie my existing proxy).
I tried this using firewall rules. But then the existing proxy doesn't understand the protocol of the requests. I heard that it should be in the kind of proxy protocol.
Recently I notice that when I'm connected to an vpn server (pptpd) and I'm using it as a default gateway my download and upload speed decreases almost to the half of the usual speed. I made a test using iptables in order to count how much GRE packets are generated (except the real traffic itself) in that way:
Code:
iptables -I INPUT -p gre -j ACCEPT
iptables -I OUTPUT -p gre -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -s 172.16.10.101 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -d 172.16.10.101 -j ACCEPT
The first 2 rules match all GRE packets between the pptpd server and client, and the next rules - the traffic between the server and the client.
When I turn the counters to zero and begin to generate traffic (to browse, to download etc.) I see that the GRE packets are even more than these in the FORWARD chain.
So, my question is first of all is my test correct and is it true that so much gre traffic is being generated during the browsing (it becames clear that the traffic is double than if the pptpd wasn't used as a gateway) and if yes - can that traffic be reduced?
We have something on our network that is reaking havoc with our content filter. I am trying to track it down, but so far I have been unsuccessful. We have approximately 500 devices in 100+ different locations spread across 9 states. Looking at each computer is not really feasible.
I need a machine that can sit in between our network and our internet connection and graphically monitor in real time and logs how much traffic each device is sending and receiving. It would need to sit inline so it has to have two nics and be able to pass traffic. The machine also needs to be transparent. Reconfiguration of our routers or workstations is not an option.
I have used ethereal and wireshark before. Ethereal may be a viable option, but wireshark seems to provide lots of information, but no practical way to make use of it. how to set up the box to be a transparent device on the network that will allow internet bound traffic to flow (freely)?
I need to set up my centOS computer as a firewall in my home network. Ive got 2 interfaces, eth0 and eth1. I want to allow and forward all traffic on eth0 and block all traffic on eth1 except ssh, ping(icmp) and DNS. How do I do this? Ive tried some editing in /etc/sysconfig/iptables but no luck.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI wanted to tell my server to block all traffic but US only traffic. So i followed this guide:[URL].. Now I know, it's the best way to help prevent hackers/crackers (doesn't matter to me what they are called. I just have to stop them). My server only deals with US clients anyways so might as well just start right there for my server's security before getting into the brute force and injection preventions. So I got it all done compiled everything moved to the proper directory. I then started to setup my iptables. Like so
Code: iptables -F INPUT
iptables -F OUTPUT
iptables -I INPUT 1 -s *.*.*.* -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT
iptables -I INPUT 2 -s *.*.*.* -p tcp -j ACCEPT
[Code]...
After seeing that i went digging in the code and figured it was something todo with memory allocation.
I have just set up shorewall on my router running Arch Linux. The external network is on eth0 and the internal network on eth1.I have set it up for masquerading and that works fine and I can open ports to the firewall. But I'm having trouble with port forwarding to my internal machines.The problem I have is that when port 22350 is forwarded to 192.168.1.3 on my local network, checking the port with nmap from a remote computer gives me:
Code:
PORT STATE SERVICE
22350/tcp closed unknown
[code]....
I'm using sendmail and I'm trying to set up some forwarding accounts. It seems simple enough but all the results I've gotten on Google so far are pretty unhelpful. Isn't there a straightforward tutorial somewhere?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a VM with RHEL 5 without an X server. My host has Windows 7.
I need to connect to the VM and redirect the X11 output of the commands to my host.
I know that if my host were a GNU/Linux machine it would be as easy as ssh -X .
I'm ussing PuTTy to connect by SSH to the VM, I tried enabling X11 forward option in PuTTy config, but nothing happened.
I'm trying to forward the X session to my Windows laptop (using Xming and putty), and I have no problem opening new programs such as gedit and having them forward, but how would I forward something such as a Firefox window which is already open and running? I don't want to shut it down and restart it. Is there any way of forwarding something that's already running? And if so, can I "unforward" the X session without closing the program down?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've spent pretty much the whole night trying to figure out how I can achieve the following: If a certain Keyword, say [key], is in the subject line, then the email is forwarded to a list of people.
My recipe (now) looks like this:
Code:
:0
* ^Subject: .*[key].*
! my-email@gmail.com
The (verbose) procmail logfile gives me this:
[Code]....
Is my recipe wrong in any way? I pretty much copied it from available ones.
It's a university server, so I'm no admin, just a user. How can I figure out whether some setting that the admin made prevents procmail from calling sendmail or whatever?
I have an OpenGL program in a Linux server. I want to run the program remotely with X forwarding, but it fails, whereas programs such as xclock and xeyes work fine. (I confirmed that the program works in the local desktop environment.) Below is additional information.
Test Code:
#include <GL/glut.h>
#define WIDTH 300
#define HEIGHT 300
void display()
[Code]...
How do I setup Self Port Forwarding on Fedora 13 x64 How Port Forwarding Works Port forwarding allows access to a local area network by a remote user through forwarding ports that provide ftp access and web server access. The operating systems use a kernel or ipfirewall to carry out the port forwarding process.
There are several different ways that port forwarding is accomplished. * Self Forwarding: Self forwarding is port forwarding that is accomplished on a local area network that has multiple computers connected to the network. Since all of the computers share the same IP address, the port forwarding must be conducted within each computer on its own system. If the local area network router has a network access translator then the computers that are connected to the router must also do port forwarding within their own system.Port forwarding can be accomplished with Unix systems however the port can only be accessed by the root administrator. This is a less common method of port forwarding due to the fact that using a root administrator poses risks to the system because the users will often take a detour to a higher port number to gain faster access to the server.Double port forwarding involves the use of multiple routers that join computers on a local area network. As a result, the ports on one router are forwarded to another router that acts as a gateway. The gateway router then forwards to a host on the local area network (LAN). This type of port forwarding involves the communication of several components which include the session server, session client, and session port. When the user establishes a connection the session server will connect to one of the session ports that are to be forwarded which will in turn, forward the port to the session client. Reverse port forwarding is used when access is required to a port that is protected behind a firewall.
While port forwarding is convenient, there are a few things to be aware of when using this type of technology. If you use port forwarding only one port can be used at a time and the machine that is receiving the port forwarding can only view the information as coming from the router instead of the original machine. Additionally, port forwarding can open up network access to other machines that may be able to find the port forwarding by gaining unauthorized access. I know how to setup port forwarding in my router along with Dyndns.org free ED, but my local area network has multiple computers connected to the network on my router. All of the computers share the same external (public) dynamic IP address; when I setup port forwarding only my Web Server can access the internet, so how do I setup Self Port Forwarding on Fedora 13 x64
[Code]...
I am trying to set up a new user account I can give to friends so they can SSH into my forward computer, and only allow forwarding of certain ports.
I do not want my friends to have a shell, or be able to change what ports to where they are allowed to forward.
example session: joe(friend) connects using PuTTY (that I have pre-set, he isn't good with computers) to example.com(my Internet facing computer) forwarding ports 8080,1990,25565 to him(with what ever end ports he wants, preferably they stay the same numbers) example ssh command to do similar (but he can still change the ports on my computer!)
ssh -N restricteduser@example.com -p443 -L8080:192.168.1.2:8080 -L1990:127.0.0.1:1990 -L25565:127.0.0.1:25565
is it possible to also leave default SSH functinality for all other users but this one?
I found this when I was searching google, but alas, I did not quite understand what was being suggested, and I don't think they covered restricting port forwarding
So unfortunately I live in a place that will not let me have a static IP, so I have been setting up access to my home computer via reverse SSH tunnels that run on an micro amazon ec2 instance. I have gotten SSH to work fine, but I cannot figure out port forwards.Here is a small infographic I made to help illustrate (i felt the question was clearer with a diagram of what I was trying to do. Here are the commands listed in the graphic:I the following on my home computer: ssh -R 1337:localhost:22 -i .ssh/tokyoMinekey.pem ec2-user@ec2serveraddressand I run this on the ec2 server: ssh -L6600:localhost:6600 -Nf localhost -p 1337
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need create ssh forwarding to other linux box that works as a proxy.I have two linux boxes(centos 5.5), one in the office(server1) behind firewall, other at colocation(server2)server1 has squid proxy instaled on port 3128.i cant use server1 as a direct proxy from home because its behind firewall.iwas able to create ssh tunnel from server1 to server2 and when i log in to server2 ican ssh root@localhost -p 12312 to server1
what i need is configure server2 so it forwards port server2:3128 to server1:3128....and i could add server2 ip addres and port to firefox proxy's and access ofice network.
I was having trouble setting up a db connection from my local machine to a db server that was configured to only accept connections from machines behind its own subnet. I had trouble setting up a multiple hop tunnel for chaining port forwarding through my firewall machine on the same subnet as the db. My first attempt involved two port forwards, on localhost and on the firewall machine, which didn't work for me. This approach I found at URL... involved constructing an end to end connection to the db via the firewall machine.
View 2 Replies View Related- I setup port forwarding of openssh :
connect 1: ssh -g -f -p 11111 -i /<path-to-private-key> user1@ip-server1 -L 22222:ip-server1:161
- Then I setup second connection
connect 2: ssh -g -f -p 11111 -i /<path-to-private-key> user1@ip-server1 -L 22223:ip-server1:3306
- Openssh waring to me "bind: address already in use"
- So I think port 22223 have had another program use,I use command:
ps aux | grep ssh /* find process id of second connection */
kill -9 <process-id-second-connection>
netstat -an | grep 22223 /*find which program use port 22223> */
- but I can't find anywhat
- Then I run again command :
connect 2: ssh -g -f -p 11111 -i /<path-to-private-key> user1@ip-server1 -L 22223:ip-server1:3306
- And I receive a error from OpenSSH :" bind: address already in use"
Right now I have a VPS that I tunnel through using SSH/Putty/Proxycap. I use it for a certain program which uses a certain port X for authentication, and a different port Y for its data. However, due to certain security protocols I need port X to be somewhat "transparent" so that the IP from the originator will be shown - whilst tunneling data through port Y. The conditions though, are that I cannot just change the X/Y port values in the application itself, these are company specific.
How would I go about doing this? Because right now, my understanding is that if Putty calls for a certain application to go through a socks server, ALL its ports will be directed at that. I want a certain port to be passthrough.
Say I have Computer A behind a router with NAT. I'm unable to add any port forwarding rules to that router. Then I have Computer B with a public IP address that I want to forward X windows from. This computer is headless, but does have a video card so X windows can be used. Here are some of the things I'd perform to setup my scenario.
1. Computer B, I'd run xhost + public_ip of NAT router.
2. Make sure that computer B's sshd service has X11 forwarding enabled.
3. SSH from Computer A to Computer B with the X windows forward option.
4. Once in Computer B, set the DISPLAY env variable to the public_ip of NAT router.
5. On Computer B run xclock.
At this point I'd expect to see an instance of xclock originating from Computer B onto my desktop. However this obviously won't work. The problem is that when the request is made to Computer B to forward the instance of xclock to Computer A the forwarded instance of xclock will get stuck at the NAT router. Without a port forwarding rule the NAT router will not know which internal IP to route the instance of xclock.
Here's my question. Is there any way for Computer A to initiate a connection to Computer B and then forward the instance of xclock? That way if it uses that same connection the NAT router will know which internal IP to route it to because it would be an active connection in the router's routing table. Or is there an alternative? Of course I can vnc into another computer outside the NAT network and then forward an X window to it just fine. But in the spirit of expanding my knowledge on X windows I'd like to see what is possible.
I have two IP address on my iMac I want to "bridge". I'm not sure what the proper terminology is... here's the situation.
My iMac has a firewire connection to my laptop and an ethernet connection to the rest of my office. My laptop has an ip of 192.168.100.2 (on the firewire interface). My iMac has an IP of 192.168.100.1 on the firewire interface, and two IPs, 10.1.0.6 and 10.1.0.7, on it's ethernet interface.
If I wanted to forward all traffic coming in from 192.168.100.2 on my OS X machine to go out on IP 10.1.0.7, and vice-versa, can this be done? I assume I would use the ipfw command.
Essentially I want to "bridge" the firewire network to the ethernet network so my laptop can see all the machines on the 10.1 network, and all those machines can see my laptop at 10.1.0.7. Is this possible?
I also had ever tried all methods they mentioned, but my problem is still there. I am using a MAC OS X 10.6 ssh a remote redhat server. I hope to see X of redhat on my own MAC. Below is what I've done: 'MAC_ip' stands for my mac; 'redhat_ip' stands for redhat server.
1) ssh to redhat server
2) change to root
3) type command: DISPLAY=MAC_ip:0.0
4) type command: export
5) Back to MAC
6) change to root
7) type command: xhost +Redhat_ip
8) vim /etc/ssh_config, add X11Forwarding yes
9) Back to redhat, type: xclock
I got below message: Error: Can't open display: MAC_ip:0.0 I also tried some methods to login as others suggested:
[Code]....
I need to log outbound (server -> remote) ssh traffic, but am unsure of the best way to do this.
I added this to iptables, but nothing is being written to the logs when I ssh from the server to another system.
iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state NEW -j LOG --log-uid iptables-save
i used the angry ip scan software and found alot of the public ip addresses on our network are accessable from outside when they are not suppose to, For eg printers/ pcs etc. to make a start on locking down the network i was wondering if anybody knew th iptables command to add a rule which blocked all incoming traffic to specific ip adresses on the network and to a range of ip addresses.
View 7 Replies View Related1. It is definitely my system and not the router. I had been accepting these connections just fine on my Fedora 6 system, but upgraded to FC11 and haven't been able to get these inbound connections working. I still have the drive with the FC6 system and whenever I put the old drive in the system, the connections work fine. So, the hardware, wiring, etc is identical between the FC6 and FC11 systems.
2. The system's firewall is disabled. iptables, and ip6tables are turned off both at startup (e.g., chkconfig iptables off) and using "service iptables stop". (Note--my router also works as a firewall)
3. sshd and httpd are both on and listening on all interfaces. "nmap -P0 -p 22,80 127.0.0.1" shows both ports open, as does 192.168.1.80. But when I use the same command looping through the external IP, the ports are filtered:
Host is up.
PORT STATE SERVICE
22/tcp filtered ssh
80/tcp filtered http
4. hosts.deny is empty.
5. The messages and secure logs do not show anything in response to the nmap scans.
Again, I'd have sworn this was my router, except that it cleanly allows the traffic when I swap the drives in my system.
I have two Linux processes communicating via a nameless pipe. How can monitor the traffic in the pipe? How can I inject data into the pipe? I have root access and know the pipe inode.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for a live Linux distro that is secure and preserves my anonymity online. For what I need, Tor seems to do the job - but such software requires configuration that someone who is not knowledgeable in how it works might find difficult. I was looking at 'Lightweight portable security' but it does not specify whether it sends all traffic through Tor. Does anyone know more information about it and/or any other such live Linux distro?
View 3 Replies View Related
