What exactly does gateway in a route refer to? I know what a default gateway is- it's the route of last resort. But used in context of a host route (with destination specified), what is a gateway and why is it important?
View 5 RepliesWhen I try wget URL... I get failed: connection timed out.I have created br0 as a bridge over eth0 to run this VM. The host has this IP 172.30.8.135.The host has access to internet through eth0 and this is the output of route inside the host.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a firewall, this consists of three NIC's:
Code: eth0[192.168.0.2] eth1[192.168.1.2] and eth2[10.10.165.2]
I am trying to ping eth0 from eth2, but I am not able to succesfully get a response from pinging the device, I am using:
Code: ping 192.168.0.2 -I eth2
I have tried to insert routing data into the routing table, but it still doesn't work
Im having a issue with routing internet traffic from my router two different subnets (vlans).
Theres my setup:-
Server:
Both eth0,1 are running dhcp (two scoopes) that works fine!
The output of route -n is:
I have ip_forwarding on aswell, but i can ping the ip on the server running that dhcp scoope ie ping 192.168.4.1 works great but i just cant get the internet on the clients.
I've been trying to setup an IPSec connection between two routers, but am having trouble with the actual packet routing.
My setup currently is two local networks (192.168.1.0/24[netLANA] and 192.168.0.0/24[netLANB]) that are connected to their own routers (192.168.1.1 and 192.168.0.1 respectively). The routers are both connected to the 194.26.1.0/24[netWAN] network. I wish to setup an IPSec connection between the two routers, to act in tunnel mode between the two local networks.
The first router is a linux box (on the netLANA network) that I am setting up using the ipsec-tools, and the other is a Netgear ProSafe FVS318G (on the netLANB). I've set them both up to have the same configuration for IPSec. Also, on the linux router I have setup a route like this:
Code:
$ route add -net 192.168.1.0/24 wlan0
So that all traffic destined for the netLANB network will be routed to the wlan0 interface (netWAN in this case, and therefore over the tunnel).
My problem is that if I ping from any host on netLANA, I can see the ICMP reply comes back to the linux router, but it doesn't get back to the original host.
From the linux router, here is the tcpdump of the ping:
Code:
$ tcpdump -n -S -i any
17:06:26.308353 IP 192.168.0.5 > 192.168.1.4: ICMP echo request, id 1036, seq 1, length 64
17:06:26.308780 IP 194.16.1.6 > 194.16.1.5: ESP(spi=0x0ea08914,seq=0x2f), length 116
17:06:26.316287 IP 194.16.1.5 > 194.16.1.6: ESP(spi=0x0be1036c,seq=0x2f), length 116
17:06:26.316287 IP 192.168.1.4 > 192.168.0.5: ICMP echo reply, id 1036, seq 1, length 64
[Code]....
After a long time that I didn't touch my PC I just forgot how to configure the routing table I trying to ping the router and get "destination host untraceable" I manually assign the ip of the machine to 192.168.1.2 .And the gateway ip to 192.168.1.1 the only problem now
Is to get to the router interface on 192.168.1.1 to configure my internet and to browse
After making an changes (add/modify/delete) to /etc/static.routes, what command should we use to reload the routing table?
View 5 Replies View Relatedrouting tables using "ip route 2" I have a server(server1 from now on) with eth0(internet connection) and eth1(lan connection). eth1 have 2 more alias devices = eth1:1 and eth1:2 On my server 1 the eth0=public ip, on eth1=192.168.10.1/24, eth1:1=192.168.20.1/24 and eth1:2=192.168.30.1/24 server1 is running squid and iptables to all 3 networks (eth1, eth1:1 and eth1:2) All of the clients have access to internet. Now what i want to do is add 3 more networks via a router(linuxBox = server2 from now on) connected to server1 in eth1. so the network will be like this:
Code:
server1
eth0=internet
eth1=192.168.10.1/24 (connected to server2 and other clients)
[code]...
A packet is sent from the computer to the router it's connected with only the destination address in it, right? So - what does "kernel routing table" mean?
View 10 Replies View RelatedMy Laptop is connected to 2 different network (Wireless "gateway 10.170.8.1" ;cable wired "gateway 192.168.1.1")the gateway 192.168.1.1 is the default i want all application like firefox that connect via http and https port 80 and 443 to use the gateway 10.170.8.1)
else to use the default gateway
My routing table does not get complete for some reason. I'm using a Huawei E220 USB modem on openSUSE 11.3 using NetworkManager to connect.When I connect to the net the routing table looks like
Code:
/home/freefox # route
Kernel IP routing table
[code]....
I have an Ubuntu 9.10 server installation which have been working flawlessly for some months. The server runs bridged networking, because of some VMs that runs on it. But, a couple of weeks ago the network connectivity have started to disappear now and then (usually once a day or so). Running "sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart" always kicks it back to life.
After a bit of debugging I noticed that when OK the routing table looked like this:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br0
192.168.122.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0
default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 br0
While when in the non-working state it looked like this:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.122.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0
default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth0
default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 br0
Deleting the two routes to eth0 restores the networking again. Why these "erronous" routes gets added, and what adds them? How to further debug this?
I have to connect my private adres 10.0.0.2/26 to an external adres 192.168.1.253/16
I am not allowed to use Nat so i have to create a static routing table..
Ive put a router between with 2 nic's:
Ive seen on various sites that :
Should do the trick but it isnt working for me ... Ipforwarding is enabled.. Also when i use the sys/proc command..
How to make the table? I am using Opensuse 11.2
eth1 which is connected to interneteth2 internal networkbecause the server is part of a complicate network i need to setup the routing tables for eth1 and eth2but i need that the default 0.0.0.0 must be read from eth1 while i dont know why the server first read the one on eth2. this creates big problem to me.if i add the default route to eth1 i get an error saying that the default route already exist (i suppose is the one on eth2)how i can solve this ? i must create a script that first delete the default from eth2 and after add it to eth1
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there any way to restore back the default ip routing table? For example, my current routing table is something like
Code:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
109.123.95.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 109.123.95.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
Then i connect to a vpn service and the routing table get's changed..now when i close it, it doesn't reset back to my default routing table.
First, I installed CentOS 5.5 and Quagga 0.99.17.
Then I configure to run OSPF v2 on R1 and R2 following below:
I added --> #echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to forward packet on centos
To be able to use my 3g connection from my laptop I am using Azilink.Azilink work by setting up a little Openvpn server on your smartphone then you connect to your smartphone from your laptop with OpenVPN.From there what i wanted was to use a second VPN connection to an external Linux host and redirecting all my traffic to that tunnel... (redirect-gateway + iptables)It is working but partially..Here is the way I connect through my phone (all steps are I think important for the routing issue...)
1) I plug the phone then a usb0 interface is created with the 192.168.239.5 ip adress (my phone is 192.168.239.4)Then adb connect 192.168.239.4
2) I have to enable a port forward on my phone adb forward tcp:41927 tcp:41927
3) I run the openvpn script (to connect to my phone on wich i have launched Azilink)
So Openvpn connect to 127.0.0.1:41927 (to my phone) From there I have a Initialization Sequence Completed
At this time I am connected through 3G via my smartphone to the Internet..And as you imagine i don't want to enter all the IP adresses of Internet minus RFC1918 manually via route command.I think the problem comes from the fact that when i do the route add default gw 10.8.0.5 it is overwritting all the routes required to establish the first and the second connection am i right? Could someone help me solve that issue ?
what is the translation table and referance table in any DB (with referance to Data conversion)
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow can i make a variable in a bash script, to refer each file in a folder,and to switch it to the next file,until the last file of the folder?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat does stage1 and stage2 refer to in grub folder.
View 2 Replies View RelatedUbuntu 10.04 Lucid
Now I have installed Lucid on a VM of Sun VBox. It is now running. But I found the source.list still refers to karmic. What can I do? Change all karmic to lucid?
i need to prepare a presentation for that i have to copy a table from [URL] to my power point slide. but when i am copying it i am just getting a table with single column. is there a method to import the contents from web page table to my presentation table?
View 2 Replies View RelatedKmail 1.13.2 Problem on startup, error is from nepomuk, data storage. "cannot find Redland backend, nepomuk is disabled until fixed. Also see the following error from the akonadi console:
100503 10:00:15 [Note] Plugin 'ndbcluster' is disabled.
100503 10:00:15 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 31413862
100503 10:00:15 [Warning] Can't open and lock time zone table: Table
'mysql.time_zone_leap_second' doesn't exist trying to live without
[code]....
I'm often on my corporate network but also need to be on another network simultaneously. At the moment I have to manually switch back and forth between the two. I'm using ubuntu 10.04. I've come across an excellent document that explains how to do this: "Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO" by Bart Hubert. He mentions:
make sure that your kernel is compiled with the "IP: advanced router" and "IP: policy routing" features
I've downloaded the kernel sources, but I don't find any config options with names like these in them.
sudo apt-get build-dep --no-install-recommends linux-image-$(uname -r)
sudo apt-get source linux-image-$(uname -r)
Searching doesn't reveal anything
~/kernelBuild/linux-2.6.35/debian.master$ grep -iR policy . | grep -i routing
~/kernelBuild/linux-2.6.35/debian.master$
So my question is...how can I tell if the kernel I have has these config options. Failing that, how do I build a kernel that does support these things?
Additional use cases for this knowledge. (1) At work with desktop computer plugged into corporate network. Plug 3g phone into USB port. My corporate network wont allow me to access my external servers over ssh, but the 3g phone will. (2) At home on the corporate VPN, but would like to access my other local network computers.
We purchased a virtual server from GoDaddy (1 month trial) to set up as a proxy for our networks (24 of them). I am having 2 separate issues. The first is I can't configure/install NAT and support is telling me the only way I can is to purchase a dedicated server. Here's the error:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3128 iptables v1.3.5: can't initialize iptables table `nat': Table does not exist (do you need to insmod?) Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. Here's the fix: [URL] So, what I am hoping to do is configure this by just opening port 3128 directly, and only allowing access from our networks. As a test I did this and allowed only from our office and it did not work. However I can't connect, so I am wondering what I am doing wrong? Here's my squid configuration:
[Code]....
I'm running Ubuntu 9.10 server at home on VMware Workstation 7. I have two NIC's configured, one NIC is setup to have a direct connection to the network "Bridged", another NIC is setup to have a private network connection on VMnet1.
Network card 1 - 192.168.1.160 (Bridged)
Network card 2 - 10.1.1.1 (Internal access only)
So when I try to access the Internet, I can not go out on the NIC 1. If I try to ping google.com I get a return from 10.1.1.1 "no reply". But I know that NIC 2 is working, because I can ping 192.168.1.160 from the workstation I'm running on.
So I think that my routing is sending traffic out to the wrong NIC, but not sure if this is a metric in the iptables or another place?
The reason for two NICS is to simulate a DMZ where the server will be running Squid, to test proxy from another workstation on the 10.1.1.X subnet.
Is there a difference between using GPT partition table when formating hard drives and MS-DOS partition table? What are the advantages/disadvantages of using either?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've been working with my OpenVPN server for a while, and I have a rather interesting problem. I need to redirect all client traffic through the tunnel except for a couple IP's that need to be resolvable locally. The way I'm doing this is pushing these routes from the server:
Server 'PUSH' directives
push "redirect-gateway def1 bypass-dhcp"
push "dhcp-option DNS 8.8.8.8"
push "dhcp-option DNS 8.8.4.4"
I'm seeing that translating into these Windows routes:
Windows routes occurring
Wed Aug 31 15:14:35 2011 PUSH: Received control message: 'PUSH_REPLY,redirect-gateway def1 bypass-dhcp,dhcp-option DNS 8.8.8.8,dhcp-option DNS 8.8.4.4,route 10.8.0.1,topology net30,ping 5,ping-restart 30,ifconfig 10.8.0.6 10.8.0.5'
Wed Aug 31 15:14:35 2011 ROUTE default_gateway=192.168.1.254
Wed Aug 31 15:14:40 2011 C:WINDOWSsystem32
oute.exe ADD 199.[*.*.*] MASK 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.254
Wed Aug 31 15:14:40 2011 C:WINDOWSsystem32
oute.exe ADD 0.0.0.0 MASK 128.0.0.0 10.8.0.5
Wed Aug 31 15:14:40 2011 C:WINDOWSsystem32
oute.exe ADD 128.0.0.0 MASK 128.0.0.0 10.8.0.5
Wed Aug 31 15:14:40 2011 C:WINDOWSsystem32
oute.exe ADD 10.8.0.1 MASK 255.255.255.255 10.8.0.5
I've hidden my server's IP beginning with 199 for security purposes.What I've gathered.I'm assuming that 0.0.0.0 is a kind of code for "everything," so I'm not sure how I could get this to work, but the general idea is that I need a specific IP range (172.16.*) to be resolvable on the LOCAL NETWORK (of the client) meaning it does not go through the VPN tunnel and the client can connect to 172.16.* locally.Is this possible? Routes can be executed through the command line, server "push" or client config options. Any way to get this to work while still routing other traffic through would do, really.
Additional Info: I have the server running on Debian 64-bit and the client running on Windows 7 (although Vista needs to work as well).Client/server configs can be provided if needed.
How to work GNUGK for H.323 Gatekeeper.
I am having a problem, configuring static call routing on GNUGK
In the section
You can see that the routers Local-router1 and 2 has the same dialling plan.
What happens is the gatekeeper send calls randomly to one router or to the other when one of the matching extension is dialled.
What I am trying to do is to force
Any calls coming from Remote1 to go out only throught Local-router1
Remote1 =========================> Local-router1
And any calls from Remote2 to go out throught Local-router2
Remote2 =========================> Local-router2
Getting the following error when trying to add a default gateway for eth1.
# route add default gw 192.168.228.2 eth1
route: SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable