After a long time that I didn't touch my PC I just forgot how to configure the routing table I trying to ping the router and get "destination host untraceable" I manually assign the ip of the machine to 192.168.1.2 .And the gateway ip to 192.168.1.1 the only problem now
Is to get to the router interface on 192.168.1.1 to configure my internet and to browse
When I try wget URL... I get failed: connection timed out.I have created br0 as a bridge over eth0 to run this VM. The host has this IP 172.30.8.135.The host has access to internet through eth0 and this is the output of route inside the host.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a firewall, this consists of three NIC's:
Code: eth0[192.168.0.2] eth1[192.168.1.2] and eth2[10.10.165.2]
I am trying to ping eth0 from eth2, but I am not able to succesfully get a response from pinging the device, I am using:
Code: ping 192.168.0.2 -I eth2
I have tried to insert routing data into the routing table, but it still doesn't work
After making an changes (add/modify/delete) to /etc/static.routes, what command should we use to reload the routing table?
View 5 Replies View Relatedrouting tables using "ip route 2" I have a server(server1 from now on) with eth0(internet connection) and eth1(lan connection). eth1 have 2 more alias devices = eth1:1 and eth1:2 On my server 1 the eth0=public ip, on eth1=192.168.10.1/24, eth1:1=192.168.20.1/24 and eth1:2=192.168.30.1/24 server1 is running squid and iptables to all 3 networks (eth1, eth1:1 and eth1:2) All of the clients have access to internet. Now what i want to do is add 3 more networks via a router(linuxBox = server2 from now on) connected to server1 in eth1. so the network will be like this:
Code:
server1
eth0=internet
eth1=192.168.10.1/24 (connected to server2 and other clients)
[code]...
A packet is sent from the computer to the router it's connected with only the destination address in it, right? So - what does "kernel routing table" mean?
View 10 Replies View RelatedMy routing table does not get complete for some reason. I'm using a Huawei E220 USB modem on openSUSE 11.3 using NetworkManager to connect.When I connect to the net the routing table looks like
Code:
/home/freefox # route
Kernel IP routing table
[code]....
I have an Ubuntu 9.10 server installation which have been working flawlessly for some months. The server runs bridged networking, because of some VMs that runs on it. But, a couple of weeks ago the network connectivity have started to disappear now and then (usually once a day or so). Running "sudo /etc/init.d/networking restart" always kicks it back to life.
After a bit of debugging I noticed that when OK the routing table looked like this:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br0
192.168.122.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0
default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 br0
While when in the non-working state it looked like this:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 br0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.122.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0
default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 eth0
default 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 br0
Deleting the two routes to eth0 restores the networking again. Why these "erronous" routes gets added, and what adds them? How to further debug this?
I have to connect my private adres 10.0.0.2/26 to an external adres 192.168.1.253/16
I am not allowed to use Nat so i have to create a static routing table..
Ive put a router between with 2 nic's:
Ive seen on various sites that :
Should do the trick but it isnt working for me ... Ipforwarding is enabled.. Also when i use the sys/proc command..
How to make the table? I am using Opensuse 11.2
eth1 which is connected to interneteth2 internal networkbecause the server is part of a complicate network i need to setup the routing tables for eth1 and eth2but i need that the default 0.0.0.0 must be read from eth1 while i dont know why the server first read the one on eth2. this creates big problem to me.if i add the default route to eth1 i get an error saying that the default route already exist (i suppose is the one on eth2)how i can solve this ? i must create a script that first delete the default from eth2 and after add it to eth1
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there any way to restore back the default ip routing table? For example, my current routing table is something like
Code:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
109.123.95.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 109.123.95.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
Then i connect to a vpn service and the routing table get's changed..now when i close it, it doesn't reset back to my default routing table.
First, I installed CentOS 5.5 and Quagga 0.99.17.
Then I configure to run OSPF v2 on R1 and R2 following below:
I added --> #echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to forward packet on centos
What exactly does gateway in a route refer to? I know what a default gateway is- it's the route of last resort. But used in context of a host route (with destination specified), what is a gateway and why is it important?
View 5 Replies View RelatedIn configuring static routing between two different subnets.
I have two different subnets as mentioned below:
I have a linux machine with two NICs on which i would like to configure static routing. details of the NICs are as mentioned below:
I have configured the gateway as 10.77.77.1 on machines which fall under 10.77.77.0/24 subnet and 172.16.40.1 on 172.16.40.0/24 machines.
My main motive here is i want communication to happen between both the subnets.
If the following modifications to route-eth0 and route-eth1.
I'm trying configure my server for routing between vlans, but I'm having troubles with my server after that vlans are set. I can create vlans and routing is OK, but when I trying remove a vlan, restart the network script or restart the server, the CLI freeze and then I can't do anything. Even Ctrl+C or Ctrl+Z isn't work. I can use other terminal or do other SSH connection (if the network interface used by ssh isn't crashed), but if I try use a ifconfig per example, crash again. The unique solution is restart the server. Nothing about this is found in the log.
Opensuse 11.4
Kernel: 2.6.37.6-0.5-desktop
I have recently upgraded a computer from Wheezy to Jessie, and I'm having trouble getting an internet connection shared via Ethernet by another computer (the provider) to work on it.I have activated the interface of the Jessie computer and configured a static IP on it in the same subnetwork as the provider's ethernet interface with the following commands:
Code: Select all# ip addr add 192.168.123.201/24 dev eth0
# ip link set up dev eth0
I now would like to set the address of the provider as the default route with Code: Select all# ip route add default via 192.168.123.100 dev eth0, but I get the following error message: Code: Select allRTNETLINK answers: File exists.
Indeed, when I run Code: Select all# ip route, the following comes up:
Code: Select alldefault dev eth0Â scope link
I've tried to remove this default route to replace it with mine with Code: Select all# ip route flush table main and Code: Select all# ip route del default but these commands don't seem to work.
I'm having trouble to configure my debian (2.6.26-2-686) with some routing tuning. In fact, I have a VPN provider. I want my Squid Proxy use this VPN provider and I have to use policy routing because my ISP forbid IP spoofing.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm facing a strange networking problem here. I'm running Debian Lenny in an OpenVZ container and my network setup is as follows:
link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
[code]...
I need to be able to do the following: Physical Router located at 192.168.40.1 On Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid machine:
eth0 with static ip 192.168.40.2
eth1 with static ip 192.168.40.3
eth2 with static ip 192.168.40.4
Associate a virtual address to eth1 with an entirely different network address such as 192.168.50.1 Do the same (virtual address) for eth2 -- e.g. 192.168.60.1 In the application:
register phone number A at 192.168.40.1 (The application will automatically use eth0 for this)
register phone number B at 192.168.50.1
register phone number C at 192.168.60.1
Somehow forward all traffic (including the register request) sent to 192.168.50.1 to 192.168.40.1 as if the register had been made directly to 192.168.40.1. In other words, the app "sends" registration and traffic to 192.168.50.1 but then Ubuntu forwards it to 192.168.40.1 (but the app does not know that). Similarly, forward all traffic sent to 192.168.60.1 to the router at 192.168.40.1.
Do the same for the reverse, forward all traffic that the router sends back to 192.168.40.3 (eth1) to 192.168.50.1 (within the Ubuntu machine) so that the app knows it is for phone B. Similarly forward all traffic that the router sends back to 192.168.40.4 (eth2) to 192.168.60.1 so that the app knows it is for phone C. Thus, the application believes that it is registering at 3 completely separate routers on 3 completely separate networks via 3 separate network interfaces but in fact is really registering all three to the same router (but does not know that). Similarly, the router believes that it is receiving 3 separate registrations because it receives each registration request and traffic from 3 separate interfaces and thus 3 separate mac addresses (i.e., of eth0, eth1, and eth2). Traffic sent to and from the router for each of the 3 phone numbers (via eth0, eth1, and eth2) are not mixed because the translation happens in both directions.
i need to prepare a presentation for that i have to copy a table from [URL] to my power point slide. but when i am copying it i am just getting a table with single column. is there a method to import the contents from web page table to my presentation table?
View 2 Replies View RelatedKmail 1.13.2 Problem on startup, error is from nepomuk, data storage. "cannot find Redland backend, nepomuk is disabled until fixed. Also see the following error from the akonadi console:
100503 10:00:15 [Note] Plugin 'ndbcluster' is disabled.
100503 10:00:15 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 0 31413862
100503 10:00:15 [Warning] Can't open and lock time zone table: Table
'mysql.time_zone_leap_second' doesn't exist trying to live without
[code]....
what is the translation table and referance table in any DB (with referance to Data conversion)
View 2 Replies View RelatedI had 40 gb of unused space at the beginning of my drive, then a 15gb primary ext3 partition for /, then a 100GB ext4 primary partition for /home, then a 4 gb extended partition that contains two 2 gb swap partitions.
I installed FreeBSD on the empty space at the beginning of the drive. The slice I created did not start on the first block. There were a few MB of free space before and after it.
After the installation finished (with no errors), grub would hang on the "Grub loading/Welcome to Grub screen". I booted a squeeze CD in rescue mode and reinstalled grub to /dev/sda. After rebooting, Grub still hangs at the same place.
I booted a live CD and checked the output of fdisk. For each of my partitions, it says "Partition does not end on cylinder boundary". I am hoping that whatever happened to my disk is not recoverable. Fortunately, I backed up some essential files beforehand, but I still don't really want to lose my old squeeze system.
Right now I am fscking all partitions.
had a bad experience when Fedora 15 overwrote the ext4 partition of a data disk to MVL during the installation process.I cloned the HD and now I am working on it. However, my first attempt resulted in 900.00 number-renamed files into the lost+found folder. And that's not what I want: with this number of files I need to recover the directory structure and the files real names.I know this is a hard issue for being discussed in the forum and that I shall look for some expert help, but, I wished to useis bad moment as an opportunity of learning.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe purchased a virtual server from GoDaddy (1 month trial) to set up as a proxy for our networks (24 of them). I am having 2 separate issues. The first is I can't configure/install NAT and support is telling me the only way I can is to purchase a dedicated server. Here's the error:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 3128 iptables v1.3.5: can't initialize iptables table `nat': Table does not exist (do you need to insmod?) Perhaps iptables or your kernel needs to be upgraded. Here's the fix: [URL] So, what I am hoping to do is configure this by just opening port 3128 directly, and only allowing access from our networks. As a test I did this and allowed only from our office and it did not work. However I can't connect, so I am wondering what I am doing wrong? Here's my squid configuration:
[Code]....
I have an unallocated space at the end of my hdd, which is about 10 gb. I installed Pardus on that space, but then deleted the partition to install something else (I know I did not have to delete it, I could simply install the new thing over it), i dont remember exactly how, but it was from my Debian System, not from a LiveCD.Now, I am unable to use that space. GParted gives an error and says:Warning: the kernel failed to re-read the partition tableon /dev/sda (Device or resource nusy). As a result, it may not reflect all of your changes until after reboot.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have just installed the newest Debian Stable 7.8 release on my new notebook. Before installation I had to free some disk space from the preinstalled Windows7 with ntfsresize and fdisk. In addition to the existing three primary partitions I created an extended one with three logical partitions for /(root) /home and swap, see the output of 'fdisk -lu'
Code: Select allDisk /dev/sda: 1000.2 GB, 1000204886016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 121601 cylinders, total 1953525168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x196585ba
[Code] ....
Partition table entries are not in disk order
For some reason I put a bootable flag on sda7, and the only small concern during installation was that some BIOS systems might not work with boot-flag no logical drives. Now, every time I boot I get this "Invalid partition table!' message which I must 'enter" away before I get to the GRUB menu.
i have got an Debian Lenny NAS with 7x1,5TB of a Softwareraid5. Kernel Version is 2.6.32. The Raid ist mountet in /media/raid5. The System ist on a seperate disk and work fine. After i tested the performance of the raid with:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/md0 bs=1G count=1 oflag=direct
Since i had done this i cant find any Data on /media/raid5. cat /proc/mdstat and mdadm --detail /dev/md0 looks fine. All UUID's are good. But: The SuperBlock is unreadable and the partition table was not found. mke2fs -n /dev/md0 shows some Backup of the Superblock , but i cant repair it with fsck.ext4: Illegal inode number on /dev/md0.
I migrated from Ubuntu 14.10 some weeks ago and I've been playing with Debian Jessie RC2 these days. Everything is working right... however when debian is starting I get some error messages from nouveau, I've just run dmesg and here is the output [URL] ....
I'm getting some lines like this :
Code: Select all[  8.933681] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:08:00.0] BOOT0 : 0x0e7240a2
[  8.933682] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:08:00.0] Chipset: GK107 (NVE7)
[  8.933683] nouveau [ DEVICE][0000:08:00.0] Family : NVE0
[  8.948205] nouveau [  VBIOS][0000:08:00.0] using image from ACPI
[  8.948513] nouveau [  VBIOS][0000:08:00.0] BIT signature found
[Code] ....
There is any explanation for these "write of ___________ FAULT at ________" messages?
Do i have any chances to restore my windows partition table after tried to install debian and i used the entire disk instead of the free space i had alocated for this
after i figured out what i did i stoped the installation but was to late ... i answered yes at write partition table changes on disk question
i tried win7 automate recovery tool from dvd and manual install of mbr with no successful result
