Fedora :: Default Runlevels In The Firewall For The Netfs Service?
Dec 6, 2009tell me the default runlevels in the firewall for the netfs service. I messed with it and rather than enable it, I would like to set it back to default.
View 4 Repliestell me the default runlevels in the firewall for the netfs service. I messed with it and rather than enable it, I would like to set it back to default.
View 4 RepliesIs there a way to restore the default runlevels of procps service? I messed it up while experimenting..
View 1 Replies View RelatedAm I safe when surfing the web with default Firewall setting? Can My Computer be hacked when the firewall is in the default setting? I have no knowledge on configuring Firewalls
View 11 Replies View RelatedHow come FC11 is set by default to reset the IPTables firewall to ACCEPT across the board each restart?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI can't get my openvpn work if the firewall is on , and I also don't see any option to allow openvpn service in firewall allow service.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two servers behind different networks. First network is protected with firewall provided by the router and there is no firewall in the server:
[Code]....
As you see, there are no difference in nmap output If I check with tcpdump, which packets are sent from 192.168.217.73 and 192.168.13.19(tcpdump -i eth0 src host 192.168.217.73 and tcpdump -i eth0 src host 192.168.13.19 respectively) towards me during nmap scan, there are none. It's understandable, as there should be no reply when port is filtered. Is there somehow possible to detect, whether firewall is active in the server or in the router?
I just set up a test CentOS 5.4 host to run the Freeswitch IP PBX. Although the process is up and running and I can connect to the host through SSH, none of the IP phones can connect to Freeswitch:
Does someone know if CentOS comes with a firewall by default that would allow SSH connections but nothing else? "ps aux" returned nothing that looked like a firewall process.
I am currently trying to make my computer as secure as it can possibly be. I am configuring the firewall to be restrictive by default, but I have some programs that are still unable to connect to the internet.
1. Pidgin Internet Messenger (I use AIM and MSN)
2. Skype
I am facing a strange problem witht my iptables as there are some firewall entries stored somewhere which is displaying the below firewall entries even after flushing the iptables & when I restart the iptables service then the firewall entries are again shown in my iptables as shown below,
[root@myhome ~]# iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
[code]....
i can smb in centos 5 and i run service smb restart, it shows :smb: unrecognized service..... i run rpm -qa |grep samba,it shows
samba-common-3.0.33-3.7.el5
samba-client-3.0.33-3.7.el5
.....
Is it safe to connect a computer running a freshly installed ubuntu desktop edition directly to the internet? Or do I need to actively configure a firewall before connecting it?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIm a long time windows user and just installed Ubuntu 9.10 and have heard that i dont need any antivirus or spyware program on it, also is the firewall enabled by default if there is one and last thing do you need to do things like disk clean and defrag if so how.
View 6 Replies View RelatedService(init.d) scripts in Redhat have default start/stop priorities commented inside, like:
Code:
...
# chkconfig: 2345 25 90
...
Second number is start priority.
But debian does not include this info. Just in case service symlinks from all runlevels are removed how do I know which priority to specify?
I am attempting to run apache on my linux router while connected to a VPN. My default route is set to the VPN endpoint and I cannot control port forwarding at that end. I cannot seem to connect to any service that i bind to the eth0 interface. I believe that my iptables rules and OpenVPN are the source of the problem.
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o tun1 -j MASQUERADE
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i tun1 -o eth1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o tun1 -j ACCEPT
I need to start a service before network service How to?
View 1 Replies View RelatedChanging runlevels is there a different way of doing it?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have made a shell script that is ran every 5 minutes (using crontab) that does the following:(please disregard the '.' in ht.tp .. I'm under 15 post...can't post URLs yet ) Code: #!/bin/bashwget -q --read-timeout=0.0 --wait=5 --tries=5 -O /var/log/dynamicDNS.data ht.tp://someURLecho "[$(date)] $(cat /var/log/dynamicDNS.data)" >>/var/log/dynamicDNS.logrm /var/log/dynamicDNS.data >/dev/nullexit 0 (this script might look pretty bad but hey, it's my first one!)hat works perfectly! Though, I need to have this "cron" run from startup (boot) without the need to open a terminal and leave it open.I understand I can use runlevels to start a program from boot but that will have it run only once.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI came up on RedHat. While I thoroughly embrace Ubuntu now, I miss the concept of runlevels. I installed all my CentOS servers with Gnome as a convenience on tap when needed. I boot them to runlevel 3 and open a vnc shell if i need gui. Then kill the vnc thus killing the gui. Just a fantastic compromise for me.
SOooo...how to replicate this behaviour in Ubuntu?
NOT a very broad topic on here that I can see. Anyone doing this? How?
I upgraded to current, and x won't start... I suspect it's probably an issue with the Nvidia drivers (I forgot to swith my xorg to the nv drivers; I knew I'd be getting a new kernel). Anyway, it leaves me with an unusable computer. Is there anyway I can get into a console before x tries to start. BTW, the ctrl-alt-f1 hotkey isn't working.
View 4 Replies View RelatedLet's say I have a init script, etc/init.d/strangeScript, that starts like this:
Code:
#! /bin/sh
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: strangeScript
# Required-Start: $remote_fs $syslog
# Required-Stop: $remote_fs $syslog
[Code].....
Why is it not only complaining my runlevels do not match the defaults, which they do, but also is refusing to create the links to the proper runlevels? This is 10.04LTS if that matters.
How would you use chkconfig to set the bigd daemon to start at runlevels 2 & 3?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow to set a default service type as ssh in place->connect to server window. there lot of options available as FTP,HTTP,Windows share etc..
View 4 Replies View RelatedI suspect this is an initial configuration bug. All firewall logs seem to be going to all
three files. That causes a lot of clutter in the log files, and makes it difficult to see whether there are any serious problems being logged.
I am learning to setup firewall in my home for that i have selected four system(sys1,sys2....sys4) for testing .I have configured sys2 to act as a firewall with two NIC. sys3 and sys4 are inside the firewall . sys1 is not connected to firewall for testing purpose.
the IP assignments are follows :
sys1 : ( fedora, not connected to firewall i am thinking, But i am not sure )
IP : 192.168.2.1 ,
gateway : blank
dns1 : blank
dns2 : blank
sys2 firewall ,IPTABLES )
code....
what happened is that sys1(not connected to firewall) can ssh to sys4(connected,inside firewall),since the rules are written not to ssh form sys1 to sys4..
then I came to know whatever the request I give, It directly goes as sys1 --> sys4. Not as sys1-----> sys2(firewall)---> sys4 .and the firewall is not filtering and processing anything for both inbound and outbound (i think it's my mistake some where). the requests are directly going inside without firewall.
I have little problem with gpk servce pack (from gpk-package-extra package). When im trying to make list of my packages in system i have:
Quote:
Can't write the file, no permissions. OK, but when i run gpk service package as root, program freeze, i click create packages list option but application never create this file, status is always on 0%, even after 1 hour. I saw video tutorial, where base are created by normal user i /home - why i can't Console says nothing about this.
I'm trying to build firewall on Debian with 'Firewall Builder'. But it won't let me compile and run unless one interface is set as management. There are two interfaces on my computer: 'eth0' and 'lo'
I don't want to be able to configure firewall remotely, so could I use 'lo' as 'management interface'?
I am running Server 10. I have a requirement to perform an action before the MySQL service starts, and perform another action after MySQL service stops.
I found the init script for MySQL under /etc/init/mysql.conf. I added my thing to the pre-start script there and works fine.
I am having trouble finding the script that stops the server so I can modify.
will the command service httpd restart the apache service if i enable httpsd service in graphical mode
View 12 Replies View RelatedCan we use iptables as firewall instead of Juniper firewall
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am noticing problems accessing the firewall gui and mounting the second hard drive in my PC running Fedora 13. This is only when I am accessing the machine with VNC. If I am sitting in front of the physical machine, I have no problems at all. I would like VNC to behave more like I am sitting in front of the computer. Is there a way to do this? Thank you in advance for your feedback.
View 4 Replies View Related