CentOS 5 :: Prevent Package From Updating?
Dec 23, 2009Is it possible to set a package in such a way that it will not update when "yum update" is executed?
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
General :: Updating Required Package In CentOS?
Oct 11, 2010So i have a small home server i need to setup. I used to have arch linux installed, but i found it unstable and more difficult to maintain. So i heard about the stability if CentOS and decided to try it out. I got samba setup no problem, but cups i cannot get to work. The orinter driver for my epson workforce 500 requires lsb 3.2 whereas lsb installed in centos is only 3.1. What can i do to fix this? Should i just go with fedora instead?
View 8 Replies View RelatedCentOS 5 :: Package Updater (Error Updating Software)
Sep 14, 2010When I select package updater for update software it gives an error I am attached my system information & error file.
Error message:-
file /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/psvn.el from install of subversion-1.6.12-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5_3.1.i386
file /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.12-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5_3.1.i386
file /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/subversion.mo from install of subversion-1.6.12-0.1.el5.rf.x86_64 conflicts with file from package subversion-1.4.2-4.el5_3.1.i386 .....
Ubuntu :: Prevent Firefox 5 From Automatically Updating Itself To A New Version?
Jul 3, 2011How can I prevent Firefox 5 from automatically updating itself to a new version? The relevant option is mission on the Update tab in Preferences.
View 5 Replies View RelatedUbuntu Installation :: How To Prevent Package Update
Feb 26, 2011I've recently downgraded kaffeine to 0.8.8 to get back the EPG which was working under hardy. Is there a simple way to prevent a package from updating when I update the rest of the system? I realise that this is not normally a good idea to keep packages back like this, but the upgrade to kaffeine caused the loss of a useful tool.
View 4 Replies View RelatedUbuntu :: Bad Package (xulrunner 1.9.1.18) Prevent General Update
May 2, 2011I have recently upgraded ubuntu to natty. I'm using a ppa (Firefox Stable) and during an update using update manager it blocked on these lines:
Setting up xulrunner-1.9.1 (1.9.1.18~hg20110309r27352+nobinonly-
0ubuntu1~umd1)
This prevents me to even see other updates cause update manager says the index is broken. How can I solve this? I don't want to reinstall firefox because I'm worried it blocks again (now firefox works).
OpenSUSE :: Prevent An Update From Being Installed (zypper Package Locks)?
May 22, 2010everytime I run "zypper up -t patch", I get the following:
Code:
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...
Resolving package dependencies...
[code]...
OpenSUSE :: Package Kit Error When Updating KDE
Feb 26, 2010What does this message mean? Can't KDE be updated at all or is it just this swedish dictionary?
PackageKit Error cannot-remove-system-package: Subprocess failed. Error: RPM failed: error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 1022 Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: BAD, key ID 3dbdc284 error: package kde4-l10n-sv-doc-4.3.1-2.4.noarch is not installed
Whats the remedy? "Totally new to Open Suse".
OpenSUSE :: Package Conflicts Updating KDE SC 4.6.5
Jul 16, 2011OpenSUSE 11.4, 64 bits, with
Index of /repositories/KDE:/Release:/46/openSUSE_11.4
and
Index of /repositories/KDE:/Extra/KDE_Release_46_openSUSE_11.4
repositories enabled. Since some days, if I go to YaST2 †’ Package †’ "Update packages if a new version is available" (I'm translating from Spanish) I get a warning that plasma-addons-4.6.5-9.3.x86_64 needs akonadi-runtime < 1.5.40, but that that requirement cannot be match because there are eliminated providers: akonadi-runtime-1.5.3-91.1.x86_64
and non instalable providers: akonadi-runtime-1.5.0-3.3.1.x86_64[openSUSE-11.4-11.4-0]
As "solution" it offers me to not install akonadi-runtime-1.6.0.93.1.x86_64 and libakonadiprotocolinternals1-1.6.0.93.1.x86_64 (which I selected) or to uninstall plasma-addons and kadressbook, which I do not think it is a good idea...
OpenSUSE :: Package Manager Update Not Updating Apps
Aug 18, 2011Was wondering if someone could suggest a reference and possible approach to troubleshooting openSUSE update. I'd always assumed that the openSUSE update (applet) would notify me and update any apps installed from any of the configured repositories.This week I found two applications were not detected and updated, one from the Pacman repository where an update was available for more than 2 weeks and another from the Contrib repository where an update was available for an unknown amount of time.I manually detected and updated both using zypper without any special repository configuration.The SUSE updater has been running regularly installing critical and recommended patches regularly without issue.Am considering
- Maybe somewhere there is a config specifying repositories and/or apps? I can't seem to find something that's applicable.
- Maybe I misunderstood that the SUSE updater isn't supposed to update anything from non-OSS repositories?
Ubuntu Installation :: Getting Error When Updating Package List / Fix It?
Jun 14, 2010Following are the error details..
W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net jaunty Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY C174A7B143CBFCC0
W: GPG error: http://ppa.launchpad.net jaunty Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY CE90D8983E731F79
Ubuntu Installation :: Ignored Repositories When Updating Package List?
Dec 3, 2010I'm experiencing a strange issue with my Ubuntu 10.10 since a few days:when trying to update the packages list, a lot of repositories are ignored.Here is the output of
Code:
sudo apt-get update | grep -i ign
.
Quote:
Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main Translation-en
Ign http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ maverick/main Translation-en_GB[code]....
How come all these repositories cannot be hit?is there any way to make the update hit there repositories? And if they're useless, no longer supported, how can I remove them so to have a tidy repositories list?
Fedora :: Odd Output After Selinux-policy-targeted Package Finished Updating?
Feb 20, 2010I just updated my system via yum and got an odd output after selinux-policy-targeted package finished updating.
Code:
Updating : selinux-policy-3.6.32-89.fc12.noarch 14/80
Updating : selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.32-89.fc12.noarch 15/80
/etc/mock/koji* /etc/rc.d/init.d/dirsrv* /srv/git* /usr/autodesk/maya2010-x64/lib /usr/lib{64,}/nagios/plugins/check_mailq /usr/sbin/ns-slapd /usr/share/e16/misc* /usr/share/shorewall/compiler.pl /var/cache/cgit* /var/lib/git* /var/lib/koji* /var/www/git/gitweb.cgi /var/www/git/gitweb.cgi
Does anyone knows what that means?
Ubuntu Installation :: Holding Package Back Permanenty When Updating With Update-manager
Sep 9, 2010ok the new version of soundkonverter in maverick seems to me lame beyond belief so i want to hang on to the soundkonverter.3.8 version which was on lucid so i have installed it..MY QUESTION IS is there a way to never have update manager trying to update it unclicking it every time i want to do my weekly update with update manager could be a massive pain in the rear.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCentOS 5 :: How To Prevent Update From 5.3 To 5.4
Oct 23, 2009when I am doing a "yum update" I receive now a long list (~94MB) because of the latest CentOS 5.4 release.I am running CentOS 5.3 on a virtual machine (virtuozzo) and had already problems to install 5.3 before. To not lose the installation I do not want to update to 5.4 but of course I want to get all updates for 5.3.How can I configure my CentOS 5.3 to update the server only with 5.3 patches/releases and how to prevent it to update to 5.4?
View 7 Replies View RelatedCentOS 5 :: Prevent Automatic Upgrade From 5.2 To 5.3
Jul 2, 2009I installed CentOS 5.2 because I want to install the latest VMWare Server (2.0.1).The release notes of vmware server say: "Support for CentOS 5.2".But after installing CentOS 5.2 and updating the packages marked for update,the Version of the system is 5.3. I know from Debian that if you do not explicitly want to do a system version upgrade,only bug fixes and security fixes are installed. That seems to be different with CentOS/RHEL?
Is there any way (or what ist the right way) to prevent automatic upgrade from one release to another? I don't want VMWare Server to stop working because of some upgrade from 5.x to 5.y.
CentOS 5 :: Prevent Users From Changing Their Own Password?
Feb 4, 2010How can I prevent users from changing their own password? I was surprisingly unsuccessfull in finding a solution for this on google. Lots of stuff about hardening ssh access or dealing with password aging using "chage" but nowhere could I find an answer for my question.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCentOS 5 :: Prevent Certain Errors From Displaying On Console / Set That Up?
Jan 26, 2011We are currently troubleshooting the following error, which was repeatedly being displayed on the console:
kernel: Northbridge Error, node 2<0>K8 ECC error."
After replacing all of the memory, the error remained, so we tried updating to the latest kernel. (Currently having to use centos-plus because we are using XFS)
After the kernel update the error disappeared fro 5 days (previously UNHEARD of - would often repeat several times a day), it appeared again and hasn't appeared since.
It does not seem like any real damage is done here - and I would like to suppress this error somehow. Optimally I would like it to only be forwarded to the log files - and NOT be displayed on the console.
Could someone point me to an easy way to set that up?
CentOS 5 :: Building RPM Package With Specific Noarch Sub-package
Feb 3, 2011I was building yesterday the boost-1.45.0 RPM package for CentOS 5.5.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCentOS 5 :: Prevent Device-mapper From Loading In Installer
Mar 5, 2009I am trying to prevent the dm_mod and friends from loading during install.I am installing by PXE boot with NFS and kickstart files over http. This works fine for other machines.Ok, I have a Dell PowerEdge 2900 III with 8gig ram, PERC 6/i raid controller.The raid has 8 1TB drives in it, so the total size of the device is >2TB.There is also an SATA drive, which is NOT on the raid controller.
The problem is, I want to install CentOS on the SATA drive. The SATA drive comes up as a device-mapper drive, with a big crazy device name.This is ok, but the problem is, when the system goes to boot, it just says 'missing operating system'.I can't boot from the raid because it is large enough to require a GPT partition, and CentOS says it can't boot from a GPT partition.The SATA drive would work FINE if I could just prevent the damn device mapper from loading, so that I could install on the SATA drive in ordinary SATA mode.
I have tried re-squashing the stage2.img with /etc/modprobe.conf with alias dm_mod off and such, no luck.I also tried adding an /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist file, that did not work either.I also tried putting blacklist= dm_mod in the kickstart file, but that seems to be a fedora-only option and it kills my install. any ideas on preventing the dm_mod et. al. from loading at install time??
CentOS 5 :: /var/log/secure Not Updating?
Mar 13, 2009Until recently the secure log was working as expected, then suddenly it has stopped logging. No changes made that I'm aware of, though automatic updates via yum are occurring. I'm assuming this is all logged through klogd, which is running.
Not overly familiar with Linux logging, where should I be looking for problems?
CentOS 5 :: Updating To 5.3 Broke Yum?
Apr 3, 2009Ever since I've updated to 5.3 i get following error trying to update with yum :
[root@athena ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile[code].....
CentOS 5 :: How To Keep Yum From Updating OS Version
Aug 3, 2009My server's manufaturer (supermicro) only provides RAID drivers for certain RHEL (CentOS) releases, 4.4, 5.2 and 5.9 are presently available. An accidental yum update recently took the server from CentOS 4.4 to 4.7, and abandoned the RAID driver. My choces are to reload 4.4 or go to 5.2. Since I will probably do the latter, is there a way to have yum just update within the distro, and not the distro version? Can someone ID the rpms I could exclude to be sure that the OS version remains static?
View 3 Replies View RelatedSUSE :: Updating - "accessing The Package Manager Failed"
Feb 17, 2010This is what happens when i try to update "accessing the package manager faild" "system manager is locked by the application with pus 10464 (/user/sbin/packagekitd).
View 1 Replies View RelatedCentOS 5 :: Updating Only The Security Packages?
Apr 28, 2009way of updating only the security packages on CentOS?
If I do a yum update. It updates everything and creates a new version which will unnecessarily uses space along with the old version. I don't want this to happen. way of updating only the security packages and keeping my old version of CentOS?
CentOS 5 :: Error Message At Updating - 5 X64
May 10, 2011I have an error message at updating centos 5 x64.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCentOS 5 :: Updating Bios But Only Have .exe To Update
Aug 27, 2011I have been told by the staff from supermicro to update my BIOS, but they only have .exe to update. I ask them if they can help me to update my bios from Centos, and this is what they said
You can use RHEL driver: [URL] use same kernel driver for CentOS as RHEL. I'm really new with Centos OS, can you guide me on how would I be able to update my software via RHEL Driver? I see alot of RPM and images.
General :: CentOS 5.3 - Updating To Next Kernel Version
Feb 7, 2010I have just downloaded CentOS 5.3. The kernel version is 2.6.18.xx However, when I updated the kernel version has not changed. Still 2.6.18. Unless something went wrong with the updates. The most up to date kernel is 2.6.31.xx I was thinking shouldn't it update to this new kernel? On my Fedora 12 I have 2.6.31. However, I thought the kernel of 2.6.18 would have been updated as least a little.
View 4 Replies View RelatedGeneral :: Updating Zend Engine API On Centos 5.6 Os
May 25, 2011I did an easy apache update and ever since have been getting an error about the Zend engine...
Quote:
Zend Guard Loader requires Zend Engine API version 220090626.
The Zend Engine API version 220060519 which is installed, is outdated.
I have searched for answers on how to update the Zend engine, but can not find much at all and wondered if anyone here has encountered a similar message and knows what I might do.
My system details are
Apache 2.2.18
CENTOS 5.6 x86_64
cPanel/WHM
PHP 5.3.6
Zend Optimizer/Guard Loader for PHP
3.3.9 -
CentOS 5 :: DRBD Mounted Partition Not Updating?
Nov 4, 2009I've been working at creating a highly available set of host servers for a linux diskless boot cluster.Each host machine is fitted with redundant power supplies and two 1TB drives in a Raid-1 configuration.When I first started this project they each had twin 160GB drives. In my original setup I had both nodes acting as primary systems so that I could mount /dev/drbd0 to my /data directory and see changes immediately.It had worked in the past where I could make a file in /data on the first machine and it would show up in the /data directory on the second machine. One day this had stopped working where if I made a file on the first machine it would display on the second one until I unmounted /data and remounted it to the /dev/drbd0 disk.
This is when I bought the new disks and decided to start from scratch. The weird thing is that if I make a file on the primary and remount on the secondary to see it and then delete it from the secondary and THEN delete it on the primary, the primary throws no error however it goes into read-only mode because it knows that file was already gone.Below is my configuration file, sda8 is an 820GB partition which is used for all of the data I want to replicate, currently populated with ~10GB of data. Sda7 is my metadisk partition which is 500MB large clearly more than needed by drbd.Also you will notice "incon-degr-cmd "halt -f";" is commented out. This is because when I go to actually use it drbd throws an error when reloading the configuration and I'm not sure why that is either
resource r0 {
protocol C;
#incon-degr-cmd "halt -f";
[code]....