CentOS 5 :: Building RPM Package With Specific Noarch Sub-package
Feb 3, 2011I was building yesterday the boost-1.45.0 RPM package for CentOS 5.5.
View 3 RepliesI was building yesterday the boost-1.45.0 RPM package for CentOS 5.5.
View 3 RepliesWhen I try to do an update I get an error-message. There are no duplicates and --skip-broken doesn't resolve anything.
Code:
Skip-broken could not solve problems
Error: Package: gnome-background-standard-3.0.0-1.fc15.noarch (installed)
Requires: gnome-themes-standard = 3.0.0-1.fc15
Removing: gnome-themes-standard-3.0.0-1.fc15.i686 (installed)
gnome-themes-standard = 3.0.0-1.fc15
[Code]...
while building a package i got this error. Package name is python-gnomecanvas and i am working in debian.
I am not able to get it correct.
i am using fedora-10,wants to install GTK+-2.18.7 or,so that i can built gui in 'C'.After several tries and installing needed libraries could not make it out.can any one give me full list of required librariescessary procedure to install them in sequence.From where i can find the full package of these libraries.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am currently working on making a audio interface work with a otherwise working debian desktop (its actually AVLinux, but its Debian for all intents and purposes). The problem is, the current version of ffado-svn installed (1949, from the experimental repository) has a bug with the firmware on the interface (an Echo Audiofire8) preventing me from using high sample rates, so I need to install a more recent version of ffado-svn.I am wondering if there is anyway I can build a current version of ffado-svn into the appropriate debian packages. While I am not familiar with debian, I am familiaux (I use Arch regularly). I have tried messing around with downloading the svn source and downloading the source files from however, my lack of knowledge of the building process in debian has rendered me unable to have success so far.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have this source.tar.gz, I unpack it and cd into it, then I
Code:
$mkdir build
$./configure --lots-of-options --prefix=$PWD/build
$make
$make install
So I have inside my build folder, 4 folders, usr, lib, man, share. How do I convert this into a binary rpm package...?
I am trying to build a deb package and I am lost. I was trying to follow this tutorial [URL] and I am not sure what kinda of package this should be. The driver is [URL].
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to build something with checkinstall but it is throwing this error message -
Code:dpkg-deb: parse error, in file '/var/tmp/tmp.tZtdRb9biy/package/DEBIAN/control' near line 3 package 'eina': field name `System' must be followed by colon make install works fine, but I would like a .deb to be built.
I am interested in package building rpms, just stumped on how packagers such as remi and atomic rocket get their spec files. Are these written from other packagers or do you need to write each spec file yourself to be considered as a "packager".
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to compile a project on my raspberry pi with little success. I typed export DH_VERBOSE=1 and added -v to the gcc options in the Makefile to see what was going on and this is the output. I'm trying to compile hda-jack-retask to get the raspberry pi headphone jack set to be a microphone jack. I want to be able to use the microphone jack as the input to xoscope, an oscilloscope program.
Code: Select allpi@raspberrypi ~/~diwic/+junk/hda-jack-retask $ dpkg-buildpackage
dpkg-buildpackage: source package hda-jack-retask
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 0.20120113
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by David Henningsson <david.henningsson@canonical.com>
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture armhf
dpkg-source --before-build hda-jack-retask
[Code] ....
And it sits here for at least 24 hours. Alternatively, It looks like this program is part of the alsa-tools package in Ubuntu, but not in Debian. Need to figure out this freezing issue, should I pull down the Ubuntu source and build a debian package from that?
I'm trying to work with the pcsx2 dev to compile on fedora 86_64. [URL]. Unfortunately I seem to be missing a gtk2 / glib package as building stops with:
Scanning dependencies of target CDVDiso 47% Building CXX object plugins/CDVDiso/src/CMakeFiles/CDVDiso.dir/CDVDisop.cpp.o In file included from /home/mythtv/pcsx2-read-only/plugins/CDVDiso/src/CDVDisop.cpp:11:0: /home/mythtv/pcsx2-read-only/plugins/CDVDiso/src/Linux/Config.h:32:21: fatal error: gtk/gtk.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make2?: plugins/CDVDiso/src/CMakeFiles/CDVDiso.dir/CDVDisop.cpp.o? Error 1 make1?: plugins/CDVDiso/src/CMakeFiles/CDVDiso.dir/all? Error 2 make: all? Error 2
I have gtk2-devel.i686, glib-devel.i686 and all the other dependencies afaik - How do I get yum to tell me which gtk* packages are installed for instance...?
I am trying to build ORBit2 as a dependency for GConf and then google-chrome.
This is a multilib system and I want 32 bit chrome.
Both my 64 bit and compat32 packages are all current as of today per ftp://slackware.mirrors.tds.net/pub/slackware/.
I have edited the Slackbuild as follows:
Code:
The build fails each time with:
Code:
I am using the newest version of ORBit2 as the above indicates, but this is just to see if the newer package would build. The X.X.17 version failed with the same output.
I have run:
Code:
I've had no problems building this package with current in a pure 64 bit environment.
I'm still trying to get comfortable with apt-get doing all my installing for me. The one question I have now is how do I find out where apt-get install "some_package" puts the package it installed for me?
View 4 Replies View Relatedhow would I backup a specific package. Really all I want is the configuration files.
the package I'm talking about is mumble-server, could I say rsync all the files that were installed, then if I wanted to drop it in just copy those back over?
If I had to wipe the installation and reinstall, could I install that package again then drop my backup copy back over it?
Dpkg tells me these are the files it installed.
Code:
dpkg-query -L mumble-server
/.
/var
/var/log
[Code].....
If one accepts an update of a specific package via apt and decides the update isn't desired, what does one do? In other words, what is the most sensible and relatively easy way to rol-back to the previous version of that specific package without affecting anything else (dependencies aside of course).
I want to do this with a recent adobe plug in.
I am trying to install asterisk on my box. When I use "apt-get install asterisk", version 1.6.29 is installed. Is there a way I can install 1.4 instead?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIf a software package I want to install is available in more than one repository, how can I choose which repository to install the package? And is there a way to do this with Synaptic?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI want to learn board specific package(BSP) for ARM processors under LINUX platform, please guide me "from where I need to start, what are the things I need to purchase" hoping to hear from you soon.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI want to know which package installed a specific file. Can I do this?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm using Debian testing but I want Shotwell (and nothing else) from experimental. I also like to be notified when there is an update to Shotwell in experimental. Will that be achieved if I add experimental to sources.conf and the following to preferences?
Package: shotwell
Pin: release a=experimental
Pin-Priority: 600
I am trying to automate yum update of specific package on a remote machine.
So far I have this:
#!/bin/bash
# Update my system
if ! yum update w3m
then
failure=1
fi
if [ $failure ]
[Code]...
All of a sudden when I ran an update with the usual
Code:
sudo apt-get upgrade
I got an input / output error for a specific file followed by an exit with dpkg returning error code 1.
In this case the package (ubuntu-docs) is not exactly life threatening, so I would prefer any update process to simply skip that particular package and move onto the ones that are getting held up. I then opened Synaptic Package Manager where I located the erroneous package. I then unmarked the particular package (ie the blob in front of the package name was green, and the status line shows zeroes for all categories (broken, upgrade/install, remove). So far so good. I then found the 'lock version' menu item under the packages menu. I clicked it, and ran the reload thing. After that thought the package was marked for deletion however, and I once again couldn't get by this one bad package.
So (tl/dr perhaps), how can I make Synaptic / apt-get / or whatever to skip this bad package for real so that I can update my system normally going forward? (Why is it that the whole upgrade process is that fragile by the way? Surely there must the the occasional dud package upgrade that people want to skip, no? Having the whole process grind to a halt because of one issue seems border line paranoid to me. Of course on a minimal server installation where every package counts this behavior makes sense perhaps, but on a IMHO bloated plain vanilla ubuntu install?
I installed ubuntu on my laptop recently and would like to have trim support. (Because I have a ssd drive (crucial c-300 256gb). The current kernel that I am using is the 2.6.32 (standard lucid kernel I believe). Unfortunately TRIM support is only available from 2.6.33 and up. So I thought I'd install a new kernel using this howto:
[Code]....
I need to install the following dependencies for synspam on Ubuntu 9.10 karmic server:
Code:
sudo aptitude install nfqueue-bindings-perl libsys-syslog-perl libappconfig-perl libnetpacket-perl libnetaddr-ip-perl
dpkg -i synspam_version_all.deb
Of these, only libnetpacket-perl is not packaged for Ubuntu 9.10 karmic.
Is this functionality present in another 9.10 package with a different name? 10.04 Lucid does have the package: [URL]
Still I am asked to package a war file as an RPM package. That is an unusual RPM packaging(To me). If you guys could guide me I have a war file inside a folder, that folder is inside a tar file as a SOURCE for RPM package. The structure is like below.
[Code]...
I simply want that the war file from sources is transferred to the web app of my tomcat server through RPM. I try to package it as an RPM, but its always giving me errors in %build stage. When I try to remove %build from stage from the spec file, then it says command missing.
My system details are:
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64)
VERSION = 10
PATCHLEVEL = 1
LSB_VERSION="core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-noarch:core-2.0-x86_64:core-3.0-x86_64"
when I try to install a package, I've the message The following packages have unmet dependencies:package-xy: Depends:lib-something (>= version_number) which is a virtual package.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI am following this guide to installing eclipse via terminal command-line on Linux. However, this seems to be happening lately with all the packages I try to install..I checked the Synaptic Package Manager and reloaded and rebooted the computer, but to no avail.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a problem when installing this package through synaptic package manager. this is :
libpng12-dev
the error is:
W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/po...tu2.1_i386.deb
404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.92.167 80]
my distribution is ubuntu 10.4.
Is there anyway to show package size that comes up in the search so you don't have to apt-get install package individually and wait for the installation initiation and then reject to install after it gives u the [y/N] confirmation thing?
View 2 Replies View Relatedi installed kernel 2.6.34 to fix my lid closing issue, and that went great. but now when i go to reinstall my broadcom i get this error. Code: Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done bcmwl-kernel-source is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. After this operation, 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up bcmwl-kernel-source (5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3) ... Removing old bcmwl-5.60.48.36+bdcom DKMS files...
[Code].....