Ubuntu :: Cannot Change Ownership Of Newly Installed Second Hard Drive

Jan 6, 2010

Recently, I decided to wipe my system, put in two 250GB hard drives and rebuild my home file and print server. One of the hard drives is a SATA drive, and the other is not. In any event, they are identified as /dev/sda and /dev/sdb in Gparted. So far so good.

Working on (reading from/writing to) the first hard drive (where the OS is installed) is no problem. However, I have had difficulty trying to get my system to recognize my second hard drive and then allow me (nate) to read and write to said second drive. I followed these directions from the ubuntu community web page during installation:

[URL]

and setup my second hard drive with an ext3 file system. The drive is /dev/sdb. The PARTITION is /dev/sdb1. The MOUNT POINT is /media/TheBase250.

The problem(s) begin at this point. I cannot:

1. Unmount the volume at my will-error says that only root can unmount

2. I am not sure if the command sudo chown -R nate:nate /media/TheBase250 allowed me to take full ownership of said drive. It appears as if nothing changes when I run this command in terminal (even when I am root) Moreover, I cannot give myself permission to read and write files to the drive.

3. However, when I open up nautilus, browse to "TheBase250", right-click in the corresponding "explorer" or "finder" window and look at the properties for the drive, it says that "nate" is the owner (under the permissions tab), but again, I cannot give myself FILE read/write capabilities, nonetheless anyone else. When I try, all that happens is the corresponding box goes back to displaying "---"

4. Interestingly, if I skip nautilus and double-click on the drive from my desktop, again, logged in as nate (only user account created) and then proceed to right-click on the window that opens up, click properties, half the time it says that I cannot make changes to the permissions because I am not "nate." Well, last time I checked, I am nate, and this is, albeit delinquent, my computer.

5. Another piece of information that may be helpful is that if I simply right-click on TheBase250 drive icon on my desktop itself, navigate to the permissions tab, the dialogue box says that "The permissions of "TheBase250" could not be determined"

Some additional information that may be helpful is the output from my fstab file. So, for your benefit, here is the output (the stars are not part of the file, but only to help improve readability):

************************************************** *****
# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'vol_id --uuid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).

[Code].....

View 9 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Slackware :: Root User Can Not Change The Ownership Of A Hard Drive?

Apr 22, 2010

I have Slackware 12.2 installed on my computer, as well as a Windows Xp. I have a hard drive named '/fat-d', which is formatted to be 'fat' and is normally used under XP. This drive can also be accessed under Slackware, both as root and the normal user.I can not write to the directory '/fat-d' when I am not root, it is normal since 'ls -l' shows that its owner is root and other users have no permission to write. The problem is that, when I tried (as root) to change the owner to the normal user:# chown [normal_user_name] /fat-dI got an error: chown: changing ownership of '/fat-d/':Operation not permittedBut how can the root have no permission to change the owner?

View 6 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Switching Hard Drive Newly Built Rig

Jun 26, 2010

I have just built a new machine and want to transfer my hard drive over to it, can i just plug it in and power up?, will ubuntu 10.04 detect the new hardware and reconfigure. if not whats the best way to backup the data and re-install.

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Cannot Change File Ownership On NTFS Drive?

May 25, 2011

process of migrating my server to Ubuntu Server 11.04 after my Server 2003 installation suffered a HDD failure. All my data is on an NTFS drive (not ideal but not much I can do about that). I can currently only read the disk as a user. root has ownership of everything on the disk. Whenever I try and change ownership of a file it doesn't bring up any errors but when running ls -l it shows that nothing has actually changed.

View 2 Replies View Related

Software :: Ubuntu Installed On External Hard Drive, Can't Startup Without External Hard Drive?

Jan 14, 2009

I have 2 ubuntu's: 1 on my ineternal hard drive, 1 on my external

When I startup without my ext drive =>GRUB error 21.

And when I plug it in I can choose: the standard ubuntu kernel is the one on my external, and the original one is listed under other...

I'd like to be able to startup without external hard drive and make the ubuntu on my internal drve the standard.

View 14 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: 10.10 Installed On A 40gb Hard Drive And Have Setup Arch On A Seperate 160gb Drive?

Feb 12, 2011

i have ubuntu 10.10 installed on a 40gb hard drive and have setup arch linux on a seperate 160gb drive and am at the Choose bootloader screen of Arch Linux. My question is do i use arch linux to reinstall GRUB or do I choose none and configure GRUB to see both? if its the later can you tell how. Oh and Ubuntu is on sda and Arch is on sdb

View 6 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Have Installed On The External Hard Drive?

Mar 29, 2010

I have another question. When again restart the computer, I lost everything I had installed before. I am sure there is option somewhere to be turned on. I do not know where it is? Is there anybody can tell me where it is? I have installed UBUNTU on the external hard drive.

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: 9.04 Installed On Hard Drive But Unusable

May 15, 2010

I've installed Ubuntu 9.04 on my hard drive. The results are worse I keep getting segmentation fault errors, black screens, lock ups, etc. This time I can't get it as stable as on Wubi. It can't stay stable more than 3-4 minutes - then the interface blinks and goes to black screen or shows weird colored strips/squares, locks up or shows tons of errors in the terminal. I did the kernel recovery mode partition check, no errors were found. I installed 9.04 on my harddrive, everything works fine, I log in and it stays great for about 1 or 2 minutes, then it freezes.

It shows the terminal with 'segmentation fault' errors, or goes to black screen and locks up. Alt+SysRQ+B is the only solution and sometimes it doesn't work either. I got Ubuntu 9.04 running through Wubi before and it ran perfectly stable occasionally on few boots. But I can't get it like that on my hard drive installation It just keeps crashing. I did a long memtest (10 tests passed), ubuntu file disk check went fine, my current operating system Windows 7 runs great and another Live CD Linux based system like Knoppix runs perfectly stable. Should it be a driver issue?

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Grub Not Booting After New Hard Drive Installed?

Jan 15, 2009

I installed a new hard drive to my system. I use a program called R-Drive image to copy all my os to my new drive. It done a pretty good job too, its an exact copy. I deleted the old one. But obviously now I cant boot. I had a look at the menu.lst file i dont know what to change it to. heres my drive setup,

C: - Windows Vista - Ubuntu
D: - Documents - Swap File
E: - Games

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Can Mount A Installed Hard Drive - Lost All My Stuff

Jan 24, 2010

I was trying to install a new hard drive and in the process have managed to not only format my old hard drive but lost all my stuff as well. I am running a live CD but unable to mount the said hard drive. I Know its there.

fdisk tells me:

As you can see its still registering as /dev/sda, I am unable to mount this to run a undelete program on it.

a e2fsck tells me

The superblock could not be read or does not describe a correct ext2 filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2 filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock: e2fsck -b 8193 <device>

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Install Grub2 From Live Cd WITHOUT Installed On Hard Drive?

Jun 10, 2010

Is there a way to install grub2 from a linux live cd when linux isn't installed on any of the partitions? I'm setting up a multiboot partition for someone and I don't want to install linux anywhere on the computer since hard drive space is running short.

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Installed 10.04 On A New Hard Drive - Windows Won't Boot

Jun 11, 2010

So I JUST installed 10.04 on a new hard drive for the third time. I had it completely wipe the hard drive and install ubuntu itself (so i couldn't mess anything up). Well NOW it won't even boot up ubuntu much less my windows hd.

So the setup is, my first harddrive which is 640gb and has my windows on it, and then my second harddrive which is 80gb and has my freshly installed ubuntu 10.04 on it. Neither will load. I don't even get a loading screen, I just get a flashing line after my mobo's splash screen.

I ran some boot loader info script and one of the first lines was

Code:

No boot loader is installed in the MBR of /dev/sda

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Format Hard Drive With GRUB Installed

Jan 17, 2011

Upon installation of Ubuntu a while back, i was using a windows xp machine with two different harddrives. Instead of formatting the xp drive and installing Linux, i decided to install Linux on the secondary harddrive. This worked all fine and dandy until recent, when I have found my linux drive filling up near capacity. I would like to format the XP harddrive and mount it in linux to give some more disk space. The problem i have found, is that the XP drive is the drive with GRUB.

View 3 Replies View Related

Hardware :: Hard Drive - Installed Ubuntu In Automatic Mode

Feb 9, 2010

I have installed ubuntu in automatic mode. when i removed it from computer by removing partition(let E by going to disk management in xp, the portion of drive where the ubuntu was installed automatically get primary partition. then i created the new drive from that partition in XP(let E. Later on when my XP got corrupted and i installed fresh xp then when i tried to access the drive i created(E says the file system not supported need to format the disk.

Also when i tried to install fresh copy of linux in those partition it never get install on those partition.

Now the issue is i cannot use those partiton due to fear that incase windows get corrupted my all data in that partition will be gone. Currently i am not having any linux on computer due to shortage of disk space.

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian Installation :: Net Install From Same Hard Drive To Be Installed On

Oct 24, 2015

I am trying to install Debian onto an IBM ThinkPad 240X. The 240X will only boot from either an internal IDE hard-drive, or an external floppy-drive. For now, I have decided to ignore the option of using the floppy drive. I have other computers to support the process, an IBM ThinkPad T43p (Pentium M) as well as my primary laptop, a ThinkPad X200s (Core2 Duo). I have tried installing the hard-drive to be used into the T43p, then booting the Debian NetInstall from a USB thumb-drive, installing as usual, then transferring the hard-drive into the 240X. This does not completely work; GRUB and LILO will load, but the computer freezes very early (almost immediately) in the boot process.

Please note, I am trying this on a CF card. The 240X has an IDE-CF adapter, and my X200s has a USB-CF reader.So, I want to try to load the actual Debian Net Install on the 240X. Ideally, it will happen something like this; I will partition the hard-drive into these 2 partitions:

sda1: the Debian Net Installer
sda2: an empty partition waiting to have Debian installed onto it URL...

but the part I do not understand is how to get GRUB or LILO installed onto the CF card. I am wary of running commands such as "grub-install" as I do not want to mess up my GRUB install on the computers this command would be run from. If I run a command such as this, I would want it to ingore everything about the computer it is being run from, and only modify files or install onto the CF card. I would not want it to acknowledge the computer it is being run from as far as available installs, architecture, etc.

View 7 Replies View Related

General :: Move A VB Installed OS To Actual Hard Drive?

Jan 2, 2010

I did a quick search but came up with nothing. I'll list things in point form to make it less confusing

-I'm running Ubuntu 9.10 with GRUB 1.97

-I have Windows 2000 installed on VirtualBox

-I have an NTFS partition with just music and my data on it, but no windows OS

-I want to take what I have on VirtualBox and put it on my NTFS partition

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Installed To External Hard Drive / Whole System Is Very Slow

Aug 3, 2011

My father installed Kubuntu to his external hard drive to try it out, however, it is running extremely slowly. It takes a good minute and a half to boot to the Plasma desktop and it even seems to run faster off of the LiveCD.His system easily meets the specifications to run Kubuntu (4 gigs of RAM, decent NVIDIA graphics card) yet it slows to a crawl immediately upon booting. Does anyone know how to fix this? The hard drive is a Western Digital MyBook, 475GB model.

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Change Permission Of Hard Drive?

Apr 21, 2010

I am getting annoyed that every time I try to extract, move, or delete a folder I get:

"Unable to move due to file permission"
"Unable to delete due to file permission"
"Unable to extract due to file permission"

I really have a hard time trying to use, and understand the chmod folder stuff in terminal. So I asked a friend and he helped me create a desktop program or icon where I would just drop the folder I wanted to use on it, and permission wouldn't be needed anymore.

Well, I dropped a a folder on it one day and the folder didn't open, so I tried another folder and eventually the thing never worked again so I removed it.

Is it possible to allow the entire hard drive or OS (Ubuntu 9.10) to give me permission to all the folders? I only installed the [password to log] in thing, so I wouldn't have to worry about people in my house using my computer without consent. If this isn't possible can someone post a method to create the launcher or icon?

Note: I made a root desktop thing (Guy holding what looks to be an ID card) but not even that will allow me to delete the folder in the file system. I the entire game that the folder is called is removed already, so there is no point me leaving this folder alone.

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Installing A Second Hard Drive That Has Existing Ubuntu8.04 Installed

Jul 31, 2009

I have a SATA hard drive from a crashed system that was running Ubuntu 8.04. I want to install it in a Ubuntu 8.10 system and use it for file storage. How do I install and reformat it?

View 3 Replies View Related

Slackware :: Adding 2 More Hard Drive As One Partition In An Already Installed Machine?

May 17, 2011

Currently I'm running a smaba on slackware 13.1 with a 1TB Hard drive for dumpng files rather than sharing. My partition table is as follows:

#####################################################################
/dev/sdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/sdb1 / ext4 defaults 1 1
/dev/sdb3 /home ext4 defaults 1 2

[code]....

Now that i need to add 2 more 1TB hard drives and I want to stripe these two drives to make one partition for large space.

View 4 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Newly Installed 9.10 Keeps Crashing

Feb 8, 2010

I have recently switched entirely to Ubuntu. I love Ubuntu and everything I need works fine, except the whole thing keeps crashing on a regular basis - screen goes black or white in a blink and totally hangs, requiring a hard reboot. How to starting trying to figure out what's happening? - I don't think it's hardware, as this laptop has worked fine with windows for a few years now. What sort of scans or checks can I do to investigate?

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Can't Start A Newly Installed 11.04?

Jun 16, 2011

i cannot start a newly installed 11.04, i installed the boatloader into the root partition because i use another bootload called boot-us which start from its own partition, this worked fine with other ubuntu versions, but now i got the following errors after i try to start ubuntu with grub:

error no such device following a number
error no such disk
error you need to load the kernel first

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: System Installed On A External Hard Drive, Themes Aren't Loading?

May 17, 2011

I've installed Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal on a External HDD (320GB Samsung S2). Worked like a charm. Bit slow to boot up and load programs, but after a while, works great. I installed it on the external HDD for one purpose: Work anywhere with Ubuntu, no matter which computer I use. I was thinking that was impossible, but I've tested thru several platforms (3 Notebooks, 2 netbooks, all Intel and one AMD Desktop). All worked flawlessly (32 Bits PAE activated and no matter how many cores are active, just works), BUT the themes.For no apparent reason, themes works on the computer I've installed Ubuntu on the HDD. It has his own Internal HDD with Windows 7 and two NTFS partitions.

Themes are stuck to the default boring-white from Gnome. I can only change the window controls. Compiz works, Wireless works, video works, sound works, filesystem works, system works - themes fail. Feels like I've hit my feet's little finger on a chair. P.S.: Ext. HDD is partitioned like this: 300GB FAT32 (it's my pop's HDD, he wants it this way), 18GB EXT4, 2GB Swap.

[Code]...

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Hard Drives, Ownership, Copying Information?

Jan 15, 2010

I'm building a new system, with the goal of making it an Ubuntu-only box. Among the things I have installed, I have a 1tb ext4 hdd and a 320gb ntfs hdd.Due to my ignorance, right now, I can't boot, but that's not the point of the question. Let me try to explain the situation:Right now, the 1tb hdd has Ubuntu installed. And the 320gb hdd is just a drive for stashing stuff. (It used to be the "large" drive).

But what I want to do now is:Copy all the contents of the 320gb to the 1tbFormat the 320gb as ext4 and install Ubuntu there so it is the "main" driveRe-format the 1tb as ext4 too to use it as the storage areaBut, when I try to copy the stuff from 320 to 1tb, I can't due to permission issues (I'm booting the box from the live CD).So I sudo and the files are copied.Now, when I try to verify (still booted from the LiveCD as the box itself doesn't boot yet) I'm told that I can't see the contents of the directories I just copied.So the question is when I finally copy all the stuff I want to the 1tb, and install Ubuntu, will I be able to read the contents of those directories? I mean, not as root but as my regular user, or conversely, just doing a chown -R myuser:myuser <directory> would allow me to use the files normally?

View 5 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Installed 13 On An 80 Gigabyte Hard Drive - Root Partition Too Large

Jun 10, 2010

I recently installed Fedora 13 on an 80 gigabyte hard drive, and it split the space in two, giving root and the normal partition both 36 gigabytes. I need at least 60 gig or more for my home partition. What can I do to shrink the root one? I currently do not have accsess to the install media or a rescue disk.

View 4 Replies View Related

Slackware :: Partitioned And Installed Slack On A 1TB Hard Drive And Missing 300Gig

Mar 25, 2010

I just partitioned and installed slack on a 1TB hard drive. I then run KDiskFree under KDE, and saw that I am missing about 300Gig! Is it just a simple thing between bytes and bits like MS. Or is this an issue I can not ignore? I have 3 partitions. One is my swap, one is ext4(slackware is on) the last is a jfs partition.

View 7 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Newly Installed App Doesn't Appear In Menu?

Feb 21, 2010

I have just installed ImageMagick but it doesn't appear in the Applications Menu. I have rebooted. Does it require another app or GU

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Get Grub2 Find Newly Installed O/s

Mar 19, 2010

I'm playing with my hard drive partitions and trying out different O/S versions so I want Grub2 to be aware of them on its boot menu. Currently I'm using the maintainer's version of Grub2 that came with karmic. Do I have to do a re-install of Grub2 or is there a makefile I can use? Specific commands that I would need be nice.

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: 9.10 - Cannot Find Newly Installed Application

Nov 23, 2010

I am a beginner Ubuntu 9.10 user. I downloaded and installed the latest version of the sun VirtualBox. My problem is I cannot find where it is installed and that's why I could not run it. Generally, when I install a program the shortcut appears in the menu "Applications->ClassOfInstalledFile". But Virtual Box did not appear. How to find the icon, or simply how to run this application and have a shortcut of it on the "Applications" menu?

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Newly Installed Application Does Not Appear In List?

Feb 26, 2011

A friend installed QCad. All seemed well but he cannot find the app in the Applications menu under any category. Strange thing is, the Software Centre shows that it is installed. How can he run it if it does not appear in the Apps menu?n it be run from the command line?

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved