Programming :: RPM: Package Requires Old Version Of Same Package?

Nov 22, 2010

I'm building a certain RPM package that must require an old version of that same package in order to be installed/upgraded. Is this possible?

For example:

For a package foo v5, somewhere in the spec file:
"Requires: foo >= 4"

I'm declaring this on the Requires tag of the spec file, but when I try to install or upgrade the package (without having the previous required version installed) I get no dependency error! As for other dependencies it all works fine. If, instead, I create a package named "bar" that "Requires: foo >= 4", when installing I do get the expected dependency error. I'm thinking it's not possible to require an old version of the same package.

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Programming :: Global Symbol "$psid" Requires Explicit Package Name At Admin.pl Line 16?

Jul 4, 2011

I have a perl script which was written for me by a professional (I have some basic knowledge), is working fine at the moment but on moving it to a different server as I'm changing a server (new server is shared and supports perl modules), I get the following message"Global symbol "$psid" requires explicit package name at admin.pl line 16". I get this for every single one for my values for the whole script which is about 2000 lines. Same error messages for main and admin.I haven't changed anything on moving it to the new server apart from the first line which is the location of the perl.I thought it would be too much to post the whole script here but anyone has any idea why is doing it taking into account that it works on a different server?

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: A Package (libsdl Related) Requires To Remove The "ubuntu-desktop" Package

Jun 4, 2011

I need to install the following packages in order to compile a ScummVM fork that is not already compiled for ubuntu.

libsdl1.2-dev
libsdl1.2debian-all

But installing via Synaptic requires me to remove the "ubuntu-desktop" package.

View 1 Replies View Related

Software :: Install A Package That Requires X11?

Jan 22, 2010

I'm trying to install a package that requires x11 and complains that it can't find it. It appears my X version is an older one. How can I check which version I have currently installed, just to be sure?

View 5 Replies View Related

Slackware :: RPM Requires Full SeaMonkey Package Install

Dec 19, 2010

There is a "standalone seamonkey-solibs package for RPM, gxine, etc". But after recent upgrades in -current, I can't use rpm without full seamonkey package installed. Can someone revise the contents of seamonkey-solibs and add missing files to it?

$ LANG=C rpm -qp --qf %{NAME} opera-11.00-1156.i386.rpm
error: opera-11.00-1156.i386.rpm: Header SHA1 digest: BAD
error: opera-11.00-1156.i386.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest)

And `rpm2txz -nd opera-11.00-1156.i386.rpm` doesn't work as expected without seamonkey package installed.

View 14 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE Multimedia :: Package-Kit-gstreamer-plugin Requires An Additional Plugin To Decode File

Jul 21, 2010

I just updated my distribution to 11.3 from 11.2. But now this problem occurs when I try to play an mp3. There was no problem before with 11.2.

It also says

Code:
The following plugin is required : MPEG-4 AAC decoder

Only certain mp3s have this problem. All gstreamer packages have been installed. What package is missing anyway?

View 1 Replies View Related

Fedora Installation :: Kernel-devel Package With Version Between The Fedora And Update Repo Version

Sep 11, 2009

I have a fedora 11 with kernel package: kernel-PAE-2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.i686

I would like to install the devel package for this kernel version, but I can't find it, because in the fedora repo there is only the original kernel (2.6.29.4....) and in the updates repo there is only the newest kernel package (2.6.30....)

Where can I find the packages which are between the fedora and update repos' versions?

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Get The "package Maintainer's Version" Of Grub (chose Local Version!)

Jul 23, 2010

I chose the local version of grub when prompted on the last update. However, after doing a bit of reading, it looks like I should have selected the "package maintainer's version" .

I've looked at the release notes [URL] related to grub and changing the menu.lst. However, when I open the menu.lst per the instructions, it is blank (the file opens but there is no text in it). I also ran the sudo update-grub command but was never prompted to choose a the local version or maintainer's version.

Is there a way to go back and get back to the prompt to select the ""package maintainer's version"?

View 9 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Install Package Meant For Older Version Of Ubuntu On Newer Version?

Jan 22, 2011

Specifically, I want Clementine player 0.6, but the guy that installed Ubuntu on my laptop put natty narwhal alpha 1 on it (don't ask me why. I wanted maverick since its stable but he never really asked. The whole thing was kinda a surprise), and Clementine only offers downloads for Ubuntu distros up to maverick. So. Can I/is there a way I can install it anyway? Or am I forced to just use Banshee until the official Update comes out and Clementine is updated in....

View 6 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE :: Zypper R - Best Version Of Package

Jul 5, 2010

I installed R using zypper some time back, but then I read that I should have used a specific repository called Rpatched. So (note order) I added the repository, then remove R (called R-base) and then proceeded to install the package. Clearly in my repository list there is more than one source of R. Should I have removed the package first and then add the new repository? How in fact does zypper deal with different repositories when they all have the same package? I expect it might choose the most recent version. But what happens when the packages are patched? How does it determine the best version of the package to use?

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Twiki Package In Version 10.04?

May 3, 2010

After upgrading to 10.04 I cannot find the twiki package in the repositories. Was the twiki package removed permanently from ubuntu 10.04, or has it just not yet become available in 10.04? If it is permanently deleted, is there a migration path in 10.04 for former twiki users? If it is to become available in 10.04 later, is there an ETA for that?

View 6 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: DEB Package Version Comes Out Wrong

Oct 6, 2010

While trying to get a new revision of ntfs-3g packaged for my OS (2010.10.02) i've run into an odd issue. I pulled the ntfs-3g sources, and got the package sources for the ntfs3g debs (apt-get source ntfs3g).I pulled the <src dir>/debian directory into the new sources, went into <new src dir>/debian/<package names>/DEBIAN and altered the versions in the control files to reflect the current version. However, during dpkg-build, the versions revert to the original package version which is 2010.03.06. When these debs get installed, apt-get update thinks that despite both the version of the installed package, and the version of the upstream package being the same, that it should replace the one i made with the upstream.

View 2 Replies View Related

Software :: Package Invoking In NS2.34 Version?

Mar 13, 2011

I need to invoke one package namely "Size aware scheduling" in advanced version of NS2.34. In net they have given steps for installing it in older version NS2.18b. i have attached url for that package download. I followed the same steps as they said in note but couldnt install it NS2.34.

[URL]

1st url shows how the package work. second url shows from where the package should be downloaded and how to install it and all.

View 14 Replies View Related

Debian :: Rolling Back A Package Version

Feb 11, 2011

I added a PPA repository to my sources list in order to install a package. After a day, i decided i didn't like the software, so i uninstalled it & removed the PPA from my sources list. Everything is still working just fine.

However, Synaptic is telling me that there is a "local or obsolete" package left over from the software i had originally installed. I can't remove the package because it is something that my entire desktop depends on (in Synaptic Package Manager, when i mark it for "Complete Removal," or even just "Removal," it says that pretty much everything else will be removed with it).The package i would like to "roll back" is libgtk2.0-common (2.24.0-1.1). although i had originally got this from a PPA, a very close version is available on Debian experimental here, which is version (2.24.0-1).

View 2 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Multiple Version Of Same Package?

May 10, 2010

I have (after upgrading from 9.10 to 10.04) several packages who are installed with multiple versions.

e.g. Python

dpkg -l | grep python2
ii libpython2.6 2.6.5-1ubuntu6 Shared Python runtime library

[code]....

I guess I only need the newest one .. The other ones have status "RC" Or am I wrong here, and do I need to keep these old versions ?So how do I get rid off 2.4 and 2.5 and just keep version 2.6.How can I easily remove these "old" packages. I tried aptitude purge, aptitude clean, aptitude autoclean. But they don't do the trick.I am looking for an easy way, because python is only an example. Else I could just delete them be using their name.... (of course)

View 1 Replies View Related

Debian :: Possible To Install Specific Version Of Package With Apt-Get

Nov 19, 2010

I am trying to install asterisk on my box. When I use "apt-get install asterisk", version 1.6.29 is installed. Is there a way I can install 1.4 instead?

View 3 Replies View Related

General :: Install Older Version Of Package Using Apt-Get

Mar 28, 2010

I am getting this when I build a project in JBoss Seam:
Code:
asookazian@asookazian-desktop:/opt/jboss-seam-2.2.1.CR1/examples/booking:10:30 PM:$ant clean explode
Buildfile: build.xml
clean:
initcopy:
initpoms:
[echo] Setting up dependencies

Build Failed
/opt/jboss-seam-2.2.1.CR1/build/common.build.xml:95: The following error occurred while executing this line:
/opt/jboss-seam-2.2.1.CR1/build/utilities.build.xml:18: Directory /opt/jboss-seam-2.2.1.CR1/classes/poms creation was not successful for an unknown reason
Total time: 0 seconds
How can I install Ant 1.7.0 (i.e. an older version of an existing package)?

Code:
asookazian@asookazian-desktop:/opt/jboss-seam-2.2.1.CR1/examples/booking:10:31 PM:$sudo apt-get install ant=1.7.0
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
E: Version '1.7.0' for 'ant' was not found
I downloaded the zip file for 1.7.0 but I need to redo all the symbolic link stuff, no?

Code:
asookazian@asookazian-desktop:/usr/bin:10:34 PM:$ls -la ant | less
Code:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2010-03-23 06:15 ant -> ../share/ant/bin/ant

I'd like to keep both versions of the ant package in my Ubuntu 9.10 system if possible...

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Version Versus Release RPM Package

Apr 6, 2011

Trying to understand version nr. of RPM package and release nr.I have the following package e.g.

tree-1.5.3-2.el6.x86_64.rpm.
tree ---> package name
1.5.3 ---> version
2 ---> release
e16 ---> operating system major version
x86_64 ---> cpu architecture

What is the difference between version nr vs release nr ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Software :: XML Parser Version RPM Package For CentOS

Apr 1, 2010

I have tried looking for expat xml parser version 2.0.1 rpm package for centos or RHEL but have not been able to find one. I did find one based for fedora (x86), can this be installed on centos without any issues? Also, I have found a tar package (expat-2.0.1.tar.gz), is the correct directory to decompress and install this under the /usr/local/bin?

View 1 Replies View Related

Software :: Used Apt-Get Install To Get DTC Package (Previous Version)

Oct 5, 2010

I've got version 1.2 of package dtc. I installed it using apt-get install. But I want version 1.1 of it installed instead. How do I get that?

View 5 Replies View Related

Fedora :: Open Office - Mixed Package Version

May 20, 2010

I'm running fedora 12, am a relatively new user, and downloaded OO 320. package is 9483. I installed it before I realized fedora already included an OO version. Now, I click the icons and nothing happens. I looked at the desktop-integration area, and see the package for the icons is 7823? Yum will now neither update, nor remove OO. I hate having to revert to Windows to do some of my work.

View 2 Replies View Related

OpenSUSE Install :: Newest Version Of A Package From Different Repository?

Apr 15, 2011

My procedure for updating the installed packages was, to klick on the list of packages that are installed in the installation source @ system in YAST and choose "Update if newer version is available". Up to Suse 11.3 Yast automatically chooses the latest version from each available repository that is installed (eg, Packman or Mozilla Build Service). With 11.4 however, I noticed that it only updates a package, if a newer version is avalible in the repository from which the package originally origines. Since I don't want to look through 4 GB of packages manually, whether there are newer versions in another repository available, I ask you if I there is a posibility to get the old behavior of YAST back.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Kubuntu Lock Or Hold Package Version?

Nov 25, 2010

Having trouble figuring this out. I've got a package that I've installed from out-of-repos and Kubuntu feels the need to "upgrade" this package to a version that I do not want to use. I've found out how to do this in Ubuntu, but not in Kubuntu. A commandline solution would be fine, although I've googled it and not come up with any working results.

View 2 Replies View Related

CentOS 5 :: Package In YUM Now That Automatically Updates Amavisd-new To Version 2.6.4?

Apr 22, 2010

Is there a package in YUM now that automatically updates amavisd-new to version 2.6.4??? My VM comes stock with version 2.5.4 and i absolutely CANNOT update it to 2.6.4 due to incompatibility issues in Maia Mailguard. When I do the package upgrade I don't understand but i specifically do NOT choose amavisd-new to be updated and everytime I check to see my latest version it is at version 2.6.4 I don't get it am I missing something? What can be causing my package to always get upgraded to the new version when I am not upgrading it.

I have spamassassin 3.3.1
clamav 0.96
postfix 2.3.3

View 3 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Servers :: Libnetpacket-perl Package For 9.10 Karmic - Functionality Present In Another 9.10 Package With A Different Name?

Jan 8, 2010

I need to install the following dependencies for synspam on Ubuntu 9.10 karmic server:

Code:
sudo aptitude install nfqueue-bindings-perl libsys-syslog-perl libappconfig-perl libnetpacket-perl libnetaddr-ip-perl
dpkg -i synspam_version_all.deb
Of these, only libnetpacket-perl is not packaged for Ubuntu 9.10 karmic.

Is this functionality present in another 9.10 package with a different name? 10.04 Lucid does have the package: [URL]

View 1 Replies View Related

SUSE :: Package A War File As An RPM Package - Always Giving Errors In %build Stage

Feb 14, 2011

Still I am asked to package a war file as an RPM package. That is an unusual RPM packaging(To me). If you guys could guide me I have a war file inside a folder, that folder is inside a tar file as a SOURCE for RPM package. The structure is like below.

[Code]...

I simply want that the war file from sources is transferred to the web app of my tomcat server through RPM. I try to package it as an RPM, but its always giving me errors in %build stage. When I try to remove %build from stage from the spec file, then it says command missing.

My system details are:
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64)
VERSION = 10
PATCHLEVEL = 1
LSB_VERSION="core-2.0-noarch:core-3.0-noarch:core-2.0-x86_64:core-3.0-x86_64"

View 5 Replies View Related

Debian Configuration :: Package-xy: Depends: Lib-something (>= Version_number) Which Is A Virtual Package

Nov 4, 2010

when I try to install a package, I've the message The following packages have unmet dependencies:package-xy: Depends:lib-something (>= version_number) which is a virtual package.

View 14 Replies View Related

Ubuntu :: Package Installation Error / 'E: Unable To Locate Package Xxx'

Feb 3, 2011

I am following this guide to installing eclipse via terminal command-line on Linux. However, this seems to be happening lately with all the packages I try to install..I checked the Synaptic Package Manager and reloaded and rebooted the computer, but to no avail.

View 5 Replies View Related

Ubuntu Installation :: Installing Package Through Synaptic Package Manager?

Aug 3, 2011

I have a problem when installing this package through synaptic package manager. this is :

libpng12-dev
the error is:
W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/po...tu2.1_i386.deb
404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.92.167 80]
my distribution is ubuntu 10.4.

View 1 Replies View Related

General :: Apt-cache Search <package> Show Package Size?

Apr 5, 2011

Is there anyway to show package size that comes up in the search so you don't have to apt-get install package individually and wait for the installation initiation and then reject to install after it gives u the [y/N] confirmation thing?

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved