I am trying to pass an array to thread program. Its printing the val[0] value but its not printing value at val[1]. Can somebody help me with this problem.
I looked on the net for such function or example and didin't find anything, thus after having made one i guess it would be legitimate to drop it to see what others thinks of it.
#!/bin/bash addelementtoarray() { local arrayname=$1
I am doing some Linux kernel programming for my research project. I need to record the timestamp (by using cpuid and rdtsc) when an interrupt handler (top half) is first invoked. Due to the time critical nature of the problem itself, I have to do the timestamping inside the interrupt handler itself (the first operation when the handler is called). However, I understand that tasks that are not so time critical should be deferred to a tasklet function (bottom half) for processing because other interrupts are disabled in a (top-half) interrupt handler. I am currently out of idea on how I can pass the timestamp information that I have obtained in the interrupt handler to the corresponding tasklet function.
This is a client server issue where the server creates a new thread for listening to a new client, now when the thread starts execution and during its execution the server needs to pass it an object of some X class, how's that to be done?
I'm making a programm under OpenSuse 11.1I'm using SDL and ofcourse SDL_TTF.when i render with the SDL's TTF function under main(), i have no problems, but when i render under thread i have segmentation fault.There is not exist any typing or any competition (i'm using semaphores) but even if i try to render on a local SDL_Surface i'm having the Segmentation fault...
$1 is an argument which is actually and array. In function we want to assign a value 0 of it's first content. But it's wrong way. Anybody know the right way to assign value in function by passing as argument.
I'm trying to implement a solver for a system of differential equations in Fortran. The solver contains a number of functions which are supposed take real values, 1D arrays of real values or both as arguments and return arrays of real numbers, all of which cause the program to segfault. Example:
Code:
function y_exakt(t) implicit none real::t, pi
[code]....
(the last number in the array seems to change randomly). Then the program crashes either when f(t,y) is called or when dy is returned (after removing the call to f). What could cause these (memory?) problems and/or what could I do to identify the problem? Increasing the maximum stack size with ulimit or compiling the program with -fno-automatic has had no effect. I'm using gfortran (gcc 4.4.3) on a 64-bit Ubuntu Lucid machine. The complete program can be found at [URL].
I am writing a function(in C language in Linux) to initialize an array of a structure from a mysql table by calling a function by reference but I have a problem with call this function by reference . this is my program:PHP Code:
I'm trying to debug a gtk app on ubuntu that crashes from time to time when I open a dialog. Lately I have found a sequence of actions that always reproduces the bug. And I always get this error: Assertion 'pthread_setspecific(t->key, userdata) == 0' failed at pulsecore/thread-posic.c:200, function pa_tls_set(). Aborting.
So my app seems to crash because an error in pulseaudio, which is strange. I made some google search and apparently, this problem exists with other apps. Then, following a suggestion in a bug report, I opened sound-preferences and disabled windows and buttons sounds. And surprise? No more crash. I know that gtk handles events from windows and buttons and so does pulseaudio. So, could it possibly be a bug in pulseaudio instead of in my app? Does anyone have an idea of what's going on here?
I am going to use "pthread_setaffinity_np" to bind a thread to a specific core. My application has two threads. I have used mutex to assign a specific id to each thread and then bind that thread to a core different from another core. but it seems that the os assigns both thread to one core.What should I do to bind each thread to a specific core?
Problem: I need a method to maintain the $i variable. In fact, actually, this variable get lost when executed. I think that an escape can preserve this variable and permit its execution inside the function, but I've no idea about.
A simple TCP based chat server could allow users to use any TCP client (telnet, for example) to communicate with each other. For this question you should consider a single process, single thread server that can support exactly 2 clients at once, the server simply forwards whatever is sent from one client to the other (in both directions). Your server must not insist on any specific ordering of messages as soon as something is sent from one client it is immediately forwarded to the other client. As soon as either client terminates the connection the server can exit
I'm writing a PHP program. I've encountered a problem; in the following code I try to pass $_POST['delete'] which is an array as the value of a hidden input to some form, but it doesn't do so.there's something wrong with converting PHP array into HTML array. I'm sure that $_POST['delete'] is not null and is a real array.
(I am using vector() and matrix() functions from "Numerical recipes in C".)There are 100 numbers to be stored in 2D array of 10 rows and 10 columns.100 numbers are stored in a 1D array.I get "segmentation fault" at the line indicated in the segment of my code below:
What is the quickest way to get the thread id(tid) of the current thread in linux? Specifically I use fedora 13. ...and I am talking about inside a C++ program.
Is there a library/system call that will return to me what CPU core a thread of execution is running on? I've looked for a bit on the net already and also in /usr/include and couldn't find one.
getcpu() and sched_getcpu() are two that I found, but when I include the appropriate header files (linux/getcpu.h, and sys/sched.h respectively), gcc says getcpu.h doesn't exist and the linker complains it cannot find the implementation in sched.h.
I'm sure I'm doing something really stupid or overthinking...
What I am doing is running an OpenMP application and specifying a list of cpu cores to run on with GOMP_CPU_AFFINITY. I want to make sure that each core is getting the same number of threads.
**UPDATE**
It seems that this code works, but only with glibc >= 2.6, and my machine has 2.5:
I have a program which is uses sigaction to register for a SIGIO signal (for incoming data on a fd) with an appropriate event handler. I also create a new detached thread 'B' that does some work with the received data. Normally the thread B runs properly. But when my event handler is called (because a there is new incoming data), after the event is handled, the thread B is not called immediately. There is a noticeable delay of the order of many seconds before it is scheduled again .During this delay, my program is doing nothing.
What am i doing wrong? Is there someway i can run thread B as soon as the event is handled (and assuming no other work is to be carried out)?
I have a process and two threads running in it. Thread1 is my GUI-Thread (using FLTK) and Thread2 is running at the first 10 sec. after start.Now, I would like to make Thread2 "nicer" to Thread1, because otherwise GUI stucks sometimes. But I didn't find a solution.Is it possible to define the "niceness" of threads inside a process (to each other)? And if so, how do I have to do this?
When I set the stack base address of the child thread using the POSIX library function "pthread_attr_setstackaddr()", I am unable to access the memory contents of its parent. The data-structures that are created on the HEAP of its parent using malloc() are either getting destroyed or unaccessible when moving to the context of the child thread. These data-structures are being passed as an argument to the child thread.Even if I make these variables global then also it is not working.pthread_attr_setstacksize(tattr, ...);stackbase = (void *) malloc(...);pthread_attr_setstackaddr(tattr, stackbase);But when I create the child thread without setting its stack base address using that pthread_attr_setstackaddr(), then it is able to access the parent's memory contents.
I'm struggling with the issue of passing a vector of a class to itself, here's what state its in now... (tried many variations, but without direction).
I'm trying to work out the best way to achieve the following.
1)php page that grabs data from a local database. (not a problem)
2)It then needs to send this data to a c program/service running on a remote server. (I probably need it to be able to handle 4+ million reocrds in an array)
3) The c service then needs to process the data and send it back to the initial php script that called it. i was hoping this could be in a an array like structure of some kind. 4)update the db with the results.
I was thinking of using gsoap to write a simple c soap service that php can communicate with. Would this be the right way of doing this or would something like sockets in php be a better way of sending this volume of data as an array or struct to linux c socket if thats even possible.