Networking :: Ssh Listening Only To Eth1
Sep 18, 2010How can I configure ssh to only listen to eth1?
View 4 RepliesHow can I configure ssh to only listen to eth1?
View 4 RepliesI need to setup two ethernets in my Centos box. OK no problem both ethernet and 1 virtual works perfect. eth0, eth1 and eth1:0. I'm trying to set up diferent routes for eth0 and eth1/eth1:0 I need eth0 has a 192.168.1.1 gateway and eth1/eth1:0 192.168.1.100 gateway.I think I've tried almost every thing but always get one gateway for all the eth.These are my config..
/sbin/ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX
inet addr:192.168.1.168 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0[code]......
I try to generate a server client code. What i try to do is sending video streams from eth0 and eth1 to the other server programs' eth0 and eth1. In order to do that, i decided to use SO_BINDTODEVICE. But the code is not working. Am i misunderstood the usage of SO_BINDTODEVICE.
1-Defining two ports
2-Defining two sockets
3-Assigning host ips on them
[code]....
I have a hardware device with two ethernet ports, eth0 and eth1 running Centos 5. Basically my goal is to forward packets from eth0->eth1 and eth1->eth0 as well as get a copy of these packets for analysis. If I set IP routing to do the forwarding then I won't get a copy of the packets for analysis.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am running Ubuntu 64-bit and I have been trying to set up an ssh connection between the Ubuntu server and a Windows 7 client (using putty) and when I enter the command:
Code:
sudo netstat --inet -lpn | grep sshd
I get the following:
[code]....
I run various manual checks on my system to see if there's anything I can't account for and just one such instance just got thrown up here. I reproduce the output from netstat below. I see there is something called "microsoft-ds" shown as listening. What on earth is this doing on my PCLinuxOS box? I have googled it and there does appear to be some security issues related to it for Windows users and all the advice relating to it that I could find is for Windows users, but I am just baffled as to what this is doing on my Linux system.
[Code]...
In emule p2p filesharing there's this thing called the id that is low if you do not configure your router for certain ports to be listening for incoming connections, forwarded by the router to ports on your pc. When the id is low, your downloads take longer or something like that. But if you have no listening port, how can a peer download from you?
View 2 Replies View Relatedroot@HOST [~]# /etc/init.d/httpd start
Starting httpd: no listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open log [FAILED]
root@HOST [~]# /etc/init.d/httpd restart
Stopping httpd: [FAILED]
Starting httpd: no listening sockets available, shutting down
Unable to open logs [FAILED]
root@HOST [~]# tail -n 10 /var/log/messages
Sep 29 17:59:30 localhost avahi-daemon[2870]: New relevant interface wlan0.IPv4 for mDNS.
Sep 29 17:59:30 localhost avahi-daemon[2870]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface wlan0.IPv4 with address 196.219.240.236.
Sep 29 17:59:30 localhost avahi-daemon[2870]: Registering new address record for 196.219.240.236 on wlan0.
Sep 29 17:59:31 localhost avahi-daemon[2870]: New relevant interface wlan0.IPv6 for mDNS.
Sep 29 17:59:31 localhost avahi-daemon[2870]: Joining mDNS multicast group on interface wlan0.IPv6 with address fe80::223:cdff:fecb:9c5e.
Sep 29 17:59:31 localhost avahi-daemon[2870]: Registering new address record for fe80::223:cdff:fecb:9c5e on wlan0.
Sep 29 17:59:31 localhost NetworkManager: <info> (wlan0): device state change: 7 -> 8
Sep 29 17:59:31 localhost NetworkManager: <info> Policy set 'Sunsoft1' (wlan0) as default for routing and DNS.
Sep 29 17:59:31 localhost NetworkManager: <info> Activation (wlan0) successful, device activated.
Sep 29 17:59:31 localhost NetworkManager: <info> Activation (wlan0) Stage 5 of 5 (IP Configure Commit) complete.
What is the problem I have a local server
CentOS Linux
Looking for a test tool where I can fire up any number of ports (TCP and / or UDP) to listen on.
I am currently getting my using nc but its only 1 port at a time (i know I can open up multiple sessions but thats cumbersome), it can't do UDP, and it closes at the end of the session.
A friend has suggested socat but it looks pretty much the same except it can do UDP, but also cumbersome, I have to manually output to a different file per port, etc.
Basically its so I can quickly test firewall and NAT rules.
I am working on USB Connectivity between android 2.1 Host and Windows Mobiles 6.1 device...When I connect the windows mobile device to android host through USB (in RNDIS Mode), It is appearing as 'eth1' interface instead of 'usb0' interface. Why 'eth1' instead of 'usb0' ? Does behaviour of 'eth1' is same as 'usb0'?
View 8 Replies View Relatedis it possible using a perl script to test for a socket listening on a UDP port on a remote host ?I work in an environment where netcat is not allowed and from time to time I need to see if a UDP port is open on a remote host.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am running Ubuntu10.04 as a Virtual Machine in virtualbox.I changed my Networking settings from NAT to Bridged Adapter and manually assigned IP addressing information for eth0 in /etc/network/interfaces. For some reason doing /etc/init.d/networking restart didn't bring up the network interface. So i replaced the new /etc/network/interfaces file with the original and rebooted. Now I have eth1 in place of eth0. Under System>Preferences>Network Connections I have Auto Ethernet and eth0. However running ifconfig shows lo and eth1.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI've noticed that when Linux boots on different machines or with different versions, the network card is assigned to eth0 or to eth1, when there is only one network card. What is the difference and is there any way to tell which one it will be for any machine or version?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI often run "gulp", a networking utility, to capture data from an instrument on "eth1". By default gulp must be run as root to have access to the ethernet port, and when I'm the only one running it, that's fine. But I need to let several other users to capture data and don't want to give them all sudo permissions for both gulp, and more importantly, 'chmod'. Is there anyway to change the permissions of eth1 to allow all users to open it and avoid sudo entirely? This is on a Red Hat/Fedora machine.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI installed Slackware 13.37 console only.
I have two ethernet cards.
I want to change eth1 to eth0 and eth0 to eth1, because I have some old firewall script and I need eth0 be eth1, because of routing internet. My ISP close my net connection on MAC adress.
I am trying to setup linux box as router.
What i am trying to do is:
1. I am trying to setup NIC via network not NetworkManager
2. I have assigned the ip to both NIC with #ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.1
3. #Ifconfig shows my nic and ip
4. restart the service network .
5. #ifconfig shows nothing. NO NIC card
I dont want the network manager coz i dont want to install the gui on router and network manager works only in gui mode. ( i think my this understanding is correct)
I tried to configure the NIC with Network Manager
When ever i restart the network service i have no out put from ifconfig
I tried to configure the NIC with #setup command as well and select the dhcp option
I can not find any ifcfg-eth0 in /etc/sysconfig/networking-scripts/
My wireless suddenly no longer works either in Ubuntu 10.10 or Windows 7. Upon some investigation, I have found that my eth1 is no longer showing up as it used to.
What can I do to get my wireless back?
Right below is some current specs, while below that is an older set of specs from a while ago.
Code:
sef@sef:~$ lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory Controller Hub (rev 07)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)
[Code]....
I'm having a strange problem. I'm using Ubuntu server 10.04 LTS and I want to setup a system with 2 network interfaces: eth0 and eth1. However eth1 does not come up at boot I have a screenshot of my /etc/network/interfaces file I don't see what is wrong. eth0 gets it's adress from DHCP eth1 gets a static adress. When i try to restart networking it quits with this message "don't seem to be have all the variables for eth1 inet" Can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong? if i do 'sudo ifconfig eth1 192.168.3.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up' eth1 comes up
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have static eth1 defined. When I boot or restart, the networking will not start automatically - i must do it from terminal by ifup eth1.
Where can I put this command to have it autostart?
I have the following setup: An ADSL Router (192.168.4.1) which plugs into my server (that has 2 network cards) Server(eth0-connecting to the ADSL Router) = 192.168.4.2 Server(eth1-connecting to the windows XP PC) = 192.168.4.3 And the windows XP PC = 192.168.4.4 if I delete the entire routing table and add a default route route add default gw 192.168.4.1 dev eth0 I get an error (I can't remember the error, the PC's at work) however if I unplug the cable going from the PC to eth1, I can then successfully add the default route, and I can ping the router, however when I reconnect the cable to the PC and Server... I can still ping the router (from the server) but I cannot ping the PC
if I try and add another route such as: route add -net 192.168.4.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.4.4 it wont let me add the rule I have a feeling i am doing something really stupid here with the addressing scheme,
i have installed centos 5.1 but it won't recognize 2nd nic card (eth1). i was unable to install the driver supplied by the cd. i am using intellinet gigabite pci network card. the network card recognize by centos 5.3 but i need to use centos 5.1. i also tried another intel gigabite adopter but it also won't recognize by centos 5.1.
View 2 Replies View RelatediSCSI Server, can I change the default port 3260 to other port ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two network devices :
1. Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Conncection (Currently eth0, Mac=00:0e:8c:ab:c6:b1)
2. National Semiconductor Corporation DP83815 (Currently eth1, Mac=00:0e:8c:8a:70:62)
I want to change them so that the "Intel" become eth1 device and the "National" become the eth0 device.
I already tried these steps :
1. I disabled the Network Manager and enabled network
2. Edit the /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules like this
Quote:
3. Change the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 MAC addresses.
4. Reboot
5. After it bootup the Fedora can't recognize the devices, if I do ifconfig -a it shows "eth0_rename with FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF mac address".
I have two network interfaces on my computer but only one of them is connected to an Ethernet cable. Until now on every Fedora release, the activated primary interface has been named as eth0 and everything has always worked well without any problem. Recently I switched to Fedora Core 12 and surprisingly I observed that for the first time, my primary interface has been considered by the system to be eth1 instead of eth0. I tried to replace the content of ifcfg-eth0 by ifcfg-eth1, yet system gave me an error that there was MAC address mismatching. I conserved their MAC addresses in their files and just replaced other connection parameters ( such as IP ADDR, NETWORK, NETMASK, etc.) but it did't work. When I do "server network restart", the command blocks.
As I try to install oracle on this system, regarding the fact that oracle requires static network configuration on the primary network interface, I don't know how to proceed in order to set eth0 as my primary interface (or rather set the current eth1 to eth0 because it is actually eth1 that refers to my activated primary network card).Just one more time, I would like to remark, that with previous versions of the Fedora Core, on the same computer (with the very same two network cards) I never had problem and I had installed oracle on the system with success, having the statically configured eth0 correctly detected by the system.
how can I change eth1 mac address permanently in an easy way?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIt is. I think this might be the reason why my $wireless objects don't work in Conky?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have an older laptop, a Toshiba Satellite Pro 6100 that has a switchable internal wireless connection. It will not connect to my router. I am using the 10,04 netbook remix. When I use lshw in terminal this is what I get:
*-network
description: Wireless interface
physical id: 1
logical name: eth1
[Code].....
Should it not be identified as wlan0? I know a whole lot about Ubuntu linux because I don't. I did a clean install over XP and am using this laptop as a learning tool for linux in hopes to divorce windows completely.
I have a bit of a "unique" situation here. I have myself plugged into two networks - since we run two networks here at work (long story, we merged and never combined them due to two different companies) and want to block ALL internet access off eth1, and only have it off eth0. I only want traffic from 192.168.67.1-192.168.67.255 allowed on eth1, but everything allowed on eth0. Or is there a way for the internet/applications to be on eth0 instead of eth1? Would I use iptables or something?
View 4 Replies View Relatedim a linux noob dont get techy ill die of brain fry im running a craft bukkit minecraft server on my 11.04 ubuntu server. however the server uses my only 10m Ethernet cable that i normaly use for my ps3 (i will NOT go wireless. i hate it (or dont like it)) therefor i found an old PCI NIC in an old computer, its a 10/100 realtek one. ifconfig detects it (after two commands:
Code:
ifconfig eth0 up
dhclient eth0
)
now i need to send the internet to my ps3 too.i know the connection wont be blazing fast but isnt it okay?it musnt interrupt the minecraft server. if you need info just ask. ill try and provide them.
I need to have the configuration showed on the attached file. I have two machines, one PC (ubuntu 9.10 ) and one embedded CPU with a tailored linux version starting from 2.4.31 linux kernel with Busybox running on PPC architecture.
PC address is 192.168.30.70.
On CPU board I have two ethernet interfaces with addresses :
eth0 192.168.30.30 netmask 255.255.255.0
eth1 192.168.30.40 netmask 255.255.255.0
PC sends messages alternatively to 192.168.30.40 and to 192.168.30.30 .Between two machines there is an ethernet switch to allow messages flowing.
I use ping (from two shells on PC I ping the two addresses on CPU) to simulate messages from PC to CPU and I see this behaviour:
Starting from a situation in which CPU responds to the pings I try to disconnect cable connected to eth0 on CPU. I cannot see any interruption on ping reply on the eth0 port. If i reconnect the cable on eth0 and I disconnect cable on eth1 there are no reply to the two pings (neither from eth0 nor from eth1). It seems that all data flows on one cable just because the addresses are on the same subnet. Is this right?
If this is the right behaviour how can i separate data from PC to CPU in order to force packets to flow on two cables and avoid this sort of internal routing beetween eth0 and eth1?