I have a iptable as firewall, I want to open incoming of port 8080 so I use "# Allow forwarding of incoming Port 8080 traffic" but it didn't work? how can I open just incoming of port 8080?
View 3 RepliesI'm trying to use iptables in order to forward all the incoming packets for port 5555 to port 5556 on the same server (192.168.2.101).
I wrote the following commands:
iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i any -p tcp --dport 5555 -j DNAT --to 192.168.2.101:5556
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m state --state NEW -d 192.168.2.101 --dport 5556 -j ACCEPT
My first time installing centos server and adding it to xp home network. I am new to setting up my own network in general. I have a home windows wired ethernet xp network (simple linxs router) with 2 xp boxes and one centos5 box all connected to the same router. I just set up the centos box running tomcat on port 8080. I need to do two very basic things at this point, but am not sure what I need to do:
What do I need to do so I can:
1. Connect in firefox on one of my xp boxes and call the tomcat server running on my centos box?
2. Be able to ftp to centos box from either of my xp boxes?
I have 2 server behind the netgear router on my network . win2k3 and CentOS development server, I have port forarded 80 to win2k3 server which i can access over the internet and is accessable. However I can SSH CentOS machine and portforwarded 8080 and 82 for web access, I can't access via any of the port, browsers says UNABLE TO CONNECT.. there is no firewall in CentOS machine.
View 1 Replies View Relatedi am not able to port 8080 on my CentOS VPS server.I have followed all the instuctions as mentioned on iptables wiki page.Also I am able to telnet my ip address and port number, But can not access from browser.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI've got a box with 2 interfaces, with IP1 = 192.168.100.1 and IP2 = 10.1.1.1 respectively on them. I've got an iptables rule that looks like:
Code:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/8 -p udp -j SNAT --to-source 10.1.1.1 --random
If I get 2 consecutive packets from the same address and port from 192.168.100.0/24, they get SNAT-ed and come out of the same port on 10.1.1.1. If then I get another packet from the same address and port 10 minutes later, then it gets SNAT-ed, but comes out of a different port on 10.1.1.1. How can I set the time delay I would like iptables to remember its incoming address/port to outgoing port mappings?
I am running lmgrd on CentOS5, but it returns Failed to open the TCP port number in the license. The port is 27000, how can I open that port?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've got a box with 2 interfaces, with IP1 = 192.168.100.1 and IP2 = 10.1.1.1 respectively on them. I've got an iptables rule that looks like:
Code:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.100.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/8 -p udp -j SNAT --to-source 10.1.1.1 --random
If I get 2 consecutive packets from the same address and port from 192.168.100.0/24, they get SNAT-ed and come out of the same port on 10.1.1.1. If then I get another packet from the same address and port 10 minutes later, then it gets SNAT-ed, but comes out of a different port on 10.1.1.1. My question is: how can I set the time delay I would like iptables to remember its incoming address/port to outgoing port mappings?
Finding the process that is using a certain port in linux
I have an Ubuntu Server setup, where I'm trying to set up a daemon that wants to have access to port 8080. When I run the command, the error message says it's being used by another process. But which one, it doesn't say. How can I go about finding which program uses this port?
My Apache is not listening on port 8080. Hence i cant access my server manager [URL]
View 2 Replies View RelatedCurrently my home internet provider does not allow services on ports 1 to 1024 but allow the use of high ports to whatever users want to do and I was wondering what ways are there to mask my webserver @ ip:8080 and yet maintain the servernames ? For example currently if I use myexample.com:8080 it will open just fine but I know there some ways to make it look like if port 8080 never existed, one example of this would be using a proxy server somewhere else to redirect the access but I don't have one available nor money to use for this.
In the above case what would happen is that when user hitted the proxy server it would redirect and query my server so user would never know 2nd server existed at all. Another way would be creating a page somewhere else and put your site as a iframe or frame which would hide it but may be a problem to some browsers etc...
So I belive the question here is what options do I have to mask my server at 8080 to look like a transparent webserver? While I do know this seems a bit technical I belive the place to ask this question would be here instead of serverfault
I will be setting up a web server at my house. It will be a simple page for my family to keep in touch and maybe some other stuff. Here is the problem: I believe my ISP blocks port 80. So when setting up the firewall and it list the normal port 80 am I able to edit to say 8080? I have a ddns already setup for my router and I am waiting for an email back from DynDNS.com on setting up a new domain to forward to my already setup hostname. I just need to get everything redirected to another port beside 80.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have got a reverse proxy that is working just fine, it accepts requests on port 443 and port 80 and ONLY sends traffic upstream to port 80 to the apache server listening on localhost. I use the following config:
https_port 10.14.1.72:443 cert=/etc/squid/self_certs/site.crt key=/etc/squid/self_certs/site.key defaultsite=site vhost
cache_peer 127.0.0.1 parent 443 80 no-query originserver login=PASS
http_port 10.14.1.72:80 vhost
My problem is the following : The site should act differently in some occasions based on whether http or https was requested. So my idea is to setup second http vhost on apache listening to port 8080 and on that vhost I would server the https code. So is it possible to use SQUID to :
Send traffic destined for port 443 to localhost:8080
and
Send traffic destined for port 80 to localhost:80 ?
I am a network/system Administrator in an avg. based company, we are using Cent Os as servers. We are developing applications in both php & java, for java we are using apache tomcat as server (port number 8080) & for php we are using apache as server (port 80). Php applications are uploaded in the server and giving the link to our clients like localhost.com/chrome. Now we are planning to give the java based application for testing purpose to clients & can give the application link to client as localhost.com:8080/mozilla. Is it is possible to change the link localhost.com:8080/mozilla to localhost.com/mozilla with out changing the portnumber of apache tomcat server & without interrupting the php applications, that means our clients can access php application as localhost.com/chrome & java application as localhost.com/mozilla in the same server at the same time.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am having trouble getting my FC10 with tomcat visible to the outside world. first off i am somewhat new to linux. I am running vmware workstation to host my linux web server. i have my VMWare setup to use my second NIC solely. it is bridged and the tcp/ip is disable from the host. i can ping the ip address but cant access tomcat on port 8080 from the outside. i can hit it fine from inside fedora. i have configured my router (wrt54gs with DD-WRT firmware) for port forwarding. so basically i think that the problem is somewhere in between the host and the vmware configuring allowing the port to be forwarded through.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am setting up tomcat server on my Centos 5.5 machine. I've been advised to run tomcat on 8080 as non root user and redirect traffic to it from port 80.
I searched and found the following iptables commands for this:# iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT -to-ports 8080
# iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 8080 -j ACCEPTI have a doubt:
Tomcat is not accessible via port 80 without the second command. But the second command opens 8080 and makes it accessible over the internet (tomcat is accesible via both: www.<website>.com and http://<ip address>:8080). This doesn't seem right. Is there some simple (iptables) way to redirect traffic "internally" from port 80 to 8080 without having to open 8080 to the internet.
I'm trying to open port 8080 on my application server. I've included it in my iptables; however I still cannot access through ssh nor putty and it doesn't show up when I netstat either.Here is my iptables-config:
-A INPUT -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i eth0 -s xxx.xx.x.0/24 -j ACCEPT
[code].....
I'm trying to get VNC working but I'm getting this error message:
Quote:
ssh: connect to host my_ip_address port 22: Connection refused
When typing:
Quote:
ssh -f -L 5900:localhost:5900 user@my_ip_address x11vnc -safer -localhost -nopw -once -display :0 && sleep 5 && vncviewer localhost:0
I'm trying to follow the instructions here: [URL] but I'm struggling with point 2 & 3:
Quote:
2. If you have previously reconfigured the firewall on your PC, make sure the firewall allows incoming connections on port 22 from anywhere, and on port 5900 from localhost (also known as 127.0.0.1)
3. If your PC is behind a home router, or any other device that uses NAT, configure your router to send connection attempts on port 22 (but not port 5900) to your PC
So my questions are:
1. I installed a fresh version of Ubuntu 11.4, should I be concerned about step 2? If so, how can I allow incoming connections on port 22 from anywhere, and on port 5900 from localhost?
2. Regarding step 3, I'm using NETGEAR model DGN1000 router. Is that something that I should do from the router's setting page or it's some commands that I should pass through SSH?
How do i set my ubuntu server to use port 4055 for incoming telnets>
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have set up an openvpn server on ubuntu via port tcp 443. The server use a public network and almost every ports are blocked (not 443) So when a client connect to the server, if it send traffic needing a blocked port, the connection cannot been etablished of course. So i d like to know if it is possible to redirect all incoming traffic on the server to an other unblocked port (like 443) to bypass firewall.
I dont think openvpn offer this possibility but maybe with linux it is possible..
I found that I can not use the UDP port on FC 12.I new install one FC 12 , but when I use the next command nmap -sU localhost.I found all udp port has been filtered.I don't know how to open the udp ports . for I need use some udp port.I use iptables , but not working. Why ?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI just installed apache. I didn't change the configuration files at all except add Quote: # added servername to avoid the could not determine fqdn error ServerName myname.homelinux.org to apache2.conf. Apache is working locally (I get the `it's working' screen at [URL]). However, I cannot access my computer from an external computer by going to [URL], which is equivalent to [URL] -- [IP address changed slightly for privacy] Here is a screenshot to my router settings. I disabled the filter for port 80 on the router. here shouldn't be a firewall, unless it's automatically installed with ubuntu 10.4. (sudo ufw status says `inactive'.)
I checked my ports from [URL] and indeed port 22 is open (ssh-ing into my computer externally is not a problem), whereas port 80 is closed. What step in opening up port 80 am I missing? (I also made sure my ISP isn't blocking port 80.)
I would like to test myself if port 5060 is open for UDP packets.
I got a few shell accounts outside of my ISP that run Linux or different BSDs. Does someone know a common program where I could send UDP packets to port 5060 of the IP address that Virginmedia assigns to me and then I would need a program on a PC within my network who reads them _if_ they get through.
Background of all this is that my VOIP phones from two different VOIP providers are offline since last Monday.
One service provider confirmed that another VOIP client is online with the same service provider Virginmedia but in a different area.
So, while I don't know how long does it take that someone from Virginmedia can tell me if their port 5060 is open for UDP, I would like to find out myself in the meantime.
I have a problem sending of file attachment using Instant Messengeri have a firewall using firestarter, if i used outside firewall they can able to recieve my file in instant meesenger but if i used firestarter it always cancelled my sending of file attachment....
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am running RHEL 5.3 and attempted to open port 4470 for an application that will use the port. I used the graphical interface to open the port, just as I have for other ports such as 4750.I can telnet to the server with:telnet server 4750
If I try the other port that I'm trying to open:telnet server 4470
I get "Could not open connection to the host, on port 4470: Connect failed."I have restarted the network and iptables services.I have turned off the local firewall and it still did not work.
needing to open a port in ubuntu, then use it for my VirtualBox Pc.My VirtualBox is running - Windows XP I have a router connected to my network - Linksys WRT54G Now lets begin, I have tried opening via there router homepage. But when I go to [URL] and test port 4900 is still says that it is closed.
View 3 Replies View RelatedNo matter what I do, i cannot get port 3100 to open. This is for a new MMO i am CBT on. I know it works on windows because that is how I installed it and played. But I prefer being on Linux. Majority of all other MMOs work fine. Just this one has to have udp 3100 open.
The following is a rough output of all the methods I have tried with no success. As you can see I have done some extensive research first before posting here.
Now its become a lil bit of an obsession.
I cannot get the following command to work:
And yes I tried the "spaces" in different places thinking that was the prob. So i cannot see if 3100 is in the list or not
I eventually turned on the firewall "ufw enable" add the port there, and output:
Some references
[url]
Firewall stuff: [url]
I even manually went into the router and turned it on there.
I add these lines for startup purposes.
Do I need to do something in "wine" ?
I feel i am starting to repease myself
results of "iptables -L"
Code:
I have an n900 phone and I'm trying to ssh to my desktop but I'm getting an error:
ssh: connect to host 58.xx.xx.xx port 22: Connection refused
I recently started using a router for I wanted to connect to net even with n900. I've tried to open the port from the setup page of the router however it doesn't seem to work. (find below the screenshot of setup page).
I've tried to ssh through slackware I've got as a virtual machine and I have the same problem although I was able to ssh through slackware before I started using the router.
how do i enable or open port in the iptables
View 14 Replies View RelatedI think port 24800 is firewalled in my linux machine. i tried synergy to sue as a server in linux and doesnt work. i tried from the windows computer and works!
So... I telnet (from linux) to an address: telnet 192.168.0.1 24800 and the time is out (so a firewall is blocking this port).
My simple question: How do I open this port so i can get the synergy server in my linux box?