i know exactly what i need to do, im just not familiar enough with command line to do it properly.i have 7 computers.the first 4 are connected to a router via wireless at one end of the house. of the last 3 only 1 will be able to access the router via wireless, so it needs to share it's one wireless connection via ethernet. this computer i'm going to call 'server'server will have two IP'swlan0 192.168.1.6 this connects to the router that has internet access.eth0 i intend to have the following settingsip:192.168.0.1sub: 255.255.0eth0 will connect to a second router, where the cat5 cable goes from the server, into the internet port of the router where i will define the router's static IP:IP: 192.168.0.100sub: 255.255.255.0gateway 192.168.0.1i have then set the router IP for LAN handling as 192.168.27.1 and all ethernet connections will have a 192.168.27.x IP.
so i need to know how to, without a gui application, use the terminal to assign server eth0 a proper IP address, and tell the server to take the connection it has and share it through eth0 to supply internet for the last 2 computers via ethernet.i had it set up in this way with a windows machine being the one that had the wifi access, but i'd rather have it setup for the ubuntu server to do this task. security is imperative for these 3 remaining machines, so just getting 2 more wifi adapters for a connection to the initial router isn't an option.the 2 that connect to server do so through SSH and though server IS connected via wireless it only makes outward connections through
My setup is...I have a wireless access point using laptop as a gateway. The AP is also connected to a switch as is the laptop. So the laptop has two interfaces one wireless and one wired. A third device is using the AP to connect to a server on the internet. The AP sends the packets to my laptop where they are dropped. I've been looking for a solution to this problem without success. Basically is there a way for my laptop to forward all packets it sees from a certain IP address to whatever destination address they have?To clarify, my laptop is just the gateway of the AP and none of the packets are addressed to it at all, it just picks them up using a sniffer or similar tool.
I have a pc with debian 6 (without GUI) installed on it and want to use it as server at home. It has 2 ethernet nics. Now i want to configure the routing process. Searched internet for a long time found something but couldn't get it work.
When setting up an SSH proxy, I know you can configure Firefox to route DNS requests through the proxy. Is this possible from linux directly? I'm trying to use wget through the proxy, including DNS lookups.
I have two subnets which I am interested in connecting.
Some basic network details:
Subnet A:
Subnet B:
I am trying to think of any further relevant details, but that seems to be it to me. If I forgot anything, please tell me.
Ok the question. WHAT do I type? (Explicitly!) And WHERE do I type it? In order to reach ubuntu-01.tec.lan, or ubuntu-02.tec.lan from perpetrator.tec.lan or rapine.tec.lan?
I'm interested in using actuall ROUTES. I can already achieve results similair to this with either a NAT firewall, or with VPN.. but that's not what I am interested in.
From what I have found out so far, I should need something like the following:
I'm newbie to Wireless. Currently I try to implement EAP-TLS but firstly I need to get the hardware work, allow Access Point to Route from Wireless to Wire (LAN DNS server).
I want to use tab networking in my kvm with routing.Can any one guide me how i can do it. i have been reading different guides over the net but not understand any one clearly.I have read this[URL].. One problem is this all my server are remote and no gui is running.I am able to install kvm with ssh console with -nographic and -x "console=ttyS0" option now i want to change from bridging to tap networking with routing.And i have live ip on kvm guest/Virtual machine.
IN LAN default GW box I have a routing rule of 172.17.1.0 192.168.180.100 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth3 that sends packets matching 172.17.1.0/24 to eth3 etc. When I ping 172.17.1.50 - it goes correctly when ping is issued in the same box (LAN GW) - falls through to default rule when the ping is done in LAN's boxes i.e. it goes to the LAN GW box and then to Internet incorrectly instead of going to eth3 and 192.168.180.100.
Is there any way of seeing why the packet matches or not the routing rules?
I have a network routing problem that I need to fix using a PC with ubuntu installed.
Here are the details of my problem: - I have two networks. - The first network is an ADSL router with subnet 192.168.1.x. I do not have access to the router nor change any of its configuration. - The second network has a subnet 172.26.x.x and connect via a wireless access point. Some of the devices connected to the network require to have static IPs. - I have a PC with ubuntu installed and two ethernet cards: one connected to the first network and the other connected to the access point. - I need to share the internet connection between the two networks using ubuntu. I already tried before on windows and the sharing worked when both networks were configured to use the same subnet. Once I changed the subnet of the second network, internet sharing stopped working.
Im having a issue with routing internet traffic from my router two different subnets (vlans).
Theres my setup:-
Server:
Both eth0,1 are running dhcp (two scoopes) that works fine!
The output of route -n is:
I have ip_forwarding on aswell, but i can ping the ip on the server running that dhcp scoope ie ping 192.168.4.1 works great but i just cant get the internet on the clients.
I have two linux boxes running RHEL 5.5 with internal ip addresses 10.0.0.114/24 and 10.0.0.118/24, and usual gateway 10.0.0.1. There's an apache listening on both ports 80 and 443 for several websites. This works nice, but the feature for load balancing has to be added. For this, externally, but in the same subnet, a hardware device has been placed for load balancing (we call it "F5"), with internal ip 10.0.0.152 (vrrp for 10.0.0.153 and 10.0.0.154). There's a service address that does NAT via round robin to the servers, 10.0.0.208, managed by the F5 balancer.
If I set as gateway the ip 10.0.0.152 in both nodes, I can use the service address for browsing http and https, *BUT* at a cost that ssh and any other connections, at OS logging level, come from 10.0.0.1, which is innaceptable (i.e., I can' set proper security, regardless the F5 is badly configured), so I have to find another way for this. So, I thought of using iptables mangling capabilities, and my thought is that just changing the default route of the incoming http(s) traffic, everything should be ok. I've done the following:
If I tweak the hosts file in my M$ workstation to test individual access for each server, I can browse the websites with no problem, but if I set the service IP address, I get an error "Document contains no data" in the browser after just a few seconds. Apache logs show nothing in its logs. I can see packets arriving, but seem to go in a loop. I can provide some output, but since surely I'm making some mistake in the process, if I get help with the proper knoweledge about how to fix it, the problem will be solved. But if still someone needs it, I can provide more data.
from the router it split into 2 connection one to my GW (linux debian) and another to a switch which is connected to a web/email server and the gateway.
My gw use x.x.x.27 and x.x.x.26 (everything I use on these ips is ok)
on the web/email server I have x.x.x.28 29 and 30
With this setup it's ok but I want to eliminate the link to the switch and make it pass thru the GW and i can't manage to get it work!
I am sharing my DSL internet connection using a modem+wireless router (single device) to 5 systems. I want all my internet traffic to go through one of the linux boxes in my network.
The problem here is that wireless devices connect directly to the modem+wireless router.
Is such routing of traffic possible??
PS: I am not sure if i could convey my situation clearly...
I'm trying to work out how to route all traffic destined for the internet from all devices connected to eth0 to a wireless router access point via wlan0 on my Slackware box. I also have dhcpd providing ip addresses on the same subnet to any device connected to both eth0 and wlan0.
If I connect to the router/access point via wireless or directly to the Server via a crossover cable I can obtain an ip address from dhcpd, so that works. As far as I can see I just need to how to route between eth0 and wlan0 then I can provide internet access to those devices!
ifconfig:
Code:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr **:**:**:**:**:** inet addr:192.168.2.253 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::201:2eff:fe27:aea3/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
I've been trying to setup an IPSec connection between two routers, but am having trouble with the actual packet routing.
My setup currently is two local networks (192.168.1.0/24[netLANA] and 192.168.0.0/24[netLANB]) that are connected to their own routers (192.168.1.1 and 192.168.0.1 respectively). The routers are both connected to the 194.26.1.0/24[netWAN] network. I wish to setup an IPSec connection between the two routers, to act in tunnel mode between the two local networks.
The first router is a linux box (on the netLANA network) that I am setting up using the ipsec-tools, and the other is a Netgear ProSafe FVS318G (on the netLANB). I've set them both up to have the same configuration for IPSec. Also, on the linux router I have setup a route like this:
Code: $ route add -net 192.168.1.0/24 wlan0
So that all traffic destined for the netLANB network will be routed to the wlan0 interface (netWAN in this case, and therefore over the tunnel).
My problem is that if I ping from any host on netLANA, I can see the ICMP reply comes back to the linux router, but it doesn't get back to the original host.
From the linux router, here is the tcpdump of the ping:
Code: $ tcpdump -n -S -i any 17:06:26.308353 IP 192.168.0.5 > 192.168.1.4: ICMP echo request, id 1036, seq 1, length 64 17:06:26.308780 IP 194.16.1.6 > 194.16.1.5: ESP(spi=0x0ea08914,seq=0x2f), length 116 17:06:26.316287 IP 194.16.1.5 > 194.16.1.6: ESP(spi=0x0be1036c,seq=0x2f), length 116 17:06:26.316287 IP 192.168.1.4 > 192.168.0.5: ICMP echo reply, id 1036, seq 1, length 64
I have a Pc that has 2 Ethernet and I have also 2 switch. I want the PC to become the router and be connected to 2 switch.How can I setup this one on FEDORA and I want to assigned for eth0 192.168.26.51 and eth1 192.168.22.51 for the IP.
I've setup an XP VM using Red Hat's KVM. The physical Red Hat box has two NICs, a fiber one in use and active and a CAT-5 one that is disabled and with no wire connected. The physical box has br0 active and bridging on the subnet of 192.168.10.0/24. ip route show also displays for virbr0 192.168.0.0/16 My physical box (192.168.10.228)can ping the virbr0 IP of 192.168.122.1, but not the XP VM of 192.168.122.228
I have played around with Window's route command to try and setup some method for the Windows VM to ping the 192.168.10.0 network, but have not had any luck. I've also messed around with the Red Hat netmask and such to work it from the Linux side. But then, as would be expected, I can't talk to other Linux boxes on the physical network.
Does anyone have any ideas how to get the Windows box to communicate with the Red Hat box and the other Linux systems beyond while keeping the two distinct networks of 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.122.0 leaving them both as Class C (255.255.255.0)? I mentioned the unused CAT-5 NIC thinking perhaps it could operate as an internal router even with no cable attached. That was just a random thought and I have not even explored that.
Im trying to configure a GRE over IPSec connection between two subnets. The IPSec tunnel is opened and now I want to add a GRE tunnel over it.So, what I didn't understand is why I can't route my subnet over the tunnel, once the only route I have there says that it should route the tunnel IP over the GRE01 interface. Any hint? Thanks.
routing tables using "ip route 2" I have a server(server1 from now on) with eth0(internet connection) and eth1(lan connection). eth1 have 2 more alias devices = eth1:1 and eth1:2 On my server 1 the eth0=public ip, on eth1=192.168.10.1/24, eth1:1=192.168.20.1/24 and eth1:2=192.168.30.1/24 server1 is running squid and iptables to all 3 networks (eth1, eth1:1 and eth1:2) All of the clients have access to internet. Now what i want to do is add 3 more networks via a router(linuxBox = server2 from now on) connected to server1 in eth1. so the network will be like this:
Code:
server1 eth0=internet eth1=192.168.10.1/24 (connected to server2 and other clients)
I have two boxes, 1- Centos router, 2- centos web/mail server..
When trying to receive mail using mail.xxx.xxx in the mail client server settings, it will not resolve to any machine on the internal network... I have to enter the internal IP address in the incoming and outgoing email settings..
Same with the website I host.. I have to enter the internal IP to get access..
It just will not resolve the DNS on the internal network.
A packet is sent from the computer to the router it's connected with only the destination address in it, right? So - what does "kernel routing table" mean?
I have just installed Fedora 10 on an old laptop and was quite impressed with how smoothly it all went ... until it came to setting up networking!
I have battled for three days now and I'm almost there; - installed updated firmware to the built in Broadcom 4306 wireless network adapter - got NetworkManager to work with a static ip address by manually editing the ifcfg-wlan0 file - managed to get the WPA security to work
The only problem I am left with is that there is no default route; if I set one up using: ip r a default via 10.1.1.1 dev wlan0
Then everything starts working.
If I try to add routes using the NetworkManager gui interface they dont get saved (no suprises there then! ).
I have tried creating a route-wlan0 file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ but this seems to be ignored by NetworkManager.
Since the NetworkManager GUI is almost useless, does anyone know if there are any other configuration files I can manually modify to get a default route set?
On a Fedora 11 machine, I configured ppp0 on eth0 and ppp1 on eth1, each one is connected to a modem, I also defined ppp0 as the default gateway.. Should I do anything else to load balance the 2 connections or will ppp1 take some of the load by default? Should I add any other routing rules? If yes then please tell me what should I add, keeping in mind that for each pppoe connection both the pppoe address and the remote address are not static so I actually needed some scripting to change the default gateway each time the remote pppoe address changes.
On the ROUTER I have set the ip_forward=1 and eth0.proxy_arp=1 and eth1.proxy_arp=1 then I run the following command : route add -net 192.168.2.0/24 gw 192.168.2.1 dev eth0 route add -net 192.168.4.0/24 gw 192.168.4.1 dev eth1
On PC1 I executed the following : route add -net 192.168.4.0/24 gw 192.168.2.1 dev eth0 and for PC2 I run the following route add -net 192.168.2.0/24 gw 192.168.4.1 dev eth0
After doing those things, I can't ping between PC1 and PC2... but both can ping the router...
My Laptop is connected to 2 different network (Wireless "gateway 10.170.8.1" ;cable wired "gateway 192.168.1.1")the gateway 192.168.1.1 is the default i want all application like firefox that connect via http and https port 80 and 443 to use the gateway 10.170.8.1) else to use the default gateway
