I am very new to Linux, 1 week old. Have just installed fedora 5 days ago and I now need to get hosts to connect to this server through telnet. I downloaded a xinetd rmp file but do not know what do next to get it installed and configure it.
View 4 Replies
i'm running some virtual Fedora installations on a windows server 2008 with hyper-v. Most of them are Fedora 12 and 13. Everything works fine for some years. Yesterday i want to upgrade a F13 machine to F14 by netistall. The upgrade ran without any problems. After the reebot the machine was off the network. All the networkconfigs by DHCP are OK, IP address, gateways, DNS settings and so on. But the machine can't ping or connect to other hosts. I tried an VM from scratch with both F14 i386 and x86_64 - same ****. This is the first time i had such a problem by upgrading Fedora machines.
View 3 Replies View RelatedAll clients on the LAN, have to have their /etc/hosts file edited for my server to resolve their hostnames/LAN ip addresses. Both Windows/Mac/Linux. That shouldn't be necessary as all other stanzas are correct. If the hosts file is not ammended my maillog shows connect from unknown rip="my_external_address" when in fact it should say connect from "host" rip=192.168.0.20 Not to sure if it is an iptables issue as I have nothing for this configuration. /etc/hosts file on the server has all required hostnames and ip addresses
View 12 Replies View RelatedI am trying to create virtual hosts for each user on my server using Name-based virtual hosts and then make a symbolic link to /home/userdir/html
Here is what I have for my virtual hosts:
NameVirtualHost *:80
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerAdmin tasha@ttu.edu
DocumentRoot /home/httpd
ServerName 128.118.118.7
ErrorLog logs/error_log
CustomLog logs/common
</VirtualHost>
What do I need to add to make it follow symbolic links in /home/userdir/html?
I need to setup a named server for a class room with 10 imaginary hosts the sub domain managed by this name server is s123456.eca.edu.au where 123456 is to be replaced by your student id. The named server will forward unresolved queries to the dns server.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIn my home network I have two ubuntu desktops that are connected to a router. On each pc I have installed Virtual Box 3.2 and various OSes. I need to sometimes run multiple vm's at the same time which is very RAM intensive so I was wondering if there is any way to connect VM's on different hosts so that they appear they are in the same network? Various articles that show up as search results hardly pertain to what I want to do. Basically, I would like to make vm's visible in the network but on different hosts and with ip addresses that would reflect that those vm's are on a same network. Like ubuntu 1 has vm's a and b and ubuntu 2 has c and d. When I start all of the vm's, I would like them to connect to each other just like they are in the same network without "knowing" they are on different hosts.
View 3 Replies View Relatedi want to configure VNC server on Fedora 12 to be able to connect from any place how to configure it i try Google to find instruction about it but i found alot on ways to configure and they are difference what you recommend
View 1 Replies View RelatedProblem:Your company network has internal only hosts / websites with names that end in .local, e.g.Your freshly installed Ubuntu machine works fine on the network, has internet access, etc. but cannot connect to these particular systems.Testing DNS with tools like dig / nslookup works fine, but normal name resolution with ping / telnet / browsers does not work.Solution:1. Open a terminal window2. Enter the command sudo nano /etc/nsswitch.conf3. Change the following line:hosts: files mdns4_minimal [notfound=RETURN] dns mdns4to this:hosts: files dns4. Press Ctrl-X, Y, Enter to saveExplanation:Ubuntu ships configured to do name lookups for self-configuring networks, based on the AppleTalk / mDNS / Bonjour protocol. In the configuration shipped for the resolver, this protocol is considered the final aurhority for the ".local" top level domain, and DNS will not be checked. The above configuration change eliminates this and restricts lookups to (a) /etc/hosts file, followed by (b) DNS
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to use ssh-keyscan to get some known_host file population going on, but I have a ton of hosts I want to scan, all with multiple aliases in /etc/hosts. Is there a way to use my current /etc/hosts file to do an ssh-keyscan instead of making a special list of hosts that (from what I've read) ssh-keyscan needs?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWell, as many proxy applications, GNOME Network Proxy Preferences only allow to ignore hosts. What I want to do is exactly the opposite. I only want to use the proxy for few sites. Is it possible to define only the allowed hosts in any way?
PS: I know FoxyProxy add-on for Firefox does this, but 1)I don't use Firefox and 2)I want the proxy settings system wide not only for browser.
I need to set up a named server for a class room with 10 imaginary hosts the sub domain managed by this name server is s123456.eca.edu.au where 123456 is to be replaced by your student id. The named server will forward unresolved queries to the dns server.
View 1 Replies View RelatedProbably an easy (which means stoopid) question...I am trying to reroute a website using my hosts file so that it matches my servers certificate file for testing without effect dns and the live site.When I went to edit my /etc/hosts file it is non-existent. I have, I am assuming in it's place, hosts.allow and hosts.deny. Can anyone explain why I do not have a hosts file?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhat is the (officially) proper way to configure Apache so that a given IP address can have two or more virtual host names, each going to different distinct configurations (e.g. with different DocumentRoot, Alias, etc), and also do this for the IP address so that it goes to a designated configuration rather than defaulting to the first or a random host name?
Apache documentation does not appear to address this. If so, it has it hidden in a non-obvious place.
I have been searching and reconfiguring for 6 days now and have lost several clumps of hair.. PROBLEM: I want 2+ virtual hosts on my ubuntu server (1 ip) BUT - Only the first "alphabetically" listed sites-enabled shows.
000-default
[URL]
Individually they all work (if i a2dissite for each leaving 1)
[Code]....
it seems i have tried everything that everyone else is having issues with but nothing seems to fix mine. Possibilities:
1) EC2
2) Permissions on the files - I changed everything to the apache2 user "www-data" - no dice.
3) I am a dope...lets hope its that and one of you kind people point me to my issue.
We have a requirement to configure multiple email gateways, for mail accounts configured on linux server. the application will trigger mails (bulk mails) and we would like to configure multiple email gateway to be used.
we decided to do it this way.
In dns we would create MX records like
yourdomain.com. 3600 IN MX 20 realmailserver1.yourdomain.com.
yourdomain.com. 3600 IN MX 20 realmailserver2.yourdomain.com.
where realmailserver1.yourdomain.com. and realmailserver2.yourdomain.com. will be our email gateway.
and internally on our linux server (from which mail is sent) if i specify multiple smart hosts like
define(`SMART_HOST',`esmtp:realmailserver1:realmailserver2')dnl
have a look at the following thread story and please clear my doubt.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a CentOS 5.5 Server and I'm hosting 3 different Name-based Virtual Hosts. Using Joomla 1.5 for the site. Each VHost has it's own subdirectory under /var/www so I have .var/www/vhost1, /var/www/vhost2 etc.
The Code in my httpd.conf for each vhost is : -
# Virtual host vhost1.site.com
<VirtualHost 192.168.0.203:80>
DocumentRoot /var/www/vhost1
ServerName vhost1.site.com
ServerPath vhost1/
[Code]...
It works perfectly, but I'm getting a lot of unwelcome spiders and bad bots trawling for MP3 files because there are a few MP3 files on one the sites. I've added all the Bad Bots to my .htaccess file and now I need to know if I should make only ONE .htaccess and put it under /var/www OR create a different .htaccess file for each vhost (this would be an ideal solution, but I'm not sure if it can be done).
I run a few virtual servers at home behind a NAT, including an e-mail server, with dynamically updated dns records pointing to each of the servers. Consequently, I suffer from the loopback problem when working with these servers from my desktop PC. (E.g., I ping one of the dns hostnames and the ping goes to my router instead of the server). I fixed this problem by manually adding the in-home IP addresses and name pairs to my /etc/hosts, and then setting /etc/host.conf to a "hosts, bind" order.
This seems to work for every application on my desktop except for one: the postfix installation on my desktop PC (used for mailing smartctl messages and so forth) cannot communicate with my in-home e-mail server (times out). I checked the logs, and it looks like it is trying to use the IP address from the actual A-RECORD, rather than the address in my hosts file.
So I'm not quite sure what to do. There seems to be a "proxy_interfaces" parameter in main.conf which might be relevant, but I think it only deals with received mail. I'd prefer to have the mail going to that e-mail server, rather than also having to check the spool on my local desktop accounts.
Ok I have 5 virtual hosts on one IP but only 1 domain (forwardconference.org) will be sending emails out to people....confirmations and such. The other sites may send out some emails...like back to my personal email address not hosted on this server. That works. But to people on like aol or yahoo or hotmail....it doesnt
Problem is, most people are not getting the emails. Mailq reports them being deffered for some reason. I'm having our ISP setup a PTR to forwardconference.org....does this mean all my emails from either of the sites....even if I put a different FROM: address in the php mail script...will come from [URL]? Or should I just setup my server as its own SMTP server?
I run couple of sites on a virtual hosting environment and I am in need of adding additional SSL for a different domain name. From what I read on some forum topics indicate that SSL cert requires different IP address. meaning one cert for each IP. Is this true? If so, then I'm having some difficulties understanding the benefits of running virtual host if a server can't host multiple secured site through single IP. Any way to run multiple ssl site within virtual host environment. I'm hoping for a possible workaround.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have several websites available via both HTTP and HTTPS, with images served from a separate virtual host. This breaks in IE because the images are loaded by the CSS, and because they're in a separate Virtual Host, I have to use absolute paths in the CSS.
Example:
[URL]
Renders in IE like this:
[URL]
The issue being that the wiki.archserver.org is being served via SSL, but the header logo is served by img.archserver.org and the CSS uses the absolute path [URL] to load the logo. So, the only solutions I can see are:
1) Change the CSS to always use SSL. This will slow down the site, increase load on the server and is generally a poor-practise as a "solution"
2) Maintain 2 copies of the CSS, serving a HTTP version to HTTP requests, and HTTPS version to HTTP. This creates a management overhead which is less than desirable.
3) Create an Alias in Apache to send requests for [URL] to [URL] internally then rewriting the CSS to use relative paths.
4) Screw IE; it works in Firefox, Chrome and every other browser AFAIK. The sites are for a Linux project anyway.
[Code]....
What I want: multiple virtual hosts with ssl and only 1 ip address: In my example: server = 192.168.227.129
[Code]....
First of all I've looked at "similar threads" without finding an answer. I'm setting up Name-based VH using an IP as the base. The OS is CentOS 5.4
My config looks like:
NameVirtualHost 12.345.678.90:80
#
# NOTE: NameVirtualHost cannot be used without a port specifier
# (e.g. :80) if mod_ssl is being used, due to the nature of the
# SSL protocol.
[Code]...
The names are of course not in DNS so to access the server from my local Windows machine I had to use the hosts file: 12.345.678.90 dev1 Entering dev1 in my browser *does* take me to the server but it takes me to default VH (DocumentRoot /var/www/html). What am I overlooking?
I have just setup two Apache virtual hosts and I was wondering how I could link them to different domains so that they could be accessed from another machine.
View 7 Replies View RelatedThis really has me baffled! I'm running Apache 2.2 on Windows Server 2003 (I know, my first blunder). I can edit existing virtual hosts without a problem, for example, I can change this existing vhost to point to a different document root and it works fine:
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerName existingsubdomain.mydomain.net
DocumentRoot "C:/Inetpub/wwwroot/mydirectory"
</VirtualHost>
But the moment I try to add a new virtual host, it doesn't get recognized! When I try to browse to it in a browser, I get a "Server not found: Firefox can't find the server at newsubdomain.mellemallc.net."
<VirtualHost *:80>
ServerName newsubdomain.mydomain.net
DocumentRoot "C:/Inetpub/wwwroot/mydirectory"
</VirtualHost>
Can anyone point me in the right direction as to why this may be happening?
I'm running sendmail 8.14 which sends out thousands of email. I'm getting several timeout error on only a few particular hosts. What I found is almost all of them are Exim 4.69
maillog shows
--> timeout waiting for input from ..@xxx during client greeting
after several tries, I finally got bounce back with
--> 451 4.4.1 reply: read error from xxx.com.
.. Deferred: Connection timed out with xxx.com.
Message could not be delivered for X day
Message will be deleted from queue
When i search though maillog with all of those error and they all seems to be running Exim and they are different mail domains.
I have about 50 servers with at least 200 GB free on each host. I need close to 10 TB of continuous shared storage between almost half of the servers for a new app I building.
I was looking into buying a storage device but was wonder if I could get any use out of the free space on all the servers, grouping all of the free storage from the hosts into one reduduant storage array.
I have 16 linux servers that use /etc/hosts files to see and talk with each other. I'm adding servers to this pool of servers. It is required to do host resolution via the /etc/hosts files. DNS or NIS are not alternatives. Aside from manually editing each of the 16+ /etc/hosts files every time I add a server or editing one /etc/hosts file on one server then scp'ing it to all the other servers, is there anyway to edit the /etc/hosts on one server and "push" it onto the other servers that need the new /etc/hosts file?
Everywhere I've looked on the Net, there hasn't been any suggestion except for the options I mention here.
Or am I just whistling in the wind?
Is there some way that I can use apache/iptables to serve both of my servers through the same basic domain? I'm not talking about VirtualHosts either, I don't believe ( despite the fact that's all I can find anything to read about on Google when searching for this ).
Anyway, the problem is that I have a TorrentFlux php torrent-client that I run so I can add stuff to the download when I'm not around. I don't want to put this on my regular webpage server because there's just not enough diskspace in that machine. On the other hand, I don't want to replace that server all-together because the other machine is my desktop and would not make a reliable host.
So my idea was that there could be some way to have the apache2 server on my dedicated server redirect a subdirectory in its webroot to the webroot of my desktop's TorrentFlux server, but over standard HTTP ports so that it is more like the server is serving up the content of my desktop server through its HTTP service, instead of simply redirecting.
The reason I want to do this is because so far I have to use the TorrentFlux server on a nonstandard port so my dedicated server can still host its own things on port 80, but I've been running into several situations where the browsers I want to use do not support the nonstandard port such as with some instances of IE or the browser on my BlackBerry.
Anyway, I'm not looking for a step by step or anything ( though it couldn't hurt ) but I just need some ideas on what I could search for to get some better ideas. There's probably some term for what I want to do I'm not even aware of that would help me greatly.
Runnining Ubuntu 7.04 and apache 2.2.4 along with shorewall 4.0 as my routing/firewall software.
I created LAMP server with a wordpress site. I created a sites-available file for the wordpress file pointing to the wordpress directory. Within my server it goes to the site properly. However I also made this server a DNS server, had another test pc use it as a DNS server and it only got the default apache page unless I added /wordpress to the url which makes it point to the directory within /var/www/ that it belongs, but then the wordpress links don't work and this is not what I want it to do anyway. I do not understand why it is working properly internally but not externally. It makes me think maybe the sites-available file is not allowing outside access appropriate permission to use it or something. Can somebody please point me in the right direction I have been working on this for weeks and I am starting to get really frustrated with it. Tell me what config files can help you figure out my issue. Also I eliminated the default index.html file so it wouldn't use it, then placed the index.php file from wordpress in /var/www/ root but in that configuration it doesn't load anything by default but will still work if you point to /wordpress. I believe I have to make some change to my apache2 configs to allow outside PCs to be pointed to the right root directory for the virtual host like is being done internally, I just don't know where to start.
[Code]...
