Well, as many proxy applications, GNOME Network Proxy Preferences only allow to ignore hosts. What I want to do is exactly the opposite. I only want to use the proxy for few sites. Is it possible to define only the allowed hosts in any way?
PS: I know FoxyProxy add-on for Firefox does this, but 1)I don't use Firefox and 2)I want the proxy settings system wide not only for browser.
I'm trying to use ssh-keyscan to get some known_host file population going on, but I have a ton of hosts I want to scan, all with multiple aliases in /etc/hosts. Is there a way to use my current /etc/hosts file to do an ssh-keyscan instead of making a special list of hosts that (from what I've read) ssh-keyscan needs?
View 2 Replies View RelatedProbably an easy (which means stoopid) question...I am trying to reroute a website using my hosts file so that it matches my servers certificate file for testing without effect dns and the live site.When I went to edit my /etc/hosts file it is non-existent. I have, I am assuming in it's place, hosts.allow and hosts.deny. Can anyone explain why I do not have a hosts file?
View 1 Replies View RelatedUbuntu 10.10 64 bitI need to set /etc/hostname and /etc/hosts so that on running;$ hostname Code: ub1004 $ hostname -a Code: ub1004 set them as;cat /etc/hostname Code: ub1004 cat /etc/hosts Code: 127.0.0.1localhost.localdomain123.123.123.123ub1004.domain.comub1004
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
[code]....
[Code]....
What I want: multiple virtual hosts with ssl and only 1 ip address: In my example: server = 192.168.227.129
[Code]....
I'm trying to pass multiple dpmains thru one ubuntu server to various hosts on my local network.
[url] should be sent to the /var/www folder on the local host.
[url] should be forwarded to an IIS box on my local network (owa.nunya.local)
[url] should be sent to another ubunto box on my local network (smtp.biznet.net)
I have tried placing VirtualHost entries in /etc/apache2/sites-available/default and [url]and [url] both work but [url] gets forwarded to the c:inetpub folder on the IIS box.
I have a problem reaching some hosts on the Internet, namely newegg.com and djangoproject.com. On the same machine and network connection using Windows 7 the host names resolve properly and I can connect to them. The host names are resolving in Ubuntu, but I cannot connect to them.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI bought a network printer, gave it a host name, address should be assigned by my cable or DSL router. Thats what DHCP and DNS is made for right?Now I will print to that printer from my (Lucid) Kubuntu box and resolve it by it's hostname.I can't ping it by printername, I can't ping it by printername.local.It works when I login my router, read out the IP address and hostname the printer registered at the routers DHCP-table and use that address.What can be done that a router transfers the hostnames it has in it's IP-table to clients upon DHCP resolve AND whenever a client get's a new IP-Address?
View 9 Replies View RelatedWhat happen if we assign a static IP address to both linux and windows host?Consider host A is a ubuntu machine and host B is a windows machine. I first set a static IP for host A (W.X.Y.Z) and connect to it through ssh. Then I duplicate that IP for host B (W.X.Y.Z).The result was that I could no longer connect to the ubuntu machine!
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have read the man files on hosts (deny/allow) and think I understand how they are supposed to work but reality has proven me wrong.
My simple test case was to add "ALL: ALL " to the end of hosts.deny which I though should make the Internet not work. I can still look up hosts fine so apparently I don't understand these files or Ubuntu is ignoring them.
This is my hosts.deny file
Code:
Code:
and hosts
Code:
hosts.deny is the only file I have edited (so far)
Not sure what iis going on, I can ping some hosts on the internet but not others see below (adobe is not the only example) Works OK from another host on the same network with same GW and DNS iptables is turned off
[root@havoc init.d]# ping www.arrl.org
PING www.arrl.org (184.106.62.248) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.arrl.org (184.106.62.248): icmp_req=1 ttl=55 time=94.1 ms
64 bytes from www.arrl.org (184.106.62.248): icmp_req=2 ttl=55 time=93.0 ms
64 bytes from www.arrl.org (184.106.62.248): icmp_req=3 ttl=55 time=99.4 ms
64 bytes from www.arrl.org (184.106.62.248): icmp_req=4 ttl=55 time=96.8 ms
[Code]...
I'm using NAT on an AP with linux. Is it possible to route an OUTGOING host not over NAT?
I'm using SNAT but could also use MAQUERADING I think. Because both are in POSTROUTING table and this table is the last one I don't think there is a solution or is there any solution?
Background:
I'm using a local VoIp client which I want to have an own ip for routing question in my network but don't want all other local machines as seperate ip's because if done so i.e. without NAT the routing table is very complicated ...
I have embedded linux (apm distributive). I modify /etc/hosts file and that changes not affected.
What could be the problem?
Example
/etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
127.0.0.1 hana-009
ping hana-009
ping: bad address 'hana-009'
How can I find all the devices(printers,etc...) and computers along with their OS if any installed that are connected in my intranet (devices/computers may be down here)?
I did this earlier using netstat or nmap not sure what I used and how I did.
I have to build a netwrok for small lab and office setup.Setup as belowI have a PC running with Centos 5.4 and has 4 NIC cards. eth0, eth1, eth2 and eth3
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a small office network with windows machines and a Linux Internet access server (CentOS 5.4). For Internet access I use masquerade, so everione can access every Internet service.
I periodicali have quite big traffic from one of the hosts, but I can't figure out which one is that?
Is there any linux command which will show me the bytes/packets (or any useful infos) going to specific hosts?
I've 3 hosts images installed in virtualbox, that every time I reboot an image, the ip address change.
The 3 images are ubuntu.
I would like to configure these images in a way that, every time I reboot the images, I can access them by the name, and not by the ip.
Something is definitely odd here:Quote:
[rena@mercury:~ 500]
$ hostname
mercury
[code]....
I often manually add a troublesome domain (e.g., advertisements, fake virus alerts, etc.) to my /etc/hosts file on Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid; but the effect isn't immediate.My hosts file is already fifteen thousand lines long (having combined all the hosts files I could find on the net, including the MVP one); but I still, almost daily, find a new irritant to add to my /etc/hosts file.My problem is I do not understand WHEN the /etc/hosts file is next read after a change.I've been rebooting to make sure the hosts is re-read; but there must be a simpler way.My question:
- WHEN is the /etc/hosts file reconsidered in Ubuntu?
- Is there a way to have the /etc/hosts file re-read sooner?
In my home network I have two ubuntu desktops that are connected to a router. On each pc I have installed Virtual Box 3.2 and various OSes. I need to sometimes run multiple vm's at the same time which is very RAM intensive so I was wondering if there is any way to connect VM's on different hosts so that they appear they are in the same network? Various articles that show up as search results hardly pertain to what I want to do. Basically, I would like to make vm's visible in the network but on different hosts and with ip addresses that would reflect that those vm's are on a same network. Like ubuntu 1 has vm's a and b and ubuntu 2 has c and d. When I start all of the vm's, I would like them to connect to each other just like they are in the same network without "knowing" they are on different hosts.
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe wireless connected hosts do not respond to pings from wired ones or other wireless ones. And all the wired connected hosts respond to pings from any wireless one. The same problem applies also to ssh connections exactly as in the ping issue.
The switch the ADSL modem/router and the Access point are all 3 different machines correctly connected to each other. I do not have a firewall in any of my hosts, all run Slackware 13.1, the wireless ones use "wext" driver and not "ndiswrapper". All wireless hosts login successfully, WPA & DHCP works fine and internet connection goes without a problem. But the fact I can only connect from a wireless host to a wired one is puzzling.
Instructions say "Add hostname for the NIC card into /etc/hosts file" do I touch or mkdir it in?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI just changed my CentOS server from DHCP to static IP address. After the change, I cannot ping other hosts on the same subnet. (I can ping the CentOS itself).The IP address of CentOS is 192.168.0.202.After pinging 192.168.0.106 (106 is on and other host can ping it), arp -a shows? (192.168.0.106) at <incomplete> on eth0 It looks ARP cannot resolve MAC address of hosts 192.168.0.106.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to configure nagios to auto detect all the hosts that belong to a network and place them in the cfg files?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI Own a netcafe and I want to limit the netspeed for some of the users on the network because some of them maybe use torrent or other ways to eat the bandwidth and the net became so slow for other users.
My task is a way to limit the net speed for some users on the network, I tried a mikrotik RouterOS but it look like a miss to install I wanted an easier way than this, I use linux or windows or any OS to make this task done please help me to do it !!
I have set up a home network using a modem/router, which my devices connect to via ethernet and wireless. I have got it working but i'm still not happy (stick with me...)!
I have settings configured so as to utilise DHCP, so IP addresses for the different machines are automatically assigned by the modem/router (as i understand it). I then obtained these auto-assigned IPs by running ifconfig on each device. I tested connections between the devices by pinging each other using these IPs (ie ping 192.168.2.2).
BUT I want to be able to use hostnames (ie ping dandelion) instead, and the only way I can make this work is to add hosts and corresponding IPs into the /etc/hosts file.
I have made it work in this way, but doesn't this method defeat the idea of DHCP, as I will now presumably have to manually maintain the /etc/hosts files on each device.
The computer connects wirelessly to a router. The router is connected to the internet and that is working well. (If i use a cable connection to the router, I can reach the internet).
Why wont the wireless connection reach the Internet? It is a strong connection. It worked before wirelessly. I am on 10.04 beta, with the recent updates installed.
Is it possible to have different /etc/hosts file for different network connections without having to go in and change it every time? The why: I have dyndns and port forwarding to get to my desktop. My laptop is sometimes on the same network, and sometimes not. Also, sometimes the dyndns doesn't update properly, or the outside connection is down, but I want to get to my desktop (and I'm too lazy to walk up the stairs). I'd like to be able to keep one set of bookmarks, ssh command aliases, etc. that would always get to it the fastest and most reliable way possible.
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe little home server of mine has bind configured as a caching dns server. I would like to configure it to resolve local host names. I know dnsmasq can do this, so what would someone need to do to get bind to do this?The network is entirely private with all private IPs which are distributed by dhcpd.(While writing this, the feeling creeps in that it would be easier to just have dnsmasq running.)
View 2 Replies View Relatedi'm running some virtual Fedora installations on a windows server 2008 with hyper-v. Most of them are Fedora 12 and 13. Everything works fine for some years. Yesterday i want to upgrade a F13 machine to F14 by netistall. The upgrade ran without any problems. After the reebot the machine was off the network. All the networkconfigs by DHCP are OK, IP address, gateways, DNS settings and so on. But the machine can't ping or connect to other hosts. I tried an VM from scratch with both F14 i386 and x86_64 - same ****. This is the first time i had such a problem by upgrading Fedora machines.
View 3 Replies View Related