After installatiion, if you find that you can't connect to your box over ssh, you might find that the service has not been started. Start it with the following from a root prompt:
/etc/init.d/sshd startIt will then proceed to create the needed keys forecuring connections and proceed to start the service allowing connections.
I am trying to install skype on a 64bit Fc14 and the 32bit doesn't work.
View 8 Replies View RelatedMy laptop is currently running on Windows 7 Ultimate. I have a 320 GB HDD, which I have partitioned as follows. C: Drive as Windows 40 GB capacity and successively partitioned the rest of the drives for 50 GB capacity and left an unallocated space of 67 GB for fedora 13 x64 installation. The problem that I am facing is, that I am unable to install fedora on this unallocated space..even though I am checking the option for "Creating custom Layout". When I check the option for "Creating Custom Layout" Ive been shown with the only option to install fedora on the unused space on the HDD which is around 265 GB. I am also attaching a screen shot of my disk management. how I can install Fedora on this unallocated space of 67 GB?
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have F12 64bit and I really need PHP4. Some hints on how to install it?
View 1 Replies View Relatedi am new in linux and fedora,i cant install xampp 32 on fedora 64 what i am must to do? Post added at 05:54 AM CDT Previous post was at 05:08 AM CDT i have this error:
sudo /opt/lampp/lampp startapache XAMPP is currently only availably as 32 bit application. Please use a 32 bit compatibility library for your system. The message is very clear that XAMPP doesn't like 32-bit system. So, we will need to cheat XAMPP that the system is 32-bit. First, we will need to install some libraries: i find this for fix this problem but i have error
yum -y install glibc.i686
yum -y install libgcc.i686
yum -y install libstdc++.i686
and now, we need to skip the 32-bit annoying check:
sudo nano /opt/lampp/lampp
Replace the following from:
[Code]...
I want to install Metasploit on Fedora14. I am new to linux.These are the steps I have done after downloading the .run file from metasploit
$ chmod +x framework-3.*-linux-x86_64.run
$ sudo ./framework-3.*-linux-x86_64.run
It runs a UI for Installation till it finishes but m not able to see metasploit installed or where it is?
I did a full install on 5.4 64bit. the installation aborted with the following errors:
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there a quick and easy way to install 32-bit software on my 64-bit Fedora 11 machine? I've got some software that is 32-bit but can't use them because I lack those library files etc. needed to run them. The programs I'm trying to get to work are : LightZone 3.7 and Bibblepro both photo software.I'd hate to go back to Ubuntu 9.04 64-bit (it worked and all that was need were ia32libs I believe.)
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am facing problem in installing/ configuring the Broad com wifi card (BCM4727) on fedora Core 13. how to install the BCM4727 on core 13. The os is 64 bit .
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have become interested in learning to use Python and I wanted to use the Eclipse IDE. I wish to find the best way to install the Eclipse IDE and add the PyDev plugin. At the Eclipse.org site I have downloaded the eclipse-SDK-3.6.1-linux-gtk-x86_64.tar.gz is this the correct file I will need for my Fedora 12 (64bit) os? If yes, what is the command line I should use to do the install? I am also interested in any books/sites that might help me to get started.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am using F14 Kernel 2.6.35.13-91.fc14.x86_64 and I tried to install VMWare Server using this toturial Click Here .
Unfortunately, I got this error "There is a problem compiling the vmnet module after it was patched." in this step on the second page:
Code:
Note that I used the names on my Laptop and here I am attaching What I Have done.. (txt is attached)
How to install any vmware Because I have to install Windows 7 on it.. Note that mine is 64-bit
I try install F14 32 bit, f14 64 bit, f15 32 bit and Centos 5.5 and when it arrives at the end of the installation and reboot, my system no boot. I try install it on a Hardware RAID 1 --> 2 x 2TB. Motherboard Intel DH57DD, Core I5, 4 Gb DD3. (Windows 7 afeter install boot OK).
View 13 Replies View RelatedBy default, Fedora x86_64 only installs 64 bit libraries under /lib64 when OS installation! I think, it is not very good because there are so many 32 bit application software, without 32bit library, 32bit application can not run at all! Why Fedora not install both libraries by default, any concern?
View 2 Replies View RelatedAny body can give me the step by step instruction how I can install Sun virtual box in Fedora 12 64Bit edition. I am using the folloeing hardware.
Server: Dell PowerEdge 1950
RAM: 16 GB
Processor: Zion Multicore
HDD: SAS 132GB
Downloaded from here: [URL] then ,it is 32-bit and I need to know what all 32-bit libs are needed as dependency for skype to work. I am on Gnome Fedora and purposefully selected static version of skype to prevent installation of libqt4.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have the simple fortran codes as:
Code:
integer :: i1=2455121, i2=2455121
real :: s1=0.19123840, s2=0.20749992
real*8 :: a1, a2
a1=i1+s1; a2=i2+s2
[Code]....
When s1 and s2 are stated with 'real*8', the 64bit and 32bit systems get the same results.
I just bought sony vaio laptop(EB16) couple of days before.I had window 7 OS. Two days before i downloaded Fedora-12-x86_64-DVD & installed in my PC.Everything is working fine except when i play any video or audio file such as .avi, .mp3 from any player such as vlc player, movie player ,xine etc , i don't get any sound.I tried to search this problem in internet but still i am not able to resolve this problem.
[Code]...
Im trying to set up my 3G modem to recive and send sms but I had no luck so far
Code:
Bus 002 Device 010: ID 19d2:0031 ONDA Communication S.p.A. ZTE MF636Im I tried with gnokii and wammu and many other things and did not want anything to do
I installed Fedora 10 x86_64 from DVD this weekend. Once the install was completed and I booted into the new install, I ran the Software Update expecting to find and download security updates. However, to my surprise no updates were found! The install DVD was downloaded and burnt to DVD about two weeks ago. Did the installer fetch and install the F10 updates? Or did I mess up my install and/or configuration of F10? I remember when I installed F9 there were a lot of updates found right after the install.
View 14 Replies View RelatedMy attempt to install Fedora 10 x86_64 to a HP EliteBook6930p with an Intel Centrino 2 processor failed. Initially the CD load presents the start screen where I select Install. Then the machine displays multiple errors. When the error scrolling stops the last comments displayed are:
ACPI Error (psparse-0530): Method parse/execution failed [\_TZ_.PSWT] (Node ffff88007fb48720), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
ACPI Error (psparse-0530): Method parse/execution failed [\_TZ_.GTTP] (Node ffff88007fb486e0), AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT
[Code].....
For the last couple of days I've been trying to install Fedora 11 x86_64 without success on my new machine, specs below. Intel Core i7-920 2.66Ghz MSI X58 Pro 7200 SATA Drive (can't remember the make) 6GB RAM So first off I tried install the 32bit live cd and that worked without any problems and installed fine. Only problem is I need access to the full 6GB of RAM so I really need to switch to the 64bit version.
I downloaded the full x86_64 install DVD and burnt it off. Rebooted and began the installation. It was going fine until it started installing the packages. The install seemed to freeze, although the mouse would still move. I left this for 10 minutes just incase it kick started again, but there was no HD activity or DVD activity so I gave up and rebooted to try again. The next time I started the install I had problems with it freezing while partitioning. I was beginning to think something was up with my hard drive or the drivers for the hard drives controller weren't working correctly (could still be the case).
After about 20 attempts with it freezing at various points I gave up and decided to try the x86_64 live cd. This booted with no problems so I started the install from the desktop. First thing I noticed was a kernel error pop up after I started the drive partitioning. Something about dereferencing a pointer in the kernel (0x20) (sorry no additional info at the moment, if needed please ask). This got me thinking the kernels not playing nice with my setup. However, it let me continue and copied the live image onto the hard drive. Then it started going through the post installation steps and this is where I got another kernel error (again I can get this if needed) and the window froze and all activity seemed to stop again. Has anyone got any ideas what could be causing these problems. I've also tried a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 version I had lying around and this had similar problems (although this does use anaconda as the installer too).
I am currently running W$7, with Fedora 13 LiveDisc I want to install Fedora 13 LiveDisc to VirtualBox. When I went to install to Hard Drive, from F13 LiveDisc I got to the point where it said "by installing you wont necessarily have your existing files deleted." At this point it was wanting to install to my HD. I dont know if there are more choices for places to install to after agreeing to install to my HD. I didnt want to chance overwriting my W$ OS. So then, my question is, if I continue with the install from F13 LiveDisc, to my HD, can I then navigate to VirtualBox for the install?
View 4 Replies View Related Im trying to install iseriesaccess for linux. I've had to use the i386 version and the 64bit says it has not 5250 emulator which is the reason im installing it. I have had a good look and cant get it to solve these dependencies. Has anyone else tried and got this working?
[ltodd2@zeus Downloads]$ rpm -ivh iSeriesAccess-5.4.0-1.6.i386.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libodbcinst.so.1 is needed by iSeriesAccess-5.4.0-1.6.i386
libodbc.so.1 is needed by iSeriesAccess-5.4.0-1.6.i386
libstdc++.so.5 is needed by iSeriesAccess-5.4.0-1.6.i386
[Code]...
Can anyone get the website below to work correctly with Firefox 3.5 and F11 64bit?[URL]...All I see is the background scrolling slowly and jerkily, none of the buttons at the bottom work. Reboot into Windows 7 and IE8: the same site is fast, smooth, the buttons work and the product details appear correctly in the centre of the screen.
I've tried disabling all adblock /pop up block options, ensured all javascript options are enabled and no change. Could this be a problem with the 64 bit flash player (installed from leigh's sticky thread) or a problem with OpenJDK?
Only asking if there is any official NVIDIA drivers for 64bit of fedora ?
And, What is the best alternatives ?
Also, What is the best graphics card to use with Fedora 64bit so i buy it ?
I just tried to update to kernel 2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10 (x86_64) at the suggestion of the gnome update widget, and the process hung. A bunch of other things were updating at the same time, many of which were related to audacity or wine.
I'm not sure just what was being updated, because the option to review which updates are available does not work - when I click on it, nothing happens, but when I take the other choice (install all updates), I take pot luck. It would be nice to be able to choose which programs to update, and to be able to upgrade the kernel independently, but I don't seem to be able to do that at the moment.
I need to run a proprietary VPN client (Aventail) that can't use the openssl libraries that are packaged with 64bit F10:The Fedora openssl package does something differently from the original openssl.org package that makes it incompatible with Aventail (see bugzilla ticket 477073) I also believe the Aventail client software requires 32-bit libraries. So, I've determined I need to install 32bit openssl directly from openssl.org, then link my Aventail client to that. Note that I don't want to replace the 64bit openssl libraries currently on my system.
Based on the Bugzilla ticket, I believe I know how to hook up Aventail before I install it simply by supplying a few specific soft links if I can make/compile/whatever the 32bit openssl.org libraries and keep them in their own isolated directory. how to get the 32bit openssl libraries installed in a little corner by themselves on my 64bit system. give a step-by-step on on the commands necessary to place a 32bit version of openssl all by itself in a directory of my choosing?
I'm having trouble installing F11 x86_64, and I'm sure it is something to do with the video card.X will not even start if I have both nvidia quadro FX1700's installed. If I take one out, I can install F11, but it always 'hangs' when it starts X (which is to say, both the keyboard and mouse are locked - until I press the power button, but then it shuts down anyway).I've fiddled inittab so it starts in runlevel 3 so I can at least get in and tinker. There is no xorg.conf in /etc/X11, so I assume the system is building it's own and not quite getting it right (guess work based on other threads with similar symptoms).
I can connect to the system from another Linux machine via ssh, and I can ftp to it. I tried copying the xorg.conf from the other machine, but while it changed the screen resolution (ergo, it had some effect), it still went nuts. Starting X remotely via ssh allowed me to trap the messages, which indicate the lack of HAL has something to do with the problem.service --status-all reports hald stopped; I'm assuming this should not be the case. I've used yum to reinstall hal, but that made no difference. Nor did an update - it was already at the most recent level.F11 was installed from a DVD downloaded vai a bittorrent; the disk checked out ok.
My knowledge is limited, and I don't know what should be in xorg.conf for my machine, although I could type it in from scratch or ftp it across from here. It was 'okay' under F10, happily tolerating both video cards. But it seems to be sulking under F11. In case it matters, I'm doing everything as root; since firstboot starts X, I can't use that to create another userid.
- nomodeset, xdriver=vesa, selinux=0, remove rhgb as boot parameters - all to no avail (although these changes seem to be ignored for the most part anyway);
- start the HAL daemon manually (mine failed to start, as others have reported). It didn't like that! (the output is available, but is enormous)
- startx -configure - simply failed;
- dirconf didn't work;
- I've tried swearing at it during start-up, which turned out to be no more or less successful than anything else, but it was fun.
Intel Q6600 64 bit. Twin nvidia Quadro FX1700 cards (one removed for the time being) driving two 1920x1200 monitors each. Please let me know if there is any other relevant information I can supply.
So, my second real attempt at getting the 64 bit F11 up and running. I just started adding stuff before all the updates. Crash. So, I'm in the post install phase. Before anything else I installled akmod-nvidia manually, rebooted, and I'm doing yum update right now. I'm hoping many dependencies are solved in the update. There are about 209 line items to update after the initial install. Been updated all afternoon.
So, after the updates are done, I'm heading over to download the different repos I need for the fun stuff. Did you know Java is installed with this first yum update? Wasn't like that in F10. I think I tried 5 times on F10 before I got it right.
I was finally able to install Fedora 11 x64 after choosing to only install packages from the repository on the install DVD. Prior to that when I had chosen tio install from the default online repositories, the install itself failed with a Python exception ( see my other post ). Now, however, once I boot after the install I eventually receive a kernel panic message, and failure. The exact same thing happened with CentOS 5.3 x64 after a flawless install. So unless someone knows what might be going on I will assume that Fedore, Red hat, and offshoots for x64 bit systems are just not for me. I have been able to successfully install the latest Mandriva and SUSE x64 Linux distros so whatever Red Hat/Fedora has done just does not work on my system.
View 3 Replies View Related