Ubuntu :: Run A Traceroute On 11.04?
Aug 12, 2011how I run a traceroute on 11.04?
View 7 Replieshow I run a traceroute on 11.04?
View 7 RepliesIf I traceroute to google, it hits my router and stops there. Generically, my Setup is this. AT&T Uverse residential gateway ---> wired to 54g router running tomato ---> wireless ethernet bridge to 54gl router running tomato in another room ---> wired to ubuntu and win7 box.
The ATT RG hands its external IP over the the 54g running tomato. the 54gl running tomato is a wireless ethernet bride in the den running the same with 2 machines wired to. The two machines are static IP to the first router, which does all DCHP, stuff like that. The Windows box is fine. The subnets are the same. What should I be looking at to figure this out? This is the only "network" issue I have come across.
what the difference between the commands tracert and traceroute is? I need to run tracert as superuser, while traceroute is no problem in user mode.
Also, it appers like tracert is showing nodes completely different from traceroute:
Code:
sudo tracert google.nl
traceroute to google.nl (216.239.59.104), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254) 1.078 ms 1.699 ms *
2 * * *
[Code]....
Another thing.. Is it correct to assume that hop 5 and 7 above are loadbalanced nodes? How should I interpret this result, is the traceroute initiating it's path three times? Otherwise it'd be rather strange as to display other addresses in the same node..
When I try traceroute it only gives me stars as output. For example:
Code:
me@desk:/etc/udev/rules.d$ traceroute taobao.com
traceroute to taobao.com (121.14.24.241), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets[code]....
It gives me some output when tracerouting to other computers within my network:
naman@naman-laptop:~$ traceroute google.co.in
google.co.in: Name or service not known
Cannot handle "host" cmdline arg `google.co.in' on position 1 (argc 1)
Then I tracked the IP address of google.com on [URL] and tried
naman@naman-laptop:~$ traceroute 74.125.77.99
traceroute to 74.125.77.99 (74.125.77.99), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
connect: Network is unreachable
I have to use my college proxy server to connect to the Internet. When I traceroute to a host within the LAN there is no problem. What should I do to be able to traceroute to a host outside my local network?
how to read a Traceroute readout.
View 14 Replies View RelatedWhy linux traceroute uses UDP protocol, we have basic ICMP protocol which is used in MS-windows tracert.Any specific use of traceroute using with UDP,TCP than ICMP?Windows is displaying all HOPs address but linux printing *.*.*
View 8 Replies View RelatedI am trying to traceroute to google.com
When i do it looks like this
Code:
It does this no matter what site I go to. also the 192.168.16.10 is the untangle server
The command does work for local Ips
Code:
As i've installed the new fedora update packets ,i've seemed to develope a strange networking problem .. Network description Fedora 15 with 3 LAN adaptors eth0 > LAN (IP address 192.168.0.254)eth1 > network connected to a pppoe conection eth2 > WAN to another provider. Ok so let's ignore eth2 because i've disable mangle(i was using trafic shifting on some ports). So now i'm using it as a simple NAT server .. so the problem is : >>my server is not responding to the traceroute command is it should .. the network works thou but this is what i get. C:UsersDUAL>tracert google.ro
[Code]...
As root I get the following result: ngssuse:~ # traceroute -nI 10.200.123.45
Note: the -i and -I options were exchangedfor compability with LBL traceroute Use -I for ICMP, and -i <ifname> to specify the interface name unable to create ICMP send socket: Permission denied. Is this a bug?
Is there some traceroute-like tool that shows ports as well as IP addresses? This is more for seeing how NAT works (on my home network) than for a practical need.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've used linuxquestions.org from time to time, but never needed to register until now.An in-depth explanation of this issue is already described over here: [URL], so I will merely quote it again here - it seems nobody knows the solution over at Ubuntu's forums...:
Quote: I recently switched my home server from debian lenny to ubuntu maverick. I've managed to port all my configs and stuff and so far I'm very happy. There's one tiny thing that's griping me, that I never experienced before with debian's (older) packages/configuration... Here's the situation: My server dials up 2 pppoe (adsl) interfaces (different isp's) with split internet routes.
If I run a general traceroute to an internet IP, all the hops which are not routed via the same interface as the destination host/IP, will appear as "* * *" in the traceroute. This was never the case before and it would be preferred to see the IP's of all routers along the way regardless of whether they are routed... (I used to be able to see IP's like 10.0.0.x before through INTERNET traceroutes if they were hops along the way [IP's which would be unreachable if traced directly], and that's no longer the case) - isn't this kinda defeating the point of traceroute?
[Code]...
I am a new learner. I need a simple scripts that compute the average ping time for hosts, and the average number of hosts that respond to pings during a traceroute. I have finished the ping part but I confused how to start the traceroute part
Code:
#!/bin/bash
#!/bin/sh
txt=$*
count=0;
for host in $txt; do
echo $host
echo $( ping -c 3 $host | grep avg | sed 's@.*=@ rrt ave =@' | sed -r 's@ = [^/]+/([^/]+).*@= 1 ms@')
done;
I'm trying to use traceroute to view hop count between my machine and a specified external host but no matter what I give to it, it provides me the same output:
[Code]...
What am I doing wrong? Should I be disabling DNS caching? Is there a property I haven't set correctly? Just a small FYI, but I dual boot this computer with Win7 and it's tracert works fine. UPDATE: I also ran the command from a different network and it worked fine. I'm assuming I need a port forward then?
I want to give access to a student to a server in order to make repeated trials of traceroute to different hosts. We have realized that it is preferable to use the -T option, as it sends TCP packets that are less commonly blocked by firewalls. However, this option is only available to superusers, and I don't want to grant the student such privileges.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI ran two scans in Zenmap: 1) Quick scan plus and 2) Quick Traceroute. Quick scan plus, under the Nmap Output tab, has a field called "Network Distance". The Quick Traceroute report under the same tab lists the HOP and RTT time. I was thinking that for a given server, the value for the Network Distance would be the same as the HOP field when initiating the scans from the same server, but they are not.
View 5 Replies View RelatedCode: # traceroute -I 69.12.32.2 Note: the -i and -I options were exchangedfor compability with LBL traceroute Use -I for ICMP, and -i <ifname> to specify the interface name unable to create ICMP send socket: Permission denied Note that the command was done as root. This worked in 11.3.
And yes, it works without the "-I". But it should work with the "-I". One shouldn't have to boot into Windows, just to run "tracert" there.
when i am using traceroute command, it is giving the erro as follow: traceroute [URL]: Temporary failure in name resolution Cannot handle "host" cmdline arg [URL] on position 1 (argc 1)
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm new to Linux, so I decided to try using Wubi to get started. THe problem is, when it finished installing 10.04, I got this message: OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'C:\ubuntu\install\ubuntu-10.04-desktop-amd64.iso' Is there any way around this? It might just be that overly restrictive thing called Vista (which I have the bad luck to be using). I was considering getting a USB drive for Ubuntu anyway..
View 1 Replies View RelatedI recently got interested with with OS.. So I downloaded wubi in Ubuntu website. I opted for the Ubuntu Netbook Edition as am using a lappy. However, halfway through finishing download I got an error. The log shows:
OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: u'C:\ubuntu\install\ubuntu-10.10-netbook-i386.iso'
What is the difference between the Ubuntu Installer for windows and the Ubuntu CD image? If I use the ubuntu installer for windows, does it have the capability to partition my drive, will it enable to share files with windows etc or is it just a way not to have to burn a CD. Just curious, the exact details of the installation files were not made clear on the website. Note: Windows Version: XP, 32bit, SP3. I have not partitioned anything yet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have windows 7 installed on Disk2 (according to windows Disk Manager), and I installed ubuntu 10.10 on Disk0, choosing the dual boot option at installation.
However, grub does not load (presumably because its on disk0 and my machine appears to boot from disk3), so the machine goes straight into windows 7.
How do I get ubuntu to load?
I'm currently running off of my live-cd, and after spending 4 hours of my life trying to fix this myself, i figured someone out here has to know how to help me. Basically, i wanted to try linux, then liked it enough to decide to put on one of my usb-drives (320g adata nobility NH92), and i couldn't get it to boot anything but windows w/o the live-cd, which would then boot the live-cd, lol, in other words, i couldn't get it to boot at all from the external, even though i had changed the setting in my bios to boot from usb first, and tried manually selecting boot from usb and all that fun stuff.
Sooo... eventually i decided it might be a problem with the bootloader, and while i'm not exactly sure at this point what i have done to my computer, all i can successfully boot is the live cd. When I try to boot w/o the live cd, whether i try to boot from my internal (windows) drive, or external, all i get is a device not found error.I think i could fix it if i had windows recovery cd's (i'm running xp, btw), or installation cds, but... unfortunately, they died in a terrible accident. So i have no cd's at all for windows. :/
I have been running Ubuntu 10.04 under Windows 7 (Is this call WUBI?) without any problems for a while. My other machines only run Ubuntu (9.04 & 10.04). I decided to give it a try to the latest Ubuntu 10.10. After going through the successful installation and then rebooting, I am getting the following error message once I select 'Ubuntu' in the boot up menu right after the BIOS screen: Booting ' Ubuntu 10.10, kernel 2.6.35-25-generic'
[Code]...
I'm wondering if this is even possible. I've searched high and low and have yet to find and answer to this particular setup.
The setup:
Router is in another building.
Desktop connected by WiFi
Laptop connected by WiFi
Both the Desktop and the Laptop are in the same building together. About 5' apart.
SSH server is setup on Desktop
FreeNX client is setup on Laptop
So they can connect just fine via WiFi for remote desktop control of the Desktop from the Laptop (so SSH and FreeNX are working).Is it possible to connect the 2 pc's directly to each other by Ethernet cable AND transfer files between them by Ethernet while still being connected to the Internet by WiFi on them both?Or would the WiFi have to be disabled while using the Ethernet connection?Neither has a Gigabit Ethernet NIC so I know it would at least require a crossover cable or another router to connect the 2 by Ethernet cable.The idea behind all this is to be able to transfer files between computers quickly by Ethernet while the computers are still busy doing other things on the Internet by WiFi.
I've been trying to find what would be the lightest ubuntu or ubuntu based distribution, I have an older PC I'd like to get up and running again, and would prefer something that works pretty quickly on it (for basic web browsing and other things) the specs are:
AMD Duron 900Mhz, 384MB RAM, 40GB HDD, Geforce FX 5200 128MB agp.
1. I accidentally wrecked a previous Ubuntu installation so I decided to re-install via the Ubuntu disk. Unfortunately Ubuntu doesn't let me override previous Ubuntu installations...
2. Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat is due to released in about 3 weeks. I want to install it via a clean install.
3. So can anyone tell me how to remove both Ubuntu partitions safely. I am currently running WinVista with Ubuntu Lucid Lynx. I know I have to use something like this to erase GRUB2. Can anyone give me a good tutorial?
I want to change from ubuntu 11.04 to ubuntu studio. Is there any way to do this without losing all my stuff/with out completely reinstalling the os?
View 7 Replies View RelatedThe scenario is as follows - I will be moving across the country and my desktop will stay here powered and online, while I move with a laptop. I need a way to connect to the desktop for file streaming(music and movies) as well as using the virtual machines. I have thought about SSH and VNC.I need something failsafe. That's priority one. I won't be around to fix it if it breaks. I can set the computer to come on in the BIOS at a certain time if the power went out. But if I can get in remotely the whole setup is useless.SSH only provides terminal use, correct? So if I chose that route I would be able to access the computer via command line and play music and movies with mplayer and such, correct? But I would not be able to run the virtual machines? Because there will be no GUI, right?
I have been playing with Vinagre and Vino through the host and guest of a virtual machine and I cannot get it to connect. Is there a better application? x11vnc? I have forwarded port 5900 on the router and have upnp enabled. Got a better remote desktop suggestion?I would like to run this setup headless.(no monitor) I also would like to run it without a gpu if that is possible to make it more energy efficient.Both computers are 64 bits and will be running Ubuntu 10.10 and soon 11.04.Are these crappy ideas to begin with? Should I go another route to get my files and access the virtual machines?
After a reinstall of 10.10, I am able to turn on file sharing and so I set up a shared folder.
Windows Vista can see this folder but in my network place, there is only one icon, and it's a "Windows Network" icon. Upon clicking on that, I can see the local network, "Rompus Room".
When I click on Rompus Room, nothing happens for a while, then I get a message saying, "Opening "ROMPUS ROOM". Then I get the final message, "Unable to mount location", followed by, "Failed to retieve share list from server"