Trying to use gdb to debug a C program, I got the message (from gdb) of "missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.12-2.i686" so I did that. However, although it began trying, I got the message "could not find debuginfo for main pkg: glibc-2.12-2.i686"
I am running Fedora 13, with pretty much the standard repositories which come with it.
I can't seem to find the kernel source for 2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.i686. This should be a simple task, what am I missing?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to rebuild a .src.rpm to produce a debuginfo rpm but one is not being built. The normal .rpm builds just fine.
I have redhat-rpm-config installed, and the following is in my .rpmmacros:
%_topdir /home/kerrg/buildroot
%_toppath /home/kerrg/buildroot/tmp
%_signature gpg
[Code].....
I am trying to run crash on a core dump.My kernel is 2.6.31.12-174.2.3.fc12.x86_64.This page tells me I have to make sure package kernel-debuginfo is installed.When I run yum install kernel-debuginfo it says there is no such package.I found another page that says to run.How do I get this installed?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhat's the difference between -debuginfo and -debugsource packages?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm having troubles running systemtap scripts. It fails to run with message:
Code:
Checking "/lib/modules/2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686/build/.config" failed: No such file or directory Ensure kernel development headers & makefiles are installed.
Then I typed:
Code:
$rpm -q kernel kernel-devel kernel-debuginfo
kernel-2.6.33.3-85.fc13.i686
kernel-devel-2.6.33.5-124.fc13.i686
kernel-devel-2.6.33.6-147.fc13.i686
package kernel-debuginfo is not installed
So no kernel-debuginfo, a package which I cannot find in repo. So where to get it and why it's not included in default installation if SystemTap is. It's like having Apache without tcp/ip stack.
i was trying to configure yum locally, can i copy files to any other location other than /var/ftp/pub. how to configure yum.repos.d/rhel debuginfo file.
View 2 Replies View RelatedLast nights upgrade of java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13.i686 and java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin-1.6.0.0-43.1.8.2.fc13.i686 prevent the loading of Ameritrades Command Center.Downgrading to version 1.6.0.0-37 fixes the problem. I'll post the bugzilla number as soon as I get the chance to file it.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI tried to use systemtap but it complains about:
Code:
semantic error: missing x86_64 kernel/module debuginfo under '/lib/modules/2.6.34.7-0.7-desktop/build'...
[code]....
I couldn't find any package containing a static version of the C library for 32-bit. Did I miss something or is it really not available, and if so is there a reason why?
View 14 Replies View RelatedIm using buildroot to generate a file system . in tat one package module-init tools need static version of libc.a . so may i know how to install tat in fedora 12 ?mine CPU is as given below
Linux Nakshatra 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Sat Nov 7 21:25:57 EST 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I'm on Ubuntu 11.04. I get the above error when running a utility to get code from a version control system (StarTeam). The error looks generic enough that I'm hoping its an easily resolvable system problem. Below is how I get it ...
Code:
$ /bin/sh -c stcmd label -x -nologo -stop -p username:password@mydomain.com:9999/NNA/NNA/Technology/nna/tools/selenium -nl selenium-utils-1.0 -b
strings: '/lib/libc.so.6': No such file
[code].....
I've been working with out servers for the past several years. We have a mix of OS. Fedora, Ubuntu, RHEL, etc. I've accidentally trashed the libc.so.6 link and now nothing but shell commands work.
I tried to echo "/lib/libc-2.10.2.so into the /etc/sestatus.conf file, but that didn't have any affect. Does anyone know where the search path is maintained besides PATH so I can try to point the apps to the /lib/libc-2.10.2.so file? I have a bunch of SVN repos on this server and right now, no one has access.
I want to supply the shared libs along with my program rather than using the target system's due to version differences:
ldd says my program uses these shared libs:
I have successfully linked ld-xxx.so by compiling like this:
But I have not managed to successfuly link libc-xxx.so.
What is the connection between the kernel and Libc (either gLibc, uClibc, etc.)?
For instance, what happens if I upgrade the kernel but keep an older version of Libc and applications that rely on it: Will applications keep running, and I will need to upgrade Libc only if I install newer applications that expect to find new systems calls in the kernel that they reach through Libc?
Or are the kernel and Libc totally unrelated?
I am trying to install sysstat-5.0.5-1.x86_64 rpm, but thats needs to install dependencies libc.so.6... For details I have attached the screenshot. No yum is configured there.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhen ever i try to install updates i get shown an error & the updates stop the error i get says "librpmio.so.0 is needed by package abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates) librpm.so.0 is needed by package abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.i686 (updates)"
View 12 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to compile ink but with no luck. Here are the terminal output,
Code:
[trumpet@Trumpet-PC ink-0.5.1]$ ./configure
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
[code]...
OS: OpenSUSE 11.2
Application: Recital Developer (database)
I'm running into this error when I startup the program."GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference"
I was trying to sort out some problems I was having with synaptic and in a <sarcasm>slash of brilliance</sarcasm> I renamed my libc.so.6 to something else. Since then any command I type throws up:Code:apt-get: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directoryI can't get anything done. Nautilus/package manager/nothing fires up.
View 1 Replies View Related1. I need to use clock_gettime(), in <time.h> it is: extern int clock_gettime (clockid_t __clock_id, struct timespec *__tp) __THROW; and in a successful build .so it is unsolved. In final app to lonk to this .so it is also unsolved. which lib missed in .so or app build?
2. libc include several libs, which are liked by default? say stdc++, rt? rt1/rt2 what does they do?
3. How to find which libc is used or linked?
What is the purpose of libc in an operating system?
Is the libc is common for all OS or it is different for different OS!?
I mean source of libc build for RH is same for Ubuntu !?
I installed RHEL 3.5 with all packages (everything), I try to install networker client software then libc.so.6 (GLIBC_2.3.4) is needed by lgtoclnt-7.6-1.
1. lgtoclnt-7.6-1.i686.rpm is supported in RHEL 3.5?
2. how can i get glibc_2.3.4
3. how to install glibc_2.3.4
1 system info:
root@yes-desktop:/usr/src/eglibc-2.11.1/malloc# uname -a
Linux yes-desktop 2.6.32-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 16 08:10:02 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
2 gcc version
root@yes-desktop:/usr/src/eglibc-2.11.1/malloc# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
[code]....
1 why cann't i debug the test? because i can't step into the "operator new" function.
I updated my netbook to the last incarnation of slackware-current yesterday.
My problem is now, that it is no more able to start the ash shell of the initial ramdisk i am using. The ramdisk was created with the latest version of the mkinitrd script.
The error message is:
Code:
And the error happens when the ash from the initial ramdisk is intended to be started. Simply copying the /lib/libc.so.6 stuff (symlink to the real so and the real so) enables to ash to be started but later cryptsetup fails to load.
The initial ramdisk from mid-January i used before did not have such a problem. What i also see is, that the failing ramdisk has a size of only 16k blocks. The one from mid-January was bigger.
/usr/dlc/bin/_progress: relocation error; symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time referrence
And the solution offered is:
But the problem still exists.
If I use 2.4.20 I get an error about shared "something" in library and I cannot use command line like using command as ll, ls, mkdir but if I change that to 2.6.18 I get the error above but I can now use these commands: ll, ls, mkdir, etc.
I'm using Progress 9.1D and the application was compiled using CENTOS 4.4. Now I just copied the Progress 9.1D as is to new server HP Proliant ML110 G5 with CENTOS 5.2 installed.
Copying Progress 9.1D to other computers (IDE and not SATA drivers) with CENTOS 4.4 installed has no problem. Everything runs.
Could this be due to GLIBC version. Progress application was compiled using GLIBC version 2.3.4 but my GLIBC now is version 2.5.
If this is the case, can I just copy GLIBC version 2.3.4 and put it in my ProliantML110G5 server? If not how do I do it? Downloading and installing etc.
I'm trying to upgrade an etch system to lenny, I've updated my sources list to lenny and ran apt-get update. When I try apt-get install apt
apt-get install apt I get the following:
Reading package lists. Done Building dependency tree. Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies. apt: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.7-1) but 2.3.6.ds1-13etch10+b1 is to be installed Depends: libstdc++6 (>= 4.2.1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages
if I try apt-get install apt libc6, it wants to upgrade a whole heap of packages - will this be a safe thing to do ?
When I debug a program with GDB and hit a break point I get:
Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=2b25d8329d1aa713a2cc61b5cb701f6f89c78022"
Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libm.so.6
Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=f05646449077dfbf15d5f78251a3b25e0f955dd9"
Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libc.so.6
Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=9b674b2caef1982db55e436bca814060e1705b7f"
When I install the suggested packages the debuginfo does not match the object files. I get:
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug//lib64/libc-2.11.2.so.debug" does not match "/lib64/libc.so.6" (CRC mismatch).
warning: the debug information found in "/usr/lib/debug/lib64/libc-2.11.2.so.debug" does not match "/lib64/libc.so.6" (CRC mismatch).
Missing separate debuginfo for /lib64/libc.so.6
Try: zypper install -C "debuginfo(build-id)=9b674b2caef1982db55e436bca814060e1705b7f"
The last package is not found. Is this missing from the repositories?
I have been trying to fix this problem for 3 days, any ideas before I jump through the window (not the bill gates one)?I am using ubuntu 9.10 and running a ./configure.
View 3 Replies View Relatedi am getting these error when compiling:
ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib64/libc.so when searching for -lc
ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib64/libc.a when searching for -lc
ld: cannot find -lc
What is the library -lc?