Flashed bios lastnight on 13.0 desktop.
all winblow$ are fine.
lspci shows ehthernet card
did 'netconfig' and
'route -n' shows default settings as if /etc/rc.d/rc.inetd1.conf were never set.
oh yes, i manually edited this too. mv'd and netconfig'd.
I installed openSUSE on one of my work system. The network port wasn't working when I was installing, but works fine now (checked in Windows). But for some reason, I am not able to configure the network. I used both Dynamic and Static IPs (both work fine in Windows) but still no go. I am using Yast Control Center for this purpose. I can't even ping the default gateway when I am using custom settings. When I use dynamic settings, it says Unreachable Network.
View 7 Replies View Relatedsetup my static network connection Here are my details :
IP : 172.16.152.137
Subnet : 255.255.255.192
Gateway : 172.16.152.191
Primary DNS : 172.16.0.1
[code]....
but after this setup when i restart my network #service network restart while bringing up the eth0 the following message is displayed before [OK] - RTNETLINK answers : Invalid Argument now it seems either this setup is wrong or not sufficient to set up the connection, whenever i try to ping 172.16.0.1 it showing connect : Network is Unreachable
I have one server with 4 network interfaces:
eth0: 192.168.0.0/24 - local lan A
eth1: 200.1.2.3 - internet link - default route
eth2: 192.168.10.0/24 - local lan B eth3: 192.168.20.0/24 - local lan C
Lan A - Default routing to eth0
Lan B - Default routing to eth2
Lan c - Default routing to another server but the workstations has static routing to this server too.
Everything is working fine on Opensuse 11.1 until I upgrade this sever to Opensuse 11.2 ( Reinstall, not update at all ). After upgrade to 11.2 the routing across local lan interfaces simply not work, if you try to ping lan-to-lan you got the message: Network unreachable, even with the IP Forward enable, but the default route is working fine trough the SNAT.
I've come back to Opensuse 11.1 and everything become normal, does anyone have an problem like this? Maybe a bug? PS: I do not try to disable the AppArmor, next weekend I will try Opensuse 11.2 without the AppArmor and post here anyway.
I've got router with: eth2 - local network (192.168.1.1), ppp0 - uplink (x.y.z.a)
my firewall:
Code:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.4.5 on Mon Jan 11 12:22:25 2010
*raw
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [1038480:666298388]
[code]....
somehow iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth2 -d x.y.z.a -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.1.1 helps, but imho there should be some other solution. kernel is 2.6.31.6, architecture is x86_64.
P.S. i've also tried iptables -A POSTROUTING ! -d x.y.z.a -s 192.168.1.0/24 -j MASQUERADE that didn't help either.
I have two linux servers, I tried to ping from one linux box to another and vice versa but error message is "connect: Network is unreachable" Where as If I tried from windows machine I am getting the reply from both the servers.
C:Documents and Settings>ping bnkprod
Pinging bnkprod.softtech.com [172.20.40.141] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=64
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 172.20.40.141: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Ping statistics for 172.20.40.141:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 16ms, Average = 4ms
I've been having a lot of trouble with getting wireless networking devices to work. I guess I have a lot of company, since mfrs don't seem to be very interested in supporting Linux.It seems that one common symptom is that, when I try to "Ping" using the Terminal, I get "network is unreachable".Does this mean anything specific, or is it a general output whenever the network is not carrying on two way communications? Does it mean that the wireless interface is down? Does it mean that the wireless hardware is not transmitting? Not receiving?
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy ubuntu installation was running fine with the Belkin F7D1101 v1 after using this install method:[URL]..But, after allowing ubuntu to autoupdate many programs (don't remember which ones), the device stopped working. I checked all of the commands in the link above. They are all still functioning. dmesg throws no errors, but it terminates with
<code>ADDRCONF (NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready</code> Are there any network files which may have been overridden from autoupdate? iwconfig wlan0 shows "Access Point: Not-Associated" What output can I show you to help me find the problem?
I want to add this route but I am getting this error message. What is the reason of this problem? I cant add this route? how can i add?
Code: [root@linux/]# route add -net 10.1.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 gw 10.2.0.1 eth0 SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
I'm using debian lenny.When I boot with kernel 2.6.36, ping always respond with Network is Unreachable. But when I boot with kernel 2.6.26 it works. I can't even ping the dafault router of 2.6.26 kernel when I am at 2.6.36. Also, system/administration/network does not show any connections while it shows something at the other kernel.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a network printer directly connected via ethernet cable to an Ubuntu netbook, but pinging the printer fails, giving "Host Unreachable". The network light on the ethernet socket is lit green, and there is nothing else cable-connected to the network - just a simple cable connection between the netbook ethernet socket and the Network printer (a HP Laserjet 4200n). Ping works fine if I plug the cable into a different machine (a Win XP box) and ping from there, so it's not a cable or IP address problem.
This sounds simple enough and should work, but I'm stumped. Clues, anyone?
I'm experiencing massive latency/unreachable problems on my Linux machine. It's true for all network connections, here's an example of me trying to ping my router:
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=15115 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=14107 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=3 ttl=64 time=13107 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=12107 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=11108 ms
[Code]...
I've tried now with both the maverick default kernel and 2.6.37-rc5 kernel (both 64 bit), same result. If I take the card up and down (ifup, ifdown) performance is restored for a little while, then it's back. I've tried changing cable, network card and router port but no luck.
I use DNS on my server as a chasing DNS so its not fully configured. I seem to be having trouble with IPV6 addresses. I'm guessing this is linked to the 6to4 tunnel I have set up to my windows box, but I'm not really sure.
Code:
May 21 18:00:16 hyrule named[1148]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET/AAAA/IN': 2001:dc3::35#53
May 21 18:00:16 hyrule named[1148]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET/AAAA/IN': 2001:500:1::803f:235#53
May 21 18:00:17 hyrule named[1148]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'zg.akamaitech.net/AAAA/IN': 2001:503:a83e::2:30#53 .....
I installed centos 5.3 x86 at vrtualbox on windows 7 x64 as host. The ping answers "network is unreachable", ifconfig has an ip "192,168,51,100". At control panel, I seleted intel PRO/1000MT Desktop Host only. Is this centos's problem?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhen ever i try to access 202.164.53.122 through ssh i get the following error message:
Couldn't establish connection to proxy: Network is unreachable ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
I have a account at 202.164.53.122.firewall is on.
I am plagued by the following error when attempting port forwarded connections to my minecraft server. Port forwarding is good and test ok on router based firewall. No iptables entries. Natty N, all updates current.
[INFO] Disconnecting CascadianNW [/184.100.247.218:57787]: Failed to verify username! [internal error java.net.NoRouteToHostException: Network is unreachable]
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: Network is unreachable
Some discussion indicate jvm network connection issues related to ipv6, but they are old posts.
I want to be able to access an old pc at home from any computer but I don't want to leave the computer on all the time (I won't use it regularly and I don't believe in wasting energy just cause I can). I've heard that some bioses have wake-on-LAN but I have no other machine on the LAN that will be left on (apparently it's impossible to wake a computer from off the LAN???) so my solution is to buy a raspberry pi (perhaps there is something cheaper/better??) and leave that on that I can ssh to from anywhere and then wake my pc from there. Unfortunately my bios doesn't have a wake-on-lan function and so I'm hoping that I can update my bios to a version that has a wake-on-lan option (perhaps there is a better way?).
oli@deb-serv:~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:Debian
Description:Debian GNU/Linux 8.2 (jessie)
Release:8.2
Codename:jessie
[Code] ....
So I've started to try and find a new bios to update. I think I need one of these: [URL]
I have a problem with flashing a BIOS. I have to use PXE to boot the computer, which actually works fine through syslinux. I also managed to find a FreeDOS floppy image (1.44 MB) that will be booted using syslinux.
The problem is moving the BIOS rom on to the computer to flash. For roms that fit on to the FreeDOS img it works fine if I just add the rom and the exe for flashing to the floppy image. But one of the roms I shall work with is to big to fit even on a 2.88 MB floppy.
I found a "Howto: BIOS-Update per bootable CD (Method II)" for creating a bootable iso holding the DOS image and the additional files for flashing. Using a syslinux configuration like Code: default boot prompt 0 label boot linux memdisk initrd 20101201_091658.iso append iso the iso will be transfered to the client and I get an "A:>" DOS prompt.
According to the HowTo I should be able to switch to drive of the "cd" and access the rom file there. I've tried all drive letters, but all I get is "Invalid drive <letter>:.". I tried booting the DOS with more drivers (FDCD0001 as CD-ROM driver) but it says "No CD-ROM drive to use; XCDROM not loaded!". Additionally it promts: "SHCDX33A installed. o drives assigned. 2 drive(s) available." Here is the question:
How am I able to reach the files from the iso that are not included to the DOS image?
Or maybe there is another way to flash a large BIOS rom over PXE?
I have a laptop that I need to update the BIOS but I cant get into Windows. Here is what I want to do.I know I need a DOS boot able disk. I figured I would download the FreeDOS disk and just add a file to the iso and burn the ISO. So far I cannot do that and I don't know how or even if there is a way to do this. So the long of the short of it is I need a bootable cd that is dos based and has my BIOS update file on it.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to flash my bios but they only supply an exe or a floppy image. obviosly I am not running windows to run the exe and I dont have a floppy drive. So I have been trying to copy the floppy image to a cd with little success.Size of boot image is 2884 sectors -> genisoimage: Error - boot image 'F1B.IMG' has not an allowable size.The way I understand it thats 4 sectors over the 1.44Mb floppy size? Is there a way I continue anyway? Seeing that I will be putting it on a cd I cant see that the size is going to matter
View 14 Replies View RelatedI probably have not done any serious programming for 20 years, not counting a little HTML.
I stumbled onto an old FREESPIRE disk my bro sent me several years back -- and tried installing it on a Sony Vaio PCG FRV 28 I had crashed a few years back. The Sony bios is still aboard, but old enough to not have USB "booting" as part of the boot menu. I don't even know if one can easily hack into the BIOS on an old sony Vaio but changing the BIOS would solve lot of problems.
Does anyone have any ideas or certain knowledge on rewriting or modifying the Master Boot Code or an idea on making my USB [with Ubuntu or any other Linux implementation visible] and bootable to the bios on powerup?
I'm looking for a way to make a bootable floppy that has drdflash.img, my flash utility and my bios file on it for a bios recovery disk. This is on a board that has a failed bios, so everything is pretty much dead (except for the humble floppy drive). I don't have a screen to work with so this floppy needs to be able to run the utility and automatically flash the chip for me. I've heard this is possible, but am unable to find clear instructions on how to do any of this. I know the basics of it is to copy the bios file and flash utility to a floppy along with a bootdisk that will run these things (sometimes the .bat file needs to be modified in order to do this automatically). So I've downloaded drdflash but it came as a .img and I don't think it can be 'just' copied to disk. I came across the 'dd' command but have also heard its nicknamed 'data destroyer' or words to that effect.
View 4 Replies View RelatedYou may know that there was a security release for Adobe Flash Plugin for Linux x86 but not for x86_64. There has been a development:
See : http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
It works fine here. I have a Multilib Slack 13.1 stable.
I recently installed Fedora 10 and I'm trying to install a driver for my HP Deskjet F4200 Series All in One printer. I downloaded the proper hplip file and when i go to install it in the terminal it gets to the very end where it is trying to install the missing required dependencies. When it checks for the network connection it comes back saying "error: The network appears to be unreachable. Installation cannot complete without access to error: distribution repositories. Please check the network and try again."I am connected to the internet through hardwire cable (also tried it through wifi) and have no trouble accessing internet through mozilla or downloading packages elsewhere. Any ideas on why my terminal won't recognize my internet connection??
View 3 Replies View RelatedI installed Fedora 10 and are using KDE. I struggled to get my network up and running - error for ping was "network is unreachable". I eventually got it right by modifying my ifcfg-eth0 file manually.
Now I'm trying to install with yum, but yum fails to connect, probably because of the proxy. I've set the proxy in <System Settings><Network Settings><Proxy> but it doesn't allow me to also add the authorization - greyed out. I've chosen the manual configuration of proxy.
1. How can I enable or allow the adding of authorization in the proxy dialogs or
2. Where is the proxy file which I can modify from command line (and how)?
I am building a v2.6 kernel floppy disk distro to run on a 1992 computer. FWIW The specs on the computer are
* 66 MHZ processor
* 12 MB ram
* 400 MB HD
* EGA monochrome video card
It runs Linux quite nice actually. I want to get it online with a null modem cable and use the other Linux box as a gateway to the internet. I have networking, TCP and slip support in the kernel. I do now know if I have all the needed network configuration files. I am able to ping 127.0.0.1. If I try to ping the other computer, I get a "network is unreachable" error. Tell me any commands to run on either box and I will attempt to do so. Remember the old computer is running a stripped down toolset since its only two floppies worth.
I all, I 've two computer with Ubuntu 9.10 (desktop version)connected by cross over cable.
I try to connect this computers in LAN with the following command:
ifconfig eth0 [address] netmask [netmask] up
When I ping from first computer to second the output is "Network is unreachable"
I just moved my Linux/Windows dual-booting laptop from a desk with an Ethernet jack to a desk that is within the WiFi range of our 2WIRE integrated modem/WiFi/ethernet router. I use GNOME with NetworkManager, and though NetworkManager reports that everything is fine with the connection, I am unable to access anything outside the local network, though I can access the modem/router and the other computers perfectly. However, when I either plug it into an Ethernet cable or boot into Windows, it works just fine.
ifconfig and iwconfig both report that the connection works, the router's firewall is set to allow all outbound traffic, and the laptop's firewall is also set to allow all inbound traffic. How is this even possible, and more importantly, how could I get it fixed?
I have recently installed 10.04 on an old box I have sitting around and wanted to include it in my home network. After struggling with Network Manager I went in and set up the files manually.
/etc/hosts reads:
127.0.0.1 localhost
10.0.0.01 one.network one
10.0.0.02 two.network two
[code]....
then the IPv6 stuff
/etc/network/interfaces reads:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
[code]...
Now I can access the internet from this machine, but when I attempt to ssh to another machine in the network I get the message "Port 22 network is unreachable" Checking with google I found that there should be some ssh config files. I have one ssh_config but no sshd_config. I don't know if this is relevant. Also "network" is not the name of my network. Changed for anonymity.
When I boot up my desktop, lilo spends more than a minute printing a string of dots to the screen, before it declares "Bios data check successful" and then loads slackware normally.
I did
Code:
echo compact >> /etc/lilo.conf
lilo
but lilo declared that to be a syntax error and is as slow as ever. My lilo/conf contains
Code:
# LILO configuration file
[Code]....