Networking :: Configure My Firewall (through Iptables) To Allow Apt-get Features
Apr 26, 2010
I am encountering problems to configure my firewall (through iptables) to allow apt-get features, like update and install.I have the latest debian server running in a virtual machine in my windows xp and therefore I have two interfaces in this debian server:- NAT Interfaceinet: 10.0.2.15- Host Only Interfaceinet: 192.168.56.101So far my iptable rules drop all packets for default, in exception icmp and ssh that I allow to ping and connect from my windows xp. Both of them I use only the Host interface (192...) to connect to another 192... interface on my windows.
Those are working fine, but apt is not. I know, in this very moment it shouldn't. But I made a lot of attempts trying to configure the iptables allow connections through the 80 and 21 ports from/to NAT and Host. I think I made all possible combination (or not, because it didnt work). But I'm wondering if someone more experient can help me solve this problem.
View 11 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 10, 2010
I have to make my final exam on network & security, my task is to compare Iptables and a firewall program, yeah not a distribution. I use Archlinux so I'd like to continue use it for my project! Anyway my question is: which Network firewall could be the best one? I need this features:
- packet filtering
- HA (High Availability)
- Live (active) connection migration (if one fails...)
- Load balancing (not really important but...)
I know "many" firewalls but they all are distro. I need something to install on a linux machine (as said... better if I can run it directly on Archlinux!)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2010
I just install 1 firewall using Iptables.
Firewall includes 2 NIC:
NIC1 <IP PUBLIC>
NIC2 192.168.10.1
I installed 1 web server IP: 192.168.10.2
I have some PC IP range: 192.168.10.10->20
I set rules NAT on firewall and PC & web server can connect internet good, but I have problems:
When PC access to web server with IP 192.168.10.2 that ok, but PC can't access to web server when using IP Public. But outside internet, I can access to web server using IP Public.
Rules on IPTables
Code:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.3.5 on Sun Mar 7 21:01:16 2010
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [950:126970]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [89:5880]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [19:1342]
-A PREROUTING -d 209.99.242.124 -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.10.2:80
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.10.0/24 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 209.99.242.124
*filter
:INPUT DROP [1599:157409]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [232:34452]
-A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -i eth1 -o eth0 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -d 192.168.10.2 -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
COMMIT
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2009
I'm at my wits end at this point.
CentOS 5
iptables 1.4.1.1
APF 9.7
Webmin 1.4.80 (yes i can be a gui noob at times)
I'm currently running a dedicated server that hosts a couple of sites and runs a game server or two. I was using iptables on its own for a while, but recently I'm a target of all sorts of attacks (typically aimed directly at the gameserver on port 7777. UDP flood attacks, etc). I'm also seeing an spike in foreign spam, SSH brutes, and a few people in Turkey thought it would be cute to download files over and over and over I have decided to start banning entire countries, using the subnets listed here [URL]... I'm trying to block Central and South america (189,190,200,201.x.x.x), China, Ukraine, Turkey, Iran, Spain and Italy. I do this because a majority of the traffic from those areas are usually up to no good.
I installed APF so I could easily add these ranges in deny_hosts.rules and be done with it. I added the ranges, which turned out to be too many, and the system tanked. I decreased the amount of ranges to just 4:
189.0.0.0/8
190.0.0.0/8
200.0.0.0/8
201.0.0.0/8
Restarted APF and it loaded fine. Do an apf --list and iptables --list and it shows those 4 ranges as blocked. The only issue...I have people from 190.x and 200.x connecting to the gameserver and PLAYING. Its as if the firewall isnt there. Also, adding those ranges to /etc/hosts.deny (or whatever) doesn't block them either.
I add one of my own ips and I get blocked instantly. WTF?? I look in the iptables for webmin, and it shows an empty firewall. I do iptables --list and it shows the ranges I added in APF. I'm looking at building (or whatever its called) an fresh iptables with the geoip module added in. [URL]...
I've never done anything like this, and I don't want to kill the box. I also don't want to spend the effort if 1) something is wrong with my system to begin with and 2) the geoip module doesn't work. geoip module aside....how exactly should i configure the firewall? Empty iptables completely and then rely on APF for everything? Oh and heres another tidbit: I tried this before 2 years ago and it used to be that anything I put in APF would show when i looked at iptables using the webmin module. Thats no longer the case now. That was also on CentOS 4 when it did that. I don't know if moving to 5 is whats preventing it now.
In a nutshell, I'm new at this and I'm being inundated with terrible people trying to do terrible things and I'm ready to just give up. Can someone just give me a quick rundown on:
1) how to test that my firewall is actually firewalling
2) how I should configure the/a firewall on this CentOS5. Not too specific, I just want to know if I should empty iptables then load apf, should i not bother with APF (i like it when it works), is there a specific order of doing things?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2008
We have a new Bussiness DSL line with 16 public addresses.What we want is to setup a DMZ to run some services and internet to the LAN. Here's a schematic of what we want:
Code:
Backup Internet Main Internet
connection connection
| |
| |
SDSL Modem BDSL Modem
[code]....
The webserver has the following settings:
IP: 12.34.56.125
subnet: 255.255.255.240
gateway: 12.34.56.126
What IPTABLES rules do i need to setup to "see" all IP's in the DMZ-2 from the internet?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2010
I am facing a strange problem witht my iptables as there are some firewall entries stored somewhere which is displaying the below firewall entries even after flushing the iptables & when I restart the iptables service then the firewall entries are again shown in my iptables as shown below,
[root@myhome ~]# iptables -L
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source destination
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2010
I have managed to get iodine working between my ubuntu intrepid box and my windows client with a caveat.
The firewall rules allows DNS queries inbound. The client tunnel endpoint gets assigned an IP address and the tunnel is established properly.
However when I try to ping from the client machine, the reply packets are not coming back.
I used TCPDUMP on the Ubuntu box and watch the dns0 tunnel interface, and noticed that the packets are reaching the Ubuntu box from the client, but I don't see ANY ICMP echo replies until I turn off the firewall from Firestarter.
I see that outbound access rule is to allow all.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2010
IPtables creates an error during startup as well as when I try to restart it: Here's the output of:
[Code]....
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2011
is this possible on 2 Linux boxes will act as a INTERNET Firewall + Filtering: 1st PC = CENTOS 5.5 functions as a firewall using iptables with two NICS 1=ETH0 connected to internet with a public ip and 1=ETH1 with ip address of 10.0.0.1 connected to the 2nd PC Centos 5.5 with squid/dansguardian with ip address of 10.0.0.2
2nd PC = Centos 5.5 functions as a squid + dansguardian internet filtering with 2 NICS 1=ETH0 with ip address of 10.0.0.2 connected to the ETH1 of the 1st PC with ip address of 10.0.0.1 and 2nd ETH1=connected to LAN (172.16.1.0/24)
does this make sense? this might be confusing but I just want to try this, to protect incoming ssh from our previous Sys admins who intended to enter the LAN 172.16.1.0/24 network. And also to confuse them that they have to pass through 10.0.0.1 - 2.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2011
Can we use iptables as firewall instead of Juniper firewall
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2011
I need to restrict access to the internet and keep unwanted software out of LAN with 45 workstations at the school I teach at. I thought about configuring a proxy and firewall on SuSE 11.4?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2010
I'm stuck at server with OpenNA installed, which has no relation with CentOS but If anyone knows GIPTABLES firewall to point me somewhere I can get configuring.I need to open 2 custom ports but I just can't get it to work.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2010
I have tried various rules, like opening port 53 for the DNS with little success. I finally figured that you need to set the source port to 53 and NOT the destination port.However, I have been unable to figure out what ports apt-get requires. The only way I get it to work is to accept everything in iptables.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2011
I have centos with software firewall enable , but i want to set up hardware firewall can anybody guide how to install and configure hardware firewall in centos
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2010
I have a question about telnet.Is there any way to configure a telnet server without disable firewall.I am using redhat 5.2 and fedora 12.I have lack of knowledge about firewall.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2011
I am running a centOS 5.5 server and can't synchronize with time servers via ntpd. My server sits behind a firewall with only port 80 open and I suspect this is the issue. Do I need to open other ports to connect to the time servers at [URL]?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 26, 2010
I'd like to (if it's possible, of course) to redirect the packets originated within a linux box, and I've been tryin' to do it through the OUTPUT chain in nat table:
Code:
iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT -p tcp -d 192.168.0.74 --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.0.17:80
The policy for the rest is ACCEPT.This redirection didn't work this way. If I do lynx http://192.168.0.74:80 I reach 192.168.0.74 host, so there is no redirection.Could I achieve what I'm needing through with IPTABLES' OUTPUT chain (in nat table)?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2010
I am using centos 5.3 , and also using webserver in local network
Here is all configuration
1, server
eth0 , 222.80.1.90 this is live ip
eth1 10.0.0.1
2, webserver
eth0 10.0.0.2
I want set iptables on server 1 , to acces webserver from other city ,
How to configure iptables
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2010
I'm trying to configure a messaging system based on php script with iptables, rsyslog and mysql. In the firewall server Sendmail is istalled so i'd like to use it to receive messages in the main mail server, located in DMZ. In the Lan i've configured another linux server than works perfectly, sending mail messages to the server located in DMZ. After looking for some solution I've tried to configure sendmail to relay mail to the server but the only thing I reached is the following message: "Deferred: Connection refused by mail.server.com" message rest on queue and flushing it reply
[Code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2011
Does the rc.firewall script just use iptables or is that something completely different?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 29, 2010
I need to set up my centOS computer as a firewall in my home network. Ive got 2 interfaces, eth0 and eth1. I want to allow and forward all traffic on eth0 and block all traffic on eth1 except ssh, ping(icmp) and DNS. How do I do this? Ive tried some editing in /etc/sysconfig/iptables but no luck.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2010
I am having a little trouble setting up a NAT firewall using iptables. I have 1 PC dedicated to being the firewall running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS. There are 2 NICs in this PC. One NIC is connected to the modem & the other is hooked into my router, sharing the connection through to the other PC on my LAN. Thing is that I am having troubles setting this up using iptables. I have it sharing the connection, but can't seem to make it forward 2 ports through to my webserver on the LAN. I am also wanting to setup init.d to control iptables. I have been trying to google this, but haven't found anything useful to get this accomplished. I put the following into rc.local to make the forwarding work:
/sbin/iptables -F
/sbin/iptables -N block
/sbin/iptables -A block -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A block -m state --state NEW -i ! eth0 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A block -j LOG
/sbin/iptables -A block -j DROP
/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -j block
/sbin/iptables --table nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2010
Recently I have been working on iptables and trying to understand how to use it. Here's a little script I have written to setup a basic firewall for myself:
Code:
#!/bin/bash
if [ `id -u` -ne 0 ]; then
echo "You need root privilege"
exit 1
fi
PROG=/sbin/iptables
$PROG -F
function sethttp {
echo "Opening http port..."
$PROG -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
}
function sethttps {
echo "Opening https port..."
$PROG -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT
}
function settorrent {
echo "Opening torrent port..."
$PROG -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 52413 -j ACCEPT
}
while getopts "hst" option; do
case "$option" in
h) sethttp;;
s) sethttps;;
t) settorrent;;
*) echo "DOH!"
esac
done
$PROG -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$PROG -A OUTPUT -m state --state NEW,ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
$PROG -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
$PROG -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
$PROG -A INPUT -j DROP
$PROG -A FORWARD -j REJECT
echo "Done setting up the firewall! Enjoy :)"
exit 0
OK, this can take 3 arguments that open ports 80, 443 and 52413. And at the end, some default rules are applied. But here's the thing I don't understand:
if I don't give the argument for port 80, I can still view web pages... and also, when I remove the line:
Code:
$PROG -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
Whether I say it to open port 80 or not, I can't view any web pages.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2010
I had been using Guarddog for iptables but I updated to KDE4 and guarddog does not work with KDE4, neither does Firestarter. Is there a Graphical interface for iptables available that works with KDE4?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2010
I have setup sshd_config for port 3210! I have difficult setup the iptables firewall to allow ssh on port 3210! i always enter this:
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 3210 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 3210 -j ACCEPT
but after i restart ssh, the system do not allow port 3210... why? do i forget something?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2011
this is my first post and I'm a newbie with debian.I have written a simple script for iptables (rc.firewall)
#!/bin/sh
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: Script Firewall for IP-tables
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2011
I am in the process of enabling Samba client and server on my opensuse 11.3 32-bit workstation, and have just looked at the firewall rules (via iptables -L) prior to enabling these applications.I have used iptables a lot before and despite having my network interface defined as being in the External Zone (ie the least trusted, and therefore supposedly the most protected), the first rules in iptables are as follows:
INPUT
target=ACCEPT, prot=all, source=anywhere, dest=anywhere
OUTPUT
[code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2011
In an effort to learn more about firewalls and iptables I have left behind gui set-up tools and have setup a firewall using iptables that logs to its own file. The firewall is as follows:
Code:
*filter
:INPUT DROP [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:TCP - [0:0]
[Code]...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2010
I have a server with 14 IP's on eth0. I'm using virtual interfaces to handle the IP's, but the iptables don't seem to work on the virtual interface. It blocks ports that I want open. I'm not that great with iptables, I use what I have because it works for me, but as far as tweaking it, I'm pretty lost.
My iptables:
# Simple Firewall configuration
#
# Set default policies --------
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
#
# Internal Networks -----------
#-A INPUT -s <private.class.C>/24 -d <private.class.C>/24 -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
#
# Loopback --------------------
-A INPUT -s 0/0 -d 0/0 -i lo -j ACCEPT
#
# Accept established connections
-A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
#
# Services --------------------
#
# For SSH gateway
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
#
# For SMTP gateway
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 25 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
#
# For FTP server
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 20 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 21 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 53 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
#
# HTTP services
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 80 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
#
# HTTPS services
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 443 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
#
# POP-3 services
#-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 110 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
#
# IMAP services
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 143 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
#
#PLESK
#-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 8443 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
#
#Games
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 28960 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 28960 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27666 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27666 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 28961 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 28961 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 28962 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 28962 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27015 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27015 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27016 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27016 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27017 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27017 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27020 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 --dport 27020 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT
# Disallow fragmented packets
-A INPUT -f -j DROP
#
# Log & Block broadcast packets
-A INPUT -d 255.255.255.255/0.0.0.255 -j LOG
-A INPUT -d 255.255.255.255/0.0.0.255 -j DROP
# Log & Block multicast packets
-A INPUT -d 224.0.0.1 -j LOG
-A INPUT -d 224.0.0.1 -j DROP
#
# Log and drop all other incoming packets
-A INPUT -j LOG
-A INPUT -j DROP
#
COMMIT
View 18 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2010
So I know Linux has iptables, I'm rather new to linux, and I'm wondering, are the stock settings with Ubuntu/Kubuntu safe? Is there anything I need to do make them more secure? I tried adding rules myself for some things but ended up just not being able to do anything so I had to reset back to stock with iptables -F. Should I be safe running as-is?
View 4 Replies
View Related
