Networking :: Iptables + Squid + Dansguardian - Boxes Will Act As A INTERNET Firewall + Filtering?
Jan 14, 2011
is this possible on 2 Linux boxes will act as a INTERNET Firewall + Filtering: 1st PC = CENTOS 5.5 functions as a firewall using iptables with two NICS 1=ETH0 connected to internet with a public ip and 1=ETH1 with ip address of 10.0.0.1 connected to the 2nd PC Centos 5.5 with squid/dansguardian with ip address of 10.0.0.2
2nd PC = Centos 5.5 functions as a squid + dansguardian internet filtering with 2 NICS 1=ETH0 with ip address of 10.0.0.2 connected to the ETH1 of the 1st PC with ip address of 10.0.0.1 and 2nd ETH1=connected to LAN (172.16.1.0/24)
does this make sense? this might be confusing but I just want to try this, to protect incoming ssh from our previous Sys admins who intended to enter the LAN 172.16.1.0/24 network. And also to confuse them that they have to pass through 10.0.0.1 - 2.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 23, 2010
I am looking to redesign my network which I'll get into bellow but basically i am looking to setup an transparent/bridged firewall with squid and dansguardian. However, I want to require LDAP authentication to access internet. You'll understand why from diagram below.
My question is, since bridged firewalls operate at layer 2 and have no/require no IP address, can you access higher layered apps with them? Example would be to have the proxy authenticate to LDAP system to check for valid user and valid net permissions, server has to somehow send a reply back, so without an IP, this can't happen right.
Below are two designs I am looking into implementing. Everything Internally will be Authenticated against LDAP with a small possibility of some public servers using LDAP too, but in my way of thinking anything using LDAP would should be behind the router on private link. FYI, the PROXY and the Linux Router would be two physically separate systems. So I guess my second question would be, can systems outside private network access limited internal services securely and be restricted at the same time?
Code:
Option 1:
(TRANSPARENT)
------------ -------------
| CBL MODM | ---------> | PROXY/FW |
------------ -------------
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2010
I want filter some sites on my network by squid .
My Distribution is suse server 11 squid 2.7
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2010
i have the following ip assignments
fedora (iptables)
eth0 -private :192.168.1.1
eth1 -public : 186.117.50.6
squid proxy
192.168.1.10:3128
my clients range
192.168.2.0/24
how can i make my clients to browse internet only from proxy server my network is NAT 'ed. Please specify a iptable rule to allow internet access for my clients to browse ONLY if they come through proxy server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2011
installed dansguardian and now working fine.I got a small problem. People bypassing proxy settings in firefox, means they go to settings and changes proxy settings to no proxy.. how to prevent this? How can I force people to use proxy to connect Internet? I done some googling but, unable to find a solution.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2011
I have a question regarding the use of iptables as sort of a firewall I suppose? Using a linux router which has a server machine connected to it. The router is also acting as a PPTP VPN server, which I would like to allow some friends to connect to so that they can VPN to my LAN.
The question I have is how I might be able to use iptables to apply restrictions to the VPN traffic to only access 1 IP? The server is on the LAN with an IP of lets say 192.168.1.25, and the VPN given IP range is 192.168.1.51-55. The router has the .1 IP, but the PPTP server on that router uses an IP of 192.168.1.50. How might I restrict the traffic from the VPN connections to only be able to access the .25 server, and possibly only on certain ports? I don't want to allow the VPN connections full access to everything on the LAN and especially not to WAN.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2010
My network is:
ISP --> SonicWALL--> Proxy --> LAN
Currently Sonicwall is running VPN, DHCP, port forwarding etc.. in a range of 10.0.0.0/24 and I have tried to configure Squid Proxy for content filtering (using squid 3 Transparent mode on Fedora 10 and Iptables). Now I need to implement the proxy over my network without changing the SonicWALL current settings (VPN, Port forwarding and DHCP).
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2010
Does anyone have tips about iptables rules for filtering network traffice?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2010
I have installed dansguardian and squid on my home computer and I need to configure them. the only problem I couldn't find any manual only one for opensuse 9. And even there the part after "acl CONNECT method CONNECT" doesn't make any sense to me.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2010
I have installed squid and dansguardian on my server, I also setup my iptables to forward port 80 communication to port 3128 (squid). I also have remove the comment on /etc/dansguardian/dansguardianf1.conf (line "bannedextensionlist") hoping that my server would block download. But it isn't, it still download file no matter I add in /etc/dansguardian/lists/bannedextensionlist. Oh yeah, I also add this line to my /etc/squid/squid.conf
Code:
cache_peer 172.16.1.212 parent 8080 0 no-query default
so that squid will consider dansguardian as it's parent.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 15, 2011
I've been pulling my hair out and can't figure out what's wrong. I have dhcp, squid, and dansguardian all running on my server, but when I point a client to it for a proxy (192.168.1.15:8080) and try to get to a website, nothing happens and the connection times out. When I don't bother with the proxy, the client has no trouble getting to the internet. I've verified I can ping the server and gateway from both machines. And the services are running, no errors noted in the logs. Do I need to do any iptables or selinux changes?
My network is very basic, several clients on the same network as the server, connected to a verizon gateway. Local addresses are 192.168.1.x. The server is 192.168.1.15, gateway is 192.168.1.1.
I'm using:
* squid-7:3.1.8-1.fc12 (x86_64)
* dansguardian-2.10.1.1-3.fc12.x86_64
* Fedora 12
My squid config file:
Quote:
#
# Recommended minimum configuration:
#
acl manager proto cache_object
acl localhost src 127.0.0.1/32 ::1
[code]....
View 18 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2011
I have around 9 squid proxy servers and going to deploy Dansguardian on all of them. But I feel managing individual copy/server would be an tedious job hence please let me know if any one aware of centralized management solution for Squid+Dansguardian? Or if not let me know if you are aware of any such other Open Source product.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2010
I have squid running perfectly and I added MySQL Squid Access Report 2.1.4 and the reports works just fine. The problem its when I add a dansguardian content filter, from that moment the only IP address that appears on the report its the box itself (I have all running on the same box).
IPtables forward requests to port 8080 Dansguardian listening on port 8080 forwards to squid on port 3128 Squid on port 3128 to internet (Here I review the logs with MySar).
I know it is because the actual http request for Squid came from Dansguardian's IP address (its the job of the proxy). how to have the real IP address on the reports.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2011
I am trying to learn DansGuardian for content filtering, but for some reasons it is NOT working for me. equest is directly getting routed to SQUID, it should come first to DansGuardian and then to SQUID.I have created the below scenario on CENTOS 5.5 boxes.
Code:
192.168.0.10box1.test.comYUM/HTTP SERVER
192.168.0.20box2.test.comYUM/HTTP CLIENT, SQUID SERVER
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2011
I have a proxy server (squid-3) that I would like to setup Dansguardian to do additional web filtering.
The system:
Ubuntu 10.10 - all updates as of today
Dansguardian - 2.10.1.1-2ubuntu0.1 (latest update)
Squid3 - latest update (not squid 2.7)
Webmin - 1.530 (all updates)
Webmin dansguardian module - 0.7.1
Ok - I have all of the above installed. When I go to the DG module page in Webmin, I get the following:
Warning - the version of DansGuardian you have is not supported by this Webmin module version
Webmin Module Version 0.7.1 supports DG version 2.10 (& 2.9)
Currently installed DG version
This obviously makes no sense, since I am running DG version 2.10.1...
PS. I have squid installed, but not configured (still tinkering) - could this be the problem? That squid needs to be running for DG to work?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2010
I want to block yahoo mail chat in dansguardian. I had google few thing I come to know that I need to do this. Locking DNS lookups to webcs.msg.yahoo and httpcs.msg.yahoo by returning 127.0.0.1. I haven't have dns configured. So what I need to do solve this problem. I had tried by making an entry in etc hosts file. but it didn't worked.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2009
I have configured squid with AD. It is working fine. Now I want to use dansguardian with squid for web filtering on group bases, what should I do. What configuration i have to do in squid for dansguardian and all my users in AD also authenticate with dansguardian and also how I use dansguardian.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2009
can anyone give me the solution how to configure dansguardian on squid transparent proxy.i m using
linux - slackware
squid - squid-2.6-stable18
dansguardian - 2.10.1.1
squid transparent proxy is working properly.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2010
I have Squid and Dans set up on a passthrough box with 2 nics, port 80 requestsEverything is working great. I need to know if there is a way to set up Dansguardian so that a user can enter a password on a blocked page to access it.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 24, 2008
in my office i have to block all messenger like yahoo messenger, windows live messenger, i have to block websites like www.yahoo.com, some more web sites. i need guidance through which i can accomplish this task through ip tables or through squid server. i can use squid but i had heard that squid blocks pop and smtp also. squid creates some problem in receiving and sending email. i am using red hat linux 4 box and installed squid having two ethernet card 1 is connected to adsl line and 2 is connected to switch. all clients will have proxy address of this linux box. guys need ur help ASAP.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2011
Please review my webmin Linux firewall. This is a squid proxy / Firewall / Router. Everything works fine until I change that last line to reject or drop all. Then the traffic behind the firewall that is trying to reach the internet gets borked. I can only assume that something is killing the connections to squid. But everything looks right to me. Here is my prerouting. (please ignore the green box) The red box is the action to be taken following the given rule. But I don't think the problem is in prerouting.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2010
I'm looking to setup a web proxy using squid.I already have a hardware firewall NAT'ing device that all the connections go through.I'm planning to install the squid web proxy on a VM (single nic) and place it behind the hardware firewall as below:internet -- modem -- Firewall --switch--squid proxy (192.168.10.100)--client workstation ((192.168.10.200)(client workstation is connected to the same switch as the squid proxy)And on the client workstation's Internet Explorer: Tools->Options->Connection-Lan Settings and check the box for "Use a proxy server for your LAN then type the address of the squid proxy (192.168.10.100) and set the port to 3128. Check the box for Bypass proxy server for local addresses.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2010
I have to make my final exam on network & security, my task is to compare Iptables and a firewall program, yeah not a distribution. I use Archlinux so I'd like to continue use it for my project! Anyway my question is: which Network firewall could be the best one? I need this features:
- packet filtering
- HA (High Availability)
- Live (active) connection migration (if one fails...)
- Load balancing (not really important but...)
I know "many" firewalls but they all are distro. I need something to install on a linux machine (as said... better if I can run it directly on Archlinux!)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2010
I am encountering problems to configure my firewall (through iptables) to allow apt-get features, like update and install.I have the latest debian server running in a virtual machine in my windows xp and therefore I have two interfaces in this debian server:- NAT Interfaceinet: 10.0.2.15- Host Only Interfaceinet: 192.168.56.101So far my iptable rules drop all packets for default, in exception icmp and ssh that I allow to ping and connect from my windows xp. Both of them I use only the Host interface (192...) to connect to another 192... interface on my windows.
Those are working fine, but apt is not. I know, in this very moment it shouldn't. But I made a lot of attempts trying to configure the iptables allow connections through the 80 and 21 ports from/to NAT and Host. I think I made all possible combination (or not, because it didnt work). But I'm wondering if someone more experient can help me solve this problem.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2010
I just install 1 firewall using Iptables.
Firewall includes 2 NIC:
NIC1 <IP PUBLIC>
NIC2 192.168.10.1
I installed 1 web server IP: 192.168.10.2
I have some PC IP range: 192.168.10.10->20
I set rules NAT on firewall and PC & web server can connect internet good, but I have problems:
When PC access to web server with IP 192.168.10.2 that ok, but PC can't access to web server when using IP Public. But outside internet, I can access to web server using IP Public.
Rules on IPTables
Code:
# Generated by iptables-save v1.3.5 on Sun Mar 7 21:01:16 2010
*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [950:126970]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [89:5880]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [19:1342]
-A PREROUTING -d 209.99.242.124 -i eth0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.10.2:80
-A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.10.0/24 -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source 209.99.242.124
*filter
:INPUT DROP [1599:157409]
:FORWARD DROP [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [232:34452]
-A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -i eth1 -o eth0 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -i eth0 -o eth1 -d 192.168.10.2 -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
COMMIT
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2009
I'm at my wits end at this point.
CentOS 5
iptables 1.4.1.1
APF 9.7
Webmin 1.4.80 (yes i can be a gui noob at times)
I'm currently running a dedicated server that hosts a couple of sites and runs a game server or two. I was using iptables on its own for a while, but recently I'm a target of all sorts of attacks (typically aimed directly at the gameserver on port 7777. UDP flood attacks, etc). I'm also seeing an spike in foreign spam, SSH brutes, and a few people in Turkey thought it would be cute to download files over and over and over I have decided to start banning entire countries, using the subnets listed here [URL]... I'm trying to block Central and South america (189,190,200,201.x.x.x), China, Ukraine, Turkey, Iran, Spain and Italy. I do this because a majority of the traffic from those areas are usually up to no good.
I installed APF so I could easily add these ranges in deny_hosts.rules and be done with it. I added the ranges, which turned out to be too many, and the system tanked. I decreased the amount of ranges to just 4:
189.0.0.0/8
190.0.0.0/8
200.0.0.0/8
201.0.0.0/8
Restarted APF and it loaded fine. Do an apf --list and iptables --list and it shows those 4 ranges as blocked. The only issue...I have people from 190.x and 200.x connecting to the gameserver and PLAYING. Its as if the firewall isnt there. Also, adding those ranges to /etc/hosts.deny (or whatever) doesn't block them either.
I add one of my own ips and I get blocked instantly. WTF?? I look in the iptables for webmin, and it shows an empty firewall. I do iptables --list and it shows the ranges I added in APF. I'm looking at building (or whatever its called) an fresh iptables with the geoip module added in. [URL]...
I've never done anything like this, and I don't want to kill the box. I also don't want to spend the effort if 1) something is wrong with my system to begin with and 2) the geoip module doesn't work. geoip module aside....how exactly should i configure the firewall? Empty iptables completely and then rely on APF for everything? Oh and heres another tidbit: I tried this before 2 years ago and it used to be that anything I put in APF would show when i looked at iptables using the webmin module. Thats no longer the case now. That was also on CentOS 4 when it did that. I don't know if moving to 5 is whats preventing it now.
In a nutshell, I'm new at this and I'm being inundated with terrible people trying to do terrible things and I'm ready to just give up. Can someone just give me a quick rundown on:
1) how to test that my firewall is actually firewalling
2) how I should configure the/a firewall on this CentOS5. Not too specific, I just want to know if I should empty iptables then load apf, should i not bother with APF (i like it when it works), is there a specific order of doing things?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2010
I have slackware 13.0 on my HP 520 laptop.My machine is connected to the internet and it also act as a gateway for other machine of mine.
I want to use mac filtering options of iptables.But i am getting following error
iptables v1.4.3.2: Couldn't load match `ac-source':/usr/libexec/xtables/libipt_ac-source.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2011
Are there any firewalls for Linux that will allow one to block certain ports for a specific application while allowing other programs to use the same port, or block Internet access altogether for specific applications?
Everything based on IPTables apparently can only block ports globally for all applications. SELinux is the only thing I've found so far that might have application-level Internet blocking capability, but it serves a broader array of security purposes and seems too complex for this task.
I don't need interactive popups like with Windows personal firewalls. I'm OK with having to edit a config file. This is for personal desktop Linux use, not a server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2011
i have configured the squid for my lan. My lan has three redhat 5.3 web servers. Now by using proxy server, i wish to give access to external clients for my web server and restrict to local client, accessing wan through port 80
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2010
I would like to be able to get squid or dansguardian to authenticate a user account against active directory so that a users browsing activities can be logged.
I can find lots a very useful info on how to set up ntlm_auth etc, but all of these methods produce a pop up window when the user launches the browser.
I'm posting this thread because I would like to be able to authenicate, but without a pop up window. Is there a way of automatically carrying out this authentication so that the user is unaware of it.
We've previously attempted authenticating against an NT4 PDC, but the users worked out that they could use any user account on the network, not just the user that was logged in which kinda defeated the whole idea of logging the users activity.
My current setup is:
Windows 2003 AD
Windows XP Clients, soon to be converted to windows 7.
Fedora 11 running squid and dansguardian.
View 2 Replies
View Related
