I am unable to create above vsftpd site with port '21'. Below is the problem,
# vsftpd vsftpd-site1.conf &
[1] 14448
500 OOPS: could not bind listening IPv4 socket
I wonder, i can able to create above FTP site with another port (example, listen_port=60001 ). In Linux(vsftpd), can i use default ftp port '21' for multiple FTP sites?
how to block multiples ports from my internal lan going out to the internet?, I want to prevent LAN user's in accessing this kind of ports for example port from 1500-10000.
im making a personal firewall script, im just testing it for just curiositie's sake.
will i use the foreward chain policy?? to drop all packets, like port 1500:10000 note '#' stands for root
#iptables -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.1/24 -p tcp --dport 1500:10000 -j DROP #iptables -A FORWARD -s 192.168.0.1/24 -p udp --dport 1500:10000 -j DROP
I have a system running 9.10 configured with Firestarter acting as a router. We have multiple Xbox 360's on the network. Unless some ports are forwarded, the Xbox has a NAT type of "Moderate". I have been able to set an Xbox with a Static IP and forward the necessary ports for that IP, which allows the Xbox's NAT to become "Open." My question is, how do I do this for multiple Xboxs? If the follow the same procedure for additional Xboxes, only one Xbox at a time can have an "Open" NAT type, and the rest would be "Moderate". The ports the Xbox uses cannot be changed via the Xbox.
Now that I've set up an FTP server here at home I'm thinking that it might be a good idea to change from the default Port 21 to something else. Can I use any port I desire or are there only certain ports that support this protocol?
I used pptpd in cent os 5.4I want to change the default port 1723 of pptpd to 1813I chnage the pptpd port in service file to 1813 but ppp dont worknote : in ms vpn client i change the port to 1813
I currently have a single mysql instance for a couple of websites. Both websites require that the user provide a username.
The thing I just noticed is that two people might choose the same username for both applications. Both of them would have grants to each others' tables, although neither would ever be able to access them, since they can only access through php scripts.
But, I'm now guessing this is not best practice. What does one do? Run multiple instances of mysql for several websites?
In SuSE firewall0. I do have a openSuse 11.4 and multiple IP addresses on eth0 interface
I run (trying to/have to) multiple TOMCAT servers.
I am trying to have each tomcat instance listen to on separate IP address for example:
What i am trying to do is to redirect
a) tomcat 1 -
a) tomcat 2 -
And so on.
I know that it has to be possible.
I do have just eth0/
Is is it possible. Do I have to create "vittual interfaces"? eth0:1, .......... and do redirection ?
"Server" has got just single interface - just 1 ethernet calbe goes to that server. I am planning to have 10-15 tomcat's on that server (I have to unfortunatley) and each has to run on port 80
Is it possible to "grant" permissions to normal users to run app on port 80 - that would solve me lots of problems if impossible to redirect.
I tried to setcap 'cap_net_bind_service=+ep' /path/to/tomcat ...... but no luck
I have managed to configure AWstats to work from one server to access the log files for multiple websites on multiple servers and even managed to write a little front end php site to access all the different conf files. I want to know if there is a way of combing two conf files for the same site but are on two different servers in a loadbalanced situation. so my conf files look something like: [URL].. I have to monitor bandwidth for our websites and its gets tedious switching between the various conf files for the same site and totaling it up so I was hoping I could combine the output of both conf files on screen using some funky command in the awstats.pl script
I've currently got a centos server setup in my home. It has 1 website running on it and I am using DynDNS.com's service to access the server. DynDNS works by redirecting a free url to the IP address of your server. I would like to add a second website under a different url. However, I'm not sure how to add a second IP address (which I would then use with DynDNS to create a new url).
I'm setting up a server on Ubuntu 10.04 for development. It all seems to work nicely, I just have one thing that's bugging me. I have a project in /var/www/portfolio, which is as you may guess my portfolio. Instead of the link http://localhost/portfolio I'd like to use http://portfolio.nl. So I set up a file 'portfolio.nl' under sites-available and a symlink on sites-enabled containing this: To get this to work on my local machine I set up this in /etc/hosts:
I am trying add three namebased virtual hosts in local apache2 webserver OS ubuntu 10.10. The three sites are :www.site1.eka,www.site2.eka,www.site2.eka
The first I created a file is virtual.conf in conf.d directory its content is : # we're running multiple virtual hosts. # NameVirtualHost *:80
Next I created following files in sites-available directory. [URL] is as follows: #site1.eka (/etc/apache2/sites-available/www.site1.eka) <VirtualHost *:80> ServerAdmin webmaster@site1.eka ServerName www.site1.eka ServerAlias site1.eka .....
When I visit the [URL] in browser it says server not found.
I need to find a solution where I can monitor multiple sites at once and know when they go down. There are fraudulent sites (not mine I am in the infosec industry)
I have been playing with Nagios and Zabbix all day with not much luck. I have managed to get both installed and running and researched for hours. I just need to figure out how to add domain names to be monitored and I am stuck. I know you have to do it in the conf files but I cannot get a domain to show up?
I have this intra net server project going on and now I moved to 10.04 however there are still some things that I would like to see clarification and instructions on. I am interested to set up multiple parallel websites for my apache server, however I am not sure how to do this exactly. Now I have solid address rivera.wippies.net and port 80 redirecting to my server. What I would like to get done is that I get multiple independent of each other websites for my server I was thinking of making websites like this
/var/www/site1 (which would be as rivera.wippies.net) /var/www/site2 (which would be as rivera.wippies.net/othersite) /var/www/site3 (which would be rivera.wippies.net/secondothersite)
etc, so that I have multiple "individual" websties for my server. Requirements would be that each of these websites could have SSL encryption as needed available too, since some of the website could have confidential information.
I currently am running 10.04.1 and have successfully setup my home web server to run a single website. My current settings are:
-I have registered the domain name annarrankings.com through godaddy -A record is - host = @ and points to = 71.114.220.3 -CName is - host = www and points to = @ -on my server I have the site running in /var/www
I've done some research and found that to run multiple websites I need to setup VirtualHost.
-So I created a folder /var/www/annarrankings.com and moved my site to that folder
-Edited Apache2.conf to add the following line
-I then went to /etc/apache2/sites-enabled and copied the default file to a new file called annarrankings.com. Here's the annarrankings.com file after I edited it
-I then created a link in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled to the annarrankings.com file in /etc/apache2/sites-available
-Next I editied /etc/hosts
-When i went to enable the site using a2ensite annarrankings.com I got the following
I figured this was ok since I had already created a symbolic link earlier (a result of trying to following multiple tutorials and ..... videos at once) so I reloaded apache2. I created an index.html file in /var/www/ just for testing purposes and when I load www.annarrankings.com I get the file located in /var/www/ instead of the website located in /var/www/annarrankings.com Do I need to change my A record or CName in godaddy or did I just do this completely wrong?
I want to do a simple port redirect, i.e. whatever comes trough whatever interface on port AAAA will get redirected to port BBBBI thought that iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING --source 0/0 --destination 0/0 -p tcp --dport AAAA -j REDIRECT --to-ports BBBBhowever it doesn't work, e.g. nc -v -w2 -z localhost AAAA gives:
nc: connect to localhost port AAAA (tcp) failed: Connection refused while nc -v -w2 -z localhost BBBB
Im trying to setup multiple domU through the default bridge setup. I am able to access only one of them through the network at a time. If you ping one of the domU it works perfectly but you cannot ping any of the others until you stop pinging the one and even then it takes a bit before you can. Ive looked around for a while and seen similar problems but nothing ever seems quite the same. Im probably missing something really stupid. Or is this the way the bridge is supposed to behave? Do i need to use a routed virtual network?
I have 2 xbee explorer USB boards hooked into my Acer Netbook running 10.04.e successfully mapped the /dev/tty/USB0 and set it up as com2 to use with X-CTU XBee software. It works. WHen I try to have a 2nd USB explorer board and do the same mapping thy both show as the same manufacturer so the same address(006). Even though the second reads as /dev/tty/USB1. Has anybody ran into this situation as well
A deamon say ssh will be listening on port 22. when a new connection is requested by the client, it will be authenticated and a new connection gets establihed with some port say 1025. And ssh will continue to listen on 22 for new connections.If I am correct then in my machine I observed following connections are establised to ssh port 22, As per my understanding connection should be established on a different port other than 22.
Is there any limitation to the number of transactions through a single port if so then if we assign multiple port to that particular service then the performance is increased (what i suppose)
so: Is there any way to assign multiple Ports to a single service. like for a web server the main service is httpd or some thing like that to be running on the server and now if we assign multiple ports to that service then the performance increases.
I'm attempting to write an application that needs to read and reply to messages that will appear via 3 different methods:
1) Standard serial communications 2) TCPIP over serial via PPP 3) TCPIP over Ethernet
The problem is that I'd like for the application to be able to receive packets from any and all of the three interfaces simultaneously. I shouldnt have much trouble with performing #1 and #3 at the same time, as I think I can just get a file descriptor from termios and another for a socket and then use select to wait for data. But #2 is problematic.
First I dont know how to set up a socket that uses PPP as the data link layer. And secondly, (here's the big one) this PPP data is coming over the same port that the serial data is. There's no chance for data collision, and I am guaranteed not to receive another packet until I respond to the last one (in the same protocol at that) but incoming packets may or may not be PPP/TCP/IP framed.
My app will act like the PPP client, so I was just thinking "somehow" that I could run a standard termios application on the serial port which would begin to interpret the packet. If its PPP framed then it would have to get passed to a PPP client, which would be listening to my application rather than a physical port. And I have no idea how to do that. Is there an API available that will help me with the PPP packets?
How hard would it be to write a device driver that simulates a serial port. The device can listen on a real serial port, interpret its contents to an extent, and then distribute the incoming data to multiple "virtual" serial ports, which the main application can then listen to for incoming traffic.
I was having no problems (that I knew of) browsing the web since installing Ubuntu 10.10 a week or so ago. I was previously trialling Win7 as my customers will likely be using that in the future. Then I wanted to go to internode.on.net. Got the following: Quote: Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at internode.on.net. or Quote: Oops! Google Chrome could not connect to internode.on.net
As it was just after Christmas I thought it must be down, for upgrades or maintenance etc. I later tried to go to Freebsd.org; same error. I've been having a small number of other websites give the same error. I thought nothing of this until I tried it on my wife's macpro. I could log onto all the websites I wanted to and none gave any indication of having been down. Both boxes are on the same adsl connection. I still can't access internode or freebsd on 10.10 yet have been able to access every website on OSX. Now, I was only looking at them for info but am worried I won't be able to access something important. (so far everything I 'need' is working)
ping just drops out. edit: weirdest thing! I just retried and now can not emulate the problem for internode. freebsd still won't show. that is less than five minutes between problems and resolution! I hadn't even posted! But I still would like to have an idea of what is going on. Here is the ping error for freebsd: Quote:
everything works fine. I can log in, and local port forwarding is done. Otherwise when I use the command:
ssh user@ssh_server -R 5500:localhost:5500 -p 22
I get an error "remote port forwarding failed for listen port 5500". However when I try remote port forwarding in WinXP by use of putty there is no problem...
I was having trouble setting up a db connection from my local machine to a db server that was configured to only accept connections from machines behind its own subnet. I had trouble setting up a multiple hop tunnel for chaining port forwarding through my firewall machine on the same subnet as the db. My first attempt involved two port forwards, on localhost and on the firewall machine, which didn't work for me. This approach I found at URL... involved constructing an end to end connection to the db via the firewall machine.
