General :: Glibc-2.3.5 Install Error
Aug 21, 2009Now i am installing glibc-2.3.5
The problem is:
Now i am installing glibc-2.3.5
The problem is:
I've been working to get gcc up and running on a new install of Fedora 13. glibc-devel had dependencies upon installation where it required glibc and glibc-common, both 2.12.1-3. No problem, found both at rpm dot pbone dot net. However, when I try to install the following circular dependency results... it doesn't matter the order of install.
Code:
[root AT localhost gcc_install]# rpm -ivh glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64 .rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.12.1-3 is needed by glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64
[code]....
I have installed Zimbra 6.0.1 and updated to Zimbra 7.1.0, the problem is that it needs the glibc-2.10 to start one of its services. I tried everything but i'dont get to update the glibc.
View 1 Replies View RelatedOS : Oracle Enter Prise Linux 6 (equivalent to RedHat)
I am in process to install oracle 10g on said OS.My process fails and after digging up , I came to know that some of the oracle libraries are compiled on 32-bit architecture and it require glibc-32 bit . also it require for gcc-32 bit.
Now i have downloaded all the required rpm for gcc-32bit . when I try to install glibc and its dependencies , it gives me error that newer version already exist.
How can I install , Gcc-32bit(libgc, libstd-i386 etc) in parallel or standalone?
I need to compile glibc.
What is this error ?
Code:
Hi I am getting this error::
*** glibc detected *** ./a.out: free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x084ed538 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/libc.so.6[0x4df851]
[code]....
Error message: GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference. What can I do?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am a non-root user on my Lab computer with RHEL4 OS and am trying to install Glibc-2.11.1 on it .. for proper installation I used a directory other than the source directory of Glibc and ran configure which was fine, then I ran make which also ran fine.. but when I ran "make install" an error came up which was :
make subdir=nscd -C nscd ..=../ subdir_install
make[2]: Entering directory `/data/sandy/Desktop/Gotten/glibc-2.11.1/nscd'
gcc -pie -Wl,-O1 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -o /data/sandy/Desktop/Gotten/glibc-build/nscd/nscd -Wl,-dynamic-linker=/data/sandy/program2/glibc/lib/ld-
[Code].....
so I guess I don't need to specify the configparms .. but anyway I did it as earlier I wasn't sure what would solve my problem with NSCD.. Then I moved to make and all went fine, but the same error popped up during "make install"
install the Glibc package being a non-root user?
I have a NAS (dlink-320) with a fully working fun_plug (http://wiki.dns323.info/) Linux system.However when I try to install x263 the configuration scripts says it need the math function log2f()But because fun_plug uses uClib instead of glibc and uClib have not yet implemented log2f() function I am trying to compile the glibc instead. I am only interested in the math part of glibc but have not found any documentation to just compile this part so it seems that I have to compile "most" of it. have gli
I have copied glibc-ports-2.9/sysdeps/arm to glibc-2.11.2/sysdeps.and I enter
Code:
../configure --prefix=/ffp --libdir=/ffp/lib --includedir=/ffp/include --enable-shared --build=arm-linux
but get the following error message
[code]....
Yesterday, I think I did something stupid: I removed kernel-headers, gcc, glibc-devel and glibc-headers. My box is a CentOS 5.4 webserver (it has loads of packages installed, but that was done through Virtualmin config, so it's quite coherent all in all). The thing is that now I need to reinstall at least the headers and glibc, but hey! this is what I get :
[Code]...
Code: [root@test ank]# uname -a
Linux test.testbox.com 2.6.9-67.0.0.0.1.ELhugemem #1 SMP Sun Nov 18 00:31:12 EST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I am unable to install glibc-2.3.4-2.41.i386.rpm
ode: [root@test ank]# rpm -Uvh glibc-2.3.4-2.41.i386.rpm
warning: glibc-2.3.4-2.41.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID b38a8516
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.3.4-2.41 is needed by glibc-2.3.4-2.41.i386
glibc = 2.3.4-2.39 is needed by (installed) glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39.i386
glibc = 2.3.4-2.39 is needed by (installed) glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39.i386
glibc = 2.3.4-2.39 is needed by (installed) glibc-utils-2.3.4-2.39.i386
I notice that these two packages contain the same files and uninstalling glibc-i18n doesn't uninstall the internationalization files, because they are also in the glibc package. Is this a mistake or is this normal or is there a reason for it ? I just made my own glibc package to fix this, but was wondering why this is the way it is...
View 7 Replies View RelatedI made an update of my Centos 5.5 yesterday. In doing so glibc has been updated to glibc.i686. Just now some of my FPGA tools crash. Unfortunately there isn't a downgrade for glibc.i686. How can I replace glibc.i686 by glibc.i386?A simple yum install glibc.i386 conflicts with the files from package glibc-2.5-65.i686
yum list glibc
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
[code]....
I am in very much need to resolve the issue of Upgrade redhat5 from glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7. The problem is when I run a binary compiled on our build setup (glibc 2.11) on Suse 11 (glibc 2.9) it works fine...
But the same binary do not work on redhat enterprise version 5 telling error as need glibc2.7 or sometimes segmentation fault for the same binary execution.
I tried upgrading the redhat glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7, but not successful.
/usr/dlc/bin/_progress: relocation error; symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time referrence
And the solution offered is:
But the problem still exists.
If I use 2.4.20 I get an error about shared "something" in library and I cannot use command line like using command as ll, ls, mkdir but if I change that to 2.6.18 I get the error above but I can now use these commands: ll, ls, mkdir, etc.
I'm using Progress 9.1D and the application was compiled using CENTOS 4.4. Now I just copied the Progress 9.1D as is to new server HP Proliant ML110 G5 with CENTOS 5.2 installed.
Copying Progress 9.1D to other computers (IDE and not SATA drivers) with CENTOS 4.4 installed has no problem. Everything runs.
Could this be due to GLIBC version. Progress application was compiled using GLIBC version 2.3.4 but my GLIBC now is version 2.5.
If this is the case, can I just copy GLIBC version 2.3.4 and put it in my ProliantML110G5 server? If not how do I do it? Downloading and installing etc.
i have a error in my vpsError: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-49.el5_5.2 is needed by package nscd-2.5-49.el5_5.2.i386 (updates)
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using CENTOS 5.3, I want to upgrade glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7.
how to do it.
I am not getting from where to start
I'm trying to install the latest debug flashplayer available here:
[URL]
linked from this page
[URL]
I follow the embedded instructions and this is the error:
root@vostro-ubuntu:~# /home/berrie/work/download/install_flash_player_10_linux/flashplayer-installer
[: 258: closing paren expected
ERROR: Your glibc library is older than 2.3.
[code]....
I'm running Ubuntu Karmic Koala and it is up to date.
Could it be that the flash installer parses the version number wrong as previously it was glibc-2.9-1, a '9' after the dot, now there is a '1'.
hey dude error in gnu c pointer
I am using Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.0.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main()
{
char * cp = NULL;
[Code].....
I'm running my own repository for my CentOS servers and ran into problem which seems to be on the 32bit boxes only. When trying to patch, I get the following dependency error.
[Code]....
I want to install glibc-utils on debain . but I can't find it by apt-get .my friend can install it on redhat. how to install glibc-utils on debian.
View 8 Replies View RelatedLinux debian 2.6.26-2-686
i686 GNU/Linux
ATI Install pre-reqs:
Code:
Message when installing:
Code:
How do I get a new version of glibc installed?
I thought it would be something like:
# apt-get install glibc2.4
or
# apt-get -s install glibc2.*
It turns out it was just a typo in the app. 2.10 is viewed as 2.1 Got it working now.
today I've got an application which is need glibc-2.1 32bit but my opensuse 11.2 is 64bit.I've checked the yast but nothing interesting catch my eyes. is there any solution to install glibc 2.1 32bit on a 64bit box?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIt seems I have some problem with glibc i686 on my VIA CPU. How can I force to install glibc i386.rpm instead of i686 in the clean installation process?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to build the glibc-2.3.6 (with debug symbols) for a powerpc system. I need to compile this libraries with gcc 4.1.1 and binutils 2.16.1.
All my tentatives fails and I don't know how to start with the process of building.
It is possible to port the (only) libthread.so from the glibc 2.xx (with mipsel cross-compiler) or do I carry the whole glibc. I need the nptl library on my mips(el) target
View 1 Replies View RelatedIn a chroot einvironment i am trying to compile gcc but is says that i need a newer version of glibc, but i have the newest version of it. i think somehow it trys to use the older glibc from the ubuntu install im makeing it on.
View 1 Replies View RelatedSuppose you have glibc 2.5 compiled with kernel headers 2.6.18. Is it safe to run this glibc with Linux kernel 2.6.32? Is it safe to run this glibc with Linux kernel 2.6.9?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've been looking further into Linux from Scratch, and I am particularly interested in the package management side of the system. I understand that this is not covered in the book, but if I were to attempt LFS, package management would be a major convenience. From what I have read, when upgrading packages like glibc, you have to recompile everything to reflect the change.
If that is true, how do package managers like pacman and apt get around this issue? Isn't lacking glibc for even the time it takes to replace the files catastrophic to the system?
I want to install the media-player vlc 1.0.6 on my system.My Linux version is Linpus. The package's name ended with tar.bz2 so I tried to install it from source. I don't know how to update the glibc run.time and I don't understand the alternative suggestion. What should I do?
View 3 Replies View Related