I want to install the media-player vlc 1.0.6 on my system.My Linux version is Linpus. The package's name ended with tar.bz2 so I tried to install it from source. I don't know how to update the glibc run.time and I don't understand the alternative suggestion. What should I do?
View 3 RepliesOS : Oracle Enter Prise Linux 6 (equivalent to RedHat)
I am in process to install oracle 10g on said OS.My process fails and after digging up , I came to know that some of the oracle libraries are compiled on 32-bit architecture and it require glibc-32 bit . also it require for gcc-32 bit.
Now i have downloaded all the required rpm for gcc-32bit . when I try to install glibc and its dependencies , it gives me error that newer version already exist.
How can I install , Gcc-32bit(libgc, libstd-i386 etc) in parallel or standalone?
I am a non-root user on my Lab computer with RHEL4 OS and am trying to install Glibc-2.11.1 on it .. for proper installation I used a directory other than the source directory of Glibc and ran configure which was fine, then I ran make which also ran fine.. but when I ran "make install" an error came up which was :
make subdir=nscd -C nscd ..=../ subdir_install
make[2]: Entering directory `/data/sandy/Desktop/Gotten/glibc-2.11.1/nscd'
gcc -pie -Wl,-O1 -nostdlib -nostartfiles -o /data/sandy/Desktop/Gotten/glibc-build/nscd/nscd -Wl,-dynamic-linker=/data/sandy/program2/glibc/lib/ld-
[Code].....
so I guess I don't need to specify the configparms .. but anyway I did it as earlier I wasn't sure what would solve my problem with NSCD.. Then I moved to make and all went fine, but the same error popped up during "make install"
install the Glibc package being a non-root user?
I've been working to get gcc up and running on a new install of Fedora 13. glibc-devel had dependencies upon installation where it required glibc and glibc-common, both 2.12.1-3. No problem, found both at rpm dot pbone dot net. However, when I try to install the following circular dependency results... it doesn't matter the order of install.
Code:
[root AT localhost gcc_install]# rpm -ivh glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64 .rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc = 2.12.1-3 is needed by glibc-common-2.12.1-3.x86_64
[code]....
I notice that these two packages contain the same files and uninstalling glibc-i18n doesn't uninstall the internationalization files, because they are also in the glibc package. Is this a mistake or is this normal or is there a reason for it ? I just made my own glibc package to fix this, but was wondering why this is the way it is...
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have installed Zimbra 6.0.1 and updated to Zimbra 7.1.0, the problem is that it needs the glibc-2.10 to start one of its services. I tried everything but i'dont get to update the glibc.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI made an update of my Centos 5.5 yesterday. In doing so glibc has been updated to glibc.i686. Just now some of my FPGA tools crash. Unfortunately there isn't a downgrade for glibc.i686. How can I replace glibc.i686 by glibc.i386?A simple yum install glibc.i386 conflicts with the files from package glibc-2.5-65.i686
yum list glibc
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
[code]....
I'm a newbie in Linux . what are the necessary commands for software engineering ?
View 13 Replies View RelatedI am in very much need to resolve the issue of Upgrade redhat5 from glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7. The problem is when I run a binary compiled on our build setup (glibc 2.11) on Suse 11 (glibc 2.9) it works fine...
But the same binary do not work on redhat enterprise version 5 telling error as need glibc2.7 or sometimes segmentation fault for the same binary execution.
I tried upgrading the redhat glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7, but not successful.
I am using CRON to create a new, blank file, every minute, in a specific location on my web server. After web searching, and reading man pages, I get the impression that the following command is supposed to work:touch /home/mydomain/var/folder/attachments/`date +%H%M`.txtThis should give me a new file with a file name that is the current hour and minute.However, when executed, the CRON mailer reports:touch /home/mydomain/var/folder/attachments/`date +/bin/sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching /bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of fileSo, it looks like shell is seeing the plus (+) sign as an EOFObviously, nothing get created.What would be the easiest, single line command to create an empty file, at a given location, with a time based file name
View 5 Replies View RelatedAnyone have a ksh solution to convert julian date to gregorian date?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am using CENTOS 5.3, I want to upgrade glibc 2.5 to glibc 2.7.
how to do it.
I am not getting from where to start
How would i find the installation date of my OS.
View 5 Replies View Relatedhow and where to find the linux installation date in machine, is there are any logs,file, date time stamp.
let us say centos 5.x or 4.x fedora if talk about
Can one perform an installation of CentOS 5 (5.4) so that the system is up-to-date at the time of the first boot (i.e. Anaconda will pull and install the 'latest' versions of the packages directly, and the user needn't run `yum update` | `yum upgrade` after the system has been installed)?
If this is doable at all, is it possible to accomplish without making use of a personally custom-crafted-and-hosted repository (i.e. can one of the official CentOS mirrors be used)?
Also, I'm not talking about creating an install DVD containing the latest versions of the packages, but rather, if the netinstall media can be used to perform this particular type of installation.
Yesterday, I think I did something stupid: I removed kernel-headers, gcc, glibc-devel and glibc-headers. My box is a CentOS 5.4 webserver (it has loads of packages installed, but that was done through Virtualmin config, so it's quite coherent all in all). The thing is that now I need to reinstall at least the headers and glibc, but hey! this is what I get :
[Code]...
I'm trying to install the latest debug flashplayer available here:
[URL]
linked from this page
[URL]
I follow the embedded instructions and this is the error:
root@vostro-ubuntu:~# /home/berrie/work/download/install_flash_player_10_linux/flashplayer-installer
[: 258: closing paren expected
ERROR: Your glibc library is older than 2.3.
[code]....
I'm running Ubuntu Karmic Koala and it is up to date.
Could it be that the flash installer parses the version number wrong as previously it was glibc-2.9-1, a '9' after the dot, now there is a '1'.
I somehow landed into this situation (don't really remember how), but no package installation/removal seems to be possible for me. Neither apt-get -f install or autoremove seems to work.
When I do: sudo apt-get -f install I see the following:
- uname -a: Linux konnichiwa 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 20:53:41 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux (Jaunty 9.04, Ubuntu)
- Configuring libc6 screen with <yes>, <no> appears.
- Click on <yes>.
- It fails with this error:
Code:
konnichiwa% ruby apt-get install -f
ruby: No such file or directory -- apt-get (LoadError)
konnichiwa% ruby apt-get -f install
ruby: No such file or directory -- apt-get (LoadError)
konnichiwa% sudo apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libc6
Suggested packages:
glibc-doc
The following packages will be upgraded:
libc6
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1025 not upgraded.
1 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/4776kB of archives.
After this operation, 217kB disk space will be freed.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 146055 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.8~20080505-0ubuntu9 (using .../libc6_2.9-23_amd64.deb) ...
Checking for services that may need to be restarted...
Checking init scripts...
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.9-23_amd64.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/locale', which is also in package belocs-locales-bin
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.9-23_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
I'm trying to build the glibc-2.3.6 (with debug symbols) for a powerpc system. I need to compile this libraries with gcc 4.1.1 and binutils 2.16.1.
All my tentatives fails and I don't know how to start with the process of building.
I need to compile glibc.
What is this error ?
Code:
Hi I am getting this error::
*** glibc detected *** ./a.out: free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x084ed538 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/libc.so.6[0x4df851]
[code]....
Now i am installing glibc-2.3.5
The problem is:
It is possible to port the (only) libthread.so from the glibc 2.xx (with mipsel cross-compiler) or do I carry the whole glibc. I need the nptl library on my mips(el) target
View 1 Replies View RelatedIn a chroot einvironment i am trying to compile gcc but is says that i need a newer version of glibc, but i have the newest version of it. i think somehow it trys to use the older glibc from the ubuntu install im makeing it on.
View 1 Replies View RelatedError message: GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference. What can I do?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSuppose you have glibc 2.5 compiled with kernel headers 2.6.18. Is it safe to run this glibc with Linux kernel 2.6.32? Is it safe to run this glibc with Linux kernel 2.6.9?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've been looking further into Linux from Scratch, and I am particularly interested in the package management side of the system. I understand that this is not covered in the book, but if I were to attempt LFS, package management would be a major convenience. From what I have read, when upgrading packages like glibc, you have to recompile everything to reflect the change.
If that is true, how do package managers like pacman and apt get around this issue? Isn't lacking glibc for even the time it takes to replace the files catastrophic to the system?
Code: [root@test ank]# uname -a
Linux test.testbox.com 2.6.9-67.0.0.0.1.ELhugemem #1 SMP Sun Nov 18 00:31:12 EST 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux I am unable to install glibc-2.3.4-2.41.i386.rpm
ode: [root@test ank]# rpm -Uvh glibc-2.3.4-2.41.i386.rpm
warning: glibc-2.3.4-2.41.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID b38a8516
error: Failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.3.4-2.41 is needed by glibc-2.3.4-2.41.i386
glibc = 2.3.4-2.39 is needed by (installed) glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.39.i386
glibc = 2.3.4-2.39 is needed by (installed) glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.39.i386
glibc = 2.3.4-2.39 is needed by (installed) glibc-utils-2.3.4-2.39.i386
I have the tar file of glibc-2.12.1, but now I want to edit the SPEC file. I can't find it. For those that want a "why", I'm trying to make it smaller. So simply, where is the SPEC file for glibc? (rpmbuild cannot find it in the *.tar.gz file).
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for a method for modifying some jpg photo files last modification date with the corresponding timestamp creation date of each file.The reason is that shotwell import pictures in folders according to last modification date which is stupid on my opinion.
View 2 Replies View Related