Our system has a large number of init scripts (over 180). When we reboot it, we need it to be reachable over the network before all the init scripts load, so putting the routes in rc.local does not work. What's the best place to put the routes so that they get added as soon as possibe?
View 4 RepliesHow do I add a route that doesn't go away after a reboot? I tried adding to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-wlan0 and /etc/sysconfig/static-routes but neither of them did anything when I restarted network and NetworkManager. route command does not show the new route that I added. I tried this too - routes.html and there were no errors but the new route doesn't show up with the route command.I added "192.168.13.88/255.255.255.255 via 192.168.13.101 dev wlan0"
View 2 Replies View RelatedIm am building a Linux distro. It will be very tiny and fast.
I only have a minimal linuxkernel (bzImage) who is 1,2 mb big. And then I have Busybox who is 174,6 kb big.
The commands in busybox is: cd, ls, mkdir, rmdir, wget, httpd, clear, rm, poweroff, halt, reboot, fdisk, mount, umount, free, and cp.
When I compiled the kernel i use initramfs/initrd function and point it to a folder where initrd/initramfs source is.
The kernel works OK with others initramfs/initrd files. But not with my own.
Quote:
Here is how the end of the kernelcomplie look like.
Quote:
Here is my init file who is the initrd/initramfs source.
Quote:
The initramfs folder contains "bin" (folder) and "init" a file. No more.
The problem is that the kernel cannot find/read init file.
I need to setup my ubuntu pc single nic card ip as 192.168.1.6 for internet and 10.172.170.95 and 135.10.86.100 for my lan and for another network through my 4port DSL modem.So i defined like this.Except addition of last two routes(10.0.0.0/8 & 200.200.176.0/24) everything worked as defined, what is the mistake i did?
In /etc/network/interfaces file
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback[code]............
I've been dual booting 10.10 with Windows7 for about a month. Today is the first time I've encountered a serious problem.
This morning, nothing functioned properly after trying to open several programs. The computer seemed to be "frozen", although the mouse was working fine.
I decided to reboot, but then encountered an even bigger problem.
It failed to boot and got this message: no init found. try passing init= bootarg
The problem now is that it requires a Live CD session and I keep getting this: GLib-WARNING **: getpwuid_r(): failed due to unknown user id (0)
In case it matters, I didn't install 10.10 from an ISO, I just upgraded from 10.04.
Ubuntu 9.10 will not boot! System froze this morning, I restarted and it is now failing to boot. Starts loading grub and I get this message:
mount: mounting /dev/disk/by-uuid/04aa3697-7bc0-45b5-b86a-77a1e6534bd5 on /root failed: invalid argument
mount: mounting /sys on /root/sys failed: no such file or directory
mount: mounting /dev on /root/sys failed: no such file or directory
[code]....
I booted with 9.04 LiveCD discovered the drive could not be mounted-ran fsck -ln and it told me the drive has no valid partition table. I have had intermittent problems mounting flash drives before this, so I'm kind of worried it might be a hardware issue.Also have files on that drive I would rather not lose, so reinstalling is hopefully a last resort.
me the difference between /etc/init.d scripts and /etc/init.d/rc?.d scripts.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have written an init script and placed it in /etc/init.d/ directory.What I would like to know is, will the script run automatically or we need to install the script using "install_initd" command.If I have to invoke this command manullay, what will be the best place to do this ? Can I add this to "/etc/init.d/rcS" file
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to boot Emdebian lenny on my compact flash and it shows the following errors during boot time :
Code:
Mounting local filesystems ... done .
/etc/rc.d/S35mountall.sh : line 45 : uname : command not found .
[code]...
openSUSE 10.3 on Itronix IX260+ Stuck on command line, init 3, and all attempts at graphic init 5 fail. Get these messages:(EE) No devices detected; Fatal screen error: no screens found; AIGLX disabled Primary Device is PCI 01:00:0kernel:device-mapper:multipath round-robin:version 1.0.0 loaderkernel:device-mapper:table:253:0:multipath: error getting device
kernel:device-mapper:ioctl: error adding target to tableProblem would seem to be with the device-mapper, but have no idea how to fix it.
While I was using my computer a few days ago, the terminal stopped working properly, so I tried to reboot, and when it started up again it wouldn't boot and said "no init found. try passing init=bootarg"
This has happened twice before, so I really need to figure out what keeps happening, otherwise I can't continue to use linux. i reinstalled both times before. i think that this is caused by a process that prevents me from using the hard drive, because when I try to check the disk in the terminal or in gparted, it says Device or resource busy while trying to open /dev/sda1. Filesystem mounted or opened exclusively by another program?
Also, in the disk utility, in the lower right corner of the filesystem it has a spinning "loading wheel".(i'm not sure if that means anything)
I am using ubuntu 10.10, but am not sure what kernel I am using, but i tried a few different kernel options(there's three of them at start up). safe mode does not work either.
what change in route table in Fedora 12 and 13, i have a route 2 links and its only works for fedora 11, in fedora 12 and 13 somethins change and my routes not works. Some know what i have to do to its works fine ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a ubuntu 10.04.1 install with openvpn, so I have some routes in my /etc/networking/interface file. But for what ever reason when it boots the routes don't come up and I have to restart the networking before they come up. Once I do that all is well.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a ubuntu 10.04.1 install with openvpn, so I have some routes in my /etc/networking/interface file. But for what ever reason when it boots the routes don't come up and I have to restart the networking before they come up. Once I do that all is well. Any idea's why it's doing that?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have some CISCO,Linux related problem with 2 Class C subnets:
192.168.64.0 -> PC5
192.168.65.0 -> PC6
Here's a picture of my situation: [URL]
HQ has to have 2 STATIC routes in order those 2 "PCs" mentioned above to have end to end connectivity with NETWORK A and NETWORK B. Now I try with
route0 -> network: 0.0.0.0, mask: 0.0.0.0, nexthop: Serial 0/0/0
route1 -> network: 0.0.0.0, mask: 0.0.0.0, nexthop: Serial 0/0/1
And it seems to work but I don't think it's proper! I feel it's kinda wrong ... but all my other attempts to set another couple of static routes ends in "Request timed out" and thus connection lost.
At work I have been given the "opportunity" to provide admin support on a bunch of RHEL3, 4, and 5 servers. My latest problem is, as the subject hints at, adding persistent (or permanent) routes on a RHEL5 server. I've successfully done this with a couple of RHEL4 servers by adding the relevant information to the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth0 file like this:
GATEWAY0=xx.56.200.129
NETMASK0=255.255.255.128
ADDRESS0=xx.56.200.250
On the RHEL5 servers I do not see a route-ethX file. Do I just add the file and the route info? Or has this functionality been moved to another location?
I have 2 NICs in one box, both connected to two different routers.Is there a way to make NIC1 handle lets say 204.x.x.x and NIC2 handle the restncoming requests though.Basically, I have apache running, and I things to go through a specific NIC based on source.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a temporary system up with wlan0 and eth2.
I want the eth0 address to be the gateway for accessing the internet on wlan0.
How do I setup static routes?
I'm not too keen with networking...
Code:
i installed the free PacketIX vpn client on my ubuntu 9.04. it created a virtual network adapter, i was able to configure and connect to the VPN service but when i add a default route to the routing table so that all internet traffic goes through the VPN, my internet connection stops working until i remove the line i added.
here's my routing table before :
Code:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.222.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1000 0 0 eth0
10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 vpn_vpn
0.0.0.0 192.168.222.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
and after i add the route:
[Code].....
I am realtively new to BGP. I use BGP in my network to advertise my /20 subnet. What i would like to know is what is the point of accepting routes from your neighbouring AS(ISP)?My ISP has given me a default gateway, and no matter what I want to reach on the internet I have to go through that default gateway, so why populate the routing table with soo many routes?also, as i understand it, there are 3 kinds of routes that you can accept, those are full routes, directly connected routes and default routes. What is the diffrence between them and again how do they affect routing since my network only has the one default gateway?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs there a standard config file for saving static routes or "ip route" commands? i lose my static routes after every "/etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 restart".rc.local wouldn't be a good idea, because it's not run automatically after "/etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 restart"
View 5 Replies View Relatedhow to setup persistent static routes in slackware? does slackware have some text file editing method like debian or redhat. ?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI currently managed it to get a pptp-connect to my home network. now I have another little problem. NetworkManager always routes the whole network traffic over my home network if i am connected to the home network.If i set the "Use this connection only for resources on its network" I have do manually say:
Code:
route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev ppp0
After that only the correct traffic runs over the vpn. Now my question is it possible to setup the route via the networkmanager gui?
First I will give some background. We have a currently working network that the Previous network Admin assigned an internal IP scheme of 200.1.1.0/24. I have no idea why he would have done such a thing, but it is my job to fix it (and keep our systems up and running). We have a Fedora 10 box on the 200 network that is acting as a router and a firewall (shorewall to be exact).
I added another NIC card (thank you again to all the great people on this forum for helping me get that working) and it is eth2. Assigned it a 10.100.1.A/24 (This is just a variable for the real IP). The other end of the cable that I plugged into that NIC connects to a Cisco Layer 3 switch. I assigned the port that connects to the other end of the cable the IP address of 10.100.1.B/24
Ok, I added the static route of ˜ip route add 10.100.1.0/24 via 10.100.1.A dev eth2' I added loc2 (which is my eth2 adapter) to the /etc/shorewall/zones file. I set eth2 on loc2 in the /etc/shorewall/interfaces file. loc2 eth2 detect I set the lines in the /etc/shorewall/policies file loc loc2 ACCEPT info loc2 loc ACCEPT info I can ping the cisco switch from the linux server itself. From a PC on the original network I can ping the new NIC card in the linux server, but cannot ping the cisco switch, so I figure it has to be either the route or shorewall.
New ubuntu desktop user here. I've been working with Ubuntu servers for over 3 yrs, using Windows as clients. I have OpenVPN running on an ubuntu 10.04 server, and it has worked well with Windows OpenVPN clients connecting. I took those same settings and applied them to this new install of Ubuntu 10.04 Desktop, and now openvpn seems to be failing when we get to the routes (I wrestled with the network-manager "secrets" issue for hours, but that works now).
I performed the following:
sudo openvpn --config fogbank-ny1.ovpn
--all is well, we're connecting/yay then *screech* FAIL--
Code:
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 PUSH: Received control message: 'PUSH_REPLY,route 10.8.0.0 255.255.255.0,redirect-gateway def1,dhcp-option DNS 10.8.0.1,route 10.8.0.0 255.255.255.0,topology net30,ping 30,ping-restart 600,ifconfig 10.8.0.10 10.8.0.9'
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 OPTIONS IMPORT: timers and/or timeouts modified
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 OPTIONS IMPORT: --ifconfig/up options modified
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 OPTIONS IMPORT: route options modified
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 OPTIONS IMPORT: --ip-win32 and/or --dhcp-option options modified
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 ROUTE default_gateway=192.168.10.1
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 TUN/TAP device tun0 opened
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 TUN/TAP TX queue length set to 100
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 /sbin/ifconfig tun0 10.8.0.10 pointopoint 10.8.0.9 mtu 1500
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 /sbin/route add -net <mypublicip> netmask 255.255.255.255 gw 192.168.10.1
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 /sbin/route add -net 0.0.0.0 netmask 128.0.0.0 gw 10.8.0.9
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 /sbin/route add -net 128.0.0.0 netmask 128.0.0.0 gw 10.8.0.9
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 /sbin/route add -net 10.8.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 10.8.0.9
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 /sbin/route add -net 10.8.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 10.8.0.9
SIOCADDRT: File exists
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 ERROR: Linux route add command failed: external program exited with error status: 7
Sun Jul 18 07:17:14 2010 Initialization Sequence Completed
I am using the suggested openvpn routes. If I connect from Windows (actually the .ovpn file is taken directly from the working windows machine).. all is well, routes work fine all traffic is routed thru the VPN -- same way it's worked for over a yar. I assume that this is what is causing networkmanager to fail as well. those logs indicate that it has connected to the vpn, but is probably stopping when it gets to routes.
I've got a 10.04 machine with two ethernet interfaces. I have two separate outside internet connections. This machine is connected to both interfaces. But it DOES NOT route between them. It's just a host on both subnets. Again, no routing is to go through this host. I'd like to force traffic originating on each ethernet port out to that network's internet connection.
Here's the desired setup:
eth0 192.168.12.37/24 gw 192.168.12.1
eth1 192.168.1.37/24 gw 192.168.1.1
I'd like traffic on the 192.168.1.37 address to go out through the 192.168.1.1 gateway. I have a program bound to that address and need it's traffic to go out ONLY through the 192.168.1.1 gateway. Any other traffic on the machine should go out the 192.168.12.1 gateway.
The logic is: source IP is 192.168.1.37, dest IP is any then go out only through 192.168.1.1 source IP is 192.168.12.37, dest IP is any then go out through 192.168.12.1 first or 192.168.1.1 next. The point is source on the .1.37 address must always go out the .1.1 gateway and NEVER through .12.1. Whereas traffic on the .12.37 address should try going out the .12.1 gateway first but can go out the .1.1 gateway if the .12.1 connection is down. I could live with this failover option. I could accept that traffic on the .12.37 address was likewise limited to its own gateway.
I just set up NIC bonding in Ubuntu 10.4, following these instructions, and I've got it working except for one problem: Every time I up or down a network device, or every time the system reboots, my routes go all to hell with eth0 and eth1 entries next to my bond0 entries. When the eth0 and eth1 entries show up, my connection is hosed and I have to go in via the maintenance IP to kill each route one at a time, leaving only bond0. Here's how I want my routes to look at all times:
Code:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
10.87.9.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 bond0
0.0.0.0 10.87.9.1 0.0.0.0 UG 100 0 0 bond0
Here's my /etc/network/interfaces:
[Code]...
On a server with 4 network interfaces, sometimes not all 4 are plugged in. All 4 interfaces have the same IP address. Sometimes the machine cannot access the local LAN, but can access the internet via a router on the local LAN, after a reboot. What I find is that the routing table looks like this:
Code:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
172.30.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
172.30.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
172.30.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth2
172.30.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth3
0.0.0.0 172.30.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 1 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 172.30.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 2 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 172.30.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 3 0 0 eth2
0.0.0.0 172.30.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 4 0 0 eth3
On the console I cannot reach any local host, but I can reach internet hosts. Pinging the gateway router 172.30.0.2 gets no answer. When I manually change it to this:
Code:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
172.30.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1 0 0 eth0
172.30.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 2 0 0 eth1
172.30.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 3 0 0 eth2
172.30.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 4 0 0 eth3
0.0.0.0 172.30.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 1 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 172.30.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 2 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 172.30.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 3 0 0 eth2
0.0.0.0 172.30.0.2 0.0.0.0 UG 4 0 0 eth3
Then all is well (can ping local hosts including the gateway router). I do have metric specified in the /etc/network/interfaces file like this:
Code:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 172.30.16.8
netmask 255.255.0.0
network 172.30.0.0
broadcast 172.30.255.255
metric 1
auto eth1
iface eth1 inet static
address 172.30.16.8
netmask 255.255.0.0
network 172.30.0.0
broadcast 172.30.255.255
metric 2
auto eth2
iface eth2 inet static
address 172.30.16.8
netmask 255.255.0.0
network 172.30.0.0
broadcast 172.30.255.255
metric 3
auto eth3
iface eth3 inet static
address 172.30.16.8
netmask 255.255.0.0
network 172.30.0.0
broadcast 172.30.255.255
metric 4
Apparently that metric setting applies only to the gateway route, not the LAN route. Is there a way to specify the LAN route metric, too?
Is it possible to add the routes to my routing table for dynamic pppoe connections? I have this setup on windows 7 with power-shell scripting and some 3rd party commercial pppoe client called Cfos, but since I'm now trying to move away from windows to Ubuntu and cant use the same programs anymore and its getting abit tricky now. I'm not trying to do any fancy load balancing here just some basic stuff which should be possible. Here is same basic info.
My ISP resets my pppoe connection every 24 hours. However the advantage of this is that I can call out 2 or more simultaneous PPPOE connections through the same modem. This is my routing table I wrote which has 5 PPPOE connections [URl]..Id like this to be automated when the PPPoes reconnect and the computer restarts.
I have 4 debian boxes networked together through a basic 5 port switch. I am trying to simulate 2 Local Area Networks joined together by a WAN. Right now I can communicate with A <--> B, B<----> C, C<----->D. However, I cannot communicate with Host A to Host D which is the whole point of this experiment. It has to be my static routing is not right. This is a confusing area to me. Right now my routes are
[code]....